OBM Integrative and Complementary Medicine is an international peer-reviewed Open Access journal published quarterly online by LIDSEN Publishing Inc. It covers all evidence-based scientific studies on integrative, alternative and complementary approaches to improving health and wellness.

Topics contain but are not limited to:

  • Acupuncture
  • Acupressure
  • Acupotomy
  • Bioelectromagnetics applications
  • Pharmacological and biological treatments including their efficacy and safety
  • Diet, nutrition and lifestyle changes
  • Herbal medicine
  • Homeopathy
  • Manual healing methods (e.g., massage, physical therapy)
  • Kinesiology
  • Mind/body interventions
  • Preventive medicine
  • Research in integrative medicine
  • Education in integrative medicine
  • Related policies

It publishes a variety of article types: Original Research, Review, Communication, Opinion, Comment, Conference Report, Technical Note, Book Review, etc.

There is no restriction on paper length, provided that the text is concise and comprehensive. Authors should present their results in as much detail as possible, as reviewers are encouraged to emphasize scientific rigor and reproducibility.

Indexing: DOAJ-Directory of Open Access Journals.

Publication Speed (median values for papers published in 2023): Submission to First Decision: 5.9 weeks; Submission to Acceptance: 14.7 weeks; Acceptance to Publication: 8 days (1-2 days of FREE language polishing included)

Open Access Research Article

Better to Not Be Alone: Relationships between Hurricane Related Trauma, Spiritual Support, and Social Support

Beren Crim Sabuncu , Wenyi Li , Amy L. Ai *

  1. College of Social Work, Florida State University, 296 Champions Way: University Center, Building C, FL 32306, Tallahassee, US

Correspondence: Amy L. Ai

Academic Editor: Michael D. Lumpkin

Special Issue: Spirituality and Sustainability

Received: November 03, 2022 | Accepted: March 20, 2023 | Published: April 06, 2023

OBM Integrative and Complementary Medicine 2023, Volume 8, Issue 2, doi:10.21926/obm.icm.2302017

Recommended citation: Sabuncu BC, Li W, Ai AL. Better to Not Be Alone: Relationships between Hurricane Related Trauma, Spiritual Support, and Social Support. OBM Integrative and Complementary Medicine 2023; 8(2): 017; doi:10.21926/obm.icm.2302017.

© 2023 by the authors. This is an open access article distributed under the conditions of the Creative Commons by Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is correctly cited.


There has been a paucity in the literature on the protective effects of spiritual and social support as it pertains to trauma symptoms following a disaster. This secondary analysis investigated: a) the longitudinal analysis of the effect of perceived spiritual support (PSS; measured using PSSS-S2) on posttraumatic stress symptoms (PTSS); and b) the effect of social support and Wave-1 PTSS results on Wave-2 PTSS among Hurricane-Katrina (H-K) volunteers. We hypothesized that, 1. The shortform PSSS-S2 would have an adequate one-dimensional structure in our H-K sample; 2. PSSS-S2 would be inversely related to Wave-2 PTSS, after controlling for Wave-1 PTSS and other disaster factors; and 3. Wave-2 perceived social support would be inversely related to Wave-2 PTSS. In 2005, researchers of universities the Deep South conducted a questionnaire survey on H-K volunteers, some of whom were also disaster victims (N = 542; age = 29.66 + 9.10, African American = 55%). The Wave-1 survey was delivered at three-months after H-K, the Wave-2 survey was delivered six-months after H-K. Robust Confirmatory Factor Analysis was used to verify the single-item structure of PSSS-S2. Multiple regression analysis was employed using SPSS27. The Robust CFA results indicate good model fit. In our final regression model, Wave-1 PTSS (β = 0.527, p < 0.001) and other H-K stressors (β = 0.154, p < 0.035) were positively associated with Wave-2 PTSS. Being older, having experienced less PTSS in Wave-1, and perceiving higher rates of social support were negatively related with Wave-2 PTSS. The present study demonstrated the lasting nature of PTSS. The present study demonstrated the lasting nature of PTSS. The six-months follow-up is important because it was the time a diagnosis of posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) could be established for volunteers. Our findings underscore the importance of social support and perceived spiritual support in fending off the negative role of disaster-induced stressors [1].


Posttraumatic stress disorder and symptoms (PTSD/PTSS); spirituality, perceived spiritual support scale-shortform (PSSS-S2); natural disasters; social support; Hurricane-Katrina/Rita related stressors

1. Introduction

Despite an increase attention to the role of integrative medicine in physical illnesses, there has been little attention to the role of spirituality in psychiatric disorders and mental health in the rising trend of climate changes. Our current study focuses on factors that may affect symptoms of post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) of volunteers for disaster relief following Hurricane Katrina/Rita (HK/R). Specifically, we are interested in the potential effect of perceived spiritual support and perceived social support along with trauma symptoms, hurricane related stressors, and peritraumatic emotional responses after.

