Recent Progress in Materials is an international peer-reviewed Open Access journal published quarterly online by LIDSEN Publishing Inc. This periodical is devoted to publishing high-quality papers that describe the most significant and cutting-edge research in all areas of Materials. Its aim is to provide timely, authoritative introductions to current thinking, developments and research in carefully selected topics. Also, it aims to enhance the international exchange of scientific activities in materials science and technology.
Recent Progress in Materials publishes original high quality experimental and theoretical papers and reviews on basic and applied research in the field of materials science and engineering, with focus on synthesis, processing, constitution, and properties of all classes of materials. Particular emphasis is placed on microstructural design, phase relations, computational thermodynamics, and kinetics at the nano to macro scale. Contributions may also focus on progress in advanced characterization techniques.          

Main research areas include (but are not limited to):
Characterization & Evaluation of Materials
Metallic materials 
Inorganic nonmetallic materials 
Composite materials
Polymer Materials
Sustainable Materials and Technologies
Special types of Materials
Macro-, micro- and nano structure of materials
Environmental interactions, process modeling
Novel applications of materials

Archiving: full-text archived in CLOCKSS.

Rapid publication: manuscripts are undertaken in 13 days from acceptance to publication (median values for papers published in this journal in 2021, 1-2 days of FREE language polishing time is also included in this period).

Current Issue: 2023  Archive: 2022 2021 2020 2019
Open Access Original Research

Physiological Response of a Natural Central Incisor Tooth to Various Loading Conditions: A 3D Finite Element Study

Dipti Nikam , Abbas S. Milani *

  1. School of Engineering, The University of British Columbia, Canada

Correspondence: Abbas S. Milani

Academic Editor: Hossein Hosseinkhani

Received: May 05, 2022 | Accepted: April 10, 2023 | Published: April 24, 2023

Recent Progress in Materials 2023, Volume 5, Issue 2, doi:10.21926/rpm.2302017

Recommended citation: Nikam D, Milani AS. Physiological Response of a Natural Central Incisor Tooth to Various Loading Conditions: A 3D Finite Element Study. Recent Progress in Materials 2023; 5(2): 017; doi:10.21926/rpm.2302017.

© 2023 by the authors. This is an open access article distributed under the conditions of the Creative Commons by Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is correctly cited.


This study evaluates the influence of different loading angles and the area of loading on the ensuing stress distribution and the physical response of a natural central incisor tooth, using a 3D finite element analysis. The CAD model of the incisor tooth assembly (including enamel, dentin, periodontal ligament, pulp, gingiva and jaw bone) was subject to an external (chewing) load of 100 N, over four different areas and at four different angles along the vertical. It was observed that the tooth experiences high von-Mises equivalent stresses and high bending when the load applied is closer to the incisal edge of the crown. Also, the stresses on the dentin, in general, increased with the increase in the loading angle regardless of the area of loading; with the highest stress (~70 MPa) generated at 45° angle. The percentage change observed in dentin von-Mises stresses was higher than that of enamel when the loading angle was increased from 0° to 45°, because of the higher stiffness of enamel and structural differences in enamel and dentin. The numerical results indicated that applying loads on incisal edge would simulate a severe loading condition for the incisor tooth.


Dental materials; finite element analysis; incisor tooth; stress analysis

1. Introduction

Clearly, teeth are an important part of human body playing an important role in our digestive systems by grinding the food to swallowable size [1,2]. Approximately half of the population experience tooth loss at some stage in life due to various factors, excluding the natural loss due to age [3,4,5,6,7]. The loss of teeth due to unnatural causes is often treated with artificial teeth which have life expectancy of 65-95% [8,9,10,11,12]. This range excludes the frequent failures of the crowns due to cracking and chipping. Such high failure rate can be associated with the lack of understanding of natural tooth structure and its behaviour under external loading. The artificial crowns are designed to have physical material properties similar or higher than those of the natural enamel, the hardest and stiffest material in the human body, unlike a multi-layered multi-stiffness natural tooth [13,14,15,16,17,18,19,20,21,22,23,24]. One of the periodontal ligamental connects the tooth to the mandibular bone and helps tooth movement [25].

