OBM Geriatrics

(ISSN 2638-1311)

OBM Geriatrics is an Open Access journal published quarterly online by LIDSEN Publishing Inc. The journal takes the premise that innovative approaches – including gene therapy, cell therapy, and epigenetic modulation – will result in clinical interventions that alter the fundamental pathology and the clinical course of age-related human diseases. We will give strong preference to papers that emphasize an alteration (or a potential alteration) in the fundamental disease course of Alzheimer’s disease, vascular aging diseases, osteoarthritis, osteoporosis, skin aging, immune senescence, and other age-related diseases.

Geriatric medicine is now entering a unique point in history, where the focus will no longer be on palliative, ameliorative, or social aspects of care for age-related disease, but will be capable of stopping, preventing, and reversing major disease constellations that have heretofore been entirely resistant to interventions based on “small molecular” pharmacological approaches. With the changing emphasis from genetic to epigenetic understandings of pathology (including telomere biology), with the use of gene delivery systems (including viral delivery systems), and with the use of cell-based therapies (including stem cell therapies), a fatalistic view of age-related disease is no longer a reasonable clinical default nor an appropriate clinical research paradigm.

Precedence will be given to papers describing fundamental interventions, including interventions that affect cell senescence, patterns of gene expression, telomere biology, stem cell biology, and other innovative, 21st century interventions, especially if the focus is on clinical applications, ongoing clinical trials, or animal trials preparatory to phase 1 human clinical trials.

Papers must be clear and concise, but detailed data is strongly encouraged. The journal publishes research articles, reviews, communications and technical notes. There is no restriction on the length of the papers and we encourage scientists to publish their results in as much detail as possible.

Archiving: full-text archived in CLOCKSS.

Rapid publication: manuscripts are undertaken in 12 days from acceptance to publication (median values for papers published in this journal in 2021, 1-2 days of FREE language polishing time is also included in this period). 

Current Issue: 2022  Archive: 2021 2020 2019 2018 2017
Open Access Review

Cortical Activity and Rhythmic Patterns in Mouse Models of Aging and Alzheimer’s Disease

Marcel Ruiz-Mejias 1, 2, *, Patricia Castano-Prat 1, Tony Donegan 1, Maria V. Sanchez-Vives 1, 3, *

1. Institute of Biomedical Research August Pi i Sunyer (IDIBAPS), Barcelona, Spain

2. Departament de Ciències Experimentals i de la Salut (DCEXS), Universitat Pompeu Fabra (UPF), Parc de Recerca Biomèdica (PRBB), Barcelona, Spain

3. Institució Catalana de Recerca i Estudis Avançats (ICREA), Barcelona, Spain

Correspondence: Marcel Ruiz-Mejias , Maria V. Sanchez-Vives

Academic Editor: Md. Golam Sharoar

Special Issue: Aging and Alzheimer’s Disease

Received: December 31, 2019 | Accepted: January 19, 2020 | Published: February 14, 2020

OBM Geriatrics 2020, Volume 4, Issue 1, doi:10.21926/obm.geriatr.2001105

Recommended citation: Ruiz-Mejias M, Castano-Prat P, Donegan T, Sanchez-Vives MV. Cortical Activity and Rhythmic Patterns in Mouse Models of Aging and Alzheimer’s Disease. OBM Geriatrics 2020; 4(1): 105; doi:10.21926/obm.geriatr.2001105.

© 2020 by the authors. This is an open access article distributed under the conditions of the Creative Commons by Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is correctly cited.


Aging and Alzheimer’s disease (AD) have been reported to induce changes in the cerebral cortex circuits. The present review aims to study these alterations by reviewing emergent cortical activity with a focus on the rhythmic patterns. The rationale for this approach was two-fold: (i) emergent rhythmic activity integrates cellular and network properties of these underlying circuits; and (ii) alterations in rhythmic patterns reflect the functional impact of changes on the network induced by the pathophysiology of the disease. We first review the changes in cortical circuits that occur with aging and AD in both humans and animal models of early aging (SAMP8) and AD. We provide experimental evidence in support of earlier studies for understanding the cortical synchrony in these neurodegenerative processes, compatible with previous observations in patients with AD. A comparison of experimental findings in the literature opens up a debate in an attempt to understand paradoxical findings in different models when analyzing cortical excitability in AD. Finally, we assess the value of sleep and oscillatory activity in understanding circuit impairments and their roles as biomarkers for AD and neurodegeneration for early intervention.


Alzheimer disease; aging; neurodegeneration; slow oscillation; synchrony; excitability; gamma rhythm; mouse model; cortex

1. Introduction

Alzheimer’s disease (AD) and other aging-associated pathophysiologies result in changes in cortical circuits, which can be observed in the emergent activity of the cortex. On one hand, brain rhythms serve as links between cellular and network properties, on the other hand, these constitute the cognitive function. This property makes them particularly suitable for studying the cellular and network basis of pathological processes [1,2,3]. The so-called slow oscillation (<1 Hz), present on the slow side of this rhythmical spectrum, occurs during slow wave sleep and deep anesthesia (Figure 1). This rhythmic pattern could be considered the default activity pattern of the cortical network [4,5] as it is spontaneously generated during conditions in which the brain is "disconnected" from external stimuli. This could be a functional disconnection such as in the case of slow-wave sleep and under certain kinds of anesthesia, or physical such as in the case of isolated cortical portions of the surrounding tissue, and clinical conditions including stroke or more generally cardiovascular or traumatic lesions that generate “cortical islands.” Evidence in support of the theory that slow oscillations can be generated by isolated cortex comes from the finding that they emerge from cortical slabs [6] and cortical slices [7] (Figure 1D). The slow oscillation is a rhythm generated and maintained by the cortex [6,8,9] through the interaction between the synaptic reverberation of the network and activity-dependent adaptation mechanisms [7,10] and/or slow inhibition [11,12,13]. Furthermore, it is a rhythm of local origin, in which the long-range connectivity that characterizes the wakeful state of the brain is significantly reduced [14,15,16], slow oscillations being rather similar across different cortical areas [17]. The ability of relatively small circuits to exhibit slow oscillations is a generalized feature of the cerebral cortex, as this rhythm is found in all cortical areas of numerous animal species including humans [18,19,20]. Therefore, it acts as an appropriate paradigm with which to compare the findings obtained in animal models of diseases with those obtained in patients. Although slow oscillations are not present during vigilance (however, see [21]), persistent activity that occurs during Up states has been considered a model of brain processing during this state [22,23,24], as in both cases the firing and dynamics of the membrane potential of neurons are considerably similar, although their input resistance is lower during the Up state [25,26] (for a review see [10]). Another similarity between the two states is the synchronization of activity in the beta-gamma frequency bands (15–100 Hz, also known as fast oscillations), rhythms that constitute the dominant pattern during the active vigil brain state [27,28,29,30] (Figure 1C), suggesting that Up states induce network operations that are significantly similar to those present during the awake state [10]. Numerous studies have shown that beta and gamma rhythms are related to higher cognitive processes [31,32], as well as to attention [33], language processing [34,35], learning [36], working memory [37], and both short- and long-term memories [38,39].

