Register or Submit a manuscript.
Quick Link
Journal of Energy and Power Technology

(ISSN 2690-1692)

Journal of Energy and Power Technology (JEPT) is an international peer-reviewed Open Access journal published quarterly online by LIDSEN Publishing Inc. This periodical is dedicated to providing a unique, peer-reviewed, multi-disciplinary platform for researchers, scientists and engineers in academia, research institutions, government agencies and industry. The journal is also of interest to technology developers, planners, policy makers and technical, economic and policy advisers to present their research results and findings.

Journal of Energy and Power Technology focuses on all aspects of energy and power. It publishes not only original research and review articles, but also various other types of articles from experts in these fields, such as Communication, Opinion, Comment, Conference Report, Technical Note, Book Review, and more, to promote intuitive understanding of the state-of-the-art and technology trends.

Main research areas include (but are not limited to):
Renewable energies (e.g. geothermal, solar, wind, hydro, tidal, wave, biomass) and grid connection impact
Energy harvesting devices
Energy storage
Hybrid/combined/integrated energy systems for multi-generation
Hydrogen energy 
Fuel cells
Nuclear energy
Energy economics and finance
Energy policy
Energy and environment
Energy conversion, conservation and management
Smart energy system

Power generation - Conventional and renewable
Power system management
Power transmission and distribution
Smart grid technologies
Micro- and nano-energy systems and technologies
Power electronic
Biofuels and alternatives
High voltage and pulse power
Organic and inorganic photovoltaics
Batteries and supercapacitors

Publication Speed (median values for papers published in 2025): Submission to First Decision: 7.9 weeks; Submission to Acceptance: 15.2 weeks; Acceptance to Publication: 10.9 days (1-2 days of FREE language polishing included)
Free Publication in 2026
Current Issue: 2026  Archive: 2025 2024 2023 2022 2021 2020 2019
Open Access Review

Use of Composite Materials in Wind Turbine Blades: A Comprehensive Review

Dudu Mertgenç Yoldaş 1,* ORCID logo, Senai Yalçinkaya 2 ORCID logo, Mehmet Fatih Yoldaş 1 ORCID logo

  1. Dokuz Eylul University, Izmir, Turkey

  2. Marmara University, Istanbul, Turkey

* Correspondence: Dudu Mertgenç Yoldaş ORCID logo

Academic Editor: Saad G. Mohamed

Collection: Wind Energy

Received: January 13, 2026 | Accepted: May 25, 2026 | Published: June 03, 2026

Journal of Energy and Power Technology 2026, Volume 8, Issue 2, doi:10.21926/jept.2602010

Recommended citation: Yoldaş DM, Yalçinkaya S, Yoldaş MF. Use of Composite Materials in Wind Turbine Blades: A Comprehensive Review. Journal of Energy and Power Technology 2026; 8(2): 010; doi:10.21926/jept.2602010.

© 2026 by the authors. This is an open access article distributed under the conditions of the Creative Commons by Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is correctly cited.

Abstract

The increasing demand for sustainable energy has accelerated the development of high-performance wind turbine systems. In this context, material selection for turbine blades plays a critical role in ensuring structural efficiency, fatigue resistance, and long-term reliability. This study evaluates the mechanical and structural advantages of carbon fiber-reinforced polymer (CFRP) composites over glass fiber-reinforced polymer (GFRP) materials in wind turbine blade applications. Results from the literature indicate that CFRP provides significantly higher stiffness-to-weight and strength-to-weight ratios, enabling weight reductions of 20-30% in critical blade components such as spar caps. This reduction improves aeroelastic stability, decreases fatigue loading, and enhances overall energy capture efficiency. Furthermore, CFRP exhibits superior fatigue resistance under cyclic loading conditions exceeding 108 cycles, which is essential for the typical 20-30 years service life of wind turbines. However, the higher cost of CFRP remains a limiting factor, leading to its selective use in load-critical regions. The findings suggest that hybrid material strategies combining GFRP and CFRP offer an optimal balance between cost and performance.

Keywords

CFRP; GFRP; wind turbine blades; fatigue behavior; structural optimization

1. Introduction

The transition toward sustainable and low-carbon energy systems has become a global necessity due to the environmental and economic impacts of fossil fuel consumption. In this context, wind energy has emerged as one of the fastest-growing renewable energy technologies, with a continuously increasing contribution to global electricity production [1,2,3]. Historical developments have shown that material selection plays a critical role in wind turbine performance, as early metallic blade designs suffered from premature failures due to insufficient strength and fatigue resistance [2,3,4]. With the rapid growth of wind energy systems, turbine sizes have significantly increased, leading to more demanding structural requirements for turbine components, particularly blades. Wind turbine blades directly influence power generation efficiency, structural reliability, and overall system cost. Therefore, the use of fiber-reinforced polymer (FRP) composites has become standard due to their high specific strength, low density, and corrosion resistance [4,5,6].

Wind turbine blades operate under complex cyclic loading conditions caused by variable wind loads, gravitational forces, and rotational effects. During their service life, blades are expected to withstand approximately 108 loading cycles, making fatigue behavior a critical design parameter [7,8,9,10,11,12,13,14]. Fatigue-related damage is commonly observed in critical regions such as blade roots and bonded joints, where stress concentrations are dominant [15,16,17].

Among composite materials, glass fiber-reinforced polymers (GFRP) are widely used due to their cost-effectiveness and acceptable mechanical performance [5,18,19,20,21,22]. However, carbon fiber-reinforced polymers (CFRP) have gained increasing attention in recent years because of their superior stiffness-to-weight and strength-to-weight ratios, enabling significant weight reduction and improved structural performance [4,23,24,25].

In addition to material selection, structural design approaches play a crucial role in improving blade performance. Techniques such as variable thickness distribution and optimized fiber orientations along the blade length have been shown to enhance strength, reduce weight, and increase energy efficiency [26,27,28]. Moreover, adhesive bonding methods are widely preferred in composite blade manufacturing due to their ability to provide uniform stress distribution and improved fatigue resistance compared to mechanical fastening methods [29,30,31,32,33,34,35,36]. However, adhesive joints are sensitive to peel stresses, which may lead to premature failure if not properly designed [35,36,37].

Recent studies have focused on improving composite performance through hybrid material systems, nano-reinforcements, and advanced manufacturing techniques. These approaches aim to enhance mechanical performance, delay damage initiation, and extend service life while maintaining economic feasibility [1,38,39,40,41]. In particular, the integration of CFRP into structurally critical regions such as spar caps has been shown to significantly improve aeroelastic stability, reduce blade weight, and enhance energy production efficiency [24,42,43].

In this context, the present study aims to evaluate the role of CFRP composites in wind turbine blade applications, focusing on their mechanical advantages, fatigue behavior, and contribution to structural optimization compared to conventional GFRP materials.

2. Literature Review

2.1 Adhesive Bonding and Joint Behavior

Adhesive bonding is widely used in composite structures due to its ability to provide uniform stress distribution and a high strength-to-weight ratio. Investigated the mechanical behavior of single-lap joints produced from carbon/epoxy prepregs using different adhesive types and reported that failure mechanisms strongly depend on the bonding method. Their study showed that crack initiation and propagation vary significantly with adhesive properties and interfacial conditions [31].

In this study, it was demonstrated that stress concentrations in adhesive joints are particularly pronounced at the ends of the overlap region, where peel stresses initiate damage. To overcome this issue, hybrid adhesive configurations combining ductile and brittle adhesives have been proposed to improve stress distribution and increase joint strength [35]. Similarly, emphasized that adhesive bonding provides more continuous load transfer compared to mechanical fastening, although complex stress states may arise under peeling and plastic deformation conditions [36].

Recent studies have focused on improving adhesive performance through reinforcement strategies. In this study, it was reported that incorporating fiber reinforcements into adhesives significantly increases damage load and delays crack propagation [38]. Furthermore, demonstrated that dual-adhesive configurations enhance bonding strength and provide more balanced stress distribution compared to single-adhesive joints [44]. In addition, it was shown that fiber-reinforced epoxy adhesives improve both ductility and load-carrying capacity of bonded joints [45].