In order to design a replacement for any biological structure, it is important to understand the original structure - in this case, the natural tooth. Use of FEA (finite element analysis) is common in engineering to design new parts and to understand the physical response of material structures to external loading. Similarly, in dentistry, researchers have used FEA to analyze artificial teeth and compare different design parameters, including variation in restorative materials, loading direction and geometry of the tooth [13,16,18,20,26,27,28,29,30,31,32,33,34,35,36,37,38,39,40,41,42,43,44,45,46,47,48,49,50,51,52,53,54]. Another recent study on glass fiber restorative implant material showed that even the reinforcing fiber orientation can significantly influence the stress pattern in the teeth [55]. With this multitude of design variables, it is of importance to first understand what are the most serve mechanical loading conditions (loading patterns targeted, area of loading applied, along with other boundary conditions) on the behaviour of natural tooth itself, based on which then the design and analysis of artificial teeth can be optimized [53].

2. Objective, Materials and Methods

Here, using FEA, an attempt has been made to assess the effect of different loading conditions on ensuing von-Misses stresses in a natural central incisor tooth, thereby providing a more holistic understanding of the physical behaviour of such structure and exploring a sever loading case that may be used for future numerical studies. A total of 16 loading cases are simulated and compared based on the location and angle of the applied (chewing) load.

2.1 3D Geometry

For the natural tooth geometry, a readily available incisor CAD model, also developed from scans, was employed from [54,55,56,57,58]. The base model was modified to have multiple layers such as pulp chamber, periodontal ligament, dentin and the enamel as shown in Figure 1. The layer thicknesses were maintained as per the ranges specified in the study [59]. This sub-structure was then assembled on bone CAD model created with two layers – cortical and cancellous bone (Figure 1). The CAD models were created in SolidWorks and were imported into ANSYS Mechanical 16.0, meshed with SOLID 187 element type, created with hex dominant shape. The areas expected to be structurally susceptible to stresses such as incisal edge, fillets, thin cross-section and rounds were re-meshed with finer element sizes, with an average total skewness factor of 0.36, and the highest body element size of 1 mm. Meshing resulted in 562,425 elements and 1,881,588 nodes. All the contacts were of bonded type.

Click to view original image

Figure 1 Natural tooth internal layered structure and tooth assembly with the supporting structure and pictorial distinction of crown and neck.

2.2 Material Properties, Loading and Boundary Conditions

Table 1 shows the mechanical properties considered for this study. Due to variation of the loading conditions in the previous FEA studies [56] and to find the most severe loading condition for an incisor, the crown was subject to a uniformly distributed load of 100 N applied over four loading surfaces at four different angles (0°, 15°, 30°, and 45°) with respect to the tooth vertical axis (Figure 2). Each loading case was evaluated separately. The side faces of the bone were fixed in all directions (6DOF) as shown in Figure 2.

Table 1 Material properties considered for the analysis of natural tooth [59].

Click to view original image

Figure 2 Design of the study: Loading and boundary conditions used for the FE analysis – four loading faces on the crown and each face subject to 100 N of uniformly distributed load at four loading angles. The side surfaces of the bones and gingiva (blue highlights) fixed in all directions [59].

3. Results

In order to understand response of the tooth to the different loading conditions and find the most severe loading condition, a total of 16 load cases were simulated, based on the combinations shown in Figure 2. The equivalent von-Mises stresses generated in the enamel and dentin were compared in Figure 3. Comparison of the stresses in enamel shows that the tooth crown experiences the highest stresses (among the cases simulated) when the load is applied on the incisal edge of the incisor tooth. A maximum stress of 150 MPa was observed in the incisal edge load [60] case followed by 113.5 MPa in upper lingual load case. An ANOVA analysis of the data [59] (with α = 0.05) also showed that the stresses induced in the tooth are more significant to the selection of loading surface than they are to the loading angle.

Click to view original image

Figure 3 Natural tooth equivalent (max) von-Mises stresses in enamel and dentin for each loading case on the natural tooth.

The equivalent stress variation of the enamel with incisal edge loaded at different angles show that the high stress location gradually moves from the incisal edge to the labial surface (Figure 4). As the angle of loading increases, the tooth starts bending backwards on the labial side. The higher the loading angle, the higher the bending of structure.