Click to view original image

Figure 1 Slow oscillations in the mouse neocortex in vivo and in vitro. (A) Oscillatory activity in the mouse cerebral cortex during ketamine anesthesia. (Top) filtered signal of the recording (band pass 10–100 Hz) illustrating the occurrence of high frequencies in the up state. (2nd trace): local field potential (LFP) in the motor cortex. (3rd trace): single-unit recording of a neuron firing in the up states. (4th trace): simultaneous bilateral extracellular recording in the prefrontal cortex. L, left hemisphere; R, right hemisphere. (Bottom): waveform cross-correlation of the two signals in L and R. (B) (Top) multiunit activity. (2nd trace) LFP. (3rd trace) raster plots of 100 aligned up states. (C) Spectrogram showing the occurrence of fast rhythms during the up states in the prefrontal cortex. (D) Slow oscillations in cortical slices. (1st trace) spectrogram. (2nd trace) MUA. (3rd trace) LFP. (4th trace) intracellular recording. A, B, C, taken from Ruiz-Mejias, M., Ciria-Suarez, L., Mattia, M., & Sanchez-Vives, M. V. (2011). Slow and fast rhythms generated in the cerebral cortex of the anesthetized mouse. Journal of neurophysiology, 106 (6), 2910–2921. Used with permission.

The observation of slow oscillations is a scenario in which the balance between excitation and inhibition, whose alteration has been linked to several pathological conditions [40,41,42,43], can be studied (Figure 2). The intense synaptic activity that occurs during Up states is triggered by the firing of excitatory and inhibitory neurons [7,25,44,45], which are well balanced [10,11,13,46,47], molding the properties of slow oscillations and determining information processing [26]. Similarly, the gradual blockage of the rapid inhibition mediated by GABAA receptors results in an increase in the local network trigger which, before causing epileptic discharge, is offset by the upward regulation of activity-dependent adaptation mechanisms, thereby shortening the duration of Up states and elongating that of Down states, and reducing the frequency of slow oscillations [48]. Therefore, the excitability of the network and susceptibility to activity-dependent adaptation mechanisms are two key factors that could modulate the properties of slow oscillations, thereby creating a large repertoire of dynamic regimes [4,49,50,51].

Click to view original image

Figure 2 Impaired cortical slow-wave oscillations in AD transgenic mice. Representative traces of slow oscillations from the frontal (red) and occipital (black) cortex in wild-type (WT) and APP23 x PS45 transgenic (Tg) mouse, respectively. Taken from Busche, M. A., Kekuš, M., Adelsberger, H., Noda, T., Förstl, H., Nelken, I., & Konnerth, A. (2015). Rescue of long-range circuit dysfunction in Alzheimer's disease models. Nature Neuroscience, 18 (11), 1623. Used with permission.

The synchronization of neuronal activity is a key element that controls the function of circuits and neural networks. Spectral disturbances in the EEG or MEG that have been consistently described in human AD indicate a gradual slowdown in the spontaneous activity that originates in posterior cortical areas and travels toward anterior areas. This is reflected in the increased power in low-frequency bands (delta 1–4 Hz, theta 4–8 Hz) and decreased power, or a displaced synchronization peak, in high-frequency bands (alpha 9–15 Hz, beta 15–30 Hz, and gamma 30–100 Hz) [52,53,54,55,56,57]. Moreover, these perturbations have been associated with regional alterations in the blood flow or metabolism and the deterioration of global cognitive function [58,59,60]. Furthermore, vigil rhythms, such as theta and alpha oscillations, have been reported to propagate across the neocortex as traveling waves [61,62]. Another alteration characteristic of AD is the lower complexity of the EEG signal, which could reflect a reduction in the transmission of information between cortical areas [59,63], as well as decreased fast rhythms, which suggests alterations in cortical connectivity [64,65,66,67,68,69]. This observation has led to the conceptualization of AD as a "disconnection syndrome" [70,71,72,73]. In addition, AD has been linked to seizures in 10–22% of patients [74]. Numerous observations have described the presence of epileptogenic activity in patients with AD (reviewed in [75]). Seizures increase with the progression of the disease [76] and are more frequent in cases with early onset [77]. Among the proposed mechanisms underlying the cortical phenotype in AD that could sustain these observations, neuronal hyperexcitability has been postulated [78,79,80]. This is in contrast to a previous hypothesis in which AD neocortical activity was described as a synaptic failure as a result of neurodegeneration and connectivity loss [81]. As a human correlate of this hypothesis, AD pathology-related cortical hyperexcitability has been reported in patients with AD following magnetic stimulation of the motor cortex [82].

As previously mentioned, a valuable tool for assessing network properties is the study of slow oscillations in sleep and under anesthesia in AD models, considering the changes observed in slow oscillations in anesthetized disease models correlate with those in awake conditions [83,84]. Animal models that attempt to reproduce the symptoms, lesions, or causes of neurodegenerative diseases have been extremely useful in understanding the etiology and pathophysiology of AD although, to date, there has been no model that presents all characteristics of the disease. For example, cognitive deficits and Aβ plates are present in almost all models; however, neurofibrillary tangles (NFTs) are only observed when animals express the human Tau protein. Moreover, very few models show a neuronal loss. In this regard, it is better to consider such models as a tool for understanding the effect of genes and proteins associated with AD on brain function [85].

Interestingly, there exists a relationship between sleep, slow wave sleep, and AD [86]. Here, we review studies on models of AD and premature aging that we have been conducting in our laboratory. We provide evidence in support of earlier work in understanding the cortical synchrony in these neurodegenerative processes and, to stimulate debate, consider findings in other models when analyzing cortical excitability. Finally, we highlight the value of sleep and oscillatory activity in mouse models in understanding circuit impairments as well as serving as a biomarker for AD and neurodegeneration.

