Register or Submit a manuscript.
Quick Link
OBM Geriatrics

(ISSN 2638-1311)

OBM Geriatrics is an Open Access journal published quarterly online by LIDSEN Publishing Inc. The journal takes the premise that innovative approaches – including gene therapy, cell therapy, and epigenetic modulation – will result in clinical interventions that alter the fundamental pathology and the clinical course of age-related human diseases. We will give strong preference to papers that emphasize an alteration (or a potential alteration) in the fundamental disease course of Alzheimer’s disease, vascular aging diseases, osteoarthritis, osteoporosis, skin aging, immune senescence, and other age-related diseases.

Geriatric medicine is now entering a unique point in history, where the focus will no longer be on palliative, ameliorative, or social aspects of care for age-related disease, but will be capable of stopping, preventing, and reversing major disease constellations that have heretofore been entirely resistant to interventions based on “small molecular” pharmacological approaches. With the changing emphasis from genetic to epigenetic understandings of pathology (including telomere biology), with the use of gene delivery systems (including viral delivery systems), and with the use of cell-based therapies (including stem cell therapies), a fatalistic view of age-related disease is no longer a reasonable clinical default nor an appropriate clinical research paradigm.

Precedence will be given to papers describing fundamental interventions, including interventions that affect cell senescence, patterns of gene expression, telomere biology, stem cell biology, and other innovative, 21st century interventions, especially if the focus is on clinical applications, ongoing clinical trials, or animal trials preparatory to phase 1 human clinical trials.

Papers must be clear and concise, but detailed data is strongly encouraged. The journal publishes research articles, reviews, communications and technical notes. There is no restriction on the length of the papers and we encourage scientists to publish their results in as much detail as possible.

Archiving: full-text archived in CLOCKSS.

Rapid publication: manuscripts are undertaken in 12 days from acceptance to publication (median values for papers published in this journal in 2021, 1-2 days of FREE language polishing time is also included in this period). 

Current Issue: 2023  Archive: 2022 2021 2020 2019 2018 2017
Open Access Review

Social Connectedness in Preventing Suicide among Older Adults

Malith Kadirappulli-Hewage 1, Rasika Jayasekara 2, *

1. Department of Human Services SA, Riverside Centre, North Terrace, Adelaide SA 5000 Australia

2. School of Nursing and Midwifery, University of South Australia, North Terrace, Adelaide, SA 5000 Australia

* Correspondence: Rasika Jayasekara

Academic Editor: Ray Marks

Special Issue: Depression and Aging: Role of Social Support

Received: August 30, 2019 | Accepted: December 24, 2019 | Published: January 02, 2020

OBM Geriatrics 2020, Volume 4, Issue 1, doi:10.21926/obm.geriatr.2001096

Recommended citation: Kadirappulli-Hewage M, Jayasekara R. Social Connectedness in Preventing Suicide among Older Adults. OBM Geriatrics 2020; 4(1): 096; doi:10.21926/obm.geriatr.2001096.

© 2020 by the authors. This is an open access article distributed under the conditions of the Creative Commons by Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is correctly cited.

Abstract

Social isolation and social disconnectedness have resulted in some older adults ending their lives by suicide; therefore, improving social connectedness has become an integral part of suicide prevention programmes. The purpose of this literature review was to assess the impact of social connectedness interventions for preventing suicide in older adults. It is evident that interventions aimed at promoting social connectedness are intended to alleviate stress and depressive symptoms due to social separation and traumatic life events, and improve resilience, allowing people to manage their difficult situations. Improving connectedness beyond the individual level has the potential to reduce the risk of suicide, and as a suicide prevention strategy, it has given promising hope for authorities in minimising the suicidal crisis. Improved interpersonal relationships among individuals not only diminish suicide-related morbidity and mortality but also enhance the psychosocial wellbeing of older adults.

Keywords

Older adults; suicide; social connectedness; social isolation

1. Introduction

Globally, suicidal behaviour in older adults is considered as a major public health issue [1,2]. According to the World Health Organization (WHO), a significant number of countries have higher suicide rates among older adults compared to other age groups [3]. In general, suicide rates of older adults in Asian countries such as Japan, Hong Kong and China, are higher than their western counterparts [4,5]. Furthermore, Japanese and Australian studies showed that elderly suicide rates in rural areas are higher than in urban areas [6,7,8,9]. Suicide rates among older adults in the world are expected to rise over the next 20 years, given that they comprise the fastest-growing age category in the population [10,11,12,13,14,15]. Japan has experienced immense difficulty in containing the suicide crisis among older adults, because Japanese older people have both the highest life expectancy globally, while simultaneously, this age segment has the highest suicide rate in the country [8,16].