Click to view original image

Figure 4 Equivalent stresses in (a) enamel and (b) dentin (b), for incisal edge loading case at different angles; showing an increase in the overall stresses on the labial side with increase in the loading angle. (c) displacement vector plot showing change in bending with angle of loading.

The equivalent stresses in dentin increased from 45 MPa to 69 MPa with the increase in loading angle for incisal edge case (Figure 3). Also, the high stress location moved from the tip of the dentin to the neck region with the increase in loading angle (Figure 4). Similar to the enamel, higher bending of the dentin body is observed with higher angle of loading. It was observed that the dentin body bends from the neck region when the loads are applied at higher angles thereby generating high stresses at the neck. The jaw bones follow the deformation pattern of the dentin. Per Figure 5, Cortical bone has the stresses concentrated at the neck region in contact with the dentin whereas the stresses in the cancellous bone were distributed over the large conical socket the dentin sits in. The overall stresses increased with the increase in the loading angle. The von-mises equivalent stress in cortical bone increased from 7 MPa to 19 MPa whereas von-Mises equivalent stresses in cancellous bone doubled from 4 MPa to 8 MPa. These stresses remained pretty much similar for all the loading locations.

Click to view original image

Figure 5 Equivalent stress plot of Cortical and Cancellous bones (at 0° loading on incisal edge) showing the high stress location. Cortical bone has the stresses concentrated at the neck region in contact with the dentin whereas the stresses in the cancellous bone were distributed over the large conical socket the dentin sits in; highest being on the edge.

Of note, in an auxiliary FE analysis [59], it was also observed that the addition of gingiva does not have any structural role to influence the stresses in the tooth. A case study with and without gingiva showed no difference in the stress magnitude of the tooth parts.

4. Discussions

4.1 Effect of Loading Surface

The shape of the tooth is roughly like a cylindrical magnetic needle with its one end supported by the jaw bone (Figure 1). The other end forms the visible crown, which is used for chewing the food and is exposed to external loads such as biting forces. Almost 3/5 of the tooth body is supported by jaw bones and is thickest at the neck (Figure 1). This means that the crown of the tooth behaves like a cantilever upon application of biting forces.

The increase in the stress magnitude with the increase in proximity of the loading surface to the crown tip can be easily explained by the change in thickness of the tooth along its length (Figure 6). Recalling the cross section of the tooth in Figure 6 and Figure 7, it is observed that moving from neck to the incisal edge, the area of cross section perpendicular to the lingual surface decreases. Figure 3 and Figure 6 show that with a constant load magnitude, the stresses increase as the area of cross section decreases. Hence the highest stresses are observed in the case of the incisal edge loading (150 MPa) and the next high stress value was observed in the case of the upper lingual surface loading (113.5 MPa). Following this theory, the least stress magnitude would be observed at a surface loading closest to the neck region and stress values in Figure 3 proves the same.

Click to view original image

Figure 6 (a) Natural tooth loading faces and loading angles representation; Second row shows the changes in area of cross section with the change in the loading face. (b) An example of the increase in area of cross section as the loading vector lowers along tooth vertical axis. In pic-1 the loading vector is close to the narrow crown tip with certain area of cross section across the tooth thickness whereas in pic-2&3 this area increases as the loading vector axis is lowered vertically.

Click to view original image

Figure 7 PDL compression at 0° and 45° loading angles in comparison with the unloaded and undeformed tooth. The PDL compression is shown by yellow arrows at the neck and at the root.

4.2 Effect of Loading Angle

As discussed in Section 4.1, the tooth crown acts like bending arm of a cantilever on application of biting forces. Theoretically, for any cantilever beam the highest bending displacement and the resulting stresses are observed when the beam tip is loaded perpendicular to the beam horizontal axis [61]. Following the same, the highest stress magnitude in dentine is observed here (Figure 3) when the loads are applied on the incisal edge at 45°. The low Young’s modulus of the dentin (E = 18.6 GPa) allows it to be flexible and bend in the direction of loading, resulting into an increase in the stresses (for incisal edge loading case) from 45 MPa to 69 MPa and moving the high stress location from incisal edge to the neck (Figure 4). These observations are consistent with the study [33] which showed that the narrow structure at the crown tip causes high stresses and bending in the crown. The present numerical results also match other studies where high stresses were reported on the enamel surface within top 1/3rd region of the crown [19,36,45,48].