2. Cortical Synchrony in the Gamma Band of AD and Aging Models

A potential tool for studying network synchrony in the neocortex is the analysis of the gamma rhythm, as it recruits excitatory activity, which is reordered by the action of inhibitory synaptic input [30,87,88] (Figure 1C). Despite few studies, alterations in cortical gamma patterns in AD have been identified. Furthermore, these alterations have been found across different models of AD and aging, and mimic similar alterations that have been observed in patients with AD [89,90]. First observed in an in vivo model, Nakazono et al. showed that cross-frequency coupling of high-frequency oscillations (30–100 Hz) to theta oscillations (4–12 Hz) was reduced in the medial entorhinal cortex of anesthetized amyloid precursor protein knock-in (APP-KI) mice [91]. Similarly, previous findings in cortical slices provided evidence of the slowing of gamma oscillations (20–60 Hz) in the entorhinal cortex [92]. In addition, a recent study showed that peak gamma oscillations (60–90 Hz) shifted toward lower frequencies within the 15 to 100 Hz band in the neocortex of anesthetized 3xTg-AD mice [93]. Moreover, deregulation of the Up–Down cycle featuring slow oscillations was observed, supporting the desynchronization of the cortical network. Further evidence of alterations in the gamma rhythm is provided in our characterization of the APP/PS1 mouse model [94], where lower activity synchronization in the beta-gamma frequency range (15–90 Hz) is shown (Figure 3). The novelty of this work was that we analyzed excitability and cortical synchrony in the beta-gamma range in the proximity of the amyloid-β (Aβ) plaques (Figure 3A), which was reduced close to the plaques. Stoiljkovic et al. observed that intra-cortical coherence was reduced in TgF344-AD rats, which is also reminiscent of altered synchrony [95]. In contrast with previous observations, Gurevicius et al. reported a general increase in EEG power from 5 to 100 Hz in a mouse model of AD [96]. Furthermore, reduced gamma oscillations have been observed in human aging [97]. Another study provided evidence of reduced gamma oscillations (30–90 Hz) during senescence and in the neurodegeneration SAMP8 mouse model [98] (Figure 4). In this study, we found that the synchronization peak in the gamma range during Up states occurred at lower frequencies in SAMP8 in anesthetized animals than in control mice. Moreover, the mean power spectrum between 0 and 100 Hz presented an overall increase in its lower range together with a decrease in its upper range. Interestingly, the gamma synchronization alterations in SAMP8 mice at seven months of age were consistent with those found in 20-month 3xTg-AD mice, providing evidence in favor of the SAMP8 model displaying premature aging. Additionally, we observed deregulation in the Up-Down cycle, consistent with that observed in the 3xTg-AD model [93,98]. These findings are substantially reminiscent of those described in human patients with AD, and add to the evidence in support of the suitability of the SAMP8 mouse as a model of AD, given the fact that few reports using mouse models find EEG alterations consistent with human observations [99]. Similar alterations in the gamma rhythm (30–90 Hz) were previously observed in a mouse model of Down syndrome, in which the authors report impaired inhibitory connectivity [83]. This may be of relevance owing to the fact that the development of AD is often present in Down syndrome subjects (for a special issue on the topic, see [100]). In support of this link, Verret et al. found in hAPP mice overexpressing a human precursor of APP gene that a loss of gamma oscillations (20–80 Hz) was related to an inhibitory interneuron deficit [101].

Click to view original image

Figure 3 Neuronal activity at different distances from amyloid plaques. (A) AC Images taken from a section of an APP/PS1 mouse showing the relationship between Aβ plaques stained with thioflavin-S (A, D) and the electrode tracks (B, E). C and F, merged images. Inset in panel B shows a 16-channel array. Squared zones in panels A-C are, respectively shown at higher magnification in panels D-F. Arrow heads indicate contacts of certain electrodes with Aβ plaques. Scale bar in F: 505 µm in panels A–C; 270 µm in D-F. (B) Slow oscillation parameters in the vicinity of Aβ plaques in the APP/PS1 mouse model. Raw LFP recordings (bottom) and filtered between 200 and 1500 Hz (top) as an estimation of the population firing rate. Below, firing rates in Down and Up states comparing the parameters obtained near an Aβ plaque and far away from them. Bars depict the mean, error bars are SE. *p<0.0125. (C) High-frequency content of SO in the vicinity of Aβ plaques in the APP/PS1 mouse model. (Top) raw LFP recording in the prelimbic cortex of a control mouse under ketamine anesthesia. (Bottom): spectrogram showing the presence of high-frequency rhythms, mainly during the Up states. (Right) Excess power during the Up states and the Down states. The shaded area is the SE. Taken from Castano-Prat, P., Aparicio-Torres, G., Muñoz, A., & Sanchez-Vives, M. V. (2018). Influence of β-Amyloid Plaques on the Local Network Activity in the APP/PS1 Mouse Model of Alzheimer’s Disease. In Advances in Cognitive Neurodynamics (VI) (pp. 245-253). Springer, Singapore. Used with permission.

Click to view original image

Figure 4 Oscillatory activity in the PrL (prefrontal) cortex of senescence accelerated mouse resistance 1 (SAMR1; control) mouse under ketamine anesthesia. (A) Recordings of LFP in four cortical areas of the mouse. (B) Raw LFP recordings from right M1 cortex at five and seven months old, respectively, in SAMR1 (black) and SAMP8 mice (green). (C) Population data showing the evolution of SO frequency in the transition from five months to seven months old, in the four cortical areas in both groups for slow oscillatory frequency, Down and Up states duration. Bars and symbols depict the mean, error bars are SE. *p<0.05 SAMP8 vs. SAMR1 (control) in panels (C, D), and 5 vs. 7 months of age for each cortical area and group in (E). 5 M (5 months old), 7 M (7 months old). Prelimbic cortex (PrL), primary motor cortex (M1), primary somatosensory cortex (S1), primary visual cortex (V1). Taken from Castano-Prat, P., Perez-Zabalza, M., Perez-Mendez, L., Escorihuela, R. M., & Sanchez-Vives, M. V. (2017). Slow and fast neocortical oscillations in the senescence-accelerated mouse model SAMP8. Frontiers in aging neuroscience, 9, 141. Used with permission.

3. Cortical Excitability in AD and Aging Models

Further to the study of alterations in the gamma rhythm, cortical hyperexcitability has been observed in different studies in AD models over the past two decades. This suggests that impairment in the excitation/inhibition balance of the cortical circuit could underlie altered emergent activity in AD. A major change in network function is the generation of epileptiform activity, with seizures having been observed in several APP-transgenic mouse strains [102,103,104,105], indicating a relative excess of excitatory neurotransmission. These findings were supported by electrophysiological recordings from the brains of several APP transgenic mouse strains [106,107]. Along these lines, a set of studies reported hyperactivity in the mouse model APP23-PS45 [108,109]. The authors found an increase in calcium transients after analyzing spontaneous calcium transients in combination with two-photon imaging in anesthetized animals. Interestingly, the hyperexcitability was observed near amyloid plaques in the frontal cortex [108] and was less prominent in the visual cortex [110]. Similarly, the authors observed an increase in calcium transients in other models of AD, such as PDAPP and Tg2576 [109]. It is noteworthy that these studies also show an increase in the proportion of hypoactive neurons in the transgenic mouse. Consistent with these findings of reduced activity, Stern et al. [111] observed in Tg2576 mice that evoked synaptic response of neurons to transcallosal stimuli were severely impaired in the cortex containing substantial plaque accumulation, with an average 2.5-fold greater rate of response failure and two-fold reduction in response precision compared with age-matched non-transgenic controls. Supporting an alteration in synaptic activity and excitability in aging, our characterizations of the 3xTg-AD mice and their controls showed increased network excitability in Up and Down states in 20-month-old mice, which seemed to be associated with age, as the increase did not significantly differ between the control and transgenic groups [93] (Figure 5). However, early aging SAMP8 mice showed stable firing rates in Up states and in Down states that even decreased with age. We found a slowing of the slow oscillation frequency with respect to their controls in both SAMP8 and 3xTg-AD mice while aging [93,98] (Figures 4 and 5, respectively), suggesting a reduction of network excitability due to genotype. Interestingly, and in contrast with previous observations, we observed systematic reductions in neuronal firing rates during Up and Down states near amyloid plaques in APP/PS1 mice [94] (Figure 3). In that study, we identified recordings obtained within 18 µm of an Aβ plaque and compared them with those obtained close to Aβ plaques and those obtained further away from them. Interestingly, the firing rate reduction in Up/Down states was recovered as recordings were further away from the plaques. Moreover, challenging the idea of increased excitability, evidence has shown that the overexpression of APP precursor hAPP in rat cortical neurons led to the inhibition of calcium oscillations in all cells of a neuronal network. Furthermore, this inhibition was independent of the production and secretion of Aβ and other APP metabolites [112]. This set of results supports a previous hypothesis of AD neurodegeneration understood as a synaptic failure [81].

