Recent Progress in Materials is an international peer-reviewed Open Access journal published quarterly online by LIDSEN Publishing Inc. This periodical is devoted to publishing high-quality papers that describe the most significant and cutting-edge research in all areas of Materials. Its aim is to provide timely, authoritative introductions to current thinking, developments and research in carefully selected topics. Also, it aims to enhance the international exchange of scientific activities in materials science and technology.
Recent Progress in Materials publishes original high quality experimental and theoretical papers and reviews on basic and applied research in the field of materials science and engineering, with focus on synthesis, processing, constitution, and properties of all classes of materials. Particular emphasis is placed on microstructural design, phase relations, computational thermodynamics, and kinetics at the nano to macro scale. Contributions may also focus on progress in advanced characterization techniques.          

Main research areas include (but are not limited to):
Characterization & Evaluation of Materials
Metallic materials 
Inorganic nonmetallic materials 
Composite materials
Polymer Materials
Biomaterials
Sustainable Materials and Technologies
Special types of Materials
Macro-, micro- and nano structure of materials
Environmental interactions, process modeling
Novel applications of materials

Archiving: full-text archived in CLOCKSS.

Rapid publication: manuscripts are undertaken in 13 days from acceptance to publication (median values for papers published in this journal in 2021, 1-2 days of FREE language polishing time is also included in this period).

Current Issue: 2023  Archive: 2022 2021 2020 2019
Open Access Review

A Review of Various Treatment Methods for the Removal of Dyes from Textile Effluent

Chingrishon Kathing , Geeta Saini †,*

Department of Chemistry, Gargi College, University of Delhi, India

† These authors contributed equally to this work.

Correspondence: Geeta Saini

Academic Editors: Laila Mandi and Miquel Salgot

Special Issue: Wastewater Reclamation and Reuse

Received: October 15, 2022 | Accepted: December 22, 2022 | Published: December 30, 2022

Recent Progress in Materials 2022, Volume 4, Issue 4, doi:10.21926/rpm.2204028

Recommended citation: Kathing C, Saini G. A Review of Various Treatment Methods for the Removal of Dyes from Textile Effluent. Recent Progress in Materials 2022;4(4):21; doi:10.21926/rpm.2204028.

© 2022 by the authors. This is an open access article distributed under the conditions of the Creative Commons by Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is correctly cited.

Abstract

Wastewater generated by the textile industry has been a major environmental concern for a long. Production of fiber involves various steps and uses a lot of chemicals, dyes, and water. Therefore, the effluent produced from the textile industry needs proper purification before discharging into the water body. The current review summarizes various physical and chemical methods like ion exchange, coagulation-flocculation, membrane separation, membrane distillation, oxidation, ozonation, etc., for wastewater treatment. Along with this, adsorption methods, the various adsorbents used to purify wastewater, and the mechanism involved in adsorption have also been discussed. The biological method utilizes various microbes (bacteria, fungi, algae, and yeast) as a whole and the enzymes (laccase and azoreductase) secreted by them for wastewater treatment, which have been considered more feasible than physical and chemical methods. The adsorption and biological methods are better than other techniques due to their ability to degrade diverse classes of dye, less accumulation of harmless sludge, and cost-effective and safer approach for the disposal of textile effluent. While physical and chemical methods are expensive and generate toxic sludge, which is difficult to decompose.

Graphical abstract

Click to view original image

Keywords

Textile industry; wastewater; treatment methods; biosorption; physical method; chemical method

1. Introduction

Water is essential to life. It is required for survival, making it one of the most important and potent elements of life for all living things. Unfortunately, rapid industrialization, modernization, and various anthropogenic activities have contaminated water bodies. The textile industry has also become one of the biggest environmental challenges, despite playing a key part in meeting people's basic needs since the beginning [1,2,3]. It has been estimated that textile dyeing contributed nearly 20% of global wastewater, or around 93 billion cubic meters producing highly colored wastewater [4]. About 7 × 107 tons of synthetic dyes are produced annually worldwide, with over 10,000 tons of such dyes by textile industries [5]. In addition to being one of the most polluting industries, it is also the largest consumer of water, resulting in water depletion and a threat to water scarcity. Directly discharging untreated wastewater containing dyes into water bodies creates pollution that ultimately damages water quality and causes major health problems in humans [6,7]. Several reports are available in the literature to prove the health hazard related to dyes [8,9]. The minute amount of metals discharged by textile effluents is toxic to animals and humans [10,11]. The highly contaminated water enters into the groundwater, which deteriorates the water quality of groundwater. Textile dyes are highly carcinogenic and may cause various skin and eye ailments in humans. e.g., dermatitis, allergic conjunctivitis, and occupational asthma are common diseases caused by textile dyes [12,13]. The most probable reason for the ailments caused by textile dyes is the replacement or denaturation of enzymatic activity [14]. In addition, it degrades the aquatic ecosystem, as the dye in the water reduces its transparency, inhibits photosynthesis, and subsequently lowers dissolved oxygen (D.O.), harming both aquatic flora and fauna [15]. At decreased D.O. level, the microorganism could not survive, and the natural process of decomposition of organic waste by bacteria and other microorganisms does not occur, which results in the accumulation of organic waste in the water body. Pollutants such as dyes, various organic and inorganic compounds, and heavy metals such as Hg, Cr, Pb, and As, which are poisonous by nature and represent significant environmental issues, are prevalent in textile industry wastewater [16,17,18].

The production of fabric from textile fiber involves many steps, as shown in Figure 1, and substantial amounts of chemicals are used at each step, further increasing water pollution [19]. Dye is the primary pollutant in textile effluent water [20]. Dye effluents are generated because dyes are not completely fixed to the fiber during the dyeing and finishing operations [21,22]. Dye molecules have a complicated aromatic backbone and contain several auxochromes that give them a beautiful color. Therefore, they have a very complex and stable structure that poses greater difficulty in breakdown and degradation; hence removal from textile effluent becomes more challenging [23].

Click to view original image

Figure 1 Various processes occur in the production of fabric from the fiber.

There are various categories of dyes based on origin, structure, and application, such as acidic, basic, disperse, direct, reactive, azo, diazo, and mordant dye, summarized in Figure 2 [24].

Click to view original image

Figure 2 Classification of dyes.

Azo dye represents the greatest production volume in dyestuff chemicals today, and their relative importance may grow. These are extensively used in the textile, paper, food, leather, cosmetics, and pharmaceutical industries and account for about 50 % of all dyes synthesized [25].

Due to the ease of coupling reactions, it is possible to synthesize the desired dye, which is suitable for a wide range of applications [26]. The intricate structure of dyes prevents their degradation; thus, they remain in the water for longer. For instance, the half-life of hydrolyzed Reactive Blue 19 is about 46 years at pH 7 and 25°C [27]. Since most of the azo dyes under anaerobic conditions decomposed as aromatic amines, which can act as carcinogens and mutagens, their removal from wastewater before discharge into water bodies is of utmost importance and is a challenging task to formulate high-efficiency treatment methods [28,29]. The treatment of wastewater to make them suitable for subsequent use requires physical, chemical, and biological processes, which are depicted in Figure 3 [30]. In the textile industry, selecting the most efficient and cost-effective treatment processes or their combinations is contingent on the dyestuffs and dyeing techniques employed in production [27,31,32,33].