The enamel is a thin, stiff layer (E = 84.1 GPa) on the dentin’s crown. It is not directly supported by the jawbones. Hence, it follows the bending pattern defined by the dentin and show minimal change in stresses due to change in the loading angle. It is evident from Figure 3 that the percentage change in stresses in enamel is far less than that of dentin when the loading angle is changed from zero to 45° degrees.

For the jawbones, as the loading angle increases, the high stress in the dentin (Figure 3) would transfer onto the bones; resulting potentially in bone resorption [23]. However, the stress magnitude of the bone remains significantly lower than its ultimate strength [15,62] because of the presence of a shock absorbing layer known as periodontal ligament (PDL) (Figure 1).

PDL is a layer of connective tissues between dentin and the bone. The significantly low Young’s modulus (E = 0.0689 GPa) allows the PDL to compress in any direction when loaded. This property allows the tooth root to float in the bone socket. The PDL absorbs most of the loads and displacements thereby softening the blow to the bones. Results from this FEA show that when the strain in dentin was 0.0032 mm/mm the strain in the PDL had was 0.04 mm/mm. When the loads are applied in vertically downward direction, the PDL compresses at the root and allows up-down movement of the tooth (Figure 7). When the tooth is loaded at the higher loading angles such as 45°, the PDL compresses and extends along the walls to allow the tooth a fore-aft movement without damaging the supporting bones.

5. Conclusion

The performed FEA on the influence of different loading angles and the area of loading on the ensuing stress distribution of a natural incisor tooth showed that, the tooth experiences highest stresses when the loading surface is close to the incisal edge. This is because of the thin cross section at the crown tip generating high stresses. High loading angle causes the dentin to bend like a cantilever. Hence, a combination of high loading angle and incisal edge loading results in the highest stresses overall. It is important to consider the flexibility of the natural tooth system when designing the replacement artificial teeth. The variation in the Young’s modulus and presence of the PDL keeps the bones protected from overloading and shock loads.

5.1 Limitations and Future Work Perspective

The scope of this study was limited to ‘numerical’ comparison of different loading cases for an incisor tooth, namely to explore which tooth area and which angle would serve as the most severe loading case (Figure 2). Lab- or clinical-scale experiments must be conducted to validate the numerical results, along with exploring the potential uncertainties in the performance of the teeth samples under different loading cases via a statistical analysis. The CAD models considered in this study assumed a perfect shape of the incisor tooth which might not always be the case in reality. Also, even though the use of basic FEA is common for comparing different designs and understanding the basic physical behavior of a given system, it involves assumptions on the materials, loading and boundary conditions. For instance, the real human tissues are non-linear materials unlike the linear elastic material considered in the present study.


The stipulating discussions and support from Perfit Dental Solutions Inc. throughout this work are highly acknowledged.

Author Contributions

Dipti Nikam: Conceptualization, Methodology, Software, Formal analysis, Writing - original draft. Abbas S. Milani: Conceptualization, Resources, Supervision, Funding acquisition, Writing - review & editing.

Competing Interests

The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.