Click to view original image

Figure 5 Slow oscillations in 3xTg-AD mouse model. A. Raw LFP recordings from right M1 at 7 and 20 months, respectively, in Wt (black) and 3xTg-AD (gray) mice. B. Population data comparing the SO frequency between 3xTg-AD and Wt mice at 7 and 20 months of age, respectively, in the four cortical areas. B. Population data showing the evolution of SO frequency between 7 and 20 months in both groups, with the four cortical areas pooled together. Bars and squares depict the mean, error bars are SE. * p<0.0125 3xTg versus Wt mice and 7 versus 20 months of age in (H). Abbreviations: AD, Alzheimer’s disease; PrL, prelimbic cortex; M, months old; M1, primary motor cortex; S1, primary somatosensory cortex; V1, primary visual cortex. Taken from Castano-Prat, P., Perez-Mendez, L., Perez-Zabalza, M., Sanfeliu, C., Giménez-Llort, L., & Sanchez-Vives, M. V. (2019). Altered slow (< 1 Hz) and fast (beta and gamma) neocortical oscillations in the 3xTg-AD mouse model of Alzheimer’s disease under anesthesia. Neurobiology of Aging, 79, 142–151. Used with permission.

4. What is the Relationship between Network Firing Rate and Gamma Synchrony in AD?

In addition to being a complex topic, a hypothesis consisting of interictal cortical hyperactivity and reduced network synchrony in the gamma band in AD is indeed difficult to explain in local network terms. In non-pathological conditions, the excitatory input to the inhibitory system has to be guaranteed to maintain effective inhibitory synaptic input to excitatory neurons, and thus synchronize their activity with the gamma rhythm [30,31,88,113]. However, we found that when NMDA input to the local network is decreased during in vitro Up and Down states, beta-gamma rhythm (15–90 Hz) is also increased, showing a hypersynchronization of fast rhythms. This suggests that NMDAR activation prevents hypersynchronization under physiological conditions [114]. Reduction of firing rates in the local network is most often associated with a decrease in the synchronization in the beta-gamma range in several cases; for example, cortical inhibitory alteration and overinhibition in a Down syndrome model [83], increased functional connectivity in a Williams–Beuren syndrome model [115], when comparing area-specific cortical activity [17], or even by the effect of temperature modulation [116]. Further to this, altered cholinergic input originating from the forebrain may play a role in network desynchronization [117], given that a lack of acetylcholine in the cortex directly leads to a loss of gamma rhythm synchronization (21–70 Hz) [118]. In addition, the cholinergic alteration of cortical and hippocampal network activity is at least in part caused by muscarinic modulation of inhibitory interneurons [100,101]. Increased cholinergic input leads to stronger gamma synchronization (21–70 Hz) although not necessarily an increase in local firing rates [118]. However, further evidence is required to describe how the local neuronal population activity relates to the emergent rhythmic patterns in AD. Future work may also address the structural and functional synaptic connectivity contribution, or the role of neuromodulation involved in gamma band desynchronization, to understand the neurobiological basis of circuit impairment in neurodegeneration. Elucidation of the mechanisms underlying the desynchronization that is compatible with the occurrence of epileptic seizures in AD patients will contribute to the understanding of how a synaptic failure, observed hyperexcitability, inhibitory system impairment, and a cholinergic cortical deficit converge together [80].

5. Studying Sleep and Gamma Rhythms in Animal Models for Understanding Circuit Impairment and as Biomarkers for Detection and Treatment of AD

Studies using transgenic animals are valuable in elucidating the underlying mechanisms of AD network dysfunction, as they allow us to measure network properties in different features recapitulated in each model. However, a limitation is that they are only useful if they accurately reflect the complete cellular and molecular processes involved in the human neurodegenerative process. Nevertheless, measuring rhythmic patterns could provide valuable information and clues that can guide the study of the circuit alterations behind altered oscillatory activity. In a variety of studies, electrophysiological measurements have been shown to precede cognitive impairment, suggesting they might be indicative of the preclinical stages of the disease. Therefore, it is critical to identify prodromal stages of the disease in order to initiate therapy before irreversible degeneration occurs. This, however, has so far been hampered by the lack of a reliable biomarker that would identify patients who are prone to develop future AD [80]. Recently, sleep has been postulated as a novel mechanistic pathway, biomarker, and treatment target in the pathology of AD [86]. As described in this work, this is attributed to the following: first, there is a bidirectional, causal interaction between NREM sleep and Aβ pathophysiology that may contribute to AD risk and progression; second, the disruption of NREM sleep may represent a novel pathway through which cortical Aβ impairs the hippocampus-dependent memory consolidation; third, the disruption of NREM sleep physiology offers potential diagnostic utility in the form of a non-invasive biomarker of Aβ pathology, AD risk, and/or AD pathophysiological progression; and finally, evidence implicates sleep disturbance as a consequence and cause of AD progression; one that is modifiable, thereby offering preventative and therapeutic treatment potential. Interestingly, inducing network synchrony via local GABA application or light stimulation with optogenetics over cortical excitatory cells restored the altered slow oscillation pattern in APP mice. Moreover, light stimulation halted plaque deposition and prevented calcium overload [119]. Furthermore, the modulation of gamma oscillations in the hippocampus attenuated amyloid load in the 5XFAD mouse model, showing that reduced gamma oscillations could serve as a potential biomarker and target for attenuating AD-associated pathology [120]. EEG patterns, such as sleep and gamma oscillations, have the advantage that they are relatively easy to measure and track. Framing the study and therapeutics of AD and neurodegeneration related to aging through the analysis and manipulation of emergent rhythmic patterns could bring forth a useful and novel perspective [80], contributing to the understanding of AD as an oscillopathy [121]. Furthermore, this framework could be applied to other diseases in which network dynamics become disrupted, such as schizophrenia [122], autism [123], and Down syndrome [124].

6. Conclusions

Neuronal network dysfunction is common to all major neurodegenerative disorders. The cortical oscillatory emergent activity can highlight circuit alterations underlying those processes. In AD, there is desynchronization of cortical circuits, combined with alterations in network excitability, whose nature remains unclear, along with the occurrence of hypersynchronized, seizure-like discharges. AD and early aging animal models, despite being diverse, have revealed alterations in cortical circuits through the study of rhythmic patterns. The alterations converge on the fact that there is an imbalance between excitation and inhibition. Sleep rhythmic patterns and gamma oscillations are postulated as biomarkers for the early detection of the neurodegenerative process present in AD and the mechanistic findings in animal models could guide future diagnostic and therapeutic approaches in humans.

Author Contributions

This is a review and all authors contributed to the written text.


This work was supported by the Spanish Ministry of Science (BFU2017-85048-R), FLAG-ERA SloW Dyn (PCIN-2015-162-C02-01) and CERCA Programme/Generalitat de Catalunya.

Competing Interests

The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.