H-KR is amongst the costliest hurricanes to date, both in terms of human lives and financial damage [2]. In 2005, Hurricane Katrina made landfall on August 29, followed by Hurricane Rita four weeks later on September 24 [3]. Both Hurricane Katrina and Hurricane Rita were Category 3 hurricanes, which means that these hurricanes carried sustained winds of 111-130 mph (178-209 km/hr) [4]. More than 1,800 people lost their lives, and the financial damages were in excess of $108 billion [5]. Examining the protective and risk factor on PTSS among volunteers may have important implications for OBM and disaster areas of work.

Natural disasters can have catastrophic micro and mezzo outcomes for all individuals and communities affected [4]. Among some of these outcomes are states of disrepair within communities’ infrastructural, social, institutional, and economic structures [6]. Even more concerning, institutions associated with disaster aid (i.e. hospitals, police departments, and fire departments) are also significantly impacted by disasters, which limit these services’ aid capacity [7,8]. As these services and providers are limited by disaster outcomes, representing one of the initial efforts to help rebuild and heal communities and address community disrepair are volunteers [9]. However, during their aid relief work, volunteers place themselves at risk for physical or psychological harm [10].

1.1 Impact of Natural Disasters on Mental Health

There is a plethora of mental and emotional adverse reactions volunteers might have related to being in a disaster-devastated environment [9,11]. Some long-term mental health outcomes of disaster exposure have been supported to be burnout [9,12] post-traumatic stress symptoms (PTSS; [13,14,15,16,17]), depression [18], anxiety [19,20], disordered sleep [13,19], and suicidality [21]. Health behaviors associated with the mentioned mental health outcomes are coping-motivated drinking [22] and increased drug use [23,24] to name a few.

As first responders, volunteers are exposed to numerous potentially traumatic sights such as human remains [10,17], structural disrepair [15], psychological distress or other trauma symptoms experienced by victims [25], and scarcity brought on by the disaster which leads to economic disrepair [9]. Combining the potentially traumatic sights with the high demand nature of volunteer work, it is expected that volunteers experience a range of trauma responses. Some of these abovementioned trauma responses can become medical disorders and have long-lasting effects on health, performance, and mobility of the volunteers [19].

1.2 Perceived Spiritual Support

Religiosity and religious practice have been linked to biopsychosocial health. For example, short term and long-term beneficial effects of spirituality (positive religious coping and perceived spiritual support/PSS) were evident in prospective studies on patients following open-heart surgery [26,27,28]. A new Italian study showed that resilience moderated the link between COVID-19 related concerns and psychological distress during the pandemic, especially among the participants who scored high in PSSS [29]. Religious beliefs are thought to impact psychological, practices are thought to impact biological, and religious community is thought to impact social health of individuals [30]. In natural and man-made disasters, victims tend to pursue their faith for coping [27,31]. This is because collective trauma is shared by many individuals and communities, leading to a need for deep interconnectedness with a higher power among people suffered together even though they may have diverse beliefs. Davis et al. [32] conducted a qualitative analysis of religiosity in the wake of a flood, finding that survivors find love, comfort, and strength in their connection with God. However, the role of religion and spirituality has remained underinvestigated, particularly within disaster contexts [31,33].

Cherry et al. [34] examined individuals exposed to HK/R and the 2010 Deepwater Horizon oil spill (n = 219), they found that spiritual support was positively associated with resilience (OR = 1.11, p ≤ 0.01). Another study examining family coping for survivors of Hurricane Katrina, found that higher levels of spirituality were significantly related to higher levels of family coping (n = 452; p < 0.01) [35]. A study examining PSS in survivors of hurricanes (n = 566) found that it was inversely related to PTSSs and positively related to personal growth after disaster trauma experiences [33]. PSS can be defined as an intrapersonal and internalized resource that is sustained by participants’ connection to a higher power, be it God, Jesus, or other cosmic presences. In a September 11 study examining the role of spiritual support in trauma experiences (n = 453), it was found that spiritual support was linked to decreased trauma responses through a pathway of prayer coping [36].

The original Perceived Spiritual Support Scale (PSSS; [37]) has been validated in previous years for individuals who were exposed to crises [33,38]. Ai and colleagues also established short forms as PSSS-S1 and PSSS-S2 in a hurricane study to meet the challenge of difficulties in studying massive crises [33]. Interestingly, a study analyzing data collected in the Louisiana Health Aging Study (LHAS) found that, amongst those who witnessed the devastation of H-KR (n = 59), religious beliefs and religious coping were negatively correlated with physical function [4]. This suggests that individuals with higher levels of physical function might be less connected to their religious practices in the wake of a disaster. Therefore, exploring religiosity and its protective effects in volunteers might result in mixed findings in cross-sectional studies. To inform future research in the OBM area, the current study attempted to further validate the PSSS-S2 and explore its longitudinal effect among the H-KR volunteer sample.

1.3 Perceived Social Support

A 9/11 follow-up survey showed that perceived spiritual support and social support had identical benefits for mental health, including PSSD, suggesting that deep interconnectedness occurs in both existential and physical levels [39]. As we are interconnected, so are our needs and health [40]. Social support is the sum of beneficent behaviors, intentions, and consequences of any interpersonal relationship [41]. Social support can take on numerous forms and can be provided by different systems, such as one’s family, romantic partner, friends, or larger community [42]. Perceived social support at baseline has been supported to be a protective factor for trauma experiences [43,44,45,46].