The risk factors associated with suicide in older adults are mixed and varied. Most common are intentional self-harm with previous histories of suicide attempts [9,17,18,19], chronic pain [1], physical illness [20,21,22,23], functional impairment [23,24], loss of a partner or a significant other [25,26], alcoholism [27], loneliness or hopelessness [20,21], depression [17,20,28,29,30,31], economic dependency [1], remoteness [32] and social isolation [17,20,21]. These suicide risk factors either individually or collectively can affect older adults, but in most of the scenarios recorded globally, it was discovered that the integration of several suicide risk factors influences late-life crisis [20]. Social isolation among older adults has been identified as one of the major suicide risk factors [17,33,34]. Therefore, modern suicide prevention programmes for older adults include new methods to improve social connectedness to minimise social isolation.

2. Social Connectedness

Social isolation and social disconnectedness have resulted in some older adults ending their lives by suicide [35,36,37,38,39,40], so improving social connectedness has become an integral part of suicide prevention programmes aimed at older adults [33,34]. Previously, there had been an emphasis on social connectedness in suicide prevention, and now this is coupled with compelling evidence supporting the role of improving social connectedness in preventing a late-life crisis [33].

Loss of a spouse, family, friends, and caretakers, as well as limited access to services and geographical location [11,23,27,41,42,43,44,45,46], are the main factors related to social disconnectedness among older adults. Societal attitudes towards older adults and family integration or disintegration have a greater influence on suicidal mortality among older adults [15]. Societal attitudes comprise emotional and cognitive factors such as friendliness, contempt, recognition, consideration, respect and prejudice, and they can influence whether older adults feel that they are socially valuable or not [15]. These factors have the potential for creating stress, depressive symptoms, frustration and a turbulent mind, which can prompt the option of taking one’s life [17]. Not everyone is capable of handling life-changing circumstances in the same manner. Depending on the context and the level of adjustability of older adults, adverse factors will impact on them at different levels when they encounter difficult life events [17]. This is where social connectedness becomes very important, as it works as a coping resource. Social connectedness can improve resilience against adverse psychological feelings and recovery from difficult times [41]. However, older adults who are not capable of coping with the impacts of these unpleasant feelings, may progress to suicidal thoughts, suicidal behaviour and eventually end their lives by suicide. Some older adults may experience multiple adverse life events. There is pressing evidence that those with multiple traumatic life events are more susceptible to die by suicide [17,42]. Therefore, improving resilience in facing difficult situations is very important.

Interventions aimed at promoting social connectedness are intended to alleviate stress and depressive symptoms due to social separation and traumatic life events and improve resilience, allowing people to manage and ‘bounce back’ from difficult situations [17,41]. Conquering difficult circumstances through social connectedness interventions and interactions among individuals, their families, community organisations and social institutions improve the active lifestyle, which is very important to the psychological well-being of older adults [33,41]. At the individual level, connectedness among persons is found to be a substantial factor in reducing suicidal thoughts and behaviours [33]. Social supports, in the forms of emotional, instrumental, actual or perceived support that is offered by individuals, as well as social integration measures such as an increased number of social contacts and friends, have a great protective influence on people at the times of stress [33,43,44]. Unfortunately, disturbed social associations such as family disintegration can result in increased risks of suicidal thoughts, suicidal behaviour and mortality [33,44,45]. Furthermore, older adults appeared to be more focused on meaningful social interactions rather than the number of social contacts. Apart from that, older adults with meaningful social relationships and the existence of a close friend with whom private matters are discussed are less likely to die by suicide [23]. The possibility of a quality friendship is that it creates accessibility to social support and increases companionship [46]. Hence, social connectedness could be improved to prevent suicide among older adults.

Logically, improving connectedness beyond the individual level has the potential to reduce the risk of suicide. Nevertheless, connectedness among older adults, community organisations and social institutions has not been studied extensively, and this area requires further understanding and research [33]. For example, connecting older adults with community organisations, places of employment, community centres and churches, or other spiritual or religious places and organisations, can enhance their access to support when in need, their sense of belonging within the community and their sense of personal value [33]. A recent study revealed that older adults who continue to be involved in meaningful employment longer have significantly lower suicidal mortality [15,47]. A lower income in late-life increases the risk of suicidal behaviour, which could be a possible explanation of why the continuation of employment reduces the suicidal risk [48]. However, the most important factor in the continuation of employment is keeping older adults active in their lives, which is very important for psychological well-being and is a barricade against suicide in late-life [15]. Apart from that, when communities are connected with social institutions such as agencies and social infrastructure, this too can facilitate suicide prevention and treatment. When formal or informal screening interventions within social support services are conducted to identify the risk of suicide, having relationships with larger organisations will ensure that referrals and that high-quality services are accessible [33].

Improving social connectedness among older adults as a suicide prevention strategy has given promising hope for authorities in minimising the suicidal crisis. An evaluation of studies which promoted social connectedness interventions among older adults has illustrated the impact of the interventions in reducing suicidal thoughts, suicidal behaviours and deaths. Several Japanese studies that implemented community-based intervention programmes in rural areas yielded a significant reduction in suicides among older adults [7,49,50]. In a case-control study in the USA, a group of older adults who received social interactions had a 27% reduction in suicide post-intervention [51]. Additionally, another study provided evidence of the effectiveness of social support, when connectedness among depressed older adults through church attendance significantly lessened suicidal behaviour [52].