  1. Schnitzler A, Gross J. Normal and pathological oscillatory communication in the brain. Nat Rev Neurosci. 2005; 6: 285-296. [CrossRef]
  2. Uhlhaas PJ, Singer W. Neural synchrony in brain disorders: Relevance for cognitive dysfunctions and pathophysiology. Neuron. 2006; 52: 155-168. [CrossRef]
  3. Buzsáki G, Watson BO. Brain rhythms and neural syntax: Implications for efficient coding of cognitive content and neuropsychiatric disease. Dialogues Clin Neurosci. 2012; 14: 345-367.
  4. Sanchez-Vives MV, Mattia M. Slow wave activity as the default mode of the cerebral cortex. Arch Ital Biol. 2014; 152: 2-3.
  5. Sanchez-Vives MV, Massimini M, Mattia M. Shaping the default activity pattern of the cortical network. Neuron. 2017; 94: 993-1001. [CrossRef]
  6. Timofeev I, Grenier F, Bazhenov M, Sejnowski TJ, Steriade M. Origin of slow cortical oscillations in deafferented cortical slabs. Cereb Cortex. 2000; 10: 1185-1199. [CrossRef]
  7. Sanchez-Vives MV, McCormick DA. Cellular and network mechanisms of rhythmic recurrent activity in neocortex. Nat Neurosci. 2000; 3: 1027-1034. [CrossRef]
  8. Timofeev I, Steriade M. Low-frequency rhythms in the thalamus of intact-cortex and decorticated cats. J Neurophysiol. 1996; 76: 4152-4168. [CrossRef]
  9. Steriade M, Nunez A, Amzica F. Intracellular analysis of relations between the slow (< 1 Hz) neocortical oscillation and other sleep rhythms of the electroencephalogram. J Neurosci. 1993; 13: 3266-3283. [CrossRef]
  10. Neske GT. The slow oscillation in cortical and thalamic networks: Mechanisms and functions. Front Neural Circuits. 2016; 9: 88. [CrossRef]
  11. Shu Y, Hasenstaub A, McCormick DA. Turning on and off recurrent balanced cortical activity. Nature. 2003; 423: 288-293. [CrossRef]
  12. Perez-Zabalza M, Reig R, Manrique J, Jercog D, Winograd M, Parga N, et al. Modulation of cortical slow oscillatory rhythm by GABAB receptors: An experimental and computational study. bioRxiv. 2019. [CrossRef]
  13. Mann EO, Kohl MM, Paulsen O. Distinct roles of GABA(A) and GABA(B) receptors in balancing and terminating persistent cortical activity. J Neurosci. 2009; 29: 7513-7518. [CrossRef]
  14. Massimini M, Ferrarelli F, Huber R, Esser SK, Singh H, Tononi G. Breakdown of cortical effective connectivity during sleep. Science. 2005; 309: 2228-2232. [CrossRef]
  15. Bettinardi RG, Tort-Colet N, Ruiz-Mejias M, Sanchez-Vives MV, Deco G. Gradual emergence of spontaneous correlated brain activity during fading of general anesthesia in rats: Evidences from fMRI and local field potentials. Neuroimage. 2015; 114: 185-198. [CrossRef]
  16. Lewis LD, Weiner VS, Mukamel EA, Donoghue JA, Eskandar EN, Madsen JR, et al. Rapid fragmentation of neuronal networks at the onset of propofol-induced unconsciousness. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2012; 109: E3377-E3386. [CrossRef]
  17. Ruiz-Mejias M, Ciria-Suarez L, Mattia M, Sanchez-Vives MV. Slow and fast rhythms generated in the cerebral cortex of the anesthetized mouse. J Neurophysiol. 2011; 106: 2910-2921. [CrossRef]
  18. Massimini M, Huber R, Ferrarelli F, Hill S, Tononi G. The sleep slow oscillation as a traveling wave. J Neurosci. 2004; 24: 6862-6870. [CrossRef]
  19. Csercsa R, Dombovári B, Fabó D, Wittner L, Erss L, Entz L, et al. Laminar analysis of slow wave activity in humans. Brain. 2010; 133: 2814-2829. [CrossRef]
  20. Sanchez-Vives MV, Reig R, Winograd M, Descalzo VF. An active cortical network in vitro. In: Timofeev I, editor. Mechanisms of spontaneous active states in the neocortex. Kerala: Research Signpost; 2007. p. 23-44.
  21. Vyazovskiy VV, Olcese U, Hanlon EC, Nir Y, Cirelli C, Tononi G. Local sleep in awake rats. Nature. 2011; 472: 443-447. [CrossRef]
  22. Steriade M, Timofeev I. Neuronal plasticity in thalamocortical networks during sleep and waking oscillations. Neuron. 2003; 37: 563-576. [CrossRef]
  23. Destexhe A, Hughes SW, Rudolph M, Crunelli V. Are corticothalamic “up” states fragments of wakefulness? Trends Neurosci. 2007; 30: 334-342. [CrossRef]
  24. McCormick DA, Shu Y, Hasenstaub A, Sanchez-Vives M, Badoual M, Bal T. Persistent cortical activity: Mechanisms of generation and effects on neuronal excitability. Cereb Cortex. 2003; 13: 1219-1231. [CrossRef]
  25. Steriade M, Timofeev I, Grenier F. Natural waking and sleep states: A view from inside neocortical neurons. J Neurophysiol. 2001; 85: 1969-1985. [CrossRef]
  26. Reig R, Zerlaut Y, Vergara R, Destexhe A, Sanchez-vives MV. Gain modulation of synaptic inputs by network state in auditory cortex in vivo. J Neurosci. 2015; 35: 2689-2702. [CrossRef]
  27. Steriade M, Amzica F, Contreras D. Synchronization of fast (30-40 Hz) spontaneous cortical rhythms during brain activation. J Neurosci. 1996; 16: 392-417. [CrossRef]
  28. Hasenstaub A, Shu Y, Haider B, Kraushaar U, Duque A, McCormick DA. Inhibitory postsynaptic potentials carry synchronized frequency information in active cortical networks. Neuron. 2005; 47: 423-435. [CrossRef]
  29. Steriade M. Grouping of brain rhythms in corticothalamic systems. Neuroscience. 2006; 137: 1087-1106. [CrossRef]
  30. Compte A, Reig R, Descalzo VF, Harvey MA, Puccini GD, Sanchez-Vives MV. Spontaneous high-frequency (10-80 Hz) oscillations during up states in the cerebral cortex in vitro. J Neurosci. 2008; 28: 13828-13844. [CrossRef]
  31. Wang XJ. Neurophysiological and computational principles of cortical rhythms in cognition. Physiol Rev. 2010; 90: 1195-1268. [CrossRef]
  32. Bosman CA, Lansink CS, Pennartz CMA. Functions of gamma-band synchronization in cognition: From single circuits to functional diversity across cortical and subcortical systems. Eur J Neurosci. 2014; 39: 1982-1999. [CrossRef]
  33. Vinck M, Womelsdorf T, Buffalo EA, Desimone R, Fries P. Attentional modulation of cell-class-specific gamma-band synchronization in awake monkey area V4. Neuron. 2013; 80: 1077-1089. [CrossRef]
  34. Lewis AG, Schoffelen JM, Schriefers H, Bastiaansen M. A predictive coding perspective on beta oscillations during sentence-level language comprehension. Front Hum Neurosci. 2016; 10: 85. [CrossRef]