Click to view original image

Figure 3 Various treatment methods used for the purification of textile effluents.

1.1 Physical Methods

Various physical methods, such as ion exchange [34], membrane separation [35,36], and adsorption [32], etc., have been employed for many years for the treatment of wastewater [37]. Ion exchange is a well-developed technique involving an exchange of mobile ions from an external solution that is electrostatically bound to the functional groups within a solid matrix [38]. It is used for purifying, separating, and decontamination of aqueous and other ion-containing solutions [39]. Despite its wide applications, there are limitations associated with the ion exchange method as it generates a highly concentrated waste that requires careful disposal. Generally, it is ineffective to treat all categories of dyes and for wastewater containing high concentrations of metal ions such as Fe, Mn, Al, etc. Membrane separation processes such as reverse osmosis (RO) [40], nanofiltration (NF) [41], and microfiltration (MF) [42] have also been successfully employed in the treatment of dye-laden water (more than or about 90% removal efficiency). However, pore blockage and membrane fouling during these processes remain significant limitations [43].

In recent times, membrane distillation (MD) technology has emerged as the most desirable and effective method for wastewater reclamation. The most important feature of membrane distillation is the ability to pass water vapor (volatile parts) through the microporous hydrophobic membrane pores and collect as distillate in a pure form [44]. Some of the benefits offered by MD are the significant reduction of equipment size, low operating temperature and pressure, low energy requirement, and low capital cost. Despite its excellent performance and sought-after method, pore wetting, membrane fouling, and scaling are the drawbacks encountered, particularly with the membrane distillation method [45].

MD processes can be classified into four major configurations depending on the methods to induce a vapor pressure difference across the membrane and the type of permeate collection on the cold side, summarized in Table 1.

Table 1 Types of Membrane Distillation (MD) Configuration and advantages and disadvantages.

1.2 Chemical Methods

Chemical method of wastewater treatment includes oxidation, electrolysis, and coagulation-flocculation methods [53]. The use of advanced oxidation processes (AOP) [54] such as ozonation [55], ultraviolet/hydrogen peroxide (UV/H2O2) [56,57], Fenton, [58,59] ultrasound [60], anodic oxidation [61], and photocatalytic processes [62] have been efficiently employed to treat dye wastewater.

The coagulation and flocculation method are physicochemical treatments used frequently for wastewater treatment with minimal generation of harmful and toxic intermediates. High molecular weights of surfactants and dyes are successfully removed by the coagulation and flocculation processes followed by sedimentation, flotation, and filtration, respectively [63]. Decolorization by this approach is achieved by eliminating dye molecules from dyebath effluents rather than through the partial decomposition of dyes, which could generate potentially hazardous and poisonous aromatic chemicals [64]. However, the method has drawbacks, such as the generation of inherent sludge and disposal problems [65]. Table 2 summarizes the different physical and chemical methods used to remove specific dyes.

Table 2 Physical and chemical methods used for removal of dyes.

1.3 Biological Methods

Biological treatment is considered the best method due to its ability to degrade diverse classes of dye, less accumulation of harmless sludge, and a cost-effective and safer approach to the disposal of textile effluent [81]. Bacterial degradation can occur via bacteria cells, enzymes present in bacteria, and bacterial consortium, as displayed in Figure 4 [82]. A few examples of microbes used for degrading various types of dyes have been given in Table 1.

Click to view original image

Figure 4 Various methods for bacterial degradation.

Azoreductase, laccase, and peroxidase are the enzymes produced by bacteria and have proven to be very effective in the degradation of complex dye molecules, particularly azo dye [83,84,85]. The microbial degradation of azo dyes to their corresponding amines is initiated by the cleavage of the azo linkage (-N=N-) with an anaerobic azo reductase [86]. Various Co-enzymes that reduce azo linkages are (Flavin Mononucleotide) FMN-independent reductases [87] and (Nicotinamide Adenine Dinucleotide Phosphate) NADPH-dependent reductases [88]. A colorless solution is obtained by reductive cleavage of the azo bond, which is converted into amines and other degraded products in the next step by oxidative cleavage, as depicted in Figure 5 [89]. Therefore, the enzymatic method has gained momentum in the last decade as it gives non-toxic end products, produces less sludge than other methods, and substantially increases the reaction rate, requiring much less time [90]. However, the amount of enzyme production is limited, and they are highly susceptible to undergoing deactivation by various physical and chemical parameters [91]. In addition, the method is overshadowed by limitations such as space requirements, low removal rate, and inefficiency in treating recalcitrant dye components [92,93].

Click to view original image

Figure 5 Schematic presentation of degradation of azo dye.

Mycoremediation, a biosorption by fungi, holds many benefits in the same way as the microbial process. The most widely used fungi in the decolorization and degradation of dye are the ligninolytic fungi of class basidiomycetes [94,95,96]. Algae with high surface area and binding affinity enable the removal of dye with high efficiency. Yeast-assisted biosorption is less explored, yet they are found to be superior and more sustainable mainly due to their ability to adapt to harsh environmental conditions [97,98]. It has been studied that yeast species like Saccharomyces cerevisiae, Saccharomyces uvarum, Saccharomyces lipolytic, and Turolopsis candida can effectively degrade Reactive Brilliant Red K-2BP through biosorption [97]. Various microorganisms used for the degradation of dye molecule are indicated in Table 3.

The strong electrostatic force of attraction between the dye and functional groups like carboxyl, hydroxyl, phosphate, and other charged groups present in the microbes' cell walls governs the biosorption capacity assisted by microorganisms [99]. Furthermore, biosorption efficiency is regulated by parameters like pH, temperature, ionic strength, time of contact, adsorbent and dye concentration, dye structure, and type of microorganisms [100]. Moreover, the rapid growth rate of bacteria and simplicity in handling enables the process to be highly favored for removing dye from wastewater [101].

Table 3 Microbial degradation of a few selected dyes.

Phytoremediation is an alternative green approach to biotreating wastewater contaminated with heavy metals and organic pollutants [21,127]. The primary benefit of dye removal by plants is that it is an autotrophic system with large biomass, which requires little nutrient cost, is easier to handle, and is generally accepted by the public due to its aesthetic demand and environmental sustainability [128,129]. Although extensive research has been carried out to establish effective and efficient phytoremediation techniques for decolorizing and degrading azo dyes, large-scale application of phytoremediation is not feasible. Presently it faces several problems, including the extent of pollutants tolerated by the plant and the requirement of large areas to establish treatment plants [130].