However, mitigating the effect of trauma through social support might not always be easy or beneficial. A three-wave longitudinal study in Chinese typhoon survivors (n = 341) found that negative psychological health outcomes of trauma exposure have a negative relationship with the perception of social support [47]. This indicates that while perceived social support has been supported to be a protective factor during trauma experiences, survivors might feel alienated by their trauma experience and perceive fewer social resources than they possess. A four-wave longitudinal study with Chinese survivors of the Wenchuan earthquake (n = 285) found that non-family social support hindered participants’ personal growth following their disaster experience in the long-term [48]. Overall, findings suggest that perceived social support has mental and physical benefits, however, these benefits may be limited in acute trauma experiences. The present study thus examined the association between social support perceived in the Wave-2 survey and PTSS.

Based on the literature on spirituality and mental health in disasters, the current study has; first, used confirmative factor analysis to validate the structure of the PSSS-S2 with an underrepresented group, volunteers. Next, we investigated the overtime influence with perceived social support assessed in the follow-up. Overall, we hypothesize that:

  1. The shortform PSSS-S2 would have the adequate one-dimensional structure in this H-KR sample; 
  2. PSSS-S2 would be inversely related to Wave-2 PTSS, after controlling for Wave-1 PTSS and other disaster factors; 
  3. Wave-2 perceived social support would be inversely related to Wave-2 PTSS. 

2. Method

2.1 Procedure

Wave-1 survey questionnaire was conducted approximately three months after H-K at five public universities in the Gulf Coast affected by the disaster. Wave-2 data were collected six months after H-K, but only two universities could join this follow-up. Researchers at each site employed posters, emails, and direct faculty contact to encourage participation. A package containing an informed consent letter, the consent form, the survey, and a return envelope was, then, distributed to consented respondents. The consent letter emphasized voluntary participation, freedom to withdraw from the study, and confidentiality, which included a description of the additional protections afforded by the federal Certificate of Confidentiality that was obtained for the study. At each participating universities, the Human Subjects Review Board approved the documents. All subsets of data were aggregated and analyzed at one site.

2.2 Respondents

The average age of the combined sample in Wave-1 (N = 542) was 29.66 (SD = 9.103) years. Additionally, the age of the youngest and oldest respondents is 17 and 61, respectively. Most respondent volunteers were female (88.4%, N = 479) and African American (55.2%, N = 298), and were undergraduate (39.1%, N = 212) or graduate students (58.5%, N = 317) who majored in social work. The average age of the combined sample in Wave-2 (N = 201) was 30.38 (SD = 9.445) years. In Wave-2, most respondent volunteers were female (91%, N = 183) and African American (38.8%, N = 78), including undergraduate (20.9%, N = 42) and graduate students (78.6%, N = 158) of social work. The attrition was mainly due to the availability of study sets for this follow-up. For instance, the number of African American respondents reduced from 298 to 78. According to two sample Z-test for proportions, the number of African American respondents in Wave 1 was significantly higher than in Wave 2 (Z-score = 3.918, p < 0.001).

2.3 Measures

2.3.1 PTSD-Like Symptoms

PTSS were measured with the 17-item Modified PTSD Symptom Scale (MPSS-SR) that assesses the 17 DSM-IV-TR symptoms of PTSD [49]. When screening for PTSD, a clinical cut off score of 28 is recommended [49]. The current study abides by the DSM-IV-TR criteria as data was collected in 2005, 7 years before the publishing of DSM-5. For an assessment of differences between the two manuals, see Pai, Suris, and North [50]. Participants indicated how often they experienced particular symptoms (e.g., bad dreams or nightmares, upsetting thoughts or images, trouble concentrating) using a 4-level scale (0 = Not at all or only one time, 3 = 5e or more times a week/almost always). Cronbach’s alphas for the MPSS-SR in Waves-1 and 2 were 0.922 and 0.911, respectively.

2.3.2 Perceived Spiritual Support Scale

The initial 12-item Spiritual Support Scale (PSSS) [38] assessed various spiritual relationships (e.g., I have been inspired by my religious or spiritual faith in the face of distress). The structure, construct and predictive validity, and reliability was reported in a landmark book [37]. The present study employed a newly validated short form, the 6-item PSSS-S2 [33], because it included an item on congressional support. The PSSS-S2 was validated using a sample of a H-MM study that demonstrated its one-factor structure and adequate reliability and validity [33]. Respondents were instructed to replace the term God with their preferred higher power in a spiritual or religious faith or belief (e.g., the divine, a higher power, Buddha). Response options ranged from 1 (Strongly disagree) to 4 (Strongly agree) concerning each statement during the time following H-KR. Cronbach’s alpha for the PSSS and PSSS-S2 was 0.967 and 0.912 in this H-KR sample, respectively. The mean and standard deviation of PSSS-S2 were 1.572 and 0.703 in Wave-1, respectively. Similarly, the mean and standard deviation of PSSS-S2 were 1.663 and 0.724 in Wave-2, respectively.