  35. Benítez-Burraco A, Murphy E. Why brain oscillations are improving our understanding of language. Front Behav Neurosci. 2019; 13: 190. [CrossRef]
  36. Van Wingerden M, Vinck M, Lankelma J V., Pennartz CMA. Learning-associated gamma-band phase-locking of action-outcome selective neurons in orbitofrontal cortex. J Neurosci. 2010; 30: 10025-10038. [CrossRef]
  37. Roux F, Wibral M, Mohr HM, Singer W, Uhlhaas PJ. Gamma-band activity in human prefrontal cortex codes for the number of relevant items maintained in working memory. J Neurosci. 2012; 32: 12411-12420. [CrossRef]
  38. Montgomery SM, Buzsáki G. Gamma oscillations dynamically couple hippocampal CA3 and CA1 regions during memory task performance. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2007; 104: 14495-14500. [CrossRef]
  39. Siegel M, Warden MR, Miller EK. Phase-dependent neuronal coding of objects in short-term memory. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2009; 106: 21341-21346. [CrossRef]
  40. Rubenstein JLR, Merzenich MM. Model of autism: Increased ratio of excitation/inhibition in key neural systems. Genes Brain Behav. 2003; 2: 255-267. [CrossRef]
  41. Kehrer C. Altered excitatory-inhibitory balance in the NMDA-hypofunction model of schizophrenia. Front Mol Neurosci. 2008; 1: 6. [CrossRef]
  42. Gogolla N, Leblanc JJ, Quast KB, Südhof T, Fagiolini M, Hensch TK. models of autism. J Neurodev Disord. 2010; 1: 172-181. [CrossRef]
  43. Lopantsev V, Both M, Draguhn A. Rapid plasticity at inhibitory and excitatory synapses in the hippocampus induced by ictal epileptiform discharges. Eur J Neurosci. 2009; 29: 1153-1164. [CrossRef]
  44. Steriade M, Nuñez A, Amzica F. A novel slow (< 1 Hz) oscillation of neocortical neurons in vivo: Depolarizing and hyperpolarizing components. J Neurosci. 1993; 13: 3252-3265. [CrossRef]
  45. Contreras D, Timofeev I, Steriade M. Mechanisms of long-lasting hyperpolarizations underlying slow sleep oscillations in cat corticothalamic networks. J Physiol. 1996; 494: 251-264. [CrossRef]
  46. Haider B, Duque A, Hasenstaub AR, McCormick DA. Neocortical network activity in vivo is generated through a dynamic balance of excitation and inhibition. J Neurosci. 2006; 26: 4535-4545. [CrossRef]
  47. Compte A, Reig R, Sanchez-Vives MV. Timing excitation and inhibition in the cortical network. In: coherent behavior in neuronal networks. New York, NY: Springer New York; 2009. p. 17-46. [CrossRef]
  48. Sanchez-Vives MV, Mattia M, Compte A, Perez-Zabalza M, Winograd M, Descalzo VF, et al. Inhibitory modulation of cortical up states. J Neurophysiol. 2010; 104: 1314-1324. [CrossRef]
  49. Mattia M, Sanchez-Vives MV. Exploring the spectrum of dynamical regimes and timescales in spontaneous cortical activity. Cogn Neurodyn. 2012; 6: 239-250. [CrossRef]
  50. Sanchez-Vives MV. Spontaneous rhythmic activity in the adult cerebral cortex in vitro. In: Ballanyi K, editor. Isolated Central Nervous System Circuits; 2012. p. 263-284. [CrossRef]
  51. Sanchez-Vives MV, Mattia M. Modulating excitability in the cortical network: Impact on emergent activity and traveling waves. IEICE Proceeding Ser. The Institute of Electronics, Information and Communication Engineers. 2014; 1: 563-565. [CrossRef]
  52. Dierks T, Jelic V, Pascual-Marqui RD, Wahlund L, Julin P, Linden DE, et al. Spatial pattern of cerebral glucose metabolism (PET) correlates with localization of intracerebral EEG-generators in Alzheimer’s disease. Clin Neurophysiol. 2000; 111: 1817-1824. [CrossRef]
  53. Huang C, Wahlund L, Dierks T, Julin P, Winblad B, Jelic V. Discrimination of Alzheimer’s disease and mild cognitive impairment by equivalent EEG sources: A cross-sectional and longitudinal study. Clin Neurophysiol. 2000; 111: 1961-1967. [CrossRef]
  54. Babiloni C, Ferri R, Moretti D V, Strambi A, Binetti G, Dal Forno G, et al. Abnormal fronto-parietal coupling of brain rhythms in mild Alzheimer’s disease: A multicentric EEG study. Eur J Neurosci. 2004; 19: 2583-2590. [CrossRef]
  55. Lizio R, Vecchio F, Frisoni GB, Ferri R, Rodriguez G, Babiloni C. Electroencephalographic rhythms in Alzheimer’s disease. Int J Alzheimers Dis. 2011; 2011: 927573. [CrossRef]
  56. Fernández A, Maestú F, Amo C, Gil P, Fehr T, Wienbruch C, et al. Focal temporoparietal slow activity in Alzheimer’s disease revealed by magnetoencephalography. Biol Psychiatry. 2002; 52: 764-770. [CrossRef]
  57. Fernández A, Gil Gregorio P, Maestú F. Actividad espontánea electroencefalográfica y magnetoencefalográfica como marcador de la enfermedad de Alzheimer y el deterioro cognitivo leve. Revista Espanola de Geriatria y Gerontologia. 2012; 47: 27-32. [CrossRef]
  58. Sloan EP, Fenton GW, Kennedy NS, MacLennan JM. Electroencephalography and single photon emission computed tomography in dementia: A comparative study. Psychol Med. 1995; 25: 631-638. [CrossRef]
  59. Jeong J. EEG dynamics in patients with Alzheimer’s disease. Clin Neurophysiol. 2004; 115: 1490-1505. [CrossRef]
  60. Rodriguez G, Nobili F, Copello F, Vitali P, Gianelli MV, Taddei G, et al. 99mTc-HMPAO regional cerebral blood flow and quantitative electroencephalography in Alzheimer’s disease: A correlative study. J Nucl Med. 1999; 40: 522-529.
  61. Murphy E. Interfaces (travelling oscillations) + recursion (delta-theta code) = language. In: Luef E, Manuela M, editors. The talking species: Perspectives on the evolutionary, neuronal and cultural foundations of language. Graz: Unipress Graz Verlag; 2018.
  62. Alamia A, VanRullen R. Alpha oscillations and traveling waves: Signatures of predictive coding? PLoS Biol. 2019; 17: e3000487. [CrossRef]
  63. Abásolo D, Hornero R, Gómez C, García M, López M. Analysis of EEG background activity in Alzheimer’s disease patients with Lempel-Ziv complexity and central tendency measure. Med Eng Phys. 2006; 28: 315-322. [CrossRef]
  64. Jelic V, Julin P, Shigeta M, Nordberg A, Lannfelt L, Winblad B, et al. Apolipoprotein E ε4 allele decreases functional connectivity in Alzheimer’s disease as measured by EEG coherence. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 1997; 63: 59-65. [CrossRef]