2.2 Fatigue Behavior and Damage Mechanisms

Fatigue is one of the most critical factors affecting the durability of wind turbine blades. Investigated fatigue damage mechanisms and highlighted that cyclic loading caused by aerodynamic forces leads to delamination and adhesive joint failures in composite blades [17].

In this study, the structural integrity of GFRP wind turbine blades was analyzed using finite element methods, and it was reported that damage is primarily concentrated at spar–shell junction regions due to insufficient stiffness and adhesive debonding [42]. Similarly, it was shown that structural failures in blades are strongly associated with inadequate stiffness and debonding in critical regions [46].

Environmental effects also play a significant role in fatigue performance. This study reports that seawater exposure reduces the mechanical strength of both GFRP and CFRP composites due to matrix degradation and diffusion effects. These findings emphasize the importance of considering environmental conditions in fatigue design [47].

2.3 Composite Materials and Mechanical Performance

Composite materials are essential for modern wind turbine blade design due to their high specific mechanical properties. In this study, the tensile behavior of glass and carbon fiber composites was investigated, and it was reported that CFRP exhibits higher strength and stiffness compared to GFRP [48]. Similarly, CFRP is confirmed to provide superior mechanical performance, while GFRP offers advantages in cost and ductility [23].

Recent research has focused on enhancing composite performance through hybrid and nano-reinforced materials. In this study, it was demonstrated that hybrid composites combining glass and carbon fibers improve fatigue resistance and structural performance [39]. In addition, highlighted the importance of reinforcement–matrix interaction in determining overall composite behavior [41].

Advanced materials such as graphene-reinforced composites have also been investigated. In this study, graphene platelet-reinforced composites were reported to significantly improve structural performance and reduce blade weight compared to conventional materials [4].

2.4 Structural Design and Optimization of Wind Turbine Blades

Structural design plays a critical role in improving the efficiency and durability of wind turbine blades. In this study, it was demonstrated that beam-based modeling approaches can accurately predict stress distribution and structural behavior while reducing computational cost [27,28].

In this study, different composite materials were analyzed using finite element methods and reported variations in deformation, stress distribution, and strain energy depending on material selection. These findings highlight the importance of selecting appropriate composite materials for optimal blade performance [49].

Furthermore, hybrid composite structures have been shown to provide higher tensile strength and improved structural stability compared to single-fiber composites [40].

2.5 Recent Advances and Future Trends

Recent developments in composite materials have focused on improving durability, sustainability, and performance. In this study, it is emphasized that advanced composites such as CFRP and hybrid materials enable larger and more efficient wind turbine blades [1].

Self-healing composites have also gained attention as a promising solution to extend service life. In this study, the integration of self-healing microcapsules was reported to improve damage tolerance and mechanical performance of composite structures [50].

In addition, nanomaterial-based enhancements and smart composite systems are increasingly being explored to improve fatigue resistance and enable real-time structural monitoring. These innovations are expected to play a significant role in the next generation of wind turbine blade technologies.

3. Materials and Methods

In this study, a comprehensive literature review was conducted to investigate the structural characteristics, material selection criteria, manufacturing processes, and design principles of composite materials used in wind turbine blades. The primary objective is to systematically compile existing knowledge and provide a reliable reference for researchers and engineers working in wind energy and composite materials. For this purpose, peer-reviewed journal articles, books, and technical reports were analyzed in detail, focusing on material requirements, composite classifications, blade structures, and production techniques [51,52,53,54,55,56,57,58].

Wind energy, as a highly variable and dynamic renewable energy source, generates complex aerodynamic, mechanical, and environmental loads on turbine blades. Variations in wind speed over time and across different geographical regions directly affect bending, torsional, and fatigue loads acting on the blades [51]. As demand for higher power capacity increases, turbine blade lengths have significantly increased, leading to higher structural loads. This trend has necessitated the use of lightweight materials with high strength and superior fatigue resistance, resulting in the replacement of conventional metallic materials with advanced composite materials [52].

Structurally, wind turbine blades are complex systems designed to ensure both aerodynamic efficiency and mechanical durability. A typical blade consists of an outer shell forming the aerodynamic surface, internal load-bearing structures such as spar caps, and shear webs that maintain structural integrity. These components collectively enable the blade to withstand varying wind loads while minimizing deformation, as illustrated in Figure 1 [53]. Among the various design considerations, fatigue behavior is particularly critical, as turbine blades are subjected to continuous cyclic loading throughout their service life [17].

Click to view original image

Figure 1 Classification of energy sources and the position of wind energy within renewable energy systems [59].

The selection of materials for wind turbine blades is governed by several key requirements, including low density, high specific strength and stiffness, excellent fatigue resistance, and environmental durability. In addition, manufacturability and cost-effectiveness play significant roles in the design process. Parameters such as specific strength and specific rigidity are decisive factors in material selection, making fiber-reinforced polymer composites the most suitable materials for these applications [54].

Composite materials, particularly glass fiber-reinforced polymers (GFRP) and carbon fiber reinforced polymers (CFRP), have become the dominant materials in modern wind turbine blades due to their high strength-to-weight ratio, fatigue resistance, and design flexibility [2]. These materials significantly reduce blade weight, thereby decreasing structural loads and improving overall energy efficiency. Furthermore, their manufacturability into complex geometries enables the development of large-scale, high-performance turbine designs. The evolution of wind turbine technology and associated material developments is summarized in Table 1 [55,56,57,58].

Table 1 Milestones in wind turbine development affecting blade size and composite material requirements [55,56,57,58].

Wind turbines can be classified based on several criteria, including axis orientation, number of blades, operating speed, power capacity, gearbox configuration, and installation location. These classifications directly influence aerodynamic performance, structural design, and application areas. The general classification of energy systems and the schematic representation of wind energy conversion are shown in Figure 2 and Figure 3, respectively [60].

Click to view original image

Figure 2 Wind turbine energy generation [61].

Click to view original image

Figure 3 Wind turbine classification [62].

In terms of axis orientation, wind turbines are mainly categorized as horizontal-axis, vertical-axis, and inclined-axis turbines. Among these, horizontal-axis wind turbines are the most widely used due to their high aerodynamic efficiency, typically reaching 45-50%, as illustrated in Figure 4 [51,63,64,65,66].

Click to view original image

Figure 4 Schematic representation of the main structural and operational characteristics of wind turbines installed in offshore wind power plants [67].

Vertical axis wind turbines, on the other hand, offer advantages such as independence from wind direction and ease of maintenance. However, they suffer from lower efficiency and limited self-starting capability (Figure 5) [63,64,65,66,68,69].

Click to view original image

Figure 5 Basic Components of a Horizontal Axis Wind Turbine System [68].

Inclined-axis turbines are relatively uncommon and are primarily investigated experimentally (Figure 6) [63,64,65,66,68,69,70].

Click to view original image

Figure 6 Basic Components of a Vertical Axis Wind Turbine System [69].

Another important classification is based on the number of blades. Wind turbines may have single, double, triple, or multiple blades; however, three-bladed configurations are the most widely used due to their balanced aerodynamic performance and structural stability. These configurations are illustrated in Figure 7 [63,64,65,66,68,69,70,71].

Click to view original image

Figure 7 (a) Schematic representation of an inclined-axis rotor blade and (b) design concept of a VAWT employing inclined blade axes [70].

The main components of a wind turbine, including rotor blades, gearbox, generator, tower, and control systems, are shown in Figure 8 and Figure 9 [72].

Click to view original image

Figure 8 Structural and aerodynamic configurations of wind turbines [71].

Click to view original image

Figure 9 Typical configuration of a modern large-scale wind turbine [73].

Composite materials used in wind turbine blades are defined as engineered materials formed by combining two or more constituents with distinct physical or chemical properties to achieve superior performance characteristics [74,75]. Typically, these materials consist of a matrix phase and a reinforcement phase, as shown in Figure 10 [76].

Click to view original image

Figure 10 Structure of composite material [76].

Composite materials are generally classified based on reinforcement type (fiber, particle, or flake) and matrix type (polymer, metal, ceramic, or carbon-carbon), as illustrated in Figure 11 [77,78,79,80,81,82,83].