The adsorption technique can be traced back to the 17th century when the first qualitative studies on the uptake of gases by charcoal and clays were reported by C.W. Scheele in 1773. It was followed by Lowitz’, who studied using charcoal to decolorize tartaric acid solutions. Similar phenomena were observed with vegetable animal charcoals by Larvitz in 1792 and Kehl in 1793, respectively. The term ‘adsorption’ was proposed by Bois-Reymond and introduced into the literature by Kayser [131]. After that, the adsorption method has been a continuing subject of interest with its wide array of applications for the removal of solutes from solutions and gases from the air atmosphere [4]. Adsorption methods involve the movement of a substance from the bulk liquid to the surface of the adsorbent [4]. The substance that accumulates at the interface is called ‘adsorbate,' and the solid on which adsorption occurs is ‘adsorbent’ [132]. The possible mechanism is due to the interaction between azo dye and adsorbent via electrostatic interaction, hydrogen bonding, functional group interaction, π-π interaction, ion exchange, Vander Waals force, hydrophobic interaction, and processes such as surface diffusion and intraparticle pore diffusion as shown in Figure 6 [32,133].

Click to view original image

Figure 6 Schematic presentation of the adsorption process.

Several types of adsorbent materials that have been utilized to remove dye molecules effectively from wastewater are metal-organic frameworks [134], magnetic nanocomposite [135], conducting polymers [136], clay minerals, zeolites [137], metal oxides [138], metal hydroxides [139] biopolymers and agricultural wastes [140]. Undoubtedly, a universal adsorbent activated carbon is the most effective adsorbent for the treatment of dye from industrial wastewater [81,141]. Nevertheless, they are still subjected to considerable disadvantages such as cost, energy consumption, regeneration, and non-selective to all dyes. Therefore, researchers have made an enormous effort and shown keen interest in designing novel adsorbents that are inexpensive, sustainable, biodegradable, renewable, and have good surface adsorption characteristics [142]. The main advantage of the adsorption process is the non-generation of toxic secondary pollutants compared to other methods, which involve toxic chemicals, high energy consumption, and a highly expensive process [143].

Recently, the major focus has been shifted to natural adsorbents than synthetic ones since they are abundant in nature, low in cost, and require little processing. Some of the promising low-cost adsorbents are microorganisms [144], agricultural waste [140], and naturally occurring industrial waste, which is listed in Figure 7 [145]. The application of these low-cost adsorbents has benefited both water treatment and waste management simultaneously.

Click to view original image

Figure 7 Low-cost adsorbents.

Along with these, several nanomaterials have been widely explored for the adsorption of waste from textile effluent [146,147]. Carbon nanotubes, oxidized graphene, reduced graphene, boron nitride nanosheets, boron carbon nanosheets, etc., have been widely explored as effective candidates for the adsorption of dyes from wastewater [148,149,150].

Along with dyes, various metal ions like Cr (VI), Cd (II), Pb (II), and Zn (II), etc., are also present in textile wastewater and pose a serious health hazard; therefore, their removal is essential before discharge into water. The source of heavy metals in the textile effluent is various pretreatment, dyeing, and finishing steps. In addition, some dyes (like chrome acid dye, reactive and direct metal-containing dye) need metal ions for their application and become an important source of metal ions in textile wastewater [151]. Various physical and chemical methods like adsorption [152,153], coagulation-flocculation [154,155], ion exchange [155,156], membrane separation, [157] biological treatment [158], etc. can be used for the removal of metal ions. Each method has its advantages and disadvantages, and the selection of a particular method depends on the type of metal ions and their concentration.

2. Conclusions

The water discharged by the textile industry is highly polluting and contains a variety of toxic metals, chemicals, and dyes. These are hazardous for the aquatic ecosystem and cause various health problems in aquatic animals and human beings. Therefore, textile effluent should be treated before discharging into a water body. Various physical, chemical, and biological methods for treating textile effluent were discussed. All these treatment processes have pros and cons; therefore, selecting the most suitable method can be made based on operational costs and sustainability. The physical and chemical methods are highly expensive, require specialized instruments and other accessories to operate, and are high in energy consumption. The chemical methods require various other chemicals to treat the chemical waste generated by the textile industry. These methods also generate by-products like solid waste and sludge formation, thereby generating a large amount of solid waste. Biosorption offers many advantages due to its simplicity in application, high removal efficiency, and cost-effectiveness. The adsorption method is another convenient process owing to its economic feasibility, simplicity of operation, recycling of absorbents, sludge-free, and high performance. Biological methods use microorganisms and their enzymes to decompose waste material generated by the textile industry. These methods are cost-effective and eco-friendly, but the efficiency of waste material removal is less than physical and chemical methods. Therefore, there is still scope for future development of innovative technologies to treat colored wastewater generated from textile dyeing industries.

Acknowledgments

The author gratefully acknowledges the Department of chemistry, Gargi College, Delhi, India for providing all the necessary infrastructure and we wish to acknowledge Dr. Neha Sharma for her constant support and encouragement throughout in writing of the current review article.

Author Contributions

Both authors contributed equally to this work.