  65. Locatelli T, Cursi M, Liberati D, Franceschi M, Comi G. EEG coherence in Alzheimer’s disease. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol. 1998; 106: 229-237. [CrossRef]
  66. Wada Y, Nanbu Y, Kikuchi M, Koshino Y, Hashimoto T, Yamaguchi N. Abnormal functional connectivity in Alzheimer’s disease: Intrahemispheric EEG coherence during rest and photic stimulation. Eur Arch Psychiatry Clin Neurosci. 1998; 248: 203-208. [CrossRef]
  67. Adler G, Brassen S, Jajcevic A. EEG coherence in Alzheimer’s dementia. J Neural Transm. 2003; 110: 1051-1058. [CrossRef]
  68. Koenig T, Prichep L, Dierks T, Hubl D, Wahlund LO, John ER, et al. Decreased EEG synchronization in Alzheimer’s disease and mild cognitive impairment. Neurobiol Aging. 2005; 26: 165-171. [CrossRef]
  69. Stam CJ, De Haan W, Daffertshofer A, Jones BF, Manshanden I, Van Cappellen Van Walsum AM, et al. Graph theoretical analysis of magnetoencephalographic functional connectivity in Alzheimer’s disease. Brain. 2009; 132: 213-224. [CrossRef]
  70. Morrison JH, Hof PR, Bouras C. An anatomic substrate for visual disconnection in Alzheimer’s disease. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 1991; 640: 36-43. [CrossRef]
  71. Delbeuck X, Van Der Linden M, Collette F. Alzheimer’s disease as a disconnection syndrome? Neuropsychol Rev. 2003; 13: 79-92.
  72. Knight RA, Verkhratsky A. Neurodegenerative diseases: Failures in brain connectivity. Cell Death Differ. 2010; 17: 1069-1070. [CrossRef]
  73. Morrison J, Scherr S, Lewis D, Campbell M. The laminar and regional distribution of neocortical somatostatin and neuritic plaques: Implications for Alzheimer’s disease as a global neocortical disconnection syndrome. In: Scheibel A, Weschler E, editors. Biological substrates of Alzheimer’s disease. New York: Academic; 1986. p. 115-131.
  74. Mendez M, Lim G. Seizures in elderly patients with dementia: Epidemiology and management. Drugs Aging. 2003; 20: 791-803. [CrossRef]
  75. Larner AJ. Epileptic seizures in AD patients. Neuromolecular Med. 2010; 12: 71-77. [CrossRef]
  76. Romanelli MF, Ashkin K, Morris JC, Coben LA. Advanced Alzheimer’s disease is a risk factor for late-onset seizures. Arch Neurol. 1990; 47: 847-850. [CrossRef]
  77. Amatniek JC, Hauser WA, DelCastillo-Castaneda C, Jacobs DM, Marder K, Bell K, et al. Incidence and predictors of seizures in patients with Alzheimer’s disease. Epilepsia. 2006; 47: 867-872. [CrossRef]
  78. Busche MA, Konnerth A. Neuronal hyperactivity--A key defect in Alzheimer’s disease? Bioessays. 2015; 37: 624-632. [CrossRef]
  79. Busche MA, Konnerth A. Impairments of neural circuit function in Alzheimer’s disease. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2016; 371. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2015.0429. [CrossRef]
  80. Nimmrich V, Draguhn A, Axmacher N. Neuronal network oscillations in neurodegenerative diseases. NeuroMolecular Med. 2015; 17: 270-284. [CrossRef]
  81. Selkoe DJ. Alzheimer’s disease is a synaptic failure. Science. 2002; 298: 789-291. [CrossRef]
  82. Di Lazzaro V, Oliviero A, Pilato F, Saturno E, Dileone M, Marra C, et al. Motor cortex hyperexcitability to transcranial magnetic stimulation in Alzheimer’s disease. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2004; 75: 555-559. [CrossRef]
  83. Ruiz-Mejias M, Martinez de Lagran M, Mattia M, Castano-Prat P, Perez-Mendez L, Ciria-Suarez L, et al. Overexpression of Dyrk1A, a down syndrome candidate, decreases excitability and impairs gamma oscillations in the prefrontal cortex. J Neurosci. 2016; 36: 3648-3659. [CrossRef]
  84. Dasilva M, Navarro-Guzman A, Maiolo L, Ozaita A, Sanchez-Vives MV. Altered functional connectivity in a mouse model of fragile X syndrome. Singapore: In Springer; 2018. p. 255-261. [CrossRef]
  85. Hall AM, Roberson ED. Mouse models of Alzheimer’s disease. Brain Res Bull. 2012; 88: 3-12. [CrossRef]
  86. Mander BA, Winer JR, Jagust WJ, Walker MP. Sleep: A novel mechanistic pathway, biomarker, and treatment target in the pathology of Alzheimer’s disease? Trends Neurosci. 2016; 39: 552-566. [CrossRef]
  87. Buzsaki G, Draguhn A. Neuronal oscillations in cortical networks. Science. 2004; 304: 1926-1929. [CrossRef]
  88. Buzsáki G, Wang XJ. Mechanisms of gamma oscillations. Annu Rev Neurosci. 2012; 35: 203-225. [CrossRef]
  89. Ribary U, Ioannides AA, Singh KD, Hasson R, Bolton JPR, Lado F, et al. Magnetic field tomography of coherent thalamocortical 40-Hz oscillations in humans. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1991; 88: 11037-11041. [CrossRef]
  90. Stam CJ, Van Cappellen van Walsum AM, Pijnenburg YAL, Berendse HW, De Munck JC, Scheltens P, et al. Generalized synchronization of MEG recordings in Alzheimer’s disease: Evidence for involvement of the gamma band. J Clin Neurophysiol. 2002; 19: 562-574. [CrossRef]
  91. Nakazono T, Lam TN, Patel AY, Kitazawa M, Saito T, Saido TC, et al. Impaired in vivo gamma oscillations in the medial entorhinal cortex of knock-in Alzheimer model. Front Syst Neurosci. 2017; 11: 48. [CrossRef]
  92. Klein AS, Donoso JR, Kempter R, Schmitz D, Beed P. Early cortical changes in gamma oscillations in alzheimer’s disease. Front Syst Neurosci. 2016; 10: 83. [CrossRef]
  93. Castano-Prat P, Perez-Mendez L, Perez-Zabalza M, Sanfeliu C, Giménez-Llort L, Sanchez-Vives MVMV. Altered slow (<1Hz) and fast (beta and gamma) neocortical oscillations in the 3xTg-AD mouse model of Alzheimer’s disease under anesthesia. Neurobiol Aging. 2019; 79: 142-151. [CrossRef]
  94. Castano-Prat P, Aparicio-Torres G, Muñoz A, Sanchez-Vives MV. Influence of β-Amyloid plaques on the local network activity in the APP/PS1 mouse model of Alzheimer’s disease. Singapore: Springer; 2018. p. 245-253. [CrossRef]
  95. Stoiljkovic M, Kelley C, Horvath TL, Hajós M. Neurophysiological signals as predictive translational biomarkers for Alzheimer’s disease treatment: Effects of donepezil on neuronal network oscillations in TgF344-AD rats. Alzheimer’s Res Ther. 2018; 10: 105. [CrossRef]
