OBM Neurobiology is an international peer-reviewed Open Access journal published quarterly online by LIDSEN Publishing Inc. By design, the scope of OBM Neurobiology is broad, so as to reflect the multidisciplinary nature of the field of Neurobiology that interfaces biology with the fundamental and clinical neurosciences. As such, OBM Neurobiology embraces rigorous multidisciplinary investigations into the form and function of neurons and glia that make up the nervous system, either individually or in ensemble, in health or disease. OBM Neurobiology welcomes original contributions that employ a combination of molecular, cellular, systems and behavioral approaches to report novel neuroanatomical, neuropharmacological, neurophysiological and neurobehavioral findings related to the following aspects of the nervous system: Signal Transduction and Neurotransmission; Neural Circuits and Systems Neurobiology; Nervous System Development and Aging; Neurobiology of Nervous System Diseases (e.g., Developmental Brain Disorders; Neurodegenerative Disorders).

OBM Neurobiology  publishes a variety of article types (Original Research, Review, Communication, Opinion, Comment, Conference Report, Technical Note, Book Review, etc.). Although the OBM Neurobiology Editorial Board encourages authors to be succinct, there is no restriction on the length of the papers. Authors should present their results in as much detail as possible, as reviewers are encouraged to emphasize scientific rigor and reproducibility.

Publication Speed (median values for papers published in 2023): Submission to First Decision: 7.5 weeks; Submission to Acceptance: 15.9 weeks; Acceptance to Publication: 7 days (1-2 days of FREE language polishing included)

Current Issue: 2024  Archive: 2023 2022 2021 2020 2019 2018 2017
Open Access Review

Trauma-Focused Cognitive Behavioral Therapy (TF-CBT), Cognitive Behavioral Intervention on Trauma in Schools (CBITS), and Other Promising Practices in the Treatment of Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder in Children and Adolescents: Evidence Evaluation

Ioannis Syros 1,2,*, Aggeliki Karantzali 3, Xenia Anastassiou-Hadjicharalambous 4

  1. Department of Child Psychiatry, School of Medicine, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, “Aghia Sophia” Children's Hospital, Athens, Greece

  2. Child and Adolescent Psychiatry Unit, “Sotiria” General Hospital, Athens, Greece

  3. Society of Social Psychiatry, P.Sakellaropoulos, Athens, Greece

  4. Psychology Program, University of Nicosia, 46 Makedonitissas Avenue, P.O.Box 24005, 1700 Nicosia, Cyprus

Correspondence: Ioannis Syros

Academic Editor: Jeffrey Kibler

Received: April 11, 2022 | Accepted: October 11, 2022 | Published: November 15, 2022

OBM Neurobiology 2022, Volume 6, Issue 4, doi:10.21926/obm.neurobiol.2204146

Recommended citation: Syros I, Karantzali A, Anastassiou-Hadjicharalambous X. Trauma-Focused Cognitive Behavioral Therapy (TF-CBT), Cognitive Behavioral Intervention on Trauma in Schools (CBITS), and Other Promising Practices in the Treatment of Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder in Children and Adolescents: Evidence Evaluation. OBM Neurobiology 2022;6(4):43; doi:10.21926/obm.neurobiol.2204146.

© 2022 by the authors. This is an open access article distributed under the conditions of the Creative Commons by Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is correctly cited.


PTSD is a serious mental health condition with a lifetime prevalence of 1% to 14% in the general population. Several studies have evaluated evidence-based treatment approaches for children and adolescents. Interventions focusing on trauma are considered first-line treatments. Trauma-Focused Cognitive Behavioral Therapy (TF-CBT) and a similar type of group intervention, the Cognitive Behavioral Intervention on Trauma in Schools (CBITS), have received the most empirical support from randomized controlled trials. Moreover, several other promising therapeutic CBT protocols are in the process of being applied and evaluated. This literature review highlights the common elements of CBT approaches for treating PTSD in children and adolescents, provides a detailed review of the therapeutic ingredients of TF-CBT and CBITS, and presents various other promising CBT protocols that are currently being used or evaluated. Future directions for the field are also discussed.

Graphical abstract

Click to view original image


Post-traumatic stress disorder; cognitive behavioral therapy; children; adolescents; trauma; evidence-based interventions

1. Introduction

Psychological trauma is a debilitating mental health condition resulting from traumatic experiences. It causes overwhelming or underwhelming distress (in cases of neglect) that exceeds the person's coping ability, leading to serious long-term negative consequences [1].

Because experiences vary among individuals, people respond differently to a similar traumatic event. Therefore, not all individuals who experience a traumatic event become psychologically traumatized. Often traumatic events precede the current incident, making some people more vulnerable to having a later traumatic reaction [2].

In recent violent incidents at schools, universities, and other parts of the community, mental health professionals have focused on the symptoms and consequences of maladaptive traumatic stress and post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) in children and adolescents. Apart from single-event traumas, both childhood abuse and neglect are common in the United States [3] and worldwide; childhood abuse and neglect result in complex PTSD, which is further aggravated by relational trauma between caregiver and child [4].

A variety of psychological treatments are effective in treating post-traumatic stress symptoms and concomitant difficulties in children. These interventions are considered first-line treatment for children and adolescents. Treatments that specifically focus on the child’s traumatic experiences are superior to nonspecific or nondirective therapies in healing post-traumatic symptomatology. This is valid for children of all ages with PTSD and for therapies derived from various theoretical backgrounds, such as psychoanalytic, attachment, and cognitive-behavioral treatment models [5,6,7].

Trauma-focused-cognitive behavioral therapy (TF-CBT) is the most widely used and best-researched manual-based CBT protocol for PTSD [8,9,10], whereas Cognitive Behavioral Intervention for Trauma in Schools (CBIΤS) is the most-researched CBT protocol implemented in groups. Follow-up studies have demonstrated the sustainability of profits for 6 months, 1 year, and 2 years post-treatment [11,12]. Several other therapeutic CBT protocols are being applied and evaluated, leading to promising results in special populations of different origins and specificities in symptomatology.

Till now, the extensive analysis of both well-established and innovative interventions for PTSD remains limited, and the results of related studies are inconsistent. In addition, the factors affecting the outcomes of these programs require further evaluation [13,14].

This study is a systematic descriptive review with the following specific goals:

  1. To highlight the common elements of CBT approaches in treating children and adolescents with PTSD.

  2. To provide a detailed review of the therapeutic ingredients of TF-CBT and CBITS with substantial evidence of effectiveness. Previous studies on and the treatment process of these two approaches are described. Furthermore, the achievement of results and accessibility to different target populations are discussed. The review also presents several other promising CBT protocols that are currently being used and/or evaluated and have accumulated less evidence of effectiveness to date. Moreover, future directions of the field are discussed.

2. Conceptual Definition of Trauma, PTSD, and Acute Stress Disorder (ASD)

The definition of trauma varies depending on the context; however, in a broader sense, it includes both physical and psychological harm and injury [15]. According to a study, more than one out of four children experience a major traumatic event before reaching adulthood [16]. These traumas may include events that may occur over some time or at a point in time. Examples are child abuse; domestic, community, or school violence; disasters; vehicular or other accidents; medical traumas; war; terrorism; refugee trauma; the traumatic death of significant others; and other shocking, unexpected, or terrifying experiences. Although most children are resilient to trauma exposure, some of them develop substantial and potentially long-lasting mental health problems. Therefore, PTSD and ASD are diagnoses that refer to a set of psychological and physical symptoms following exposure to such a stressful traumatic event [17]. According to the International Classification of Diseases 11th Revision (ICD-11) diagnostic descriptions, in contrast to a single trauma event, prolonged or repeated trauma causes complex PTSD (C-PTSD), which has been diagnosed in many children participating in the treatment approaches. The type of trauma (relational trauma, single trauma, trauma caused by a man-made factor, or a natural disaster) affects the natural course of symptoms and the design of interventions, as well as their outcome [18].

3. Criteria for PTSD and ASD Diagnosis

In the new edition of the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM-5), PTSD is not categorized under “anxiety disorders,” but is included in a new section that groups the disorders related to trauma and stress (i.e., trauma-related and stressor-related disorders). PTSD is a mental disorder, with exposure to at least one or more traumatic events considered an essential diagnostic criterion. Diagnostic criteria in children aged 7 years and older comprise four clusters of symptoms that appear or worsen after exposure to actual or threatened death, severe injury, or sexual maltreatment by direct experience, direct observation, hearing of a traumatic experience that happened to a close friend or relative, or exposure to stressful reminders of the trauma.

These clinical features are required to occur for more than 1 month and be associated with distress and functional impairment. In children aged 7 years and younger, distinct PTSD criteria currently apply, which include developmentally specific phenomenology. ASD is a distinct psychiatric disorder that is diagnosed when traumatic stress or dissociative features occur within 3 days to 1 month of trauma exposure and last at least 3 days.

Changes in diagnostic semiology in the subsequent versions of the DSM indicate the increase in understanding and research on PTSD over the last two decades. The changes concern the stressor definition, the groups in whom the specific symptoms are classified, and the required number of symptoms for each group (the onset, duration, and requirements of clinical discomfort or functional impairment) [19].

4. Epidemiology and Prevalence

The lifetime prevalence of PTSD in the general population ranges from 1% to 14% [1,19,20,21]. In a recent study by Koenen et al. [21] with 71,083 individuals, the lifetime prevalence of PTSD was 3.9% among the participants and 5.6% among individuals exposed to trauma.

Giaconia et al. [22] reported that at the age of 18 years, more than 2 out of 5 adolescents in a community sample of working-class or lower-middle-class households met the criteria for at least one trauma according to DSM-III-R. Moreover, more than 6% fulfilled the criteria for PTSD diagnosis during their lifetime.

In a national sample of adolescents (12–17 years), 3.7% of male and 6.3% of female adolescents met the diagnostic criteria of PTSD [23]. In the National Comorbidity Survey Adolescent Supplement (NCS-A) study by Merikangas et al. [24], with approximately 10,000 adolescents aged 13–18 years in the U.S, the estimated lifetime prevalence of PTSD was 5.0%, with 1.5% having a severe impairment. The prevalence of PTSD among female adolescents (8.0%) was higher than in male adolescents (2.3%).

5. Trajectories of Post-Traumatic Adaptation: Risk and Protective Factors

Effects of traumatic stress exposure in children differ widely and can potentially vary over time. Cases with unfavorable outcomes are characterized by either initial severe reactions accompanied by persistent or episodic post-traumatic damage (chronic PTSD) or initial mild to moderate responses accompanied by intense damage (delayed-onset PTSD) [25].

Delayed-onset PTSD was assumed to be rare. However, a study revealed that 2 out of 10 young people, as well as adults, do not exhibit clinically significant symptoms for several months or even years after the initial exposure to traumatic events [26].

Negative prognostic factors for the development of chronic pediatric PTSD include the presence of pre-traumatic psychiatric disorders, problematic caregiver/family relationships, poverty, emotional distress, and exposure to relational trauma (e.g., maltreatment, sexual abuse, and domestic abuse). Moreover, post-traumatic reduced social support, withdrawal, psychiatric comorbidity, poor family adjustment to trauma, and post-traumatic cognitive distortions (distraction, rumination, thought suppression, and increased threat sensitivity) are included in the negative prognostic factors [27,28,29,30,31].

Some children, however, are resilient or without essential clinical manifestations of trauma exposure [32]. Therefore, they can adapt and preserve both the functioning and development of resilient behavior. In other cases, children show moderate to severe initial reactions during early-onset PTSD (i.e., within 3 months of exposure) but improve and retrieve normal functioning over time with or without therapy [25].

6. Assessment of PTSD Symptomatology in Children

For the assessment of post-traumatic symptomatology in children, the following should be performed: 1. the acquisition of a detailed history of traumatic event exposure as well as any previous traumas in the individual history of the child; 2. the clinical observation of the child (behavior, the content of speech/thoughts, emotional reactions, nonverbal communication, insight on difficulties, and cognitive functioning—attention, judgment, and orientation); 3. the usage of projective techniques, such as play and drawing; and 4. the application of general and special trauma assessment tests, such as Child Behavior Checklist (CBCL), Clinician-Administered PTSD Scale for Children and Adolescents (CAPS-CA-5), and the UCLA children/adolescent PTSD reaction index [26].

The specialists ensure that a child’s evaluation always begins with a sensitive clinical interview. Children with undeveloped verbal skills can express their experiences through simple projective techniques, such as play, drawing, or storytelling. These often reveal their discomfort through repetitive and graphic representations of their experiences.

The routine evaluation of children in the group or community where the traumatic event, especially a natural disaster, took place constitutes a useful practice [33]. These procedures involve minimal clinical supervision and are economical and less time-consuming. In addition, in cases of traumatic experiences after natural disasters, group interviews with children, such as those conducted in classrooms or other smaller groups, could also be used. Therefore, a thorough individual assessment of these children with symptoms, such as increased arousal, sleep disorders, withdrawal, avoidance of reminders of the trauma, and intrusive thoughts related to their experience, is essential. Group interviews can be used to elicit children's cognitive and emotional responses, assess current adjustments, explore coping strategies, validate their emotions, and encourage support.

7. Brief Overview of the CBT

CBT provides a framework to help children understand the association between their thoughts, feelings, and behaviors. Therefore, children can acknowledge, challenge, and re-evaluate their negative thoughts in an optimal way. CBT comprises many behavioral techniques to facilitate changes in behavior, the important ones being positive reinforcement of supportive behaviors, contingency management, self-assessment of nonhelpful beliefs, and gradual exposure to traumatic memories [3,34,35,36]. The expected results of CBT relate to each of the following areas of the model:

A. Cognitive modification, resulting in reduced anxious or negative thoughts.

B. Improved emotional response, leading to a reduction in anxiety and depressive symptoms.

C. Changes in behavior that lead to improved self-efficacy; therefore, the child learns to overcome and face traumatic experiences and challenges [37,38,39].

8. CBT for the Treatment of PTSD in Children and Adolescents

Numerous studies have highlighted the effectiveness of CBT for PTSD in children and adolescents exposed to various traumatic experiences [5,10,17,40,41,42,43]. During CBT, therapists educate youths on stress reduction techniques, leading to the individual’s preparedness to gradually expose himself/herself to and, therefore, gain mastery over the trauma stimuli. CBT for individuals with PTSD is also effective when conducted in groups in various community or mental health clinics [44,45,46].

The bulk of empirical investigations have compared CBT with waitlist control groups; CBT was more effective even when compared with other well-known treatments, such as supportive [5,40] and narrative therapy [41]. CBT following appropriate developmental modifications is also effective in 3–6-year-old children who have experienced sexual abuse [47,48] or other traumas [49]. Therefore, as suggested by the UK National Institute for Clinical Excellence (NICE) guidelines, CBT is effective in the treatment of PTSD. Children and young people with PTSD should be offered a course of trauma-focused CBT suitably adapted to their age, circumstances, and developmental level [3,50].

As stated in the introduction, this study specifically provides an overview of two evidence-based preventive interventions, TF-CBT [8] and a similar type of group intervention, the CBITS [46]. Both have received the most empirical support through randomized controlled trials (RCTs).

Regarding these aforementioned interventions, the most important information on the RCTs, quasi-experimental, and open trials described in sections 8, 9, and 10 are listed in Table 1.



TF-CBT is the most widely used and best-studied protocol that is based on CBT principles [8,9,11]. It is a "supported and effective" intervention and is based on the standards of evidence-based practice [56]. The protocol is designed for children with PTSD, comorbid depression, anxiety, and other trauma-related difficulties (shame, self-blame, etc.).

The TF-CBT model includes nine components that are described as follows by using the acronym, PRACTICE [8]:

(P) Psychoeducation regarding post-traumatic symptomatology: the education of a child/adolescent regarding the clinical manifestations of the disorder and the therapeutic options, as well as the formation of a therapeutic alliance.

Aid to (P) parental skills: on the basis of learning theories and behavioral techniques, parents are taught the utilization of effective parenting interventions, such as praise, positive attention, selective attention, time out, and contingency reinforcement procedures.

Teaching (R) relaxation skills: Children are taught how to use a range of relaxation techniques, such as focused breathing exercises, progressive muscle relaxation, and other personalized relaxation activities, to reverse the physiological manifestations of traumatic stress.

Enhancement of (A) affective modulation skills: children are taught emotional education skills, such as the identification of their feelings, the utilization of positive self-talk, thought interruption, and positive imagery. In addition, they learn problem-solving techniques, social skills, as well as, the recognition and self-regulation of their negative affective states.

The skills of cognitive coping (C) and processing and narration of the trauma (T): with the help of the therapist, children create a narrative of their traumatic experiences, repair cognitive distortions related to the traumatic nature of their experiences, and place those experiences within the context of their lives.

In vivo (I) control (mastery) over childhood trauma reminders: this is achieved with gradual exposure of the child to fearful stimuli.

Conduct of (C) combined child-parent sessions: these are joint sessions in which the child shares the narrative trauma with the parents; moreover, other family issues are addressed at the same time.

(E) Enhancement of the future safety and development of the child: with the help of the therapist, the child is able to deal with safety concerns associated with the prevention of future trauma, thereby returning to a normal developmental trajectory.

TF-CBT consists of 12–20 sessions, lasting 60–90 min each, and is suitable for children and adolescents aged 3 to 18 years [8]. It is delivered separately to children and their parents and is also provided in a group format. Gradual exposure is an important part of this intervention [13]. To address transportation barriers, various RCTs have evaluated the efficacy of TF-CBT in multiple settings (e.g., homes, foster homes, schools, and residential treatment facilities).

Studies on TF-CBT have included more than 900 youths, with over 16 randomized trials demonstrating clinically significant improvement. Follow-up studies have indicated profit sustainability for 6 months, 1 year, and 2 years after treatment. Therefore, TF-CBT is “supported and efficacious in PTSD, depressive and anxiety symptoms, conduct problems, sexualized behaviors, and shame, negative cognitions evoked by trauma, interpersonal trust, and social competence” [11,12,40,51,52,53,54,57,58,59].

TF-CBT has been evaluated in multiracial populations, such as American, Caucasian, African American, and Latino residents. Moreover, European, African, and Australian young people have demonstrated positive outcomes in multiple domains. To be more specific, TF-CBT was applied to English-speaking and Hispanic populations after the terrorist attacks of September 11, 2001, and was effective in reducing PTSD symptoms [55,60]. An adapted model in two studies has also revealed significant improvement in both PTSD and grief symptoms [5,53]. Moreover, parents have also reported a significant reduction in their distress and depressive symptomatology and significant gains in their ability to support and deal with their children’s behavioral difficulties [61].


CBITS is the best-supported CBT protocol in a group intervention, especially for children with PTSD. CBITS is delivered in a group format (6 to 8 children per group), with 10-week sessions of 1 h each. CBITS has been delivered to adolescents from 5th to 12th grade, specifically to those who have witnessed or experienced traumatic life events, such as violence in the community and/or at schools. Moreover, it is suitable for individuals who have experienced or witnessed accidents and injuries, physical abuse, domestic violence, and natural or man-made disasters. It is usually provided inside the school environment but beyond the school schedule and includes all the elements of PRACTICE, except for the parent education component, which is limited and optional. However, a new component for teachers has been added to its design. This component educates teachers regarding the potential impact of trauma on students’ behavior and academic competence in the classroom. The trauma narrative component is mainly conducted during short one-to-one sessions in which children meet the group's primary caregiver.

CBITS was designed for trauma-impacted, recently immigrated students from Latino, Korean, Armenian, and Russian backgrounds; it was designed to be delivered in inner-city school mental health clinics. However, CBITS has been applied to a wide variety of populations in the US and worldwide. It was initially applied in two major studies in East Los Angeles in the US, primarily on Latino children exposed to violence in the community. Compared with waitlist control groups, more reduction in PTSD and depressive symptomatology was observed with CBITS intervention [42,43].

In the field trial by Jaycox et al. [44] that was conducted 15 months after Hurricane Katrina in Southern California, children with PTSD were randomly assigned to a group intervention at school (CBITS) or an individual intervention (TF-CBT). Both interventions resulted in reduced symptoms of post-traumatic stress; however, a larger percentage of children completed the whole intervention in the CBITS group [62].

11. Advantages and Disadvantages of TF-CBT and CBITS

The TF-CBT and CBITS interventions are flexible and easily adaptable to diverse populations. They are easy to learn in a short time and are specifically designed and evaluated in multicultural and multilingual populations. In addition, they can be applied to populations with different languages. Both interventions have been experimentally validated by RCTs that demonstrated their effectiveness in several traumatized youths.

CBITS is specially designed to be used by school-based clinicians with appropriate training and specifically focuses on the implementation of trauma services in school settings. Common obstacles in CBITS include transportation barriers, mental health stigma (which prevents someone from getting care), and the dependence on parents and families to seek and find proper care. CBITS is accessible to all eligible students, regardless of the parent's ability to be involved in the treatment.

These interventions, however, may not be appropriate or some parts of them may require modification in adolescents with externalized behavioral problems. In cases where trauma-induced behaviors interfere with therapeutic engagement, it would be more beneficial for the person to deal with the problematic behavior first and address his/her trauma afterward. In addition, in adolescents with active suicidal ideation or substance abuse, the part of the intervention focusing on trauma exposure could worsen the distress associated with these clinical conditions. In such cases, another intervention that does not prioritize trauma exposure but focuses on the practical management of the deviant behaviors would have advantages [13,63,64]. Finally, it is not clear whether the application of TF-CBT in the school environment ensures its accuracy because organizational (e.g., organizational culture and implementation climate) and individual factors of the providers (especially attitudes) can hinder its implementation and effectiveness [65,66,67,68].

12. Other Promising Treatment Practices and Protocols

This section describes protocols that have been used or are currently being evaluated to treat post-traumatic symptomatology but have not gained the evidence-based support of TF-CBT and CBITS. They are also designed to handle other crucial and essential components for achieving a positive therapeutic outcome; for example, new and promising practices for more comorbid situations, such as depression, externalizing behaviors, grief, and family social exclusion. Moreover, these practices are designed after considering particular cultural elements of the target population, such as grief symptoms in Latino immigrants. In some programs, trauma exposure, which is a necessary component for a positive outcome, is excluded. These promising protocols are presented in Table 2.


12.1 Support for Students Exposed to Trauma (SSET)

SSET is an adaptation of CBITS. It is provided by school staff without any clinical experience but with the support of a clinician in the situation of an urgent mental health issue. SSET is more like a "traditional" lesson plan, in which the individual and parental training sessions are eliminated. In this context, exposure to the imagination is applied in a more psychoeducational and academic structure and is formulated in a lesson plan format. In the study of Jaycox, Langley, Stein et al. [69], including 76 children with PTSD, the application of SSET resulted in the reduction of post-traumatic symptoms and concomitant depression. However, compared with CBITS, less improvement was observed. Furthermore, SSET intervention is mainly effective in young people with high levels of distressful symptoms before treatment sessions.

12.2 UCLA Trauma and Grief Component Therapy (TGCT)

UCLA TGCT was designed by the UCLA Trauma Psychiatry Service and was used in Armenia after the 1988 earthquake. Although it can be delivered in community mental health or other settings, UCLA TGCT has been primarily provided at schools. It mainly focuses on adolescents, with both individual and group sessions being available. It is used in addition to other empirically supported techniques and targets the alleviation of PTSD symptoms and traumatic grief. Therefore, youths restore their normal development course [70,71].

According to a study by Layne et al. [72], this intervention was beneficial in reducing PTSD, traumatic grief, and depressive symptoms in a sample of Bosnian adolescents. In addition, adolescents exposed to community violence and exhibiting PTSD symptoms also benefited from this intervention [103]. Moreover, it was effective in reducing PTSD symptoms in adolescents after a terrorist act [59,60].

In a study by Smith et al. in 2007 [43] including 24 young people (8–18 years) who experienced a single traumatic event, the intervention group exhibited a significant improvement in the symptoms of PTSD, depression, anxiety, and functionality compared with the wait list group; gains were maintained even after 6 months.

12.3 Surviving Cancer Competently Intervention Program (SCCIP)

SCCIP is an intervention model based on cognitive and family therapy. It is a 1-day program delivered through four sessions to a group of families. Compared with the waitlist group, the SCCIP group exhibited more relief in the symptoms of arousal and agitation in adolescent cancer survivors. The target groups are the survivors, siblings, and parents. Although the intervention provided favorable results in children, modifications in family functioning were more challenging [73].

12.4 Trauma Systems Therapy (TST)

TST is a systemic and CBT-influenced intervention inspired by Bronfenbrenner's social-ecological model [104]. It focuses on both post-traumatic stress symptoms and other comorbid symptoms of anxiety and depression [75]. In an open study, this intervention was applied to 110 children and adolescents aged 5–20 years [74]. The intervention focused on strengthening the ability of individuals to control uncomfortable emotions and deal with significant distress. Moreover, it promoted changes in the social context that perpetuates the symptoms. TST is an effective intervention for families who experience obstacles in completing a treatment, multiple injuries, and several issues related to the social environment of the families. Saxe et al. [74] demonstrated that participants exhibited significant improvements in PTSD symptoms. Moreover, family and school-related problems were relieved within a 3-month follow-up period.

12.5 Prolonged Exposure Therapy (PET)

PET teaches individuals to gradually approach trauma-related memories and emerged in a study by Foa et al. [76], which included 61 girls aged 13–18 years who had been sexually abused. Therapists were clinicians with no previous experience in behavioral therapy and who worked in community mental health clinics after receiving a short training in exposure therapy. The intervention included 14 individual sessions lasting 60 to 90 min and containing education on skills and in vivo exposure to the trauma. A significant improvement in PTSD symptoms was observed in the behavioral therapy group (n = 31) compared with the nonspecific counseling support group (n = 30, comparison group). Moreover, therapeutic gains were maintained during a 12-month follow-up. However, Foa's model has certain disadvantages. Some studies have indicated that exposure-based approaches can lead to higher dropout rates compared with nontrauma focused ones [105,106]. However, this finding was not confirmed in a subsequent meta-analysis regarding the RCTs of PTSD treatments, especially in children and adolescents [107].

12.6 Structured Psychotherapy for Adolescents Responding to Chronic Stress (SPARCS)

SPARCS is a 16-session group intervention. It is beneficial for chronically injured adolescents, aged 12–19 years, who live in or return to chaotic environments and exhibit post-traumatic symptoms and concomitant problems in various areas of functionality [77]. Weiner, Schneider, and Lyons [78] applied this intervention and observed a significant improvement in 33 adolescents who were of various origins, were aged 13–21 years, and experienced moderate to severe distinct traumatic experiences. The SPARCS methodology is mainly based on CBΤ techniques and also includes the components of dialectical behavioral therapy (e.g., mindfulness), Trauma Adaptive Recovery Group Education, and Therapy for Adolescents and Preadolescents (TARGET-A; e.g., emotion regulation and current PTSD symptom management skills), and TGCT (e.g., adaptive remembrance of the deceased and psychoeducation regarding grief). In contrast to trauma-focused interventions, direct exposure of the participant to the trauma is optional in SPARCS intervention and depends on the desire of the participant to discuss the traumatic experiences.


This intervention was specifically designed to address complex presentations of PTSD and also to focus on assisting juvenile delinquents involved in judicial procedures. It focuses on young people aged 12–19 years who have experienced interpersonal trauma (e.g., abuse), other chronic traumas (e.g., domestic violence and community violence), or other stressors [79]. Because of the manifestations of complex PTSD, the exclusive use of basic CBT skills in TARGET-A programs is not sufficient. Therefore, interventions from other psychotherapeutic backgrounds, such as emotion regulation and current PTSD symptom management skill acquisition, psychoeducation on trauma impact, training for nonprofessional helpers in implementation and reinforcement of the intervention, and substance abuse counseling and support, are also used. As in SPARCS intervention, the young person can choose to talk about previous traumatic events. Therefore, gradual exposure to traumatic ingredients is not a nuclear component of TARGET-A [80,81,108]. In addition, it is an approach designed for older children or adolescents who either refuse to narrate their trauma or their externalized behavioral problems hinder their commitment to therapy.

12.8 Combined CBT Approach for Children and Families at Risk of Physical Abuse (CPC-CBT)

CPC-CBT is implemented in families who are at risk of abuse or who have already been abused. Efficacy data for this intervention come from an RCT study [82] and a small open-label study [83].

It is specifically applied to young people with a history of harsh punishment and stressful parenting disciplinary techniques, leading to PTSD, depression, abuse-related negative beliefs, and externalized behavioral difficulties. CPC-CBT includes the elements of TF-CBT, mobilization interviews, recruitment of support services (e.g., facilitating the supervision & movement of children), and improvements in communication skills specifically aimed at preventing domestic violence. In this intervention, parents, and children participate in 16-week 2-hour sessions. Parental and child interventions are conducted concurrently for the first 75 min of the session by two therapists in each group. The rest of the 45 min comprise joint parent-child sessions.

12.9 Risk Reduction Through Family Therapy (RRFT)

RRFT is a CBT-oriented intervention consisting of 16–20 sessions (depending upon the intensity of symptoms) of 60–90 min each. The sessions are aimed at reducing risky behaviors and trauma-related symptoms in young people aged 13 to 18 years and who are victims of sexual assault or abuse. It comprises psychoeducation, problem-solving skills, family communication skills, substance abuse management, and PTSD symptom management. Moreover, it contains healthy sexual behavior lessons and techniques aimed at reducing the risk of re-victimization.

RRFT addresses a wide range of interrelated symptoms in a single intervention (i.e., symptoms and risk behaviors are not treated separately). Moreover, it addresses traditional barriers associated with this difficult-to-reach population. RRFT is tailored to individual adolescents’ and families’ requirements based on the family’s goals for treatment, needs, and strengths [84,85].

12.10 Intervention for Seeking Safety (SS)

SS is a CBT-oriented intervention designed for individuals and groups; it assists young individuals in coping with the comorbidity of PTSD and substance abuse [109]. Its methodology includes the modification of negative emotions, reduction of the risk of substance abuse, and correction of nonhelpful beliefs related to the trauma experience.

In a small pilot RCT by Najavits et al. [86], the intervention proved superior to the usual therapeutic interventions in a group of adolescent girls with PTSD and substance abuse.

12.11 Alternatives for Families—A Cognitive Behavioral Therapy (AF-CBT)

AF-CBT is an intervention with empirically substantiated data and has been designed to improve relationships between children and caregivers in families, whose relations are characterized by physical abuse or systematic conflicts. Some parents impose severe physical discipline or emotional neglect. Methodological adjustments have been implemented for children with comorbid externalized behavioral problems or developmental disabilities, especially in social communication. AF-CBT is based on the study by Kolko et al. [87,88,89,90,91], which is an RCT involving 55 people, mostly of American-African origin. The authors demonstrated a significant positive outcome in the target domains.

Since its introduction, AF-CBT has been delivered in English, Spanish, Japanese, and other languages. Therefore, the intervention has been appropriately applied to physically abusive parents and their school-age children. Moreover, it has been implemented both in community area services and mental health clinics. AF-CBT usually includes 20 sessions of 1–1.5 h each. The target population is young people aged 5–17 years from medium to low socio-economic status (SES) families. The intervention has not been designed for specific cultural groups. Its theoretical basis comprises learning/behavioral and cognitive theory, family systems, developmental victimology, and the psychology of aggression.

This intervention has several advantages. AF-CBT contains comprehensive material for children, parents, and families. It focuses on family conflicts, aggression, and the provision of alternative methods to set limits instead of overt physical punishment or child abuse. Moreover, it includes a structured session guide with handouts to facilitate implementation. Finally, the material can be adapted by clinicians to the requirements of the clients on the basis of their frequent decisions on what content to emphasize. However, this approach has certain disadvantages also. The treatment can sometimes be lengthy. Moreover, because of the difficult living conditions of treated families, it is sometimes complex to accommodate them and embrace their commitment to the treatment [89,91].

12.12 Bounce Back: An Elementary School Intervention for Childhood Trauma (BB)

BB is a group-based CBT-oriented intervention that educates elementary school children to cope with their traumatic experiences and to recover from them. It is often applied to children who have experienced or witnessed violence in the community, family, or school environment. Furthermore, children who have experienced natural disasters or traumatic separation from a loved one due to death, imprisonment, deportation, or placement in a childcare facility are referred to receive this intervention.

The intervention includes 10 group sessions where children learn and practice emotion modification, relaxation, helpful thinking, problem-solving, conflict resolution, positive activities, and social support. It also includes 2–3 individual sessions in which children recall their traumatic memory and the accompanying grief and share it with a parent/caregiver. Subsequently, children practice the skills acquired from these sessions. Moreover, BB contains materials for parent training sessions [93].

BB is developed by adapting CBITS for elementary school students and contains many of the same therapeutic elements. However, it is designed with additional elements and engaging activities, such as emotion recognition, behavioral activation, and social support. It also requires more parental involvement that is developmentally appropriate for children aged 5–11 years. It is designed to be applied in schools and to children from a variety of national and socioeconomic backgrounds and cultural levels. In the study by Langley et al. [92], BB was applied to 77 primary school children of various origins, with the intervention lasting 3 months. The outcome was positive for post-traumatic symptoms, comorbid depression, and anxiety in both groups (immediate intervention and delayed intervention).

The program is advantageous because its implementation at schools enables clinicians to reach underserved students who are not otherwise fortunate to receive mental health care. It reduces the barriers to health-care access, such as transportation. Moreover, BB is typically delivered at no cost to families. However, BB has some limitations, such as not all students are permitted by their parents to participate in screening or intervention groups at schools. Furthermore, some participants may require to receive further treatment beyond this early intervention group treatment. Therefore, clinicians who deliver BB need to link it with other mental health services and make appropriate referrals after the end of the BB process or in parallel.

12.13 Child and Family Traumatic Stress Intervention (CFTSI)

CFTSI is a brief intervention, consisting of 5 to 8 sessions. It is an empirically supported treatment for children aged 7 to 18 years and is designed to reduce the escalation of traumatic stress and PTSD occurrences. It has been successfully applied and evaluated in populations with varying ethnic and racial backgrounds. CFTSI is delivered within 30–45 days after traumatic events, such as physical or sexual abuse, domestic or community violence, rape, assault, and traffic accidents. The goal of CFTSI is to increase communication and family support. CFTSI highlights the importance of family support as a primary protective factor for children with trauma exposure [94,95,97,110,111,112].

12.14 Dialectical Behavior Therapy (DBT)

DBT is a complex and comprehensive intervention originally developed for chronically suicidal adults. After the developmentally appropriate adaptations since the publication of the original treatment manual, DBT now also targets adolescents with a history of trauma; moreover, it has already been implemented in individuals living in shelters or in hospital settings [113]. The DBT approach is based on the principles of CBT and focuses on two main aspects, problem-solving techniques (in conjunction with strategies based on acceptance of the individual) and other dialectical processes. The dialectic addresses issues related to the equilibrium between interventions of change versus interventions of acceptance of the individual. The DBT intervention consists of the following five components: (1) skills training; (2) a behavioral therapy plan; (3) the availability of therapists outside of clinical settings, including working at home with the adolescent and his family; (4) organization of the individual’s daily life by selectively enhancing mastery and providing pleasure through creative and enjoyable activities; and (5) inclusion of consulting team to the intervention therapist group. DBT highlights the balance between behavioral change, problem-solving, and emotional modification, with the validation of youth’s requirements, mindfulness techniques, and acceptance [98,114,115,116,117].

12.15 Modular Approach to Therapy for Children with Anxiety, Depression, Trauma, or Conduct Problems (MATCH-ADTC)

MATCH-ADTC is an evidence-supported intervention based on CBT and designed for children aged 6 to 15 years. Unlike most treatment approaches that focus on a single diagnosis, this intervention overcomes barriers to therapists' use of empirically supported interventions through its transdiagnostic modular design.

The intervention is designed for multiple disorders and maladaptive states, including anxiety, depression, and post-traumatic stress, as well as for conduct problems. MATCH-ADTC was developed by Chorpita and Weisz [118] and assembles years of empirical studies on evidence-based treatments. Recent data [99,100,101,102,118,119] indicates that children treated with MATCH-ADTC exhibited significantly faster rates of improvement over time than did children in the usual community care. The outcomes regarding internalizing and total problems and the severity ratings on major problems were reported by children and parents. Compared with children in standard community care, children treated with this intervention spent less time in treatment, were less likely to require additional treatment services, and were less likely to be prescribed psychotropic medication.

13. Conclusions, Dilemmas, and Future Challenges

Effective and empirically supported intervention protocols for PTSD are available, with most of them, including CBT approaches [3,120,121]. CBT and psychoeducation can provide the necessary support for the child, youth, and family when post-traumatic stress and avoidance discourage trauma exploration. Most of the CBT treatments result in improvements in common concomitant difficulties, with the therapeutic gains maintained over time. These therapies have many modules in common with the well-established TF-CBT and CBITS interventions (e.g., psychoeducation, gradual exposure, and problem-solving skills). However, they also present innovative strategies to address the barriers to a positive therapeutic outcome.

In the last three decades, a rapid increase in knowledge regarding the development and management of PTSD in children and adolescents has been noted. However, many key issues remain unaddressed. Nevertheless, children with post-traumatic stress are increasingly being recognized, assessed, and treated.

The main benefits of the intervention programs included in the current review are summarized in the subsequent sentences: 1. They all comprise strategies and skills that are transdiagnostic; therefore, they are effective in treating not only PTSD but also various other coexisting diagnoses, such as depression, grief, and externalized behaviors. For example, exposure to feared stimuli is beneficial not only for treating post-traumatic symptoms but also for treating other comorbid anxiety disorders. Problem-solving techniques are essential not only in youth with post-traumatic symptoms but also in youths with internalizing disorders. 2. These intervention approaches can be provided not only by mental health professionals but also by other specialties (e.g., teachers). This possibility widens the perspective for dissemination in school settings in a cost-effective way. 3. The group interventions provide a protective environment in which children can practice a plethora of techniques. However, it is challenging to adapt these programs to the individual requirements of each child.

Whether these programs are practicable in various community settings (e.g., the school environment) remains controversial. Moreover, whether their efficacy is ensured when administered by different program leaders, for example, trained teachers and volunteers who are not mental health professionals, remains uncertain [122]. In some cases, the assessment of the intervention studies is not based on data from multiple sources (children, parents, and teachers), and in most cases, researchers do not use diagnostic interviews, which would increase the reliability of the outcome measures [123]. Finally, these group approaches may not be the most efficacious techniques for reducing post-traumatic stress in those children who have already experienced noteworthy symptoms or in those who exhibit complex presentations of PTSD due to multiple, repeated, and prolonged trauma. The TF-CBT and CBITS methods have been criticized for the management of children with multiple traumas. In such cases, it is recommended that the child be the one to choose, with the help of the clinician, which trauma will be the focus of treatment. Although a clinician may perceive a trauma as the largest significance for the child, the child may associate greater impact with another trauma [96,124].

The prevention programs have received much criticism from several researchers who argue that without demonstrating consistent efficacy across different types of traumas, study designs, and target populations, these programs cost money that could be invested in other forms of therapy. In addition, the detection process could create moral issues, as people deemed healthy may be false negatives because of inadequate screening procedures [125].

However, prevention programs have, gradually and internationally, established their presence in the treatment options of the specialist. Therefore, research is emerging, and the outlook is positive for the upcoming years. The necessity for early, selective, intensive, persistent, multifaceted, and participatory interventions is imperative.

Future challenges in the research and development of intervention programs include the following:

  1. An in-depth understanding of risk factors for the escalation of post-traumatic stress symptoms would benefit from prospective studies that may assist in the development of more targeted and selective prevention programs.

  2. Development of effective interventions for PTSD for particular populations, such as refugees and people with coexisting chronic diseases.

  3. The sustainability of treatment benefits over time should be explored. Sandler [126] suggested prevention programs should be judged on the basis of their long-term effects, instead of their immediate effects.

  4. The importance of including booster sessions and sessions with parents or primary caregivers should also be further highlighted. To achieve this, strategies must first be implemented to maximize parental participation.

  5. In many cases, evidence-based treatments were more effective in mental health settings, compared with school settings. This is because the mediation of both organizational and individual factors affects the program delivery by the school-trained clinician. Specifically, mental health interventions in school settings must fulfill the requirements of the school, e.g., the inclusion of teacher involvement, peer or group interventions, coordination between learning and mental health specialists, and coordination between school discipline and therapeutic interventions. Therefore, strategies that could enhance the training of mental health clinicians at schools should be explored to change the clinician’s perceptions, increase their sense of self-efficacy, and increase their motivation to faithfully apply protocols that have been proven effective, such as TF CBT and CBITS [66].

  6. The efficacy of these intervention programs in youth with high levels of post-traumatic stress symptoms must be further investigated.

  7. Further studies on the special elements that mostly “work” in prevention programs are required. Moreover, their importance in empowering young health professionals who are trained in these interventions should be highlighted.

  8. New CBT practices should be embraced to support trauma-impacted youths who might refuse to narrate their distressing experience thoroughly. Such practices should focus on affect dysregulation, education on the developmental impact of trauma, and cognitive restructuring regarding beliefs about oneself as diminished or worthless in relation to the traumatic events, as implemented in SPARCS and TARGET-A interventions. [127].

  9. Dissemination of the latest methods of these programs by using technology (telehealth programs).

  10. Additional research is required to improve current methodological issues associated with design, analysis, and descriptions of participation and dropout rates. Furthermore, whether researcher bias is factored into the outcome should be determined.

  11. These programs must be re-evaluated to include qualitative analyses supplementing the quantitative results. For this, the appraisal of the perspectives of children, parents, and educators must be performed.



Acute Stress Disorder


American Psychiatric Association


Cognitive Behavioral Interventions for Trauma in Schools


Cognitive Behavioral Therapy


Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders-5th Edition


National Health Service


National Institute for Health and Care Excellence


Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder


Randomized Controlled Trial


Trauma-Focused Cognitive Behavior Therapy

Author Contributions

Syros Ioannis conceived the original idea, wrote the manuscript and supervised the project. Karantzali Aggeliki and Anastassiou-Hadjicharalambous Xenia provided critical feedback and helped shape the manuscript.

Competing Interests

The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.


  1. Kessler RC, Sonnega A, Bromet E, Hughes M, Nelson CB. Posttraumatic stress disorder in the national comorbidity survey. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 1995; 52: 1048-1060. [CrossRef]
  2. Storr CL, Ialongo NS, Anthony JC, Breslau N. Childhood antecedents of exposure to traumatic events and posttraumatic stress disorder. Am J Psychiatry. 2007; 164: 119-125. [CrossRef]
  3. Gillies D, Taylor F, Gray C, O'Brien L, D'Abrew N. Psychological therapies for the treatment of post-traumatic stress disorder in children and adolescents (review). Evid Based Child Health. 2013; 8: 1004-1116. [CrossRef]
  4. Schore AN. The effects of early relational trauma on right brain development, affect regulation, and infant mental health. Infant Ment Health J. 2001; 22: 201-269. [CrossRef]
  5. Cohen JA, Deblinger E, Mannarino AP, Steer RA. A multisite, randomized controlled trial for children with sexual abuse–related PTSD symptoms. J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 2004; 43: 393-402. [CrossRef]
  6. Lieberman AF, Van Horn P, Ippen CG. Toward evidence-based treatment: Child-parent psychotherapy with preschoolers exposed to marital violence. J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 2005; 44: 1241-1248. [CrossRef]
  7. Trowell J, Kolvin I, Weeramanthri T, Sadowski H, Berelowitz M, Glasser D, et al. Psychotherapy for sexually abused girls: Psychopathological outcome findings and patterns of change. Br J Psychiatry. 2002; 180: 234-247. [CrossRef]
  8. Cohen JA, Mannarino AP, Deblinger E. Treating trauma and traumatic grief in children and adolescents. New York: Guilford Publications; 2016.
  9. Deblinger E, Lippmann J, Steer R. Sexually abused children suffering posttraumatic stress symptoms: Initial treatment outcome findings. Child Maltreat. 1996; 1: 310-321. [CrossRef]
  10. Syros I. Cognitive behavioral therapy for the treatment of PTSD. Eur J Psychotraumatol. 2017; 8: 1351219. [CrossRef]
  11. Deblinger E, Steer RA, Lippmann J. Two-year follow-up study of cognitive behavioral therapy for sexually abused children suffering post-traumatic stress symptoms. Child Abuse Negl. 1999; 23: 1371-1378. [CrossRef]
  12. Deblinger E, Mannarino AP, Cohen JA, Steer RA. A follow-up study of a multisite, randomized, controlled trial for children with sexual abuse-related PTSD symptoms. J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 2006; 45: 1474-1484. [CrossRef]
  13. Dorsey S, Briggs-Gowan EC, Woods BA. Cognitive-behavioral treatment for posttraumatic stress disorder in children and adolescents. Child Adolesc Psychiatr Clin. 2011; 20: 255-269. [CrossRef]
  14. Kassam-Adams N. Design, delivery, and evaluation of early interventions for children exposed to acute trauma. Eur J Psychotraumatol. 2014; 5. doi: 10.3402/ejpt.v5.22757. [CrossRef]
  15. The American Heritage dictionary of the English language. Boston: Houghton Mifflin; 1992.
  16. Costello EJ, Erkanli A, Fairbank JA, Angold A. The prevalence of potentially traumatic events in childhood and adolescence. J Trauma Stress. 2002; 15: 99-112. [CrossRef]
  17. Cohen JA, Bukstein O, Walter H, Benson SR, Chrisman A, Farchione TR, et al. Practice parameter for the assessment and treatment of children and adolescents with posttraumatic stress disorder. J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 2010; 49: 414-430. [CrossRef]
  18. International classification of diseases 11th revision. Geneva: WHO; 2022. Available from: https://icd.who.int/en.
  19. Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders. 5th ed. Washington: American Psychiatric Association; 2013.
  20. Helzer JE, Robins LN, McEvoy L. Post-traumatic stress disorder in the general population. Findings of the epidemiologic catchment area survey. N Engl J Med. 1987; 317: 1630-1634. [CrossRef]
  21. Koenen KC, Ratanatharathorn A, Ng L, McLaughlin KA, Bromet EJ, Stein DJ, et al. Posttraumatic stress disorder in the World Mental Health Surveys. Psychol Med. 2017; 47: 2260-2274. [CrossRef]
  22. Giaconia RM, Reinherz HZ, Silverman AB, Pakiz B, Frost AK, Cohen E. Traumas and posttraumatic stress disorder in a community population of older adolescents. J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 1995; 34: 1369-1380. [CrossRef]
  23. Kilpatrick DG, Acierno R. Mental health needs of crime victims: Epidemiology and outcomes. J Trauma Stress. 2003; 16: 119-132. [CrossRef]
  24. Merikangas KR, He JP, Burstein M, Swanson SA, Avenevoli S, Cui L, et al. Lifetime prevalence of mental disorders in U.S. adolescents: Results from the National Comorbidity Survey Replication--Adolescent Supplement (NCS-A). J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 2010; 49: 980-989. [CrossRef]
  25. Layne CM, Saltzman WR, Poppleton L, Burlingame GM, Pasalić A, Duraković E, et al. Effectiveness of a school-based group psychotherapy program for war-exposed adolescents: A randomized controlled trial. J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 2008; 47: 1048-1062. [CrossRef]
  26. Child/adolescent trauma assessments [Internet]. Chicago: International Society for Traumatic Stress Studies; 2022. Available from: https://istss.org/clinical-resources/child-trauma-assessments/.
  27. Smid GE, Mooren TT, van der Mast RC, Gersons BP, Kleber RJ. Delayed posttraumatic stress disorder: Systematic review, meta-analysis, and meta-regression analysis of prospective studies. J Clin Psychiatry. 2009; 70: 1572-1582. [CrossRef]
  28. Briggs-Gowan MJ, Ford JD, Fraleigh L, McCarthy K, Carter AS. Prevalence of exposure to potentially traumatic events in a healthy birth cohort of very young children in the northeastern United States. J Trauma Stress. 2010; 23: 725-733. [CrossRef]
  29. Briggs-Gowan MJ, Carter AS, Ford JD. Parsing the effects violence exposure in early childhood: Modeling developmental pathways. J Pediatr Psychol. 2012; 37: 11-22. [CrossRef]
  30. D'Andrea W, Ford J, Stolbach B, Spinazzola J, van der Kolk BA. Understanding interpersonal trauma in children: Why we need a developmentally appropriate trauma diagnosis. Am J Orthopsychiatry. 2012; 82: 187-200. [CrossRef]
  31. McLaughlin KA, Koenen KC, Hill ED, Petukhova M, Sampson NA, Zaslavsky AM, et al. Trauma exposure and posttraumatic stress disorder in a national sample of adolescents. J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 2013; 52: 815-830.e14. [CrossRef]
  32. Nugent NR, Sumner JA, Amstadter AB. Resilience after trauma: From surviving to thriving. Eur J Psychotraumatol. 2014; 5. doi: 10.3402/ejpt.v5.25339. [CrossRef]
  33. Stallard P, Velleman R, Baldwin S. Psychological screening of children for post-traumatic stress disorder. J Child Psychol Psychiatry. 1999; 40: 1075-1082. [CrossRef]
  34. Barrett P, Turner C. Prevention of anxiety symptoms in primary school children: Preliminary results from a universal school-based trial. Br J Clin Psychol. 2001; 40: 399-410. [CrossRef]
  35. David D, Cristea I, Hofmann SG. Why cognitive behavioral therapy is the current gold standard of psychotherapy. Front Psychiatry. 2018; 9: 4. [CrossRef]
  36. Shortt AL, Barrett PM, Fox TL. Evaluating the FRIENDS program: A cognitive-behavioral group treatment for anxious children and their parents. J Clin Child Psychol. 2001; 30: 525-535. [CrossRef]
  37. James AC, Reardon T, Soler A, James G, Creswell C. Cognitive behavioural therapy for anxiety disorders in children and adolescents. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013162.pub2. [CrossRef]
  38. Rapee RM, Schniering CA, Hudson JL. Anxiety disorders during childhood and adolescence: origins and treatment. Annu Rev Clin Psychol. 2009; 5: 311-341. [CrossRef]
  39. Silverman WK, Ortiz CD, Viswesvaran C, Burns BJ, Kolko DJ, Putnam FW, et al. Evidence-based psychosocial treatments for children and adolescents exposed to traumatic events. J Clin Child Adolesc Psychol. 2008; 37: 156-183. [CrossRef]
  40. Cohen JA, Mannarino AP. Interventions for sexually abused children: Initial treatment outcome findings. Child Maltreat. 1998; 3: 17-26. [CrossRef]
  41. Gilboa-Schechtman E, Foa EB, Shafran N, Aderka IM, Powers MB, Rachamim L, et al. Prolonged exposure versus dynamic therapy for adolescent PTSD: A pilot randomized controlled trial. J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 2010; 49: 1034-1042. [CrossRef]
  42. King NJ, Tonge BJ, Mullen P, Myerson N, Heyne D, Rollings S, et al. Treating sexually abused children with posttraumatic stress symptoms: A randomized clinical trial. J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 2000; 39: 1347-1355. [CrossRef]
  43. Smith P, Yule W, Perrin S, Tranah T, Dalgleish T, Clark D. A randomized controlled trial of individual cognitive behavior therapy for PTSD in children and adolescents. J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 2007; 46: 1051-1061. [CrossRef]
  44. Jaycox LH, Cohen JA, Mannarino AP, Walker DW, Langley AK, Gegenheimer KL, et al. Children's mental health care following Hurricane Katrina: A field trial of trauma-focused psychotherapies. J Trauma Stress. 2010; 23: 223-231. [CrossRef]
  45. Kataoka SH, Stein BD, Jaycox LH, Wong M, Escudero P, Tu W, et al. A school-based mental health program for traumatized Latino immigrant children. J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 2003; 42: 311-318. [CrossRef]
  46. Stein BD, Jaycox LH, Kataoka SH, Wong M, Tu W, Elliott MN, et al. A mental health intervention for schoolchildren exposed to violence: A randomized controlled trial. JAMA. 2003; 290: 603-611. [CrossRef]
  47. Cohen JA, Mannarino AP. A treatment outcome study for sexually abused preschool children: Initial findings. J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 1996; 35: 42-50. [CrossRef]
  48. Deblinger E, Stauffer LB, Steer RA. Comparative efficacies of supportive and cognitive behavioral group therapies for young children who have been sexually abused and their nonoffending mothers. Child Maltreat. 2001; 6: 332-343. [CrossRef]
  49. Scheeringa MS, Weems CF, Cohen JA, Amaya-Jackson L, Guthrie D. Trauma-focused cognitive-behavioral therapy for posttraumatic stress disorder in three-through six year-old children: A randomized clinical trial. J Child Psychol Psychiatry. 2011; 52: 853-860. [CrossRef]
  50. Summerfield DA. Coping with the aftermath of trauma: NICE guidelines on post-traumatic stress disorder have fundamental flaw. BMJ. 2005; 331: 50. [CrossRef]
  51. Cohen JA, Mannarino AP, Knudsen K. Treating sexually abused children: 1 year follow-up of a randomized controlled trial. Child Abuse Negl. 2005; 29: 135-145. [CrossRef]
  52. Dalgleish T, Goodall B, Chadwick I, Werner-Seidler A, McKinnon A, Morant N, et al. Trauma-focused cognitive behaviour therapy versus treatment as usual for post traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) in young children aged 3 to 8 years: Study protocol for a randomised controlled trial. Trials. 2015; 16: 116. [CrossRef]
  53. Hitchcock C, Goodall B, Wright IM, Boyle A, Johnston D, Dunning D, et al. The early course and treatment of posttraumatic stress disorder in very young children: Diagnostic prevalence and predictors in hospital-attending children and a randomized controlled proof-of-concept trial of trauma-focused cognitive therapy, for 3- to 8-year-olds. J Child Psychol Psychiatry. 2022; 63: 58-67. [CrossRef]
  54. McMullen J, O'Callaghan P, Shannon C, Black A, Eakin J. Group trauma-focused cognitive-behavioural therapy with former child soldiers and other war-affected boys in the DR Congo: A randomised controlled trial. J Child Psychol Psychiatry. 2013; 54: 1231-1241. [CrossRef]
  55. Hoagwood KE, Vogel JM, Levitt JM, D'Amico PJ, Paisner WI, Kaplan SJ. Implementing an evidence-based trauma treatment in a state system after September 11: The CATS project. J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 2007; 46: 773-779. [CrossRef]
  56. Saunders BE, Berliner L, Hanson RF. Child physical and sexual abuse: Guidelines for treatment. Final Report. Charleston: National Crime Victims Research and Treatment Center; Seattle: Center for Sexual Assault and Traumatic Stress; 2003. Available from: https://mainweb-v.musc.edu/vawprevention/general/saunders.pdf. [CrossRef]
  57. Cohen JA, Mannarino AP, Kinnish K. Trauma-focused cognitive behavioral therapy for commercially sexually exploited youth. J Child Adolesc Trauma. 2017; 10: 175-185. [CrossRef]
  58. McMullen J, O’Callaghan P. Delivering and evaluating a group intervention with former child soldiers and other war-affected children: A randomised controlled trial. Proceedings of the British Psychological Society, Division of Educational and Child Psychology Annual Conference; 2012 January 11-13; Stratford-Upon-Avon, United Kingdom.
  59. McMullen J, O’Callaghan P. Psychological and psychosocial intervention with war-affected children. Bethesda: ClinicalTrials.gov; Available from: https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT01509872.
  60. CATS Consortium. Implementing CBT for traumatized children and adolescents after September 11: Lessons learned from the Child and Adolescent Trauma Treatments and Services (CATS) Project. J Clin Child Adolesc Psychol. 2007; 36: 581-592. [CrossRef]
  61. Deblinger E, Mannarino AP, Cohen JA, Runyon MK, Heflin AH. Child sexual abuse: A primer for treating children, adolescents, and their nonoffending parents. 2nd ed. New York: Oxford University Press; 2015. [CrossRef]
  62. Zatzick DF, Koepsell T, Rivara FP. Using target population specification, effect size, and reach to estimate and compare the population impact of two PTSD preventive interventions. Psychiatry. 2009; 72: 346-359. [CrossRef]
  63. Najavits LM. Clinicians' views on treating posttraumatic stress disorder and substance use disorder. J Subst Abuse Treat. 2002; 22: 79-85. doi:10.1016/s0740-5472(02)00219-2. [CrossRef]
  64. Trauma-focused cognitive behavioral therapy for children affected by sexual abuse or trauma. Washingtonl: Child Welfare Information Gateway; 2012. Available from: https://www.ojp.gov/ncjrs/virtual-library/abstracts/trauma-focused-cognitive-behavioral-therapy-children-affected-0.
  65. Evans SW, Weist MD. Implementing empirically supported treatments in the schools: What are we asking? Clin Child Fam Psychol Rev. 2004; 7: 263-267. [CrossRef]
  66. Lyon AR, Pullmann MD, Dorsey S, Levin C, Gaias LM, Brewer SK, et al. Protocol for a hybrid type 2 cluster randomized trial of trauma-focused cognitive behavioral therapy and a pragmatic individual-level implementation strategy. Implement Sci. 2021; 16: 3. [CrossRef]
  67. Odom SL, McLean ME, Johnson LJ, Lamontagne MJ. Recommended practices in early childhood special education: Validation and current use. J Early Interv. 1995; 19: 1-17. [CrossRef]
  68. Owens JS, Lyon AR, Brandt NE, Warner CM, Nadeem E, Spiel C, et al. Implementation science in school mental health: Key constructs in a developing research agenda. School Ment Health. 2014; 6: 99-111. [CrossRef]
  69. Jaycox LH, Langley AK, Stein BD, Wong M, Sharma P, Scott M, et al. Support for students exposed to trauma: A pilot study. School Ment Health. 2009; 1: 49-60. [CrossRef]
  70. Goenjian AK, Steinberg AM, Walling D, Bishop S, Karayan I, Pynoos R. 25-year follow-up of treated and not-treated adolescents after the Spitak earthquake: Course and predictors of PTSD and depression. Psychol Med. 2021; 51: 976-988. [CrossRef]
  71. Goenjian AK, Pynoos RS, Steinberg AM, Najarian LM, Asarnow JR, Karayan I, et al. Psychiatric comorbidity in children after the 1988 earthquake in Armenia. J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 1995; 34: 1174-1184. [CrossRef]
  72. Layne CM, Pynoos RS, Saltzman WR, Arslanagić B, Black M, Savjak N, et al. Trauma/grief-focused group psychotherapy: School-based postwar intervention with traumatized Bosnian adolescents. Group Dyn. 2001; 5: 277-290. [CrossRef]
  73. Kazak AE, Alderfer MA, Streisand R, Simms S, Rourke MT, Barakat LP, et al. Treatment of posttraumatic stress symptoms in adolescent survivors of childhood cancer and their families: A randomized clinical trial. J Fam Psychol. 2004; 18: 493-504. [CrossRef]
  74. Saxe GN, Ellis BH, Fogler J, Hansen S, Sorkin B. Comprehensive care for traumatized children: An open trial examines treatment using trauma systems therapy. Psychiatric Annals. 2005; 35: 443-448. [CrossRef]
  75. Saxe GN, Ellis BH, Kaplow JB. Collaborative treatment of traumatized children and teens: The trauma systems therapy approach. New York: Guilford Press; 2007.
  76. Foa EB, McLean CP, Capaldi S, Rosenfield D. Prolonged exposure vs supportive counseling for sexual abuse-related PTSD in adolescent girls: A randomized clinical trial. JAMA. 2013; 310: 2650-2657. [CrossRef]
  77. DeRosa R, Pelcovitz D. Group treatment for chronically traumatized adolescents: Igniting SPARCS of change. In: Treating traumatized children. Hove: Routledge; 2009. pp. 225-239.
  78. Weiner DA, Schneider A, Lyons JS. Evidence-based treatments for trauma among culturally diverse foster care youth: Treatment retention and outcomes. Child Youth Serv Rev. 2009; 31: 1199-1205. [CrossRef]
  79. Ford JD, Russo E. Trauma-focused, present-centered, emotional self-regulation approach to integrated treatment for posttraumatic stress and addiction: Trauma adaptive recovery group education and therapy (TARGET). Am J Psychother. 2006; 60: 335-355. [CrossRef]
  80. Ford JD, Steinberg KL, Zhang W. A randomized clinical trial comparing affect regulation and social problem-solving psychotherapies for mothers with victimization-related PTSD. Behav Ther. 2011; 42: 560-578. [CrossRef]
  81. Ford JD, Steinberg KL, Hawke J, Levine J, Zhang W. Randomized trial comparison of emotion regulation and relational psychotherapies for PTSD with girls involved in delinquency. J Clin Child Adolesc Psychol. 2012; 41: 27-37. [CrossRef]
  82. Runyon MK, Deblinger E, Steer RA. Group cognitive behavioral treatment for parents and children at-risk for physical abuse: An initial study. Child Fam Behav Ther. 2010; 32: 196-218. [CrossRef]
  83. Runyon MK, Deblinger E, Schroeder CM. Pilot evaluation of outcomes of combined parent-child cognitive-behavioral group therapy for families at risk for child physical abuse. Cogn Behav Pract. 2009; 16: 101-118. [CrossRef]
  84. Danielson CK, McCart MR, Walsh K, de Arellano MA, White D, Resnick HS. Reducing substance use risk and mental health problems among sexually assaulted adolescents: A pilot randomized controlled trial. J Fam Psychol. 2012; 26: 628-635. [CrossRef]
  85. Danielson CK, Macdonald A, Amstadter AB, Hanson R, de Arellano MA, Saunders BE, et al. Risky behaviors and depression in conjunction with--or in the absence of--lifetime history of PTSD among sexually abused adolescents. Child Maltreat. 2010; 15: 101-107. [CrossRef]
  86. LM, Gallop RJ, Weiss RD. Seeking safety therapy for adolescent girls with ptsd and substance use disorder: A randomized controlled trial. J Behav Health Serv Res. 2006; 33: 453-463. [CrossRef]
  87. Kolko DJ. Clinical monitoring of treatment course in child physical abuse: Psychometric characteristics and treatment comparisons. Child Abuse Negl. 1996; 20: 23-43. [CrossRef]
  88. Kolko DJ. Individual cognitive behavioral treatment and family therapy for physically abused children and their offending parents: A comparison of clinical outcomes. Child Maltreat. 1996; 1: 322-342. [CrossRef]
  89. Kolko DJ, Baumann BL, Herschell AD, Hart JA, Holden EA, Wisniewski SR. Implementation of AF-CBT by community practitioners serving child welfare and mental health: A randomized trial. Child Maltreat. 2012; 17: 32-46. [CrossRef]
  90. Kolko DJ, Herschell AD, Baumann BL, Hart JA, Wisniewski SR. AF-CBT for families experiencing physical aggression or abuse served by the mental health or child welfare system: An effectiveness trial. Child Maltreat. 2018; 23: 319-333. [CrossRef]
  91. Kolko DJ, Iselin AM, Gully KJ. Evaluation of the sustainability and clinical outcome of Alternatives for Families: A Cognitive-Behavioral Therapy (AF-CBT) in a child protection center. Child Abuse Negl. 2011; 35: 105-116. [CrossRef]
  92. Langley AK, Gonzalez A, Sugar CA, Solis D, Jaycox L. Bounce back: Effectiveness of an elementary school-based intervention for multicultural children exposed to traumatic events. J Consult Clin Psychol. 2015; 83: 853-865. [CrossRef]
  93. Santiago CD, Raviv T, Ros AM, Brewer SK, Distel LML, Torres SA, et al. Implementing the Bounce Back trauma intervention in urban elementary schools: A real-world replication trial. Sch Psychol Q. 2018; 33: 1-9. [CrossRef]
  94. Berkowitz S, Marans S. The child and family traumatic stress intervention: Implementation guide for providers. 2011.
  95. Marans S, Berkowitz S, Epstein C. The child and family traumatic stress intervention: Adaptation for children in foster care. 2011.
  96. Kearns MC, Ressler KJ, Zatzick D, Rothbaum BO. Early interventions for PTSD: A review. Depress Anxiety. 2012; 29: 833-842. [CrossRef]
  97. Hahn H, Oransky M, Epstein C, Smith Stover C, Marans S. Findings of an early intervention to address children’s traumatic stress implemented in the child advocacy center setting following sexual abuse. Journal of Child & Adolescent Trauma. 2016; 9: 55-66. doi: 10.1007/s40653-015-0059-7 [CrossRef]
  98. Geddes K, Dziurawiec S, Lee CW. Dialectical behaviour therapy for the treatment of emotion dysregulation and trauma symptoms in self-injurious and suicidal adolescent females: A pilot programme within a community-based child and adolescent mental health service. Psychiatry J. 2013; 2013: 145219. doi: 10.1155/2013/145219. [CrossRef]
  99. Harmon SL, Price MA, Corteselli KA, Lee EH, Metz K, Bonadio FT, et al. Evaluating a modular approach to therapy for children with anxiety, depression, trauma, or conduct problems (MATCH) in school-based mental health care: Study protocol for a randomized controlled trial. Front Psychol. 2021; 12: 639493. [CrossRef]
  100. Weisz JR, Chorpita BF, Palinkas LA, Schoenwald SK, Miranda J, Bearman SK, et al. Testing standard and modular designs for psychotherapy treating depression, anxiety, and conduct problems in youth: A randomized effectiveness trial. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 2012; 69: 274-282. [CrossRef]
  101. Weisz JR, Bearman SK, Ugueto AM, Herren JA, Evans SC, Cheron DM, et al. Testing robustness of child STEPs effects with children and adolescents: A randomized controlled effectiveness trial. J Clin Child Adolesc Psychol. 2020; 49: 883-896. [CrossRef]
  102. Chorpita BF, Daleiden EL, Park AL, Ward AM, Levy MC, Cromley T, et al. Child steps in California: A cluster randomized effectiveness trial comparing modular treatment with community implemented treatment for youth with anxiety, depression, conduct problems, or traumatic stress. J Consult Clin Psychol. 2017; 85: 13-25. [CrossRef]
  103. Saltzman WR, Pynoos RS, Layne CM, Steinberg AM, Aisenberg E. Trauma-and grief-focused intervention for adolescents exposed to community violence: Results of a school-based screening and group treatment protocol Group dynamics: Theory, research, and practice. 2001; 5: 291-303. doi: 10.1037/1089-2699.5.4.291. [CrossRef]
  104. Bronfenbrenner U. The Ecology of Human Development. Cambridge, Mass: Harvard University Press; 1979.
  105. Bradley R, Greene J, Russ E, Dutra L, Westen D. A multidimensional meta-analysis of psychotherapy for PTSD. Am J Psychiatry. 2005; 162: 214-227. [CrossRef]
  106. Imel ZE, Laska K, Jakupcak M, Simpson TL. Meta-analysis of dropout in treatments for posttraumatic stress disorder. J Consult Clin Psychol. 2013; 81: 394-404. [CrossRef]
  107. Simmons C, Meiser-Stedman R, Baily H, Beazley P. A meta-analysis of dropout from evidence-based psychological treatment for post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) in children and young people. Eur J Psychotraumatol. 2021; 12: 1947570. [CrossRef]
  108. Ford JD, Elhai JD, Connor DF, Frueh BC. Poly-victimization and risk of posttraumatic, depressive, and substance use disorders and involvement in delinquency in a national sample of adolescents. J Adolesc Health. 2010; 46: 545-552. [CrossRef]
  109. Najavits LM, Clark HW, DiClemente CC, Potenza MN, Shaffer HJ, Sorensen JL, et al. PTSD/substance use disorder comorbidity: Treatment options and public health needs. Curr Treat Options Psychiatry. 2020; 7: 544-558. [CrossRef]
  110. Hill HM, Levermore M, Twaite J, Jones LP. Exposure to community violence and social support as predictors of anxiety and social and emotional behavior among African American children. J Child Fam Stud. 1996; 5: 399-414. [CrossRef]
  111. Kliewer W, Cunningham JN, Diehl R, Parrish KA, Walker JM, Atiyeh C, et al. Violence exposure and adjustment in inner-city youth: Child and caregiver emotion regulation skill, caregiver-child relationship quality, and neighborhood cohesion as protective factor. J Clin Child Adolesc Psychol. 2004; 33: 477-487. [CrossRef]
  112. Ozer EJ, Best SR, Lipsey TL, Weiss DS. Predictors of posttraumatic stress disorder and symptoms in adults: A meta-analysis. Psychol Bull. 2003; 129: 52-73. [CrossRef]
  113. Ritschel LA, Lim NE, Stewart LM. Transdiagnostic applications of DBT for adolescents and adults. Am J Psychother. 2015; 69: 111-128. [CrossRef]
  114. Berk MS, Starace NK, Black VP, Avina C. Implementation of dialectical behavior therapy with suicidal and self-harming adolescents in a community clinic. Arch Suicide Res. 2020; 24: 64-81. [CrossRef]
  115. McCauley E, Berk MS, Asarnow JR, Adrian M, Cohen J, Korslund K, et al. Efficacy of dialectical behavior therapy for adolescents at high risk for suicide: A randomized clinical trial. JAMA Psychiatry. 2018; 75: 777-785. [CrossRef]
  116. Miller AL, Rathus JH, Linehan MM. Dialectical behavior therapy with suicidal adolescents. New York: Guilford Press; 2007.
  117. Rathus JH, Miller AL. DBT® skills manual for adolescents. New York: Guilford Press; 2015.
  118. Chorpita BF, Weisz JR. Modular approach to therapy for children with anxiety, depression, trauma, or conduct problems (MATCH-ADTC). Satellite Beach: Practice Wise; 2009.
  119. Hagen KA, Olseth AR, Laland H, Rognstad K, Apeland A, Askeland E, et al. Evaluating modular approach to therapy for children with anxiety, depression, trauma and conduct problems (MATCH-ADCT) in Norwegian child and adolescent outpatient clinics: Study protocol for a randomized controlled trial. Trials. 2019; 20: 16. [CrossRef]
  120. Connor DF, Ford JD, Arnsten AF, Greene CA. An update on posttraumatic stress disorder in children and adolescents. Clin Pediatr. 2015; 54: 517-528. [CrossRef]
  121. Neil AL, Christensen H. Efficacy and effectiveness of school-based prevention and early intervention programs for anxiety. Clin Psychol Rev. 2009; 29: 208-215. [CrossRef]
  122. Syros I, Karantzali A, Anastassiou-Hadjicharalambous X. Innovative strategies and challenges for the prevention of pathological anxiety in children and adolescents. OBM Neurobiol. 2021; 5: 106. [CrossRef]
  123. De Los Reyes A, Thomas SA, Goodman KL, Kundey SM. Principles underlying the use of multiple informants' reports. Annu Rev Clin Psychol. 2013; 9: 123-149. [CrossRef]
  124. Oransky M, Hahn H, Stover CS. Caregiver and youth agreement regarding youths' trauma histories: Implications for youths' functioning after exposure to trauma. J Youth Adolesc. 2013; 42: 1528-1542. [CrossRef]
  125. Harrington R, Clark A. Prevention and early intervention for depression in adolescence and early adult life. Eur Arch Psychiatry Clin Neurosci. 1998; 248: 32-45. [CrossRef]
  126. Sandler I. Progress in developing strategies and theory for the prevention of depression and anxiety. Prev Treat. 1999; 2. doi: 10.1037/1522-3736.2.1.29c. [CrossRef]
  127. Deblinger E, Mannarino AP, Cohen JA, Runyon MK, Steer RA. Trauma-focused cognitive behavioral therapy for children: Impact of the trauma narrative and treatment length. Depress Anxiety. 2011; 28: 67-75. [CrossRef]
Download PDF Download Citation
0 0