Competing Interests

The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

References

  1. Holkar CR, Jadhav AJ, Pinjari DV, Mahamuni NM, Pandit AB. A critical review on textile wastewater treatments: Possible approaches. J Environ Manage. 2016; 182: 351-366. [CrossRef]
  2. Adane T, Adugna AT, Alemayehu E. Textile industry effluent treatment techniques. J Chem. 2021; 2021: 5314404. [CrossRef]
  3. Olisah C, Rubidge G, Human LR, Adams JB. Organophosphate pesticides in South African eutrophic estuaries: Spatial distribution, seasonal variation, and ecological risk assessment. Environ Pollut. 2022; 306: 119446. [CrossRef]
  4. Hynes NRJ, Kumar JS, Kamyab H, Sujana JAJ, Al-Khashman OA, Kuslu Y, et al. Modern enabling techniques and adsorbents based dye removal with sustainability concerns in textile industrial sector - A comprehensive review. J Clean Prod. 2020; 272: 122636. [CrossRef]
  5. Chandanshive V, Kadam S, Rane N, Jeon BH, Jadhav J, Govindwar S. In situ textile wastewater treatment in high rate transpiration system furrows planted with aquatic macrophytes and floating phytobeds. Chemosphere. 2020; 252: 126513. [CrossRef]
  6. Lellis B, Fávaro-Polonio CZ, Pamphile JA, Polonio JC. Effects of textile dyes on health and the environment and bioremediation potential of living organisms. Biotechnol Res Innov. 2019; 3: 275-290. [CrossRef]
  7. Mani S, Chowdhary P, Bharagava RN. Textile wastewater dyes: Toxicity profile and treatment approaches. In: Emerging and eco-friendly approaches for waste management. Springer; 2019. pp.219-244. [CrossRef]
  8. Nilsson R, Nordlinder R, Wass U, Meding B, Belin L. Asthma, rhinitis, and dermatitis in workers exposed to reactive dyes. Br J Ind Med. 1993; 50: 65-70. [CrossRef]
  9. Soni BP, Sherertz EF. Contact dermatitis in the textile industry: A review of 72 patients. Am J Contact Dermatitis. 1996; 7: 226-230. [CrossRef]
  10. Miretzky P, Cirelli AF. Cr (VI) and Cr (III) removal from aqueous solution by raw and modified lignocellulosic materials: A review. J Hazard Mater. 2010; 180: 1-19. [CrossRef]
  11. Mohan D, Pittman Jr CU. Activated carbons and low cost adsorbents for remediation of tri-and hexavalent chromium from water. J Hazard Mater. 2006; 137: 762-811. [CrossRef]
  12. Almroth BC, Cartine J, Jönander C, Karlsson M, Langlois J, Lindström M, et al. Assessing the effects of textile leachates in fish using multiple testing methods: From gene expression to behavior. Ecotox Environ Safe. 2021; 207: 111523. [CrossRef]
  13. Li WY, Chen FF, Wang SL. Binding of reactive brilliant red to human serum albumin: Insights into the molecular toxicity of sulfonic azo dyes. Protein Pept Lett. 2010; 17: 621-629. [CrossRef]
  14. Kusaka Y. [Occupational diseases caused by exposure to sensitizing metals]. Sangyo Igaku. 1993; 35: 75-87. [CrossRef]
  15. Aksu O, Yildirim NC, Yildirim N, Danabas D, Danabas S. Biochemical response of crayfish Astacus leptodactylus exposed to textile wastewater treated by indigenous white rot fungus Coriolus versicolor. Environ Sci Pollut Res. 2015; 22: 2987-2993. [CrossRef]
  16. Mudhoo A, Ramasamy DL, Bhatnagar A, Usman M, Sillanpää M. An analysis of the versatility and effectiveness of composts for sequestering heavy metal ions, dyes and xenobiotics from soils and aqueous milieus. Ecotox Environ Safe. 2020; 197: 110587. [CrossRef]
  17. Ali SS, Elsamahy T, Al-Tohamy R, Zhu D, Mahmoud YAG, Koutra E, et al. Plastic wastes biodegradation: Mechanisms, challenges and future prospects. Sci Total Environ. 2021; 780: 146590. [CrossRef]
  18. Waring DR, Hallas G. The chemistry and application of dyes. Springer Science & Business Media; 2013.
  19. Kishor R, Purchase D, Saratale GD, Saratale RG, Ferreira LFR, Bilal M, et al. Ecotoxicological and health concerns of persistent coloring pollutants of textile industry wastewater and treatment approaches for environmental safety. J Environ Chem Eng. 2021; 9: 105012. [CrossRef]
  20. Ali SS, Sun J, Koutra E, El-Zawawy N, Elsamahy T, El-Shetehy M. Construction of a novel cold-adapted oleaginous yeast consortium valued for textile azo dye wastewater processing and biorefinery. Fuel. 2021; 285: 119050. [CrossRef]
  21. Patil R, Zahid M, Govindwar S, Khandare R, Vyavahare G, Gurav R, et al. Constructed wetland: A promising technology for the treatment of hazardous textile dyes and effluent. In: Development in Wastewater Treatment Research and Processes. Elsevier; 2022. pp. 173-198. [CrossRef]
  22. Pang YL, Abdullah AZ. Current status of textile industry wastewater management and research progress in Malaysia: A review. CLEAN. 2013; 41: 751-764. [CrossRef]
  23. Singha K, Pandit P, Maity S, Sharma SR. Harmful environmental effects for textile chemical dyeing practice. In: Green Chemistry for Sustainable Textiles. Elsevier; 2021. pp. 153-164. [CrossRef]
  24. Akpomie K, Conradie J. Advances in application of cotton-based adsorbents for heavy metals trapping, surface modifications and future perspectives. Ecotox Environ Safe. 2020; 201: 110825. [CrossRef]
  25. Benkhaya B, El Harfi S, El Harfi A. Classifications, properties and applications of textile dyes: A review. Appl J Environ Eng Sci. 2017; 3: 3.
  26. Tang AY, Lo CK, Kan Cw. Textile dyes and human health: A systematic and citation network analysis review. Color Technol. 2018; 134: 245-257. [CrossRef]
  27. Hao OJ, Kim H, Chiang PC. Decolorization of wastewater. Crit Rev Environ Sci Technol. 2000; 30: 449-505. [CrossRef]
  28. Shi Y, Yang Z, Xing L, Zhang X, Li X, Zhang D. Recent advances in the biodegradation of azo dyes. World J Microbiol Biotechnol. 2021; 37: 1-18. [CrossRef]
  29. Mathur N, Bhatnagar P, Bakre P. Assesing mutagenicity of textile dyes from Pali (Rajasthan) using AMES bioassay. J Appl Eco and Environ Res. 2006; 4: 111-118. [CrossRef]
  30. Collivignarelli MC, Abbà A, Miino MC, Damiani S. Treatments for color removal from wastewater: State of the art. J Environ Manage. 2019; 236: 727-745. [CrossRef]
  31. Vandevivere PC, Bianchi R, Verstraete W. Treatment and reuse of wastewater from the textile wet‐processing industry: Review of emerging technologies. J Chem Technol Biotechnol. 1998; 72: 289-302. [CrossRef]
  32. Yagub MT, Sen TK, Afroze S, Ang HM. Dye and its removal from aqueous solution by adsorption: A review. Adv Colloid Interface Sci. 2014; 209: 172-184. [CrossRef]