  96. Gurevicius K, Lipponen A, Tanila H. Increased cortical and thalamic excitability in freely moving APPswe/PS1dE9 mice modeling epileptic activity associated with alzheimer’s disease. Cereb Cortex. 2013; 23: 1148-1158. [CrossRef]
  97. Böttger D, Herrmann CS, Von Cramon DY. Amplitude differences of evoked alpha and gamma oscillations in two different age groups. Int J Psychophysiol. 2002; 45: 245-251. [CrossRef]
  98. Castano-Prat P, Perez-Zabalza M, Perez-Mendez L, Escorihuela RM, Sanchez-Vives MV. Slow and fast neocortical oscillations in the senescence-accelerated mouse model SAMP8. Front Aging Neurosci. 2017; 9: 141. [CrossRef]
  99. Sabbagh JJ, Kinney JW, Cummings JL. Alzheimer’s disease biomarkers: Correspondence between human studies and animal models. Neurobiol Dis. 2013; 56: 116-130. [CrossRef]
  100. Salehi A, Ashford JW, Mufson EJ. The link between Alzheimer’s disease and down syndrome. A historical perspective. Curr Alzheimer Res. 2016; 13: 2-6. [CrossRef]
  101. Verret L, Mann EO, Hang GB, Barth AMI, Cobos I, Ho K, et al. Inhibitory interneuron deficit links altered network activity and cognitive dysfunction in alzheimer model. Cell. 2012; 149: 708-721. [CrossRef]
  102. Laferla FM, Tinkle BT, Bieberich CJ, Haudenschild CC, Jay G. The Alzheimer’s Aβ peptide induces neurodegeneration and apoptotic cell death in transgenic mice. Nat Genet. 1995; 9: 21-30. [CrossRef]
  103. Moechars D, Dewachter I, Lorent K, Reversé D, Baekelandt V, Naidu A, et al. Early phenotypic changes in transgenic mice that overexpress different mutants of amyloid precursor protein in brain. J Biol Chem. 1999; 274: 6483-6492. [CrossRef]
  104. Kumar-Singh S. Nonfibrillar diffuse amyloid deposition due to a gamma42-secretase site mutation points to an essential role for N-truncated Abeta42 in Alzheimer’s disease. Hum Mol Genet. 2000; 9: 2589-2598. [CrossRef]
  105. Lalonde R, Kim HD, Maxwell JA, Fukuchi K. Exploratory activity and spatial learning in 12-month-old APP 695SWE/co + PS1/ΔE9 mice with amyloid plaques. Neurosci Lett. 2005; 390: 87-92. [CrossRef]
  106. Minkeviciene R, Rheims S, Dobszay MB, Zilberter M, Hartikainen J, Fülöp L, et al. Amyloid β-induced neuronal hyperexcitability triggers progressive epilepsy. J Neurosci. 2009; 29: 3453-3462. [CrossRef]
  107. Palop JJ, Chin J, Roberson ED, Wang J, Thwin MT, Bien-Ly N, et al. Aberrant excitatory neuronal activity and compensatory remodeling of inhibitory hippocampal circuits in mouse models of Alzheimer’s disease. Neuron. 2007; 55: 697-711. [CrossRef]
  108. Busche MA, Eichhoff G, Adelsberger H, Abramowski D, Wiederhold KH, Haass C, et al. Clusters of hyperactive neurons near amyloid plaques in a mouse model of Alzheimer's disease. 2008; 321: 1686-1689. [CrossRef]
  109. Busche MA, Grienberger C, Keskin AD, Song B, Neumann U, Staufenbiel M, et al. Decreased amyloid-β and increased neuronal hyperactivity by immunotherapy in Alzheimer’s models. Nat Neurosci. 2015; 18: 1725-1727. [CrossRef]
  110. Grienberger C, Rochefort NL, Adelsberger H, Henning HA, Hill DN, Reichwald J, et al. Staged decline of neuronal function in vivo in an animal model of Alzheimer’s disease. Nat Commun. 2012; 3: 774. [CrossRef]
  111. Stern EA, Bacskai BJ, Hickey GA, Attenello FJ, Lombardo JA, Hyman BT. Cortical synaptic integration in vivo is disrupted by amyloid-β plaques. J Neurosci. 2004; 24: 4535-4540. [CrossRef]
  112. Ferrao Santos S, Pierrot N, Morel N, Gailly P, Sindic C, Octave JN. Expression of human amyloid precursor protein in rat cortical neurons inhibits calcium oscillations. J Neurosci. 2009; 29: 4708-4718. [CrossRef]
  113. Cardin JA, Carlén M, Meletis K, Knoblich U, Zhang F, Deisseroth K, et al. Driving fast-spiking cells induces gamma rhythm and controls sensory responses. Nature. 2009; 459: 663-667. [CrossRef]
  114. Rebollo B, Perez-Zabalza M, Ruiz-Mejias M, Perez-Mendez L, Sanchez-Vives MV. Beta and gamma oscillations in prefrontal cortex during NMDA hypofunction: An in vitro model of schizophrenia features. Neuroscience. 2018; 383: 138-149. [CrossRef]
  115. Dasilva M, Navarro-Guzman A, Ortiz-Romero P, Camassa A, Muñoz-Cespedes A, Campuzano V, et al. Altered neocortical dynamics in a mouse model of williams–beuren syndrome. Mol Neurobiol. 2019. doi: 10.1007/s12035-019-01732-4. [CrossRef]
  116. Reig R, Mattia M, Compte A, Belmonte C, Sanchez-Vives M V. Temperature modulation of slow and fast cortical rhythms. J Neurophysiol. 2010; 103: 1253-1261. [CrossRef]
  117. Dringenberg HC. Alzheimer’s disease: More than a “cholinergic disorder” - evidence that cholinergic-monoaminergic interactions contribute to EEG slowing and dementia. Behav Brain Res. 2000; 115: 235-249. [CrossRef]
  118. Rodriguez R, Kallenbach U, Singer W, Munk MHJ. Short- and long-term effects of cholinergic modulation on gamma oscillations and response synchronization in the visual cortex. J Neurosci. 2004; 24: 10369-10378. [CrossRef]
  119. Kastanenka KV, Hou SS, Shakerdge N, Logan R, Feng D, Wegmann S, et al. Optogenetic restoration of disrupted slow oscillations halts amyloid deposition and restores calcium homeostasis in an animal model of Alzheimer’s disease. PLoS One. 2017; 12: e0170275. [CrossRef]
  120. Iaccarino HF, Singer AC, Martorell AJ, Rudenko A, Gao F, Gillingham TZ, et al. Gamma frequency entrainment attenuates amyloid load and modifies microglia. Nature. 2016; 540: 230-235. [CrossRef]
  121. Llinás RR, Ribary U, Jeanmonod D, Kronberg E, Mitra PP. Thalamocortical dysrhythmia: A neurological and neuropsychiatric syndrome characterized by magnetoencephalography. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1999; 96: 15222-15227. [CrossRef]
  122. Murphy E, Benítez-Burraco A. Bridging the gap between genes and language deficits in schizophrenia: An oscillopathic approach. Front Hum Neurosci. 2016; 10: 15. [CrossRef]
  123. Wilkinson C, Murphy E. Joint Interventions in autism spectrum disorder: Relating oscillopathies and syntactic deficits. UCL Work Pap Linguist. 2016; 28: 1-7.
  124. Ruiz-Mejias M. Outer brain oscillations in down syndrome. Front Syst Neurosci. 2019; 13: 17. [CrossRef]
Download PDF Download Citation
0 0