2.3.3 Perceived Social Support

Social Support was measured with the 12-item Multidimensional Scale of Perceived Social Support from family, friends, and significant others (MSPSS; [51]). Participants were asked “to what extent you agree with these statements since the time Hurricanes Katrina and Rita,” on a 6-level scale (1 = very strongly disagree, 6 = very strongly agree; α = 0.971). The mean and standard deviation of perceived social support were 4.979 and 1.167, respectively.

2.3.4 Hurricane-Related Stressors

The stressors experienced in the month following H-KR by respondents were assessed with an 18-item checklist [52]. Stressors included common stressful experiences in various domains of living, ranging from the moderate (e.g., food and gasoline shortages, being an evacuee for less than a week, problems contacting loved ones) to the more severe (e.g., loss of personal property, separation from pets, being an evacuee for a week or more). Items checked on the list were summed to create a composite score. Cronbach’s alpha for the Hurricane-related stressor was 0.761 in this H-KR sample. The mean and standard deviation of hurricane-related stressors were 5.431 and 3.273 in Wave-1, respectively. Similarly, the mean and standard deviation of hurricane-related stressors were 5.530 and 3.233 in Wave-2, respectively.

2.3.5 Peritraumatic Emotional Responses

Participants’ initial emotional reactions to H-KR were assessed with the 12-item Types of Peritraumatic Emotional Responses checklist, originally developed for a 9/11 study [36], with a contextual modification. Using a 5-level scale (1 = Not at all, 5 = A great deal), respondents indicated the extent to which they experienced 12 types of emotional reactions (e.g., horror/shock, anger/hatred, fear/anxiety/worry, sympathy for victims and their families, admiration for the first responders, gratitude for the international support) and an additional “Other” item during the month following H-KR. As factored in Ai et al.’s [36] study, the first five items were summed up as negative emotional responses and the remaining seven constituted positive emotional responses. Cronbach’s alpha for both subscales was 0.82.

2.3.6 Demographics and Internship Status

Age, race, gender, and study levels (undergraduate and graduate students) were included in the analysis as demographic controls. Age was presented in years. Race, gender, and study levels were dichotomized (African American = 0, White = 1; Male = 0, Female = 1; No = 0, Yes = 1).

2.4 Data Analysis

No missing values were computed. However, in the factor analysis and hierarchical regression these were reduced to 521 and 152, respectively. The sample size 521 was a listwise deletion regarding the PSSS (e.g., 12 item list). The sample size 152 was another listwise deletion regarding the independent variables (e.g., Race, Age, Gender, PTSS in Wave-1, PTSS-S2, Hurricane stressors, and social support). Descriptive statistics were used to summarize data. Univariate analyses were performed to examine the correlations between independent and PTSD-like symptoms. Using statistical software of R-language [53], Robust Confirmatory factor analysis was conducted to verify the single-item structure of the PSSS-S2 [33], since the data were not normally distributed and with missing data. Finally, a hierarchical multiple regression analysis was performed following preplanned steps (i.e., 1. Demographics; 2. H-KR stressors, Wave-1 PTSS, and PSSS-S2; 3. Wave-2 perceived social support) to explore the association of PSSS-S2 and perceived social support with Wave-2 PTSS, controlling for demographic, Wave-1 PTSS and H-KR stressors.

3. Results

3.1 Factor Analyses

Initially, we adopted the single-item structure of the PSSS-S2 (n = 521). However, the result was not satisfactory. Model fit indices indicate that single-item structure was not a good fit of the CFA: χ2(9) = 57.512, p < 0.001 (significance indicates not a good fit); CFI and TLI were 0.983 and 0.972, respectively [RMSEA = 0.094 (<0.06 is optimal); and SRMR = 0.022 (<0.08 is optimal)], all indicating non-satisfactory fit, except SRMR [54,55]. In addition to that, the modification index suggests an error variance between V2 and V3. Review Figure 1 for the CFA path diagram.

Click to view original image

Figure 1 The CFA Path Diagram for PSSS-S2.

Next, Table 1 shows standardized coefficients of Robust CFA using the H-KR sample with a covariance variance 0.312 between V2 and V3. All six items adequately loaded on the single factor of the PSSS-S2 (i.e., 0.696/v1 to 0.669/v6). Model fit indices indicated an better fit than initial model, χ2(8) = 9.189, p = 0.327 (non-significance indicates good fit); CFI and TLI were 0.999 and 0.998, respectively [RMSEA = 0.022 (<0.06 is optimal); and SRMR = 0.015 (<0.08 is optimal)], all indicating good fit [54,55].

Table 1 Confirmatory Factor Analysis for PSSS-S2(N = 521).

3.2 Correlational Analyses

Table 2 showed bivariate relationships among all factors. Wave-1 PTSS and hurricane-related stressors were positively related to Wave-2 PTSS. Race was also positively correlated with Wave-1, and Wave-2 PTSS, indicating that females might reported higher PTSS scores in both waves. In addition, Gender was positively associated with Race, PTSS scores in Wave-1, hurricane-related stressors, and Wave-2 perceived social support. Moreover, Wave-1 PTSS was also positively associated with hurricane-related stressors and Wave-2 perceived social support. Further, hurricane-related stressors is positively correlated with Wave-2 perceived social support.