  1. White TD, Folkens PA. Chapter 8--Dentition. In: The human bone manual. Burlington, MA: Elsevier Science; 2005. [CrossRef]
  2. Kong F, Singh RP. Disintegration of solid foods in human stomach. J Food Sci. 2008; 73: R67-R80. [CrossRef]
  3. Gattinger J, Bullemer CN, Harrysson OL. Patient specific root-analogue dental implants–additive manufacturing and finite element analysis. Curr Dir Biomed Eng. 2016; 2: 101-104. [CrossRef]
  4. Nayar S, Bhuminathan S, Nisha JS, Ramesh G, Sujitha K. Edentulism and public awareness–An epidemiological study. Biomed Pharmacol J. 2013; 6: 77-81. [CrossRef]
  5. Consumer Guide to Dentistry. Causes and consequences of tooth loss [Internet]. Nashville, TN: Ceatus Media Group LLC.; 2019 [cited date 2021 June 19]. Available from:
  6. Van der Velden U. Effect of age on the periodontium. J Clin Periodontol. 1984; 11: 281-294. [CrossRef]
  7. Matuda AG, Silveira MP, Andrade GS, Piva AM, Tribst JP, Borges AL, et al. Computer aided design modelling and finite element analysis of premolar proximal cavities restored with resin composites. Materials. 2021; 14: 2366. [CrossRef]
  8. Romeo E, Lops D, Margutti E, Ghisolfi M, Chiapasco M, Vogel G. Long-term survival and success of oral implants in the treatment of full and partial arches: A 7-year prospective study with the ITI dental implant system. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2004; 19: 247-259.
  9. Fernandes NA, Vally ZI, Sykes LM. The longevity of restorations-A literature review. S Afr Dent J. 2015; 70: 410-413.
  10. Ribeiro CG, Cascaes AM, Silva AE, Seerig LM, Nascimento GG, Demarco FF. Edentulism, severe tooth loss and lack of functional dentition in elders: A study in Southern Brazil. Braz Dent J. 2016; 27: 345-352. [CrossRef]
  11. Canadian Dental Association. The state of oral health in Canada [Internet]. Ottawa: Canadian Dental Association; 2017. Available from:
  12. Emami E, de Souza RF, Kabawat M, Feine JS. The impact of edentulism on oral and general health. Int J Dent. 2013; 2013: 498305. [CrossRef]
  13. De Jager N, de Kler M, van der Zel JM. The influence of different core material on the FEA-determined stress distribution in dental crowns. Dent Mater. 2006; 22: 234-242. [CrossRef]
  14. Türk AG. The Effect of marginal preparation type on an all-ceramic anterior crown: A finite element study. Cumhur Dent J. 2017; 19: 214-221. [CrossRef]
  15. Zhang YR, Du W, Zhou XD, Yu HY. Review of research on the mechanical properties of the human tooth. Int J Oral Sci. 2014; 6: 61-69. [CrossRef]
  16. Chen B, Ma Y, Wu K, Chen H, Li L, Liang L, et al. Influence of various materials on biomechanical behavior of endocrown-restored, endodontically-treated mandibular first molar: A 3D-finite element analysis. J Wuhan Univ Technol Mater Sci Ed. 2015; 30: 643-648. [CrossRef]
  17. Dabla N, Phull TS, Prasad PN, Rawat N. Stress appraisal in periodontium of maxillary first molar using various intrusive forces: A finite element analysis study. J Orthod Res. 2014; 2: 90-96. [CrossRef]
  18. Reimann Ł, Żmudzki J, Dobrzański L. Strength analysis of a three-unit dental bridge framework with the finite element method. Acta Bioeng Biomech. 2015; 17: 51-59.
  19. Faegh S. Mechanism of load transfer along bone-dental implant. Boston, MA: Northeastern University; 2009. [CrossRef]
  20. Zelic K, Vukicevic A, Jovicic G, Aleksandrovic S, Filipovic N, Djuric M. Mechanical weakening of devitalized teeth: Three-dimensional finite element analysis and prediction of tooth fracture. Int Endod J. 2015; 48: 850-863. [CrossRef]
  21. Chen Z, Zhang Y, Li J, Wang HL, Yu H. Influence of laser-microtextured surface collar on marginal bone loss and peri-implant soft tissue response: A systematic review and meta-analysis. J Periodontol. 2017; 88: 651-662. [CrossRef]
  22. Madfa AA, Yue XG. Dental prostheses mimic the natural enamel behavior under functional loading: A review article. Jpn Dent Sci Rev. 2016; 52: 2-13. [CrossRef]