Improved interpersonal relationships among individuals not only diminish suicide-related morbidity and mortality but also enhance the physiological aspects of an individual, such as the functioning of the immune, endocrine and cardiovascular systems [33,53]. Escalating evidence suggests that social disconnectedness among older adults may influence on developing Alzheimer's disease, cardiovascular diseases and all other mortalities [34,54,55,56,57]. Finally, consideration of all of these factors suggests that promoting social connectedness among older adults is a feasible means of reducing suicidal thoughts, suicidal behaviour and suicidal-related morbidity and mortality.

3. Conclusions

It can be concluded that social connectedness interventions are likely to be useful in reducing suicides among older adults. The inferences to be drawn for practising health professions include knowing the importance and potential value of specific group programs targeting individuals at risk. Irrespective of age, breaking down of stigma surrounding help-seeking in mental health, should be a priority area for a successful implementation of suicide prevention programs. Drawing out by health professionals of individuals (consumers) to speak openly about their fears, concerns, feelings of isolation and or loneliness - as well as hopes for the future - will be key to any successful therapeutic program. Implementing interventions for an optimal period, evaluating cost-effectiveness, comprehending the influence of co-morbidities on the effectiveness of social connectedness interventions for preventing suicide, and establishing the optimal intensity of social connectedness interventions, are some of the issues that need to be addressed in future research.

Acknowledgments

The authors acknowledge the support and supervision giving by Professor Nicholas Procter Chair: Mental Health Nursing University of South Australia.

Author Contributions

Rasika Jayasekara and Malith Kadirappulli-Hewage have contributed to this review.

Competing Interests

The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

References

  1. Manthorpe J, Iliffe S. Suicide in later life: Public health and practitioner perspectives. Int J Geriatr Psychiatry. 2010; 25: 1230-1238. [CrossRef]
  2. Kawada T. Suicide risk of old adults with special reference to aging. Int Psychogeriatr. 2018; 30: 603. [CrossRef]
  3. Fässberg MM, Van Orden KA, Duberstein P, Erlangsen A, Lapierre S, Bodner E, et al. A systematic review of social factors and suicidal behavior in older adulthood. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2012; 9: 722-745. [CrossRef]
  4. Cheng ATA, Lee C. Suicide in Asia and the far East. In: The international book of suicide and attempted suicide. New York: Wiley; 2000.
  5. Chiu HFK, Takahashi Y, Suh GH. Elderly suicide prevention in East Asia. Int J Geriatr Psychiatry. 2003; 18: 973-976. [CrossRef]
  6. Handley TE, Inder KJ, Kelly BJ, Attia JR, Lewin TJ, Fitzgerald MN, et al. You've got to have friends: The predictive value of social integration and support in suicidal ideation among rural communities. Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol. 2012; 47: 1281-1290. [CrossRef]
  7. Oyama H, Goto M, Fujita M, Shibuya H, Sakashita T. Preventing elderly suicide through primary care by community-based screening for depression in rural Japan. Crisis. 2006; 27: 58-65. [CrossRef]
  8. Oyama H, Ono Y, Watanabe N, Tanaka E, Kudoh S, Sakashita T, et al. Local community intervention through depression screening and group activity for elderly suicide prevention. Psychiatry Clin Neurosci. 2006; 60: 110-114. [CrossRef]
  9. Koo YW, Kolves K, De Leo D. Suicide in older adults: Differences between the young-old, middle-old, and oldest old. Int Psychogeriatr. 2017; 29: 1297-1306. [CrossRef]
  10. Kinsella K, He W. An ageing world 2008. International Population Reports Washington DC: U.S. Census Bureau. 2008. Available from: http://www.census.gov/prod/2009pubs/p95-09-1.pdf.
  11. O'Connell H, Chin A-V, Cunningham C, Lawlor BA. Recent developments: Suicide in older people. BMJ. 2004; 329: 895-899. [CrossRef]
  12. The Royal Australian and New Zealand College of Psychiatrists. Submission to the Senate Community Affairs References Committee: Inquiry into suicide in Australia. 2009. Available from: https://www.ranzcp.org/Files/Resources/Submissions/sub28-pdf.aspx.
  13. World Health Organization. Supre: The WHO worldwide initiative for the prevention of suicide. Available from: http://www.who.int/mental_health/management/en/SUPRE_flyer1.pdf?ua=1.
  14. World Health Organization. Public health action for the prevention of suicide: A framework. 2012. Available from: http://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/10665/75166/1/9789241503570_eng.pdf.
  15. Yur'yev A, Leppik L, Tooding LM, Sisask M, Värnik P, Jing W, et al. Social inclusion affects elderly suicide mortality. Int Psychogeriatr. 2010; 22: 1337-1343. [CrossRef]
  16. Oyama H, Koida J, Sakashita T, Kudo K. Community-based prevention for suicide in elderly by depression screening and follow