Table 2 Correlation Analysis (N = 521).

3.3 Multiple Regression Analyses

Table 3 illustrated the result of the hierarchical regression analysis following preplanned steps. Among all models, the second and third steps were significant, while F-changes were also significant (second step: 25.893, and third step: 6.238). In Step 1, none of the demographics predicted Wave-2 PTSS. In Step 2, among the newly entered variables, Wave-1 PTSS (β = 0.518, p < 0.001) and H-KR stressors (β = 0.157, p < 0.05) were positively associated with Wave-2 PTSS. In the final step, age (β = -0.155, p < 0.05), remained to be negatively related with Wave-2 PTSS. Additionally, H-KR victims who experienced PTSS (β = 0.524, p < 0.001) and more hurricane-related stressors (β = 0.173, p < 0.01) in Wave-1 were more likely to report higher levels of PTSS in Wave-2. However, H-KR victims who perceived more social support (β = -0.171, p < 0.01) in Wave-2 were more likely to experience reduced levels of PTSS in Wave-2.

Table 3 Hierarchical Regression Step 1, 2, and 3 models on PTSD Wave-2 (N = 152).

4. Discussion

The findings generated from the current study are partly consistent with expectations. First, as hypothesized, the PSSS-S2 has the adequate one-dimensional structure in this H-KR sample, supported by confirmative factor analysis and model fit indices. Further, despite the reduced symptom levels, PSSS persisted among some volunteers, which is consistent with the literature. A systematic review examining health outcomes amongst disaster relief responders supported that some adverse medical outcomes experienced by volunteers include environmental, infectious, dermatologic, gastrointestinal, and respiratory diseases, and burns, fractures, falls [11,56]. These can be clearly attributed to structural disrepair (i.e. debris, weak infrastructure) and location-specific environmental conditions (i.e. clean water availability, extreme weather conditions) [57]. Paired with the aforementioned mental health effects, these can prolong the effects of disaster trauma experiences. The current findings add new evidence for the lasting damage of disasters and should get attention from health and mental health providers for future crisis intervention.

However, findings did not support the hypothesized protection against post-traumatic stress symptoms. Contrary to our second hypothesis, PSSS-S2 was not a significant predictor for PTSS in the follow-up, after controlling for symptom levels in the first survey. In other words, it is not consistent with the 9/11 follow-up study [39], nor a similar study on H-KR Wave-1 depressive disorders [58]. Numerous previous studies also support that spirituality has served as a protective factor for survivors of disaster experiences [33,59,60,61]. Further, spirituality has also been supported to be a moderator between volunteers’ experience of burnout and intent to quit their organizations [62]. The literature suggests that there is a relationship between spirituality and resilience [59] and Post-Traumatic Growth [63]. Future studies with volunteer samples should examine the role of perceived spiritual support on predicting longitudinally observed remnants of trauma experiences controlling for the volunteers’ active participation in the rebuilding process. It would be especially valuable to the field to examine the extent to which perceived spiritual support impacts the length of stay at a disaster-stricken community.

The inconsistent results might be due to a market loss of participants because only two universities joined the follow-up with only 1/3 of the original sample. It could also be due to the even more loss of African American participants from the first wave (1/4) survey when over half of volunteers had African American race identity. As noted earlier, African Americans were more rely on spirituality and religion to cope with adversities [58]. Still another reason lies in the potential less traumatization among volunteers than actual victims at the center of H-KR in New Orleans. In any case, more longitudinal research is warranted [31].

Lastly, we had hypothesized that Wave-2 perceived social support would be inversely related to Wave-2 PTSS. Studies have previously identified social support as a protective factor in trauma reactions of survivors. Our findings are consistent with previous findings on the role of perceived social support [39,43,44,45,46]. The bivariate analyses indicate that perceived social support is inversely related to age, which is consistent with literature on non-volunteering older adults (for a review, see [64]). This suggests that older volunteers perceive less social support than younger volunteers. These findings underscore the importance of creating a community for volunteers in disaster situations, with an emphasis on older volunteers who might be at a relatively higher risk for physical and emotional correlates of aid relief. Nevertheless, this link should be considered preliminary and there remains a need for prospective studies to replicate this finding.

The current study has limitations. Our current sample is a convenience sample of student volunteers; therefore, the findings of this study might not be generalizable across populations. Further longitudinal research is necessary to assess the impact of perceived spirituality on trauma experiences. In addition, due to the lack of capacity to join the follow-up by three universities, our Wave-2 participants are less than our Wave-1 participants, which may be due to individuals not wanting to relive their traumatic experiences. Lastly, collecting data for this kind of major disaster may not be realistic, since occurrence is rare. Technology and disaster preparedness methods change constantly, the same way survivors process trauma and the level of exposure are expected to change as well. The findings of the current study hence might not be reproducible, which the authors of this paper think might indicate progress.