  33. Al-Tohamy R, Ali SS, Li F, Okasha KM, Mahmoud YAG, Elsamahy T, et al. A critical review on the treatment of dye-containing wastewater: Ecotoxicological and health concerns of textile dyes and possible remediation approaches for environmental safety. Ecotox Environ Safe. 2022; 231: 113160. [CrossRef]
  34. Üstün GE, Solmaz SKA, Birgül A. Regeneration of industrial district wastewater using a combination of Fenton process and ion exchange—A case study. Resour Conserv Recycl. 2007; 52: 425-440. [CrossRef]
  35. Liu CH, Wu JS, Chiu HC, Suen SY, Chu KH. Removal of anionic reactive dyes from water using anion exchange membranes as adsorbers. Water Res. 2007; 41: 1491-1500. [CrossRef]
  36. Arefi-Oskoui S, Khataee A, Jabbarvand Behrouz S, Vatanpour V, Haddadi Gharamaleki S, Orooji Y, et al. Development of MoS2/O-MWCNTs/PES blended membrane for efficient removal of dyes, antibiotic, and protein. Sep Purif Technol. 2022; 280: 119822. [CrossRef]
  37. Meertens W. Wastewater treatment using a novel combined electro-oxidation, electro-coagulation, and electro-filtration process. Montreal: Concordia University; 2020.
  38. Joseph J, Radhakrishnan RC, Johnson JK, Joy SP, Thomas J. Ion-exchange mediated removal of cationic dye-stuffs from water using ammonium phosphomolybdate. Mater Chem Phys. 2020; 242: 122488. [CrossRef]
  39. Nippatla N, Philip L. Electrocoagulation-floatation assisted pulsed power plasma technology for the complete mineralization of potentially toxic dyes and real textile wastewater. Process Saf Environ Protect. 2019; 125: 143-156. [CrossRef]
  40. Abid MF, Zablouk MA, Abid-Alameer AM. Experimental study of dye removal from industrial wastewater by membrane technologies of reverse osmosis and nanofiltration. Iran J Environ Health Sci Eng. 2012; 9: 1-9. [CrossRef]
  41. Liang CZ, Sun SP, Li FY, Ong YK, Chung TS. Treatment of highly concentrated wastewater containing multiple synthetic dyes by a combined process of coagulation/flocculation and nanofiltration. J Membr Sci. 2014; 469: 306-315. [CrossRef]
  42. Moradi G, Zinadini S, Rajabi L. Development of high flux nanofiltration membrane using para-amino benzoate ferroxane nanoparticle for enhanced antifouling behavior and dye removal. Process Saf Environ Protect. 2020; 144: 65-78. [CrossRef]
  43. Nataraj S, Hosamani K, Aminabhavi T. Nanofiltration and reverse osmosis thin film composite membrane module for the removal of dye and salts from the simulated mixtures. Desalination. 2009; 249: 12-17. [CrossRef]
  44. Yadav A, Labhasetwar PK, Shahi VK. Membrane distillation crystallization technology for zero liquid discharge and resource recovery: Opportunities, challenges and futuristic perspectives. Sci Total Environ. 2022; 806: 150692. [CrossRef]
  45. Horseman T, Yin Y, Christie KSS, Wang Z, Tong T, Lin S. Wetting, scaling, and fouling in membrane distillation: State-of-the-art insights on fundamental mechanisms and mitigation strategies. ACS EST Eng. 2021; 1: 117-140. [CrossRef]
  46. Yadav A, Patel RV, Labhasetwar PK, Shahi VK. Novel MIL101(Fe) impregnated poly(vinylidene fluoride-co-hexafluoropropylene) mixed matrix membranes for dye removal from textile industry wastewater. J Water Process Eng. 2021; 43: 102317. [CrossRef]
  47. Yadav A, Sharma P, Panda AB, Shahi VK. Photocatalytic TiO2 incorporated PVDF-co-HFP UV-cleaning mixed matrix membranes for effective removal of dyes from synthetic wastewater system via membrane distillation. J Environ Chem Eng. 2021; 9: 105904. [CrossRef]
  48. Parani S, Oluwafemi OS. Membrane distillation: Recent configurations, membrane surface engineering, and applications. Membranes. 2021; 11: 934. [CrossRef]
  49. Eykens L, Reyns T, De Sitter K, Dotremont C, Pinoy L, Van der Bruggen B. How to select a membrane distillation configuration? Process conditions and membrane influence unraveled. Desalination. 2016; 399: 105-115. [CrossRef]
  50. Yadav A, Patel RV, Awasthi P, Sinha N, Labhasetwar PK. Hexagonal boron nitride nanosheets incorporated photocatalytic polyvinylidene fluoride mixed matrix membranes for textile wastewater treatment via vacuum-assisted distillation. Colloid Surf A Physicochem Eng Asp. 2022; 653: 129955. [CrossRef]
  51. Yadav A, Patel RV, Singh CP, Labhasetwar PK, Shahi VK. Experimental study and numerical optimization for removal of methyl orange using polytetrafluoroethylene membranes in vacuum membrane distillation process. Colloid Surf A Physicochem Eng Asp. 2022; 635: 128070. [CrossRef]
  52. Hayer H, Bakhtiari O, Mohammadi T. Analysis of heat and mass transfer in vacuum membrane distillation for water desalination using computational fluid dynamics (CFD). Desalin Water Treat. 2015; 55: 39-52. [CrossRef]
  53. Prousek J. Advanced oxidation processes for water treatment. Chem Process Chem Listy. 1996; 90: 229-237.
  54. Saharan VK, Pinjari DV, Gogate PR, Pandit AB. Advanced oxidation technologies for wastewater treatment: An overview. In: Industrial Wastewater Treatment, Recycling and Reuse. Elsevier; 2014. pp. 141-191. [CrossRef]
  55. Kasiri MB, Modirshahla N, Mansouri H. Decolorization of organic dye solution by ozonation; Optimization with response surface methodology. Int J Ind Chem. 2013; 4: 3. [CrossRef]
  56. Georgiou D, Melidis P, Aivasidis A, Gimouhopoulos K. Degradation of azo-reactive dyes by ultraviolet radiation in the presence of hydrogen peroxide. Dyes Pigm. 2002; 52: 69-78. [CrossRef]
  57. Zuorro A, Lavecchia R. Evaluation of UV/H2O2 advanced oxidation process (AOP) for the degradation of diazo dye Reactive Green 19 in aqueous solution. Desalin Water Treat. 2014; 52: 1571-1577. [CrossRef]
  58. Bokare AD, Choi W. Review of iron-free Fenton-like systems for activating H2O2 in advanced oxidation processes. J Hazard Mater. 2014; 275: 121-135. [CrossRef]
  59. Chen Y, Cheng Y, Guan X, Liu Y, Nie J, Li C. A Rapid Fenton treatment of bio-treated dyeing and finishing wastewater at second-scale intervals: Kinetics by stopped-flow technique and application in a full-scale plant. Sci Rep. 2019; 9: 9689. [CrossRef]
  60. Low SK, Tan MC, Chin NL. Effect of ultrasound pre-treatment on adsorbent in dye adsorption compared with ultrasound simultaneous adsorption. Ultrason Sonochem. 2018; 48: 64-70. [CrossRef]
  61. Jiang Y, Zhao H, Liang J, Yue L, Li T, Luo Y, et al. Anodic oxidation for the degradation of organic pollutants: Anode materials, operating conditions and mechanisms. A mini review. Electrochem Commun. 2021; 123: 106912. [CrossRef]
  62. Al-Mamun M, Kader S, Islam M, Khan M. Photocatalytic activity improvement and application of UV-TiO2 photocatalysis in textile wastewater treatment: A review. J Environ Chem Eng. 2019; 7: 103248. [CrossRef]