  23. O'Brien S. Characterising the deformation behaviour of human tooth enamel at the microscale. Joondalup, WA: Edith Cowan University; 2013.
  24. Chun KJ, Lee JY. Comparative study of mechanical properties of dental restorative materials and dental hard tissues in compressive loads. J Dent Biomech. 2014; 5. doi: 10.1177/1758736014555246. [CrossRef]
  25. Wu B, Pu P, Zhao S, Izadikhah I, Shi H, Liu M, et al. Frequency-related viscoelastic properties of the human incisor periodontal ligament under dynamic compressive loading. PLoS One. 2020; 15: e0235822. [CrossRef]
  26. Kanjanaouthai A, Mahatumarat K, Techalertpaisarn P, Versluis A. Effect of the inclination of a maxillary central incisor on periodontal stress finite element analysis. Angle Orthod. 2012; 82: 812-819. [CrossRef]
  27. Bramanti E, Cervino G, Lauritano F, Fiorillo L, D’Amico C, Sambataro S, et al. FEM and von Mises analysis on prosthetic crowns structural elements: Evaluation of different applied materials. Sci World J. 2017; 2017: 1029574. [CrossRef]
  28. Sengul F, Gurbuz T, Sengul S. Finite element analysis of different restorative materials in primary teeth restorations. Eur J Paediatr Dent. 2014; 15: 317-322.
  29. Aggarwal S, Garg V. Finite element analysis of stress concentration in three popular brands of fiber posts systems used for maxillary central incisor teeth. J Conserv Dent. 2011; 14: 293-296. [CrossRef]
  30. Matson MR, Lewgoy HR, Barros Filho DA, Amore R, Anido-Anido A, Alonso RC, et al. Finite element analysis of stress distribution in intact and porcelain veneer restored teeth. Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Engin. 2012; 15: 795-800. [CrossRef]
  31. Jager ND. Finite element analysis of stresses in dental crowns. In: Dental biomaterials. Abington: Woodhead Publishing Limited; 2008. pp. 343-359. [CrossRef]
  32. Schwitalla AD, Abou-Emara M, Spintig T, Lackmann J, Müller WD. Finite element analysis of the biomechanical effects of PEEK dental implants on the peri-implant bone. J Biomech. 2015; 48: 1-7. [CrossRef]
  33. Samal P, Mohanty SS, Panigrahi M, Mohanty S. Finite element analysis of the dental crown: A case study of alumina based incisor. IOP Conf Ser Mater Sci Eng. 2018; 410: 012003. [CrossRef]
  34. Alsarani M, De Souza G, Rizkalla A, El-Mowafy O. Influence of crown design and material on chipping-resistance of all-ceramic molar crowns: An in vitro study. Dent Med Probl. 2018; 55: 35-42. [CrossRef]
  35. El-Anwar MI, Al-Azrag KE, Ghazy MH, Dawood LE. Influence of implant-abutment angulations and crown material on stress distribution on central incisor: A 3D FEA. Brazilian J Oral Sci. 2015; 14: 323-329. [CrossRef]
  36. BIN D. Inverse analysis of dental implant systems using finite element method. Singapore: National University of Singapore; 2006.
  37. Mehdi G, Belarbi A, Mansouri B, Azari Z. Numerical study of effect of elastomeric stress absorbers on stress reduction in bone-dental implant interface. J Appl Oral Sci. 2015; 23: 87-93. [CrossRef]
  38. Gomes EA, Diana HH, Oliveira JS, Silva-Sousa YT, Faria AC, Ribeiro RF. Reliability of FEA on the results of mechanical properties of materials. Braz Dent J. 2015; 26: 667-670. [CrossRef]
  39. Poiate IA, Vasconcellos AB, Poiate Junior E, Dias KR. Stress distribution in the cervical region of an upper central incisor in a 3D finite element model. Brazilian Oral Res. 2009; 23: 161-168. [CrossRef]
  40. Yan W, Jiao X, Shao P, Cai W. Stress distribution in the mandibular central incisor and periodontal ligament while opening the bite: A finite element analysis. Biomed Res. 2012; 23: 343-348.
  41. De Jager N, Pallav P, Feilzer AJ. The influence of design parameters on the FEA-determined stress distribution in CAD-CAM produced all-ceramic dental crowns. Dent Mater. 2005; 21: 242-251. [CrossRef]
  42. Mezzomo LA, Corso L, Marczak RJ, Rivaldo EG. Three-dimensional FEA of effects of two dowel-and-core approaches and effects of canal flaring on stress distribution in endodontically treated teeth. J Prosthodont. 2011; 20: 120-129. [CrossRef]