Our findings imply the importance of deep interconnectedness among victims and volunteers, both before and after a disaster experience. Humans have collective experiences which can be bettered or worsened by human interaction. Disaster experiences are a way for us to remember that we must take an active stance in bettering our universal experience. Support and progress are connected. Medical and mental health practitioners might assess perceived social support of individuals who have been impacted by trauma. Further, encouraging pre-existing religious coping methods in clients with limited mobility might be useful in trauma symptom mitigation.

Author Contributions

We greatly acknowledge the contribution of five universities that contributed to the data collection for this follow-up secondary analysis.

Competing Interests

Authors have no known conflicts of interest.


  1. Sabuncu BC, Ai AL, Li W. Better to not be alone: Relationships between hurricane related trauma, spiritual support, and social support [Conference Presentation]. ISTSS 38th Annual Meeting; 2022 November 9-12; Atlanta, GA, United States.
  2. Cowling K, Tucker D. Natural disasters and public health: Hurricanes Katrina, Rita, and Wilma. Acad Emerg Med. 2010; 17: e52-e53. [CrossRef]
  3. Leitch ML, Vanslyke J, Allen M. Somatic experiencing treatment with social service workers following Hurricanes Katrina and Rita. Soc Work. 2009; 54: 9-18. [CrossRef]
  4. Brown JS, Cherry KE, Marks LD, Jackson EM, Volaufova J, Lefante C, et al. After Hurricanes Katrina and Rita: Gender differences in health and religiosity in middle-aged and older adults. Health Care Women Int. 2010; 31: 997-1012. [CrossRef]
  5. Office of Response and Restoration. Hurricanes Katrina and Rita [Internet]. Office of Response and Restoration; [cited date 2022 October 10]. Available from: https://response.restoration.noaa.gov/oil-and-chemical-spills/significant-incidents/hurricanes-katrina-and-rita.
  6. Wisner B, Blaikie PM, Blaikie P, Cannon T, Davis I. At risk: Natural hazards, people’s vulnerability and disasters. Britain: Taylor & Francis Books Ltd.; 2004. [CrossRef]
  7. Chaffee MW, Oster NS. The role of hospitals in disaster. Disaster Med. 2006; 34-42. doi: 10.1016/B978-0-323-03253-7.50012-1. [CrossRef]
  8. Melnychuk E, Sallade TD, Kraus CK. Hospitals as disaster victims: Lessons not learned? J Am Coll Emerg Physicians Open. 2022; 3: e12632. [CrossRef]
  9. Chen HY, Ahmad CA, Abdullah KL. The impact of serving in disaster relief among volunteers in Malaysia. Chin J Traumatol. 2021; 24: 237-248. [CrossRef]
  10. Quevillon RP, Gray BL, Erickson SE, Gonzalez ED, Jacobs GA. Helping the helpers: Assisting staff and volunteer workers before, during, and after disaster relief operations. J Clin Psychol. 2016; 72: 1348-1363. [CrossRef]
  11. Garbern SC, Ebbeling LG, Bartels SA. A systematic review of health outcomes among disaster and humanitarian responders. Prehosp Disaster Med. 2016; 31: 635-642. [CrossRef]
  12. McCann IL, Pearlman LA. Vicarious traumatization: A framework for understanding the psychological effects of working with victims. J Trauma Stress. 1990; 3: 131-149. [CrossRef]
  13. Ironson G, Wynings C, Schneiderman N, Baum A, Rodriguez M, Greenwood D, et al. Posttraumatic stress symptoms, intrusive thoughts, loss, and immune function after Hurricane Andrew. Psychosom Med. 1997; 59: 128-141. [CrossRef]
  14. Lee JY, Kim SW, Bae KY, Kim JM, Shin IS, Yoon JS. Factors associated with posttraumatic stress disorder symptoms among community volunteers during the Sewol ferry disaster in Korea. Compr Psychiatry. 2017; 77: 38-44. [CrossRef]
  15. Thormar SB, Gersons BP, Juen B, Djakababa MN, Karlsson T, Olff M. Organizational factors and mental health in community volunteers. The role of exposure, preparation, training, tasks assigned, and support. Anxiety Stress Coping. 2013; 26: 624-642. [CrossRef]
  16. Wen X, An Y, Zhou Y, Du J, Xu W. Mindfulness, posttraumatic stress symptoms, and posttraumatic growth in aid workers: The role of self-acceptance and rumination. J Nerv Ment Dis. 2021; 209: 159-165. [CrossRef]
  17. West C, Bernard B, Mueller C, Kitt M, Driscoll R, Tak S. Mental health outcomes in police personnel after Hurricane Katrina. J Occup Environ Med. 2008; 50: 689-695. [CrossRef]
  18. Nicdao EG, Noel LT, Ai AL, Plummer C, Groff S. Post disaster resilience: Racially different correlates of depression symptoms among Hurricane Katrina-Rita volunteers. Disaster Health. 2013; 1: 45-53. [CrossRef]