  63. Golob V, Vinder A, Simonič M. Efficiency of the coagulation/flocculation method for the treatment of dyebath effluents. Dyes Pigm. 2005; 67: 93-97. [CrossRef]
  64. Riera-Torres M, Gutiérrez-Bouzán C, Crespi M. Combination of coagulation–flocculation and nanofiltration techniques for dye removal and water reuse in textile effluents. Desalination. 2010; 252: 53-59. [CrossRef]
  65. Torres E, Bustos-Jaimes I, Le Borgne S. Potential use of oxidative enzymes for the detoxification of organic pollutants. Appl Catal B. 2003; 46: 1-15. [CrossRef]
  66. Rekhate C, Shrivastava JK. Decolorization of azo dye solution by ozone based advanced oxidation processes: Optimization using response surface methodology and neural network. Ozone Sci Eng. 2020; 42: 1-15. [CrossRef]
  67. Sun K, Yuan D, Liu Y, Song Y, Sun Z, Liu R. Study on the efficiency and mechanism of Direct Red 80 dye by conventional ozonation and peroxone (O3/H2O2) treatment. Sep Sci Technol. 2019; 55: 1-9. [CrossRef]
  68. Venkatesh S, Venkatesh K. Ozonation for degradation of acid red 14: Effect of buffer solution. Proc Natl Acad Sci India A. 2020; 90: 209-212. [CrossRef]
  69. El Hassani K, Kalnina D, Turks M, Beakou BH, Anouar A. Enhanced degradation of an azo dye by catalytic ozonation over Ni-containing layered double hydroxide nanocatalyst. Sep Purif Technol. 2019; 210: 764-774. [CrossRef]
  70. Kamarehie B, Jafari A, Ghaderpoori M, Karami ma, Mousavi K, Ghaderpoury A. Catalytic ozonation process using PAC/γ-Fe2O3 to Alizarin Red S degradation from aqueous solutions: A batch study. Chem Eng Commun. 2018; 206: 1-11. [CrossRef]
  71. Abdi M, Balagabri M, Karimi H, Hossini H, Rastegar SO. Degradation of crystal violet (CV) from aqueous solutions using ozone, peroxone, electroperoxone, and electrolysis processes: A comparison study. Appl Water Sci. 2020; 10: 1-10. [CrossRef]
  72. Subramaniam M, R S, Mohammed A, Ansari M. Effect of pH and electrolysis time on removal of reactive black b dye by electrochemical treatment. Asian J Eng Appl Technol. 2018; 7: 45-47. [CrossRef]
  73. Beddai AA, Badday BA, Al-Yaqoobi AM, Mejbel MK, Al Hachim ZS, Mohammed MKA. Color removal of textile wastewater using electrochemical batch recirculation tubular upflow cell. Int J Chem Eng. 2022; 2022: 4713399. [CrossRef]
  74. Palanisamy S, Nachimuthu P, Awasthi MK, Ravindran B, Chang SW, Palanichamy M, et al. Application of electrochemical treatment for the removal of triazine dye using aluminium electrodes. J Water Supply Res Technol Aqua. 2020; 69: 345-354. [CrossRef]
  75. Sun Y, Wang G, Dong Q, Qian B, Meng Y, Qiu J. Electrolysis removal of methyl orange dye from water by electrospun activated carbon fibers modified with carbon nanotubes. Chem Eng J. 2014; 253: 73-77. [CrossRef]
  76. Zhao HZ, Sun Y, Xu LN, Ni JR. Removal of Acid Orange 7 in simulated wastewater using a three-dimensional electrode reactor: Removal mechanisms and dye degradation pathway. Chemosphere. 2010; 78: 46-51. [CrossRef]
  77. Cestarolli DT, das Graças de Oliveira A, Guerra EM. Removal of Eriochrome Black textile dye from aqueous solution by combined electrocoagulation–electroflotation methodology. Appl Water Sci. 2019; 9: 101. [CrossRef]
  78. Sadri Moghaddam S, Alavi Moghaddam MR, Arami M. Coagulation/flocculation process for dye removal using sludge from water treatment plant: Optimization through response surface methodology. J Hazard Mater. 2010; 175: 651-657. [CrossRef]
  79. Shi B, Li G, Wang D, Feng C, Tang H. Removal of direct dyes by coagulation: The performance of preformed polymeric aluminum species. J Hazard Mater. 2007; 143: 567-574. [CrossRef]
  80. Kristianto H, Tanuarto M, Prasetyo S, Sugih A. Magnetically assisted coagulation using iron oxide nanoparticles-Leucaena leucocephala seeds’ extract to treat synthetic Congo red wastewater. Int J Environ Sci Technol. 2020; 17. [CrossRef]
  81. Amin NK. Removal of reactive dye from aqueous solutions by adsorption onto activated carbons prepared from sugarcane bagasse pith. Desalination. 2008; 223: 152-161. [CrossRef]
  82. Phugare SS, Kalyani DC, Patil AV, Jadhav JP. Textile dye degradation by bacterial consortium and subsequent toxicological analysis of dye and dye metabolites using cytotoxicity, genotoxicity and oxidative stress studies. J Hazard Mater. 2011; 186: 713-723. [CrossRef]
  83. Tilli S, Ciullini I, Scozzafava A, Briganti F. Differential decolorization of textile dyes in mixtures and the joint effect of laccase and cellobiose dehydrogenase activities present in extracellular extracts from Funalia trogii. Enzyme Microb Technol. 2011; 49: 465-471. [CrossRef]
  84. Liers C, Bobeth C, Pecyna M, Ullrich R, Hofrichter M. DyP-like peroxidases of the jelly fungus Auricularia auricula-judae oxidize nonphenolic lignin model compounds and high-redox potential dyes. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 2010; 85: 1869-1879. [CrossRef]
  85. Kanagaraj J, Senthilvelan T, Panda RC. Degradation of azo dyes by laccase: Biological method to reduce pollution load in dye wastewater. Clean Technol Environ Policy. 2015; 17: 1443-1456. [CrossRef]
  86. Dhir B. Degradation of dyes using filamentous fungi. In: Dye Biodegradation, Mechanisms and Techniques. Springer; 2022. pp. 51-66. [CrossRef]
  87. Bürger S, Stolz A. Characterisation of the flavin-free oxygen-tolerant azoreductase from Xenophilus azovorans KF46F in comparison to flavin-containing azoreductases. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 2010; 87: 2067-2076. [CrossRef]
  88. Mendes S, Pereira L, Batista C, Martins LO. Molecular determinants of azo reduction activity in the strain Pseudomonas putida MET94. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 2011; 92: 393-405. [CrossRef]
  89. Sarkar S, Banerjee A, Halder U, Biswas R, Bandopadhyay R. Degradation of synthetic azo dyes of textile industry: A sustainable approach using microbial enzymes. Water Conserv Sci Eng. 2017; 2: 121-131. [CrossRef]
  90. Singh RL, Singh PK, Singh RP. Enzymatic decolorization and degradation of azo dyes – A review. Int Biodeterior Biodegradation. 2015; 104: 21-31. [CrossRef]
  91. Pandey A, Singh P, Iyengar L. Bacterial decolorization and degradation of azo dyes. Int Biodeterior Biodegradation. 2007; 59: 73-84. [CrossRef]
  92. Dutta S, Bhattacharjee J. A comparative study between physicochemical and biological methods for effective removal of textile dye from wastewater. In: Development in Wastewater Treatment Research and Processes. Elsevier; 2022. pp. 1-21. [CrossRef]