Click to view original image

Figure 11 Classification of Composites [77,78,79,80,81,82,83].

Among these, polymer matrix composites (PMCs) are the most widely used in wind turbine blades due to their low density, high strength, corrosion resistance, and ease of manufacturing. Polymer matrices are further divided into thermoplastic and thermoset materials. Thermoplastics offer advantages such as recyclability and high production rates, whereas thermosets provide superior thermal stability and mechanical performance due to their cross-linked molecular structure [84,85,86,87]. The mechanical performance of composite materials is largely determined by the type of reinforcement used. Glass fibers are the most commonly used reinforcement due to their low cost and good mechanical properties. In contrast, carbon fibers are preferred in regions requiring higher stiffness and fatigue resistance. Aramid fibers offer high impact resistance and low density, whereas ceramic fibers are mainly used in high-temperature applications due to their cost and specialized properties [88,89,90].

In addition to fiber-reinforced structures, sandwich composite structures are widely used in wind turbine blades to achieve high stiffness with minimal weight. These structures consist of face sheets and lightweight core materials such as PVC, PET foams, or balsa wood, which enhance bending stiffness and structural efficiency. A schematic representation of sandwich structures is provided in Figure 12 [90].

Click to view original image

Figure 12 Forces that act against bending in sandwich structure applications [91].

Polymer matrix composites (PMCs) have become the dominant material class in wind turbine blade applications due to their superior specific strength, excellent fatigue resistance, and high corrosion durability under harsh environmental conditions. The relatively low density of polymer matrices, combined with their ease of processing, enables efficient manufacturing of large-scale and geometrically complex blade structures. In particular, thermoset matrices provide high-dimensional stability and long-term environmental resistance, which are critical for achieving the 20-30 years service life expected of modern wind turbines. Compared to metal and ceramic matrix composites, PMCs offer a more favorable balance between structural performance, manufacturability, and cost, making them the most suitable choice for wind energy applications.

Composite materials can be broadly classified by reinforcement type, which directly influences their mechanical behavior and structural performance under complex loading conditions. As illustrated in Figure 13 and Figure 14, composites may consist of continuous, discontinuous, or particulate reinforcements. Among these, continuous fiber-reinforced composites are predominantly used in wind turbine blades due to their superior load-carrying capacity and fatigue resistance under cyclic aerodynamic loading conditions [91,92].

Click to view original image

Figure 13 Different types of composite materials [92].

Click to view original image

Figure 14 Schematic representation of composite materials according to reinforcement type [93].

The mechanical performance of fiber-reinforced composites is also strongly affected by the weave pattern of the reinforcement. In plain weave (plain knit) fabrics, fibers alternately pass over and under each other, resulting in a balanced and symmetric structure. However, the inherent fiber crimp in this configuration reduces effective load transfer efficiency, resulting in lower mechanical properties. For this reason, plain weave structures are generally limited to low-stress regions in wind turbine blades (Figure 15) [81].

Click to view original image

Figure 15 Plain weave structure.

In contrast, twill weave fabrics exhibit reduced fiber crimp due to their staggered over-under pattern, which improves surface smoothness and mechanical performance. Twill and multi-axial fiber architectures are therefore preferred in high-load regions of wind turbine blades, where enhanced fatigue resistance and strength are required (Figure 16) [81].

Click to view original image

Figure 16 Twill weave structure.

Composite materials provide several critical advantages in wind turbine blade design. Their high specific strength enables lightweight structures, reducing centrifugal and gravitational loads while improving aerodynamic efficiency. Additionally, their directional strength allows fiber orientations to be tailored according to load paths, particularly in flapwise and edgewise loading directions. Composites also exhibit excellent corrosion resistance, ensuring durability under environmental exposure such as UV radiation, moisture, and temperature fluctuations. Furthermore, their high impact resistance and design flexibility allow the production of complex aerodynamic geometries while reducing assembly requirements and maintenance needs [81]. Despite these advantages, composite materials also present certain limitations. These include relatively high material and manufacturing costs, limited high-volume production capabilities, and the need for specialized design and fabrication expertise. Moreover, their thermal resistance is dependent on matrix properties, and environmental factors such as humidity and temperature variations may influence long-term mechanical behavior [81].

Laminate design is another critical factor determining the structural performance of composite materials. Laminates are formed by stacking multiple layers with different fiber orientations, and their configuration significantly affects bending stiffness, torsional rigidity, and fatigue life. A unidirectional laminate, in which all fibers are aligned in the same direction, provides maximum strength along the loading axis and is typically used in regions subjected to uniaxial stress (Figure 17) [81,94].

Click to view original image

Figure 17 Unidirectional laminate [94].

Angle-ply laminates consist of layers oriented at angles other than 0° and 90°, allowing improved resistance to multi-directional loads (Figure 18) [94].

Click to view original image

Figure 18 Angle-ply laminate [94].

Cross-ply laminates, formed by alternating 0° and 90° fiber orientations, provide balanced in-plane stiffness and are widely used in structural applications (Figure 19) [94].

Click to view original image

Figure 19 Cross-ply laminate [94].

More advanced laminate configurations include symmetric, antisymmetric, asymmetric, and quasi-isotropic (semi-isotropic) stacking sequences. Symmetric laminates ensure balanced bending behavior, while antisymmetric configurations improve torsional stiffness. Quasi-isotropic laminates, such as [0/±45/90]s, provide nearly uniform in-plane properties and are commonly used in complex loading environments. A schematic representation and deformation diagram of fiber-reinforced composites are shown in (Figure 20) [81].

Click to view original image

Figure 20 Schematic representations of (a) continuous and aligned, (b) discontinuous and aligned, and (c) discontinuous and randomly oriented fiber–reinforced composites [78].

Fiber orientation is one of the most influential parameters affecting composite mechanical behavior. Fibers aligned parallel to the applied load (0° orientation) exhibit maximum tensile strength, whereas perpendicular orientations (90°) provide minimal load-carrying capacity. Multi-directional laminates enable more uniform load distribution but may reduce peak strength compared to unidirectional configurations. Therefore, optimizing fiber orientation is essential for achieving both high strength and balanced structural performance. Fabric-laminated composites and layer orientation examples are shown in Figure 21 [75,76,78].

Click to view original image

Figure 21 Fabric laminated composites and ply orientation examples [74,95].

The application of composite materials in the wind energy industry has significantly evolved with advances in materials science and manufacturing technologies. Glass fiber-reinforced polymers (GFRP) remain the most widely used materials due to their cost-effectiveness and adequate mechanical performance, while carbon fiber-reinforced polymers (CFRP) are increasingly utilized in load-critical regions to enhance stiffness and reduce structural weight. These materials are typically combined with thermoset matrices such as epoxy, which provide high mechanical performance and processing advantages [2,96,97].

Manufacturing processes such as hand lay-up and vacuum infusion play a crucial role in determining the quality of composite structures. Among these, vacuum infusion has become the preferred technique for large-scale wind turbine blades, as it ensures uniform resin distribution, reduces void content, and enhances structural integrity. In these processes, dry fiber reinforcements and core materials, such as PVC foam or balsa wood, are placed in a mold, and resin is introduced under vacuum pressure to create a dense and durable composite structure.

Sandwich composite structures are widely used in wind turbine blades to achieve high stiffness-to-weight ratios. These structures consist of lightweight core materials bonded between stiff composite face sheets, significantly improving bending performance without increasing weight. Foam cores and balsa wood are commonly used due to their excellent mechanical properties and low density. Despite the significant advancements in composite materials, ongoing research focuses on improving recyclability, sustainability, and long-term durability. The increasing demand for larger wind turbines with capacities exceeding 8-10 MW continues to drive innovation in hybrid composite systems, advanced manufacturing techniques, and environmentally sustainable materials. Rotor blades in modern wind turbine systems consist primarily of two main structural components, namely the external shell and the internal load-carrying spar system. The shell defines the aerodynamic profile of the blade and is composed of suction and pressure-side surfaces, while the spar system provides structural rigidity by transferring aerodynamic, gravitational, and inertial loads toward the blade root. Within the spar structure, vertical elements are generally referred to as shear webs, whereas horizontal elements are known as spar caps. These components extend along the blade span from the root region toward the tip and are designed to resist bending and torsional loads under operational conditions. Rectangular and I-beam type configurations are commonly employed in practical applications, as they provide efficient load distribution and high structural stiffness (Figure 22) [8,98].