  19. Benedek DM, Fullerton C, Ursano RJ. First responders: Mental health consequences of natural and human-made disasters for public health and public safety workers. Annu Rev Public Health. 2007; 28: 55-68. [CrossRef]
  20. Galea S, Brewin CR, Gruber M, Jones RT, King DW, King LA, et al. Exposure to hurricane-related stressors and mental illness after Hurricane Katrina. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 2007; 64: 1427-1434. [CrossRef]
  21. Kessler RC, Galea S, Gruber MJ, Sampson NA, Ursano RJ, Wessely S. Trends in mental illness and suicidality after Hurricane Katrina. Mol Psychiatry. 2008; 13: 374-384. [CrossRef]
  22. Stewart SH, Mitchell TL, Wright KD, Loba P. The relations of PTSD symptoms to alcohol use and coping drinking in volunteers who responded to the swissair flight 111 airline disaster. J Anxiety Disord. 2004; 18: 51-68. [CrossRef]
  23. Anderson D, Prioleau P, Taku K, Naruse Y, Sekine H, Maeda M, et al. Post-traumatic stress and growth among medical student volunteers after the March 2011 disaster in Fukushima, Japan: Implications for student involvement with future disasters. Psychiatr Q. 2016; 87: 241-251. [CrossRef]
  24. Pfefferbaum B, Newman E, Nelson SD, Nitiéma P, Pfefferbaum RL, Rahman A. Disaster media coverage and psychological outcomes: Descriptive findings in the extant research. Curr Psychiatry Rep. 2014; 16: 464. [CrossRef]
  25. Clukey L. Transformative experiences for Hurricanes Katrina and Rita disaster volunteers. Disasters. 2010; 34: 644-656. [CrossRef]
  26. Ai A, Park C, Huang B, Rodgers W, Tice T. Psychosocial mediation of religious coping: A prospective study of short-term adjustment after cardiac surgery. Pers Soc Psychol Bull. 2007; 33: 867-882. [CrossRef]
  27. Ai AL, Wink P, Shearer M. Secular reverence predicts shorter hospital length of stay among middle-aged and older patients following open-heart surgery. J Behav Med. 2011; 34: 532-541. [CrossRef]
  28. Ai AL, Hall D, Pargament K, Tice TN. Posttraumatic growth in patients who survived cardiac surgery: The predictive and mediating roles of faith-based factors. J Behav Med. 2013; 36: 186-198. [CrossRef]
  29. Kosic A, Kenfack CSK, Ai AL. Resilience and spirituality as moderators between several concerns and psychological stress during the COVID-19 pandemic. Med Res Arch. 2023; 11. doi: 10.18103/mra.v11i2.3517.
  30. Marks L. Religion and bio-psycho-social health: A review and conceptual model. J Relig Health. 2005; 44: 173-186. [CrossRef]
  31. Aten JD, Smith WR, Davis EB, Van Tongeren DR, Hook JN, Davis DE, et al. The psychological study of religion and spirituality in a disaster context: A systematic review. Psychol Trauma. 2019; 11: 597. [CrossRef]
  32. Davis EB, Kimball CN, Aten JD, Hamilton C, Andrews B, Lemke A, et al. Faith in the wake of disaster: A longitudinal qualitative study of religious attachment following a catastrophic flood. Psychol Trauma. 2019; 11: 578-587. [CrossRef]
  33. Ai AL, Raney AA, Paloutzian RF. Perceived spiritual support counteracts the traumatic impact of extreme disasters: Exploration of moderators. Psychol Trauma. 2023; 15: 199-209. [CrossRef]
  34. Cherry KE, Sampson L, Galea S, Marks LD, Stanko KE, Nezat PF, et al. Spirituality, humor, and resilience after natural and technological disasters. J Nurs Scholarsh. 2018; 50: 492-501. [CrossRef]
  35. Hackbarth M, Pavkov T, Wetchler J, Flannery M. Natural disasters: An assessment of family resiliency following Hurricane Katrina. J Marital Fam Ther. 2012; 38: 340-351. [CrossRef]
  36. Ai AL, Cascio T, Santangelo LK, Evans-Campbell T. Hope, meaning, and growth following the September 11, 2001, terrorist attacks. J Interpers Violence. 2005; 20: 523-548. [CrossRef]
  37. Ai AL, Tice TN, Peterson C, Paloutzian RF, Croney-Clark P. The perceived spiritual support scale (PSSS): Measuring support from the deep connection with diverse sacred entities. In: Assessing spirituality in a diverse world. Cham: Springer; 2021. pp. 493-520. [CrossRef]
  38. Ai AL, Tice TN, Peterson C, Huang B. Prayers, spiritual support, and positive attitudes in coping with the September 11 national crisis. J Pers. 2005; 73: 763-792. [CrossRef]
  39. Ai AL, Richardson R, Plummer C, Ellison CG, Lemieux C, Tice TN, et al. Character strengths and deep connections following Hurricanes Katrina and Rita: Spiritual and secular pathways to resistance among volunteers. J Sci Study Relig. 2013; 52: 537-556. [CrossRef]
  40. Smith KP, Christakis NA. Social networks and health. Annu Rev Sociol. 2008; 34: 405-429. [CrossRef]
  41. Thoits PA. Mechanisms linking social ties and support to physical and mental health. J Health Soc Behav. 2011; 52: 145-161. [CrossRef]
  42. Sippel LM, Pietrzak RH, Charney DS, Mayes LC, Southwick SM. How does social support enhance resilience in the trauma-exposed individual? Ecol Soc. 2015; 20: 10. [CrossRef]
  43. Chan CS, Lowe SR, Weber E, Rhodes JE. The contribution of pre-and postdisaster social support to short-and long-term mental health after Hurricanes Katrina: A longitudinal study of low-income survivors. Soc Sci Med. 2015; 138: 38-43. [CrossRef]
  44. Littleton H, Haney L, Schoemann A, Allen A, Benight C. Received support in the aftermath of Hurricane Florence: Reciprocal relations among perceived support, community solidarity, and PTSD. Anxiety Stress Coping. 2022; 35: 270-283. [CrossRef]
  45. Wolters B, Kok A, Huisman M, Cartwright F, Pruchno R. Long-term impact of Hurricane Sandy exposure on positive and negative affect: The role of perceived social support. J Gerontol. 2022; 77: 1892-1903. [CrossRef]
  46. Yang YS, Bae SM. Association between resilience, social support, and institutional trust and post-traumatic stress disorder after natural disasters. Arch Psychiatr Nurs. 2022; 37: 39-44. [CrossRef]
  47. Yuan G, Shi W, Lowe S, Chang K, Jackson T, Hall BJ. Associations between posttraumatic stress symptoms, perceived social support and psychological distress among disaster-exposed Chinese young adults: A three-wave longitudinal mediation model. J Psychiatr Res. 2021; 137: 491-497. [CrossRef]
  48. Sun R, Yang X, Wu X, Zhou X. Sometimes less is more: Switching influence of social support on posttraumatic growth over time after a natural disaster. J Youth Adolesc. 2022; 52: 218-228. [CrossRef]
  49. Falsetti SA, Resnick HS, Resick PA, Kilpatrick DG. The modified PTSD symptom scale: A brief self-report measure of posttraumatic stress disorder. Behav Ther. 1993; 16: 161-162. [CrossRef]
  50. Pai A, Suris AM, North CS. Posttraumatic stress disorder in the DSM-5: Controversy, change, and conceptual considerations. Behav Sci. 2017; 7: 7. [CrossRef]
  51. Zimet GD, Dahlem NW, Zimet SG, Farley GK. The multidimensional scale of perceived social support. J Pers Assess. 1988; 52: 30-41. [CrossRef]
  52. Lemieux CM, Plummer CA, Richardson R, Simon CE, Ai AL. Mental health, substance use, and adaptive coping among social work students in the aftermath of Hurricanes Katrina and Rita. J Soc Work Educ. 2010; 46: 391-410. [CrossRef]
  53. R Core Team. The R Project for Statistical Computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. 2020. Available from: https://www.R-project.org/.
  54. Byrne BM. Structural equation modeling with AMOS: basic concepts, applications, and programming. New York: Routledge; 2013. [CrossRef]
  55. Hu LT, Bentler PM. Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Struct Equ Modeling. 1999; 6: 1-55. [CrossRef]
  56. Sullivent III EE, West CA, Noe RS, Thomas KE, Wallace LD, Leeb RT. Nonfatal injuries following hurricane Katrina—new Orleans, Louisiana, 2005. J Safety Res. 2006; 37: 213-217. [CrossRef]
  57. Khatri J, Fitzgerald G, Chhetri MBP. Health risks in disaster responders: A conceptual framework. Prehosp Disaster Med. 2019; 34: 209-216. [CrossRef]
  58. Huang B, Ai AL, Lemieux CM, Tice TN. Modeling the post-9/11 meaning-laden paradox: From deep connection and deep struggle to posttraumatic stress and growth. Arch Psychol Relig. 2011; 33: 173-204. [CrossRef]
  59. Lawson EJ, Thomas C. Wading in the waters: Spirituality and older Black Katrina survivors. J Health Care Poor Underserved. 2007; 18: 341-354. [CrossRef]
  60. Laditka SB, Murray LM, Laditka JN. In the eye of the storm: Resilience and vulnerability among African American women in the wake of Hurricane Katrina. Health Care Women Int. 2010; 31: 1013-1027. [CrossRef]
  61. Tausch C, Marks LD, Brown JS, Cherry KE, Frias T, McWilliams Z, et al. Religion and coping with trauma: Qualitative examples from Hurricanes Katrina and Rita. J Relig Spiritual Aging. 2011; 23: 236-253. [CrossRef]
  62. Scherer LL, Allen JA, Harp ER. Grin and bear it: An examination of volunteers’ fit with their organization, burnout and spirituality. Burn Res. 2016; 3: 1-10. [CrossRef]
  63. Manove EE, Lowe SR, Bonumwezi J, Preston J, Waters MC, Rhodes JE. Posttraumatic growth in low-income Black mothers who survived Hurricane Katrina. Am J Orthopsychiatry. 2019; 89: 144-158. [CrossRef]
  64. Fakoya OA, McCorry NK, Donnelly M. Loneliness and social isolation interventions for older adults: A scoping review of reviews. BMC Public Health. 2020; 20: 129. [CrossRef]
Download PDF Download Citation
0 0