  93. Aksu Z, Dönmez G. A comparative study on the biosorption characteristics of some yeasts for Remazol Blue reactive dye. Chemosphere. 2003; 50: 1075-1083. [CrossRef]
  94. Abd Ellatif S, El-Sheekh MM, Senousy HH. Role of microalgal ligninolytic enzymes in industrial dye decolorization. Int J Phytoremediation. 2021; 23: 41-52. [CrossRef]
  95. Yesilada O, Birhanli E, Geckil H. Bioremediation and decolorization of textile dyes by white rot fungi and laccase enzymes. In: Mycoremediation and environmental sustainability. Springer; 2018. pp. 121-153. [CrossRef]
  96. Khan R, Bhawana P, Fulekar M. Microbial decolorization and degradation of synthetic dyes: A review. Rev Environ Sci Biotechnol. 2013; 12: 75-97. [CrossRef]
  97. Yu Z, Wen X. Screening and identification of yeasts for decolorizing synthetic dyes in industrial wastewater. Int Biodeterior Biodegradation. 2005; 56: 109-114. [CrossRef]
  98. Martorell MM, Pajot HF, de Figueroa LI. Dye-decolourizing yeasts isolated from Las Yungas rainforest. Dye assimilation and removal used as selection criteria. Int Biodeterior Biodegradation. 2012; 66: 25-32. [CrossRef]
  99. Zhang XB, Dong WY, Sun FY, Yang W, Dong J. Degradation efficiency and mechanism of azo dye RR2 by a novel ozone aerated internal micro-electrolysis filter. J Hazard Mater. 2014; 276: 77-87. [CrossRef]
  100. Ambrósio ST, Vilar Júnior JC, Da Silva CAA, Okada K, Nascimento AE, Longo RL, et al. A biosorption isotherm model for the removal of reactive azo dyes by inactivated mycelia of Cunninghamella elegans UCP542. Molecules. 2012; 17: 452-462. [CrossRef]
  101. Saratale RG, Saratale GD, Chang JS, Govindwar SP. Bacterial decolorization and degradation of azo dyes: A review. J Taiwan Inst Chem Eng. 2011; 42: 138-157. [CrossRef]
  102. Won SW, Yun YS. Biosorptive removal of Reactive Yellow 2 using waste biomass from lysine fermentation process. Dyes Pigm. 2008; 76: 502-507. [CrossRef]
  103. Vijayaraghavan K, Mao J, Yun YS. Biosorption of methylene blue from aqueous solution using free and polysulfone-immobilized Corynebacterium glutamicum: Batch and column studies. Bioresour Technol. 2008; 99: 2864-2871. [CrossRef]
  104. Won SW, Choi SB, Yun YS. Interaction between protonated waste biomass of Corynebacterium glutamicum and anionic dye Reactive Red 4. Colloid Surf A Physicochem Eng Asp. 2005; 262: 175-180. [CrossRef]
  105. Mnif I, Fendri R, Ghribi D. Biosorption of Congo Red from aqueous solution by Bacillus weihenstephanensis RI12; effect of SPB1 biosurfactant addition on biodecolorization potency. Water Sci Technol. 2015; 72: 865-874. [CrossRef]
  106. Wang H, Su JQ, Zheng XW, Tian Y, Xiong XJ, Zheng TL. Bacterial decolorization and degradation of the reactive dye Reactive Red 180 by Citrobacter sp. CK3. Int Biodeterior Biodegradation. 2009; 63: 395-399. [CrossRef]
  107. Telke A, Kalyani D, Jadhav J, Govindwar S. Kinetics and mechanism of reactive red 141 degradation by a bacterial isolate Rhizobium radiobacter MTCC 8161. Acta Chim Slov. 2008; 55.
  108. Kalyani D, Telke A, Dhanve R, Jadhav J. Ecofriendly biodegradation and detoxification of Reactive Red 2 textile dye by newly isolated Pseudomonas sp. SUK1. J Hazard Mater. 2009; 163: 735-742. [CrossRef]
  109. Sahasrabudhe M, Pathade G. Decolourization of CI reactive yellow 145 by Enterococcus faecalis strain YZ66. Arch Appl Sci Res. 2011; 3: 403-414.
  110. Oturkar CC, Nemade HN, Mulik PM, Patole MS, Hawaldar RR, Gawai KR. Mechanistic investigation of decolorization and degradation of Reactive Red 120 by Bacillus lentus BI377. Bioresour Technol. 2011; 102: 758-764. [CrossRef]
  111. Kolekar YM, Pawar SP, Gawai KR, Lokhande PD, Shouche YS, Kodam KM. Decolorization and degradation of Disperse Blue 79 and Acid Orange 10, by Bacillus fusiformis KMK5 isolated from the textile dye contaminated soil. Bioresour Technol. 2008; 99: 8999-9003. [CrossRef]
  112. Sani RK, Banerjee UC. Decolorization of triphenylmethane dyes and textile and dye-stuff effluent by Kurthia sp. Enzyme Microb Technol. 1999; 24: 433-437. [CrossRef]
  113. Chen CC, Liao HJ, Cheng CY, Yen CY, Chung YC. Biodegradation of crystal violet by Pseudomonas putida. Biotechnol Lett. 2007; 29: 391-396. [CrossRef]
  114. Cheriaa J, Khaireddine M, Rouabhia M, Bakhrouf A. Removal of triphenylmethane dyes by bacterial consortium. Sci World J. 2012; 2012. [CrossRef]
  115. Selim KA, Abdel-Khalek NA, El-Sayed SM, Abdallah SS. Bioremoval of crystal violet dye from egyption textile effluent. IRJET. 2015; 2: 1038-1043.
  116. Ali SAM, Akthar N. A study on bacterial decolorization of crystal violet dye by Clostridium perfringens, Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Proteus vulgaris. Res Article Biol Sci. 2014; 4: 89-96.
  117. Sharma P, Singh L, Dilbaghi N. Biodegradation of Orange II dye by Phanerochaete chrysosporium in simulated wastewater. CSIR; 2009.
  118. Abdallah R, Taha S. Biosorption of methylene blue from aqueous solution by nonviable Aspergillus fumigatus. Chem Eng J. 2012; 195: 69-76. [CrossRef]
  119. Eichlerova I, Homolka L, Nerud F. Evaluation of synthetic dye decolorization capacity in Ischnoderma resinosum. J Ind Microbiol Biotechnol. 2006; 33: 759-766. [CrossRef]
  120. Ali H, Ahmad W, Haq T. Decolorization and degradation of malachite green by Aspergillus flavus and Alternaria solani. Afr J Biotechnol. 2009; 8.
  121. Wang MX, Zhang QL, Yao SJ. A novel biosorbent formed of marine-derived Penicillium janthinellum mycelial pellets for removing dyes from dye-containing wastewater. Chem Eng J. 2015; 259: 837-844. [CrossRef]
  122. Fu Y, Viraraghavan T. Removal of Congo Red from an aqueous solution by fungus Aspergillus niger. Adv Environ Res. 2002; 7: 239-247. [CrossRef]
  123. Mohammed HA. Bio declorization of some industerial dyes by use Pencillium expansum and Aspergillus niger. Mesop Environ J. 2016; 3: 37-44.
  124. Karacakaya P, Kılıç NK, Duygu E, Dönmez G. Stimulation of reactive dye removal by cyanobacteria in media containing triacontanol hormone. J Hazard Mater. 2009; 172: 1635-1639. [CrossRef]
  125. Jadhav J, Parshetti G, Kalme S, Govindwar S. Decolourization of azo dye methyl red by Saccharomyces cerevisiae MTCC 463. Chemosphere. 2007; 68: 394-400. [CrossRef]
  126. Meehan C, Banat IM, McMullan G, Nigam P, Smyth F, Marchant R. Decolorization of Remazol Black-B using a thermotolerant yeast, Kluyveromyces marxianus IMB3. Environ Int. 2000; 26: 75-79. [CrossRef]