  43. Dejak B, Młotkowski A, Langot C. Three-dimensional finite element analysis of molars with thin-walled prosthetic crowns made of various materials. Dent Mater. 2012; 28: 433-441. [CrossRef]
  44. Kumar P, Rao Rn. Three-dimensional finite element analysis of stress distribution in a tooth restored with metal and fiber posts of varying diameters: An in-vitro study. J Conserv Dent. 2015; 18: 100-104. [CrossRef]
  45. Çelik Köycü B, İmirzalioğlu P, Özden UA. Three-dimensional finite element analysis of stress distribution in inlay-restored mandibular first molar under simultaneous thermomechanical loads. Dent Mater J. 2016; 35 :180-186. [CrossRef]
  46. D’souza KM, Aras MA. Three-dimensional finite element analysis of the stress distribution pattern in a mandibular first molar tooth restored with five different restorative materials. J Indian Prosthodont Soc. 2017; 17: 53-60. [CrossRef]
  47. Moraes SL, Verri FR, Santiago Júnior JF, Almeida DA, Lemos CA, Gomes JM, et al. Three-dimensional finite element analysis of varying diameter and connection type in implants with high crown-implant ratio. Braz Dent J. 2018; 29: 36-42. [CrossRef]
  48. Meirelles LC, Pierre FZ, Tribst JP, Pagani C, Bresciani E, Borges AL. Influence of preparation design, restorative material and load direction on the stress distribution of ceramic veneer in upper central incisor. Brazilian Dent Sci. 2021; 24. doi: 10.14295/bds.2021.v24i3.2494. [CrossRef]
  49. Ha SR, Kim SH, Lee JB, Han JS, Yeo IS, Yoo SH, et al. Biomechanical three-dimensional finite element analysis of monolithic zirconia crown with different cement thickness. Ceram Int. 2016; 42: 14928-14936. [CrossRef]
  50. Dal Piva AM, Tribst JP, Borges AL, e Souza RO, Bottino MA. CAD-FEA modeling and analysis of different full crown monolithic restorations. Dent Mater. 2018; 34: 1342-1350. [CrossRef]
  51. Sun L, Wu X, Li Y, Lin Z, Xu D, Lin X, et al. Comparative analysis of the stress distribution in five anatomical types of maxillary central incisor. Technol Health Care. 2017; 25: S53-S62. [CrossRef]
  52. Chun KJ, Choi HH, Lee JY. Comparison of mechanical property and role between enamel and dentin in the human teeth. J Dent Biomech. 2014; 5. doi: 10.1177/1758736014520809. [CrossRef]
  53. Rahmati S, Kheirollahi H, Azari A. Design and analysis of a new dental implant using finite element method. Adv Des Manuf Technol. 2013; 6: 22-33.
  54. Bahrami B, Shahrbaf S, Mirzakouchaki B, Ghalichi F, Ashtiani M, Martin N. Effect of surface treatment on stress distribution in immediately loaded dental implants - A 3D finite element analysis. Dent Mater. 2014; 30: e89-e97. [CrossRef]
  55. Nikam D, Milani AS. Effect of fiber orientation on the stresses generated in dental crowns made of glass fiber composites. Compos Struct. 2022; 279: 114790. Doi : 10.1016/j.compstruct.2021.114790. [CrossRef]
  56. Amarante MV, Pereira MV, Darwish FA, Camarão AF. Virtual analysis of stresses in human teeth restored with esthetic posts. Mater Res. 2008; 11: 459-463. [CrossRef]
  57. Tjulkins F. Human jaw CAD [Internet]. Waltham, MA: Stratasys Inc.; 2017 [cited date 2021 March 7]. Available from:
  58. Gupta S. Incisor tooth CAD [Internet]. Waltham, MA: Stratasys Inc.; 2017 [cited date 2021 March 7]. Available from:
  59. Nikam D. Design of dental crowns using glass fiber composites: A finite element study on the effect of fiber orientation. Vancouver: The University of British Columbia; 2019.
  60. Tsouknidas A, Karaoglani E, Michailidis N, Kugiumtzis D, Pissiotis A, Michalakis K. Influence of preparation depth and design on stress distribution in maxillary central incisors restored with ceramic veneers: A 3D finite element analysis. J Prosthodont. 2020; 29: 151-160. [CrossRef]
  61. Beer FP, Johnston E, DeWolf J. Mechanics of materials. 8th ed. New York: McGraw-Hill; 2020.
  62. Lin YS. Structure and mechanical properties of teeth. Concr J. 1983; 21: 19-30. doi: 10.3151/coj1975.21.3_19. [CrossRef]
Download PDF Download Citation
0 0