Click to view original image

Figure 22 Generic composition of a wind turbine blade [98].

Wind turbine blades convert the kinetic energy of the wind into mechanical energy through rotational motion. Structurally, the blade is divided into three main regions: root, mid-span, and tip. The root region, located near the rotor hub connection, is typically subjected to the highest stress levels and initially exhibits a circular cross-section to improve structural strength. The mid-span region plays a dominant role in energy capture and aerodynamic efficiency, whereas the tip region requires precise geometric optimization due to its sensitivity to flow variations and structural flexibility. In modern designs, the blade geometry gradually transitions from structurally dominant root sections to aerodynamically optimized tip sections, ensuring an optimal balance between strength and efficiency (Figure 23 and Figure 24) [8,99,100].

Click to view original image

Figure 23 General view and main components of a standard three-bladed horizontal-axis wind turbine [100].

Click to view original image

Figure 24 Cross-sectional profile of a wind turbine blade [16].

Although the external shape defines aerodynamic performance, the internal structural integrity of the blade is ensured by shear webs and spar caps. These components function as internal beam-like structures that carry most of the mechanical loads generated during operation (Figure 25) [2].

Click to view original image

Figure 25 The internal beam structure is responsible for carrying the vast majority of mechanical loads generated during operation.

The blade is typically manufactured by bonding the two shell halves with structural adhesives, thereby forming a closed aerodynamic profile (Figure 26).

Click to view original image

Figure 26 Schematics of the manufacturing of a wind turbine rotor blade by assemblage and bonding of two aeroshells and two shear webs [2].

Under aerodynamic loading, compressive stresses occur on the suction side while tensile stresses develop on the pressure side. These loads are transferred through the shell to the spar caps, which act as primary load-carrying elements. At the same time, shear webs prevent relative displacement between the upper and lower shell surfaces, maintaining structural integrity (Figure 27) [78].

Click to view original image

Figure 27 Compression and Tensile Stresses in the Loaded Wing [101].

Aerodynamic performance is governed by airfoil geometry, which is designed to maximize lift generation while minimizing drag. Airfoils such as NACA profiles are widely used in wind turbine applications due to their well-documented aerodynamic characteristics (Figure 28) [102].

Click to view original image

Figure 28 NACA is the most commonly used aerofoil [102].

The lift force is generated due to pressure differences between the suction and pressure sides of the airfoil, in accordance with Bernoulli’s principle, where increased flow velocity leads to reduced static pressure [80,81]. The aerodynamic force system acting on the airfoil consists of lift and drag components, which act perpendicular and parallel to the incoming flow direction, respectively (Figure 29) [103].

Click to view original image

Figure 29 Lift-Driven Wind Turbine Concept [103].

A typical airfoil geometry is defined by parameters such as chord length, camber, thickness distribution, and angle of attack. The leading edge is the point where airflow first interacts with the airfoil, while the trailing edge is the flow exit region. The chord line is defined as the straight line connecting these two points, and the angle of attack is the angle between the chord line and the incoming flow direction. Aerodynamic forces are generally assumed to act at the quarter-chord point (c/4), where lift, drag, and pitching moment are analyzed for performance evaluation (Figure 30 and Figure 31) [104,105,106].

Click to view original image

Figure 30 Airfoil schematic [105].

Click to view original image

Figure 31 Airfoil aerodynamic force system [106].

From a materials perspective, wind turbine blade design is strongly influenced by requirements such as high strength-to-weight ratio, fatigue resistance, and environmental durability. Composite materials, particularly glass fiber-reinforced polymers (GFRP) and carbon fiber-reinforced polymers (CFRP), are widely used due to their superior mechanical performance and low density characteristics (Table 2) [83].

Table 2 Rigidity and strength parameters of wind turbine blade materials [83].

In large-scale turbines, hybrid composite systems are commonly employed to optimize cost and structural efficiency (Figure 32).

Click to view original image

Figure 32 General Configuration of Modern Large-Scale Wind Turbines (www.desmoinesregister.com).

Modern blade structures frequently incorporate sandwich composite configurations consisting of lightweight core materials such as balsa wood or polymer foams, bonded between stiff composite face sheets. This configuration significantly improves bending stiffness while minimizing weight (Figure 33, Figure 34, and Figure 35) [107,108].

Click to view original image

Figure 33 Material Configuration of Wind Turbine Blade Components [107].

Click to view original image

Figure 34 The use of adhesive bonding in foam structures sandwich [109].

Click to view original image

Figure 35 Analogy between sandwich slab and I-beam profiles [110].

Manufacturing processes such as hand lay-up, vacuum bagging, and vacuum infusion are widely used in composite blade production. Among these, vacuum infusion is preferred for large-scale applications due to its ability to reduce void content and improve laminate quality (Figure 36, Figure 37, and Figure 38) [16,51,52].

Click to view original image

Figure 36 Schematic representation of the hand lay-up process [111].

Click to view original image

Figure 37 Schematic representation of the vacuum bagging process [112].

Click to view original image

Figure 38 Vacuum infusion method [113].

During operation, wind turbine blades are subjected to complex loading conditions including aerodynamic forces, gravitational effects, and centrifugal loads. These loads induce internal stresses and strains, which may lead to failure mechanisms such as delamination, fiber breakage, adhesive debonding, and surface cracking (Figure 39) [114,115,116,117,118]. The primary structural resistance against these loads is provided by spar caps, while shear webs distribute shear stresses and maintain geometric stability of the blade cross-section [16,51].

Click to view original image

Figure 39 Damage types in wind turbine blade shell structure [118].

In terms of structural behavior, rotor blades operate as cantilever beams, in which flapwise and edgewise bending loads represent the dominant stress modes. Flapwise bending is primarily resisted by spar caps, whereas edgewise bending is largely carried by the outer shell structure [17]. Load transfer between blade components is achieved through different joining techniques, including mechanical fastening, adhesive bonding, and hybrid systems. Adhesive bonding plays a critical role in composite blade structures, providing uniform stress distribution and eliminating stress concentrations associated with mechanical fasteners (Figure 40) [119].

Click to view original image

Figure 40 A typical adhesive bond [119].

However, mechanical fastening methods such as bolts and rivets introduce localized stress concentrations and may reduce composite continuity due to drilling-induced fiber damage (Figure 41) [120,121,122].

Click to view original image

Figure 41 Typical examples of engineering adhesive joints [122].

Adhesive joints exhibit high resistance to shear and tensile loads but are more sensitive to peel stresses. Failure typically occurs either at the adhesive–substrate interface or within the adhesive layer itself. To overcome limitations of individual joining methods, hybrid connections that combine mechanical fasteners and adhesives are increasingly used in wind turbine blade structures to enhance load-carrying capacity and structural reliability [35,36,120].

4. Results

This study presents a comprehensive evaluation of composite materials used in wind turbine blades, with particular emphasis on material selection, manufacturing techniques, joining methods, and structural performance. The findings clearly indicate that the transition from conventional metallic materials to fiber-reinforced polymer (FRP) composites has been a key factor in enabling the development of modern, large-scale wind turbine blades.

The results demonstrate that glass fiber-reinforced polymers (GFRP) remain the most widely used materials due to their cost-effectiveness and adequate mechanical performance, while carbon fiber-reinforced polymers (CFRP) are increasingly utilized in critical load-bearing regions that require higher stiffness and fatigue resistance. The high strength-to-weight and stiffness-to-weight ratios of these materials significantly reduce structural loads while supporting longer blade spans, thereby directly improving energy capture efficiency.

In manufacturing processes, advanced composite fabrication techniques such as vacuum infusion and vacuum bagging have shown superior performance compared to conventional hand lay-up methods. These processes minimize defects such as void formation, fiber misalignment, and delamination, resulting in improved laminate quality and enhanced mechanical reliability. Among these, vacuum infusion has emerged as the most effective method for large-scale blade production due to its ability to ensure uniform resin distribution and consistent structural integrity.

The evaluation of joining methods highlights that adhesive bonding is the most effective technique for composite blade structures, primarily because it provides uniform stress distribution and superior fatigue resistance. However, its performance is highly dependent on proper surface preparation and curing conditions. Mechanical fastening, while advantageous for assembly and maintenance, introduces stress concentrations and potential structural weaknesses due to fiber discontinuities. Hybrid joining methods, which combine adhesive bonding with mechanical fastening, offer a balanced solution by improving joint strength, reducing stress concentrations, and enhancing overall structural reliability.

Furthermore, the results emphasize that damage mechanisms such as delamination, fiber breakage, adhesive debonding, and matrix cracking are critical factors affecting blade performance and service life. These damage modes are strongly influenced by local stress concentrations and cyclic loading conditions. Therefore, accurate prediction of stress distribution and careful design of load paths are essential to prevent premature failure.

Overall, the findings confirm that integrating advanced composite materials, optimized manufacturing techniques, and efficient joining methods enables the production of lightweight, high-performance, and durable wind turbine blades. This integration plays a crucial role in increasing turbine efficiency, extending service life, and reducing maintenance and operational costs. Additionally, ongoing developments in material technology and structural design are expected to further enhance blade performance and support the continued growth of wind energy systems.

5. Discussion and Conclusions

The literature reviewed in this study clearly demonstrates that the advancement of wind turbine blade technology is strongly dependent on developments in composite materials, manufacturing processes, and structural design optimization. The transition from conventional metallic materials to fiber-reinforced polymer (FRP) composites has enabled the production of lighter, longer, and more aerodynamically efficient rotor blades, which are essential for modern large-scale wind energy systems. From a material perspective, glass fiber-reinforced polymers (GFRP) remain the most commonly used materials in wind turbine blade manufacturing due to their cost-effectiveness and acceptable mechanical properties. However, carbon fiber-reinforced polymers (CFRP) provide significantly higher stiffness-to-weight and strength-to-weight ratios, making them particularly suitable for structurally critical regions such as spar caps. Literature findings indicate that the selective use of CFRP in these regions can reduce blade weight by approximately 20–30%, which leads to reduced gravitational loading, improved aeroelastic stability, and enhanced energy conversion efficiency. Manufacturing techniques directly influence the structural integrity and fatigue performance of composite blades. Advanced processes such as vacuum infusion and vacuum bagging significantly improve laminate quality by reducing void content, enhancing fiber wet-out, and ensuring uniform resin distribution. Compared to traditional hand lay-up methods, these techniques provide superior mechanical consistency and are therefore preferred in large-scale wind turbine blade production. Joining techniques are another critical factor affecting blade performance. Adhesive bonding is widely adopted due to its ability to distribute stresses uniformly across bonded surfaces and eliminate stress concentrations associated with mechanical fasteners. However, its performance is highly dependent on proper surface preparation, curing conditions, and environmental resistance. Mechanical fastening methods, while advantageous for assembly and maintenance, introduce discontinuities in the fiber structure and localized stress concentrations that may weaken composite performance. Hybrid joining systems, combining adhesive bonding with mechanical fastening, offer an improved balance between strength, reliability, and damage tolerance. The literature also identifies several critical damage mechanisms in wind turbine blades, including delamination, fiber breakage, matrix cracking, and adhesive debonding. These failures are primarily driven by cyclic loading, aerodynamic forces, and local stress concentrations, particularly in high-risk regions such as blade roots and spar-shear web interfaces. Accurate prediction of these stress distributions and optimization of fiber orientation are therefore essential to ensure long-term structural reliability and prevent premature failure. From a structural standpoint, the use of fiber-reinforced composites enables tailoring of mechanical properties to load paths, a key advantage in wind turbine blade design. Spar caps act as the main load-bearing elements resisting flapwise bending, while shear webs transfer shear loads between blade surfaces. The outer shell maintains aerodynamic shape and contributes to load distribution, whereas adhesive joints ensure structural continuity between components.

Overall, this study confirms that the integration of advanced composite materials, optimized manufacturing techniques, and efficient joining methods is essential for achieving high-performance wind turbine blades. These developments significantly enhance energy efficiency, reduce operational and maintenance costs, and extend service life. Future research is expected to focus on hybrid material systems, smart composites, automated manufacturing technologies, and sustainable recycling methods, thereby further improving the performance and environmental sustainability of wind energy systems.

Author Contributions

D.M.Y.: Project Administration, Conceptualization, Validation, Formal Analysis; S.Y.: Methodology, Writing—Original Draft Preparation, Writing—Review and Editing, Data Curation; M.F.Y.: Investigation, Resources, Visualization. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Competing Interests

The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

AI-Assisted Technologies Statement

The authors declare that any use of artificial intelligence tools was limited to language editing and did not affect the scientific content, data analysis, or conclusions of the manuscript. The authors take full responsibility for the manuscript.

References

  1. Ebissa DT, Alemu MA. Current developments and prospects of composite materials for wind turbine blades. Poly J Eng Technol. 2024; 2: 22-49. [Google scholar]
  2. Mishnaevsky Jr L, Branner K, Petersen HN, Beauson J, McGugan M, Sørensen BF. Materials for wind turbine blades: An overview. Materials. 2017; 10: 1285. [CrossRef] [Google scholar]
  3. International Renewable Energy Agency. World energy transitions outlook 2023: 1.5°C pathway (Vol. 1) [Internet]. Abu Dhabi, UAE: IRENA; 2023. Available from: https://www.irena.org/-/media/Files/IRENA/Agency/Publication/2023/Jun/IRENA_World_energy_transitions_outlook_2023.pdf.
  4. Kim HJ, Cho JR. Exploratory study on the application of graphene platelet-reinforced composite to wind turbine blade. Polymers. 2024; 16: 2002. [CrossRef] [Google scholar]
  5. Guo W, Bai S, Ye Y. A new strategy of reusing abandoned carbon fiber reinforced plastic: Microstructures and properties of C/C composites based on recycled carbon fiber. J Reinf Plast Compos. 2021; 40: 294-306. [CrossRef] [Google scholar]
  6. Liu WG, Zhang XC, Li HY, Liu Z. Effect of surface modification with 3-aminopropyltriethyloxy silane on mechanical and crystallization performances of ZnO/poly (butylenesuccinate) composites. Compos B Eng. 2012; 43: 2209-2216. [CrossRef] [Google scholar]
  7. Yağlıkçı M, Çeliktaş MS. Material selection and projection on the composite wind turbine Blades’ fatigue life and strength (in Turkish). Eng Mach. 2018; 59: 27-44. [Google scholar]
  8. Kaya K, Koç E. Blade profile design and manufacturing principles of horizontal axis wind turbines (in Turkish). Eng Mach. 2015; 56: 38-48. [Google scholar]
  9. Global Wind Energy Council. Global wind report 2022 [Internet]. Brussels, Belgium: Global Wind Energy Council; 2022. Available from: https://www.gwec.net/reports/globalwindreport/2022.
  10. Psomopoulos CS, Kalkanis K, Kaminaris S, Ioannidis GC, Pachos P. A review of the potential for the recovery of wind turbine blade waste materials. Recycling. 2019; 4: 7. [CrossRef] [Google scholar]
  11. İzmir Kalkinma Ajansi. Izmir wind turbine blade recycling roadmap (in Turkish) [Internet]. Konak, Turkey: İzmir Kalkinma Ajansi; 2023. Available from: https://www.kalkinmakutuphanesi.gov.tr/assets/upload/dosyalar/ruzgar-turbin-geri-donusumu-projesi.pdf.
  12. WindEurope. Wind energy in Europe: 2022 statistics and the outlook for 2023-2027 [Internet]. Brussels, Belgium: WindEurope; 2023. Available from: https://windeurope.org/data/products/wind-energy-in-europe-2022-statistics-and-the-outlook-for-2023-2027/.
  13. Turkish Electricity Transmission Corporation. Turkish electricity statistics [Internet]. Turkish Electricity Transmission Corporation; 2023. Available from: https://ytbsbilgi.teias.gov.tr/ytbsbilgi/frm_istatistikler.jsf.
  14. Şahin H. One of the three wind turbine blades shipped to Europe last year came from Izmir (in Turkish) [Internet]. Anadolu Agency; 2023. Available from: https://www.aa.com.tr/tr/ekonomi/gecen-yil-avrupaya-gonderilen-3-ruzgar-turbini-kanadindan-biri-izmirden/2938262.
  15. İmak A, Solmaz MY, Topkaya T. The analysis of fatigue behaviours of the laminated hybrid composite materials (in Turkish). El-Cezerî J Sci Eng. 2016; 3: 448-458. [Google scholar]
  16. Zhang Y, Xue S, Chen C, Ma T, Zhou B. Study on acoustic emission characteristics and damage mechanism of wind turbine blade main spar with different defects. Polymers. 2024; 16: 3261. [CrossRef] [Google scholar]
  17. Sutherland HJ. On the fatigue analysis of wind turbines. Sandia National Labs.; 1999; No. SAND99-0089. [Google scholar]
  18. Bever MB, Duwez PE. Gradients in composite materials. Mater Sci Eng. 1972; 10: 1-8. [CrossRef] [Google scholar]
  19. Cantor KM, Watts P. Plastics processing. In: Applied plastics engineering handbook. William Andrew Publishing; 2011. pp. 195-203. [CrossRef] [Google scholar]
  20. Hao S, Kuah AT, Rudd CD, Wong KH, Lai NY, Mao J, et al. A circular economy approach to green energy: Wind turbine, waste, and material recovery. Sci Total Enviro. 2020; 702: 135054. [CrossRef] [Google scholar]
  21. Rathore N, Panwar NL. Environmental impact and waste recycling technologies for modern wind turbines: An overview. Waste Manag Res. 2023; 41: 744-759. [CrossRef] [Google scholar]
  22. Wind Europe. Homepage [Internet]. Brussels, Belgium: Wind Europe; 2026. Available from: https://windeurope.org.
  23. Yoldaş MF. Experimental Investigation of the Mechanical Characterization of Glass Fiber Reinforced Plasma (GFRP) and Carbon Fiber Reinforced Polymer (CFRP) Composite Materials Used in Marine Vessels (in Turkish). Istanbul, Turkey: Marmara University; 2023. [Google scholar]
  24. Kafashha M, Banitalebi E, Mahboubizadeh S, Ashkani O. Optimizing wind turbine blade performance: A comparative analysis of mechanical properties in CFRP and GFRP composites. Proceedings of the 12th International Conference on Materials and Metallurgical Engineering (IMAT); 2024 November 28-29; Tehran, Iran. [Google scholar]
  25. Atakok G, Mertgenc Yoldas D. Comparison of GFRP (glass fiber-reinforced polymer) and CFRP (carbon fiber-reinforced polymer) composite adhesive-bonded single-lap joints used in marine environments. Sustainability. 2024; 16: 11105. [CrossRef] [Google scholar]
  26. Gaunaa M. Unsteady two-dimensional potential-flow model for thin variable geometry airfoils. Wind Energy. 2010; 13: 167-192. [CrossRef] [Google scholar]
  27. Werthen E, Hardt D, Balzani C, Hühne C. Comparison of different cross-sectional approaches for the structural design and optimization of composite wind turbine blades based on beam models. Wind Energy Sci. 2024; 9: 1465-1481. [CrossRef] [Google scholar]
  28. Özmen F. Composite wind turbine blade design and analysis (in Turkish). Konak, Turkey: Dokuz Eylul University; 2024. [Google scholar]
  29. Serbest S. Experimental analysis and modeling of shear strength of adhesive-bonded single-lap glass fiber reinforced composites. İzmir, Turkey: Izmir Institute of Technology; 2024. [Google scholar]
  30. Gürsel A, Yildiz S. Affecting factors of bond strength in adhesive joints: Surface morphology and surface energy (in Turkish). Düzce Üniv Bilim Teknol Derg. 2021; 9: 987-996. [CrossRef] [Google scholar]
  31. Kim KS, Yoo JS, Yi YM, Kim CG. Failure mode and strength of uni-directional composite single lap bonded joints with different bonding methods. Compos Struct. 2006; 72: 477-485. [CrossRef] [Google scholar]
  32. Croccolo D, De Agostinis M, Fini S, Olmi G. Influence of the engagement ratio on the shear strength of an epoxy adhesive by push-out tests on pin-and-collar joints: Part I: Campaign at room temperature. Int J Adhes Adhes. 2016; 67: 69-75. [CrossRef] [Google scholar]
  33. Takamura M, Isozaki M, Takeda SI, Koyanagi J. Numerical analysis on optimal adhesive thickness in CFRP single-lap joints considering material properties. Materials. 2025; 18: 2423. [CrossRef] [Google scholar]
  34. Taş H, Soykok IF. Investigating fabric interlayer effects on tensile loading limits of adhesively bonded single-lap composite joints. J Reinf Plast Compos. 2025; 44: 2928-2940. [CrossRef] [Google scholar]
  35. Adams RD, Comyn J, Wake WC. Structural adhesive joints in engineering. Springer Science & Business Media; 1997. [CrossRef] [Google scholar]
  36. Da Silva LF, Campilho RD. Advances in numerical modelling of adhesive joints. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg; 2012. [CrossRef] [Google scholar]
  37. Ozdemir O, Oztoprak N. An investigation into the effects of fabric reinforcements in the bonding surface on failure response and transverse impact behavior of adhesively bonded dissimilar joints. Compos B Eng. 2017; 126: 72-80. [CrossRef] [Google scholar]
  38. Akpinar S, Akpinar IA. Effect of nanostructured reinforcement of adhesive on thermal cycling performance of a single-lap joint with composite adherends. Compos B Eng. 2019; 175: 107106. [CrossRef] [Google scholar]
  39. Chikhradze NM, Marquis FD, Abashidze GS. Hybrid fiber and nanopowder reinforced composites for wind turbine blades. J Mater Res Technol. 2015; 4: 60-67. [CrossRef] [Google scholar]
  40. Long T, Chen X, Qiu L, Han J, Dong QJ. Wind turbine blades with hybrid fiber composite: Tensile properties and numerical verification. Therm Sci. 2024; 28: 2109-2114. [CrossRef] [Google scholar]
  41. Rajak DK, Pagar DD, Kumar R, Pruncu CI. Recent progress of reinforcement materials: A comprehensive overview of composite materials. J Mater Res Technol. 2019; 8: 6354-6374. [CrossRef] [Google scholar]
  42. Brondsted P, Nijssen RP, Goutianos S. Advances in wind turbine blade design and materials. Woodhead Publishing; 2023. [Google scholar]
  43. Yalçinkaya S, Yoldaş MF, Mertgenç Yoldaş D. Experimental investigation of four-point bending test results of GFRP and CFRP composites used in wind turbine blades. Polymers. 2025; 17: 2412. [CrossRef] [Google scholar]
  44. Jairaja R, Naik GN. Single and dual adhesive bond strength analysis of single lap joint between dissimilar adherends. Int J Adhes Adhes. 2019; 92: 142-153. [CrossRef] [Google scholar]
  45. Behera RK, Parida SK, Das RR. Effect of using fibre reinforced epoxy adhesive on the strength of the adhesively bonded Single Lap Joints. Compos B Eng. 2023; 248: 110358. [CrossRef] [Google scholar]
  46. Yang J, Peng C, Xiao J, Zeng J, Xing S, Jin J, et al. Structural investigation of composite wind turbine blade considering structural collapse in full-scale static tests. Compos Struct. 2013; 97: 15-29. [CrossRef] [Google scholar]
  47. Yoldaş MF, Yalçinkaya S. Deniz araçlarinda kullanilan cam elyaf (GFRP) takviyeli kompozit malzemelerin mekanik karakterizasyonlarinin deneysel incelenmesi. Proceedings of the 4th International Congress on Engineering Sciences and Multidisciplinary Approaches; 2022 November 3-5; Istanbul, Turkey. pp. 855-867. [Google scholar]
  48. Saad NA, Hamzah MS, Hamzah AF. Numerical and experimental investigation for tensile properties of polyphenylene sulfide basis composite material. Babylon Univ. 2014; 10: 1-22. Available from: https://cdnx.uobabylon.edu.iq/research/repository1_publication24910_29_4129.pdf.
  49. Gukendran R, Sambathkumar M, Sabari C, Raj CR, Kumar VR. Structural analysis of composite wind turbine blade using ANSYS. Mater Today Proc. 2022; 50: 1011-1016. [CrossRef] [Google scholar]
  50. Yilmaz MA, Hasirci K, Yakar H, Cetin S, Isık D, Irez AB. Development of self-healing glass fiber–reinforced laminate composites for wind turbine blades. In: Society for experimental mechanics annual conference and exposition. Cham: Springer Nature Switzerland; 2023. pp. 33-37. [CrossRef] [Google scholar]
  51. Burton T, Jenkins N, Sharpe D, Bossanyi E. Wind energy handbook. John Wiley & Sons; 2011. [CrossRef] [Google scholar]
  52. Veers PS, Ashwill TD, Sutherland HJ, Laird DL, Lobitz DW, Griffin DA, et al. Trends in the design, manufacture and evaluation of wind turbine blades. Wind Energy. 2003; 6: 245-259. [CrossRef] [Google scholar]
  53. Hau E, Von Renouard H. Wind turbines: Fundamentals, technologies, application, economics. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg; 2006. [CrossRef] [Google scholar]
  54. Jureczko ME, Pawlak M, Mężyk A. Optimisation of wind turbine blades. J Mater Process Technol. 2005; 167: 463-471. [CrossRef] [Google scholar]
  55. Global Wind Energy Council. Global wind report 2023 [Internet]. Brussels, Belgium: Global Wind Energy Council; 2023. Available from: https://www.gwec.net/reports/globalwindreport/2023.
  56. McCoy A, Musial W, Hammond R, Mulas Hernando D, Duffy P, Beiter P, et al. Offshore wind market report: 2024 edition. Golden, CO: National Renewable Energy Laboratory; 2024; No. NREL/TP-5000-90525. [CrossRef] [Google scholar]
  57. Walgern J. Field-data based reliability modelling of wind turbine subsystems. Glasgow, UK: University of Strathclyde; 2025. [Google scholar]
  58. Republic of Türkiye Ministry of Energy Andnatural Resources. Homepage [Internet]. Ankara, Turkey: Republic of Türkiye Ministry of Energy Andnatural Resources; 2026. Available from: https://enerji.gov.tr/homepage.
  59. Elavarasan RM. The motivation for renewable energy and its comparison with other energy sources: A review. Eu J Sustain Dev Res. 2019; 3: em0076. [CrossRef] [Google scholar]
  60. Gunasekaran N, Joo YH. Nie–Tan fuzzy method of fault-tolerant wind energy conversion systems via sampled-data control. IET Control Theory Appl. 2020; 14: 1516-1523. [CrossRef] [Google scholar]
  61. Jahromi S, Moosavian SF, Yaghoubirad M, Azizi N, Ahmadi A. 4E analysis of the horizontal axis wind turbine with LCA consideration for different climate conditions. Energy Sci Eng. 2022; 10: 4085-4111. [CrossRef] [Google scholar]
  62. Elibüyük U, Üçgül İ. Wind turbines, types and methods of wind energy storage (in Turkish). J Yekarum. 2014; 2. Available from: https://izlik.org/JA59CH49SA.
  63. Manwell JF, McGowan JG, Rogers AL. Wind energy explained: Theory, design and application. John Wiley & Sons; 2010. [CrossRef] [Google scholar]
  64. Hau E. Rotor aerodynamics. In: Wind turbines: Fundamentals, technologies, application, economics. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg; 2013. pp. 89-166. [CrossRef] [Google scholar]
  65. Akwa JV, Vielmo HA, Petry AP. A review on the performance of Savonius wind turbines. Renew Sustain Energy Rev. 2012; 16: 3054-3064. [CrossRef] [Google scholar]
  66. Islam M, Ting DS, Fartaj A. Aerodynamic models for Darrieus-type straight-bladed vertical axis wind turbines. Renew Sustain Energy Rev. 2008; 12: 1087-1109. [CrossRef] [Google scholar]
  67. Tumse S, Bilgili M, Yildirim A, Sahin B. Comparative analysis of global onshore and offshore wind energy characteristics and potentials. Sustainability. 2024; 16: 6614. [CrossRef] [Google scholar]
  68. Sawant M, Thakare S, Rao AP, Feijóo-Lorenzo AE, Bokde ND. A review on state-of-the-art reviews in wind-turbine-and wind-farm-related topics. Energies. 2021; 14: 2041. [CrossRef] [Google scholar]
  69. Soleimani J, Ejlali A, Moradkhani M. Transverse flux permanent magnet generator design and optimization using response surface methodology applied in direct drive variable speed wind turbine system. Period Eng Nat Sci. 2019; 7: 36-53. [CrossRef] [Google scholar]
  70. Guo J, Zeng P, Lei L. Structure analysis of an innovative vertical axis wind turbine with inclined pitch axes using finite element method. IOP Conf Ser Mater Sci Eng. 2020; 825: 012004. [CrossRef] [Google scholar]
  71. Jenkins PE, Younis A, Jenkins PE. Flow simulation to determine the effects of shrouds on the performance of wind turbines. J Power Energy Eng. 2016; 4: 79-93. [CrossRef] [Google scholar]
  72. iStockPhoto. Wind turbine work principle with mechanical inner structure outline diagram [Internet]. iStockPhoto; 2021 [cited date 2024 April 4]. Available from: https://www.istockphoto.com/tr/vektör/wind-turbine-work-principle-with-mechanical-inner-structure-outline-diagram-gm1353539090-428607754.
  73. Rafaat SM, Hussein R. Power maximization and control of variable-speed wind turbine system using extremum seeking. J Power Energy Eng. 2018; 6: 51-69. [CrossRef] [Google scholar]
  74. Clyne TW, Hull D. An introduction to composite materials. Cambridge University Press; 2019. [CrossRef] [Google scholar]
  75. Mazumdar S. Composites manufacturing: Materials, product, and process engineering. Boca Raton, FL: CRC press; 2001. [CrossRef] [Google scholar]
  76. Mishra PM, Tripathi A, Soni S. Experimental and comparative analysis of zirconium oxide and fly ash reinforced with heat treated Al 7075 aluminum alloy hybrid. IOP Conf Ser Mater Sci Eng. 2021; 1136: 012036. [CrossRef] [Google scholar]
  77. Shehab E, Meiirbekov A, Amantayeva A, Tokbolat S. Cost modelling for recycling fiber-reinforced composites: state-of-the-art and future research. Polymers. 2022; 15: 150. [CrossRef] [Google scholar]
  78. Callister Jr WD, Rethwisch DG. Materials science and engineering: An introduction. John Wiley & Sons; 2020. [Google scholar]
  79. Gibson RF. Principles of composite material mechanics. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press; 2007. [CrossRef] [Google scholar]
  80. Hull D, Clyne TW. An introduction to composite materials. 2nd ed. Cambridge University Press; 1996. [CrossRef] [Google scholar]
  81. Mallick PK. Materials, manufacturing, and design. Mech Eng. 2007; 83: 74-81. [Google scholar]
  82. Matthews FL, Rawlings RD. Composite materials: Engineering and science. Woodhead Publishing; 1999. [Google scholar]
  83. Chawla KK. Composite materials: Science and engineering. Springer Science & Business Media; 2012. [Google scholar]
  84. Tawfik BE, Leheta H, Elhewy A, Elsayed T. Weight reduction and strengthening of marine hatch covers by using composite materials. Int J Nav Archit Ocean Eng. 2017; 9: 185-198. [CrossRef] [Google scholar]
  85. Alshammari BA, Alsuhybani MS, Almushaikeh AM, Alotaibi BM, Alenad AM, Alqahtani NB, et al. Comprehensive review of the properties and modifications of carbon fiber-reinforced thermoplastic composites. Polymers. 2021; 13: 2474. [CrossRef] [Google scholar]
  86. National Research Council, Division on Engineering, Physical Sciences, National Materials Advisory Board, Committee on High-Performance Structural Fibers for Advanced Polymer Matrix Composites. High-performance structural fibers for advanced polymer matrix composites. Washington, D.C.: National Academies Press; 2005. [Google scholar]
  87. Marchant RE, Patel CKN, McCullough R, Girifalco LA, Venables JD, Kukich DS. Polymer matrix composites [Internet]. Chicago, IL: Encyclopædia Britannica; 2026. Available from: https://www.britannica.com/technology/materials-science/Polymer-matrix-composites.
  88. Beşergil B. Composites: Fundamental principles from nature to technology (in Turkish). Ankara, Turkey: Gazi Kitabevi; 2016. [Google scholar]
  89. Gümülcine T. Characterization of continuous e-glass and basalt fiber-reinforced composite materials with isophthalic polyester resin matrix (in Turkish). Istanbul, Turkey: Yildiz Technical University; 2014. [Google scholar]
  90. Güneş D. Comparison of mechanical properties of uniaxial and biaxial carbon fiber reinforced polyester resin matrix composite materials (in Turkish). Kütahya, Turkey: Kütahya Dumlupınar University; 2019. [Google scholar]
  91. Widiyanto I, Alwan FH, Mubarok MA, Prabowo AR, Laksono FB, Bahatmaka A, et al. Effect of geometrical variations on the structural performance of shipping container panels: A parametric study towards a new alternative design. Curved Layer Struct. 2021; 8: 271-306. [CrossRef] [Google scholar]
  92. Sikarwar S, Yadav SB, Yadav AK, Yadav BC. Nanocomposite material for packaging of electronic goods. Int J Sci Innov Res. 2014; 1: 93-108. [Google scholar]
  93. Ashebir DA, Mengesha GA, Sinha DK. An insight into mechanical and metallurgical behavior of hybrid reinforced aluminum metal matrix composite. Adv Mater Sci Eng. 2022; 2022: 7843981. [CrossRef] [Google scholar]
  94. Ahmed MN, Kumar PV, Shivanand HK, Muzammil SB. A study on effect of variation of thickness on tensile properties of hybrid polymer composites (glassfibre-carbonfibre-graphite) and GFRP composites. Int J Eng Res Appl. 2013; 3: 2015-2024. [Google scholar]
  95. Hasan KF, Horváth PG, Alpár T. Potential fabric-reinforced composites: A comprehensive review. J Mater Sci. 2021; 56: 14381-14415. [CrossRef] [Google scholar]
  96. Cheng X, Du B, He J, Long W, Su G, Liu J, et al. A review of thermoplastic composites on wind turbine blades. Compos B Eng. 2025; 299: 112411. [CrossRef] [Google scholar]
  97. Carnicero R, Cano L, Cruz I, Garcia-Manrique JA. Manufacturing and structural testing of small wind turbine blades using thermoplastic composites. Fibers Polym. 2026; 27: 379-396. [CrossRef] [Google scholar]
  98. Geiger R, Hannan Y, Travia W, Naboni R, Schlette C. Composite wind turbine blade recycling-value creation through Industry 4.0 to enable circularity in repurposing of composites. IOP Conf Ser Mater Sci Eng. 2020; 942: 012016. [CrossRef] [Google scholar]
  99. Schubel PJ, Crossley RJ. Wind turbine blade design. Energies. 2012; 5: 3425-3449. [CrossRef] [Google scholar]
  100. McKenna R, vd Leye PO, Fichtner W. Key challenges and prospects for large wind turbines. Renew Sustain Energy Rev. 2016; 53: 1212-1221. [CrossRef] [Google scholar]
  101. Paula AA. The airfoil thickness effects on wavy leading edge phenomena at low Reynolds number regime. São Paulo, Brazil: Universidade de São Paulo; 2016. [Google scholar]
  102. Agarwal K, Vijaykrishnan V, Mohanty D, Murugaiah M. A comprehensive dataset of the aerodynamic and geometric coefficients of airfoils in the public domain. Data. 2024; 9: 64. [CrossRef] [Google scholar]
  103. Bošnjaković M. Wind power buildings integration. J Mech Eng Autom. 2013; 3: 221-226. [CrossRef] [Google scholar]
  104. Hansen M. Aerodynamics of wind turbines. London and New York: Routledge; 2015. [CrossRef] [Google scholar]
  105. Zhao P, Gao X, Zhao B, Liu H, Wu J, Deng Z. Machine learning assisted prediction of airfoil lift-to-drag characteristics for mars helicopter. Aerospace. 2023; 10: 614. [CrossRef] [Google scholar]
  106. Panigrahi DC, Mishra DP. CFD simulations for the selection of an appropriate blade profile for improving energy efficiency in axial flow mine ventilation fans. J Sustain Min. 2014; 13: 15-21. [CrossRef] [Google scholar]
  107. Steigmann R, Iftimie N, Savin A, Sturm R. Wind turbine blade composites assessment using non-contact ultrasound method. J Clean Energy Technol. 2016; 4: 440-443. [CrossRef] [Google scholar]
  108. Zenkert D, Allen HG. An introduction to sandwich construction. Sheffield, UK: Engineering Materials Advisory Services; 1995. [Google scholar]
  109. Pereira AB, Fernandes FA. Sandwich panels bond with advanced adhesive films. J Compos Sci. 2019; 3: 79. [CrossRef] [Google scholar]
  110. Diab Group. The sandwich technology-core materials [Internet]. Helsingborg, Sweden: Diab Group. Available from: https://www.diabgroup.com/what-we-do/the-sandwich-technology/.
  111. Mottram JT, Henderson J. Fibre-reinforced polymer bridges—Guidance for designers. London, UK: CIRIA; 2018. [Google scholar]
  112. Liu X, Zheng S, Yang F. Airworthiness compliance methods for low-cost wet composite structures in general aviation aircraft. Aerospace. 2025; 12: 592. [CrossRef] [Google scholar]
  113. Habibie S, Suhendra N, Setiawan BA, Hamzah M, Aisah N, Fitriani DA, et al. Prospect of ramie fiber development in Indonesia and manufacturing of ramie fiber textile-based composites for industrial needs, an overview. Int J Compos Mater. 2021; 11: 43-53. [Google scholar]
  114. Mandell JF, Samborsky DD, Cairns D. Fatigue of composite materials and substructures for wind turbine blades. Sandia National Labs.; 2002; No. SAND2002-0771. [CrossRef] [Google scholar]
  115. Jensen FM, Falzon BG, Ankersen J, Stang H. Structural testing and numerical simulation of a 34 m composite wind turbine blade. Compos Struct. 2006; 76: 52-61. [CrossRef] [Google scholar]
  116. Mishnaevsky Jr L. Root causes and mechanisms of failure of wind turbine blades: Overview. Materials. 2022; 15: 2959. [CrossRef] [Google scholar]
  117. Snel H. Review of aerodynamics for wind turbines. Wind Energy. 2003; 6: 203-211. [CrossRef] [Google scholar]
  118. Zhang Z, Shu Z. Unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV)-assisted damage detection of wind turbine blades: A review. Energies. 2024; 17: 3731. [CrossRef] [Google scholar]
  119. Wahab MA. The mechanics of adhesives in composite and metal joints: Finite element analysis with ANSYS. Lancaster, PA: DEStech Publications, Inc.; 2014. [Google scholar]
  120. Kinloch AJ. Adhesion and adhesives: Science and technology. Springer Science & Business Media; 2012. [Google scholar]
  121. Monajati L, Vadean A, Boukhili R. Mechanical behavior of adhesively bonded joints under tensile loading: A synthetic review of configurations, modeling, and design considerations. Materials. 2025; 18: 3557. [CrossRef] [Google scholar]
  122. Kujawa M, Smakosz Ł, Paczos P, Jan F, Winkelmann K, Konopińska-Zmysłowska V, et al. An analytical, finite element and experimental study of single-lap joints bonded with epoxy adhesive. Int J Eng Sci. 2026; 226: 104555. [CrossRef] [Google scholar]
Newsletter
Download PDF Download Full-Text XML Download Citation
0 0
Newsletter  

TOP