  127. Saini G, Kalra S, Kaur U. The purification of wastewater on a small scale by using plants and sand filter. Appl Water Sci. 2021; 11: 68. [CrossRef]
  128. Ghodake GS, Talke AA, Jadhav JP, Govindwar SP. Potential of Brassica juncea in order to treat textile—effluent—contaminated sites. Int J Phytoremediation. 2009; 11: 297-312. [CrossRef]
  129. Kagalkar AN, Jagtap UB, Jadhav JP, Bapat VA, Govindwar SP. Biotechnological strategies for phytoremediation of the sulfonated azo dye Direct Red 5B using Blumea malcolmii Hook. Bioresour Technol. 2009; 100: 4104-4110. [CrossRef]
  130. Williams JB. Phytoremediation in wetland ecosystems: Progress, problems, and potential. Crit Rev Plant Sci. 2002; 21: 607-635. [CrossRef]
  131. Dąbrowski A. Adsorption—from theory to practice. Adv Colloid Interface Sci. 2001; 93: 135-224. [CrossRef]
  132. Khan A, Rehman R, Rashid H, Nasir A. Exploration of environmental friendly adsorbents for treatment of azo dyes from textile wastewater and its dosage optimization. Earth Sci Pakistan. 2017; 1: 05-07. [CrossRef]
  133. Wu Y, Li T, Yang L. Mechanisms of removing pollutants from aqueous solutions by microorganisms and their aggregates: A review. Bioresour Technol. 2012; 107: 10-18. [CrossRef]
  134. Samokhvalov A. Aluminum metal–organic frameworks for sorption in solution: A review. Coord Chem Rev. 2018; 374: 236-253. [CrossRef]
  135. Wang C, Feng C, Gao Y, Ma X, Wu Q, Wang Z. Preparation of a graphene-based magnetic nanocomposite for the removal of an organic dye from aqueous solution. Chem Eng J. 2011; 173: 92-97. [CrossRef]
  136. Karthikeyan P, Elanchezhiyan SS, Preethi J, Meenakshi S, Park CM. Mechanistic performance of polyaniline-substituted hexagonal boron nitride composite as a highly efficient adsorbent for the removal of phosphate, nitrate, and hexavalent chromium ions from an aqueous environment. Appl Surf Sci. 2020; 511: 145543. [CrossRef]
  137. Faki A, Turan M, Ozdemir O, Turan AZ. Analysis of fixed-bed column adsorption of reactive yellow 176 onto surfactant-modified zeolite. Ind Eng Chem Res. 2008; 47: 6999-7004. [CrossRef]
  138. Ai L, Zhou Y, Jiang J. Removal of methylene blue from aqueous solution by montmorillonite/CoFe2O4 composite with magnetic separation performance. Desalination. 2011; 266: 72-77. [CrossRef]
  139. Shan RR, Yan LG, Yang YM, Yang K, Yu SJ, Yu HQ, et al. Highly efficient removal of three red dyes by adsorption onto Mg–Al-layered double hydroxide. J Ind Eng Chem. 2015; 21: 561-568. [CrossRef]
  140. Bharathi K, Ramesh S. Removal of dyes using agricultural waste as low-cost adsorbents: A review. Appl Water Sci. 2013; 3: 773-790. [CrossRef]
  141. Faria P, Órfão J, Figueiredo J, Pereira M. Adsorption of aromatic compounds from the biodegradation of azo dyes on activated carbon. Appl Surf Sci. 2008; 254: 3497-3503. [CrossRef]
  142. Vigo TL. Textile processing and properties: Preparation, dyeing, finishing and performance. Elsevier; 2013.
  143. Hossain MI, Soliman MM, El-Naggar ME, Sultan MZ, Kechi A, Abdelsalam NR, et al. Synthesis and characterization of graphene oxide-ammonium ferric sulfate composite for the removal of dyes from tannery wastewater. J Mater Res Technol. 2021; 12: 1715-1727. [CrossRef]
  144. Sarayu K, Sandhya S. Current technologies for biological treatment of textile wastewater–A review. Appl Biochem Biotechnol. 2012; 167: 645-661. [CrossRef]
  145. Woolard C, Strong J, Erasmus C. Evaluation of the use of modified coal ash as a potential sorbent for organic waste streams. Appl Geochem. 2002; 17: 1159-1164. [CrossRef]
  146. Biswal HJ, Yadav A, Vundavilli PR, Gupta A. High aspect ZnO nanorod growth over electrodeposited tubes for photocatalytic degradation of EtBr dye. RSC Adv. 2021; 11: 1623-1634. [CrossRef]
  147. Bangari RS, Yadav A, Awasthi P, Sinha N. Experimental and theoretical analysis of simultaneous removal of methylene blue and tetracycline using boron nitride nanosheets as adsorbent. Colloid Surf A Physicochem Eng Asp. 2022; 634: 127943. [CrossRef]
  148. Gajera R, Patel RV, Yadav A, Labhasetwar PK. Adsorption of cationic and anionic dyes on photocatalytic flyash/TiO2 modified chitosan biopolymer composite. J Water Process Eng. 2022; 49: 102993. [CrossRef]
  149. Yadav A, Dindorkar SS. Adsorption behaviour of hexagonal boron nitride nanosheets towards cationic, anionic and neutral dyes: Insights from first principle studies. Colloid Surf A Physicochem Eng Asp. 2022; 640: 128509. [CrossRef]
  150. Yadav A, Dindorkar SS, Ramisetti SB, Sinha N. Simultaneous adsorption of methylene blue and arsenic on graphene, boron nitride and boron carbon nitride nanosheets: Insights from molecular simulations. J Water Process Eng. 2022; 46: 102653. [CrossRef]
  151. Velusamy S, Roy A, Sundaram S, Kumar Mallick T. A review on heavy metal ions and containing dyes removal through graphene oxide-based adsorption strategies for textile wastewater treatment. Chem Rec. 2021; 21: 1570-1610. [CrossRef]
  152. Al-Saydeh SA, El-Naas MH, Zaidi SJ. Copper removal from industrial wastewater: A comprehensive review. J Ind Eng Chem. 2017; 56: 35-44. [CrossRef]
  153. Zou G, Guo J, Peng Q, Zhou A, Zhang Q, Liu B. Synthesis of urchin-like rutile titania carbon nanocomposites by iron-facilitated phase transformation of MXene for environmental remediation. J Mater Chem A. 2016; 4: 489-499. [CrossRef]
  154. El Samrani A, Lartiges B, Villiéras F. Chemical coagulation of combined sewer overflow: Heavy metal removal and treatment optimization. Water Res. 2008; 42: 951-960. [CrossRef]
  155. Du X, Hao X, Wang Z, Guan G. Electroactive ion exchange materials: Current status in synthesis, applications and future prospects. J Mater Chem A. 2016; 4: 6236-6258. [CrossRef]
  156. Du X, Zhang Q, Qiao W, Sun X, Ma X, Hao X, et al. Controlled self-assembly of oligomers-grafted fibrous polyaniline/single zirconium phosphate nanosheet hybrids with potential-responsive ion exchange properties. Chem Eng J. 2016; 302: 516-525. [CrossRef]
  157. Getachew BA, Kim SR, Kim JH. Self-healing hydrogel pore-filled water filtration membranes. Environ Sci Technol. 2017; 51: 905-913. [CrossRef]
  158. Catanzaro I, Avellone G, Marcì G, Saverini M, Scalici L, Sciandrello G, et al. Biological effects and photodegradation by TiO2 of terpenes present in industrial wastewater. J Hazard Mater. 2011; 185: 591-597. [CrossRef]
Announcement
Newsletter
Download PDF Download Citation
0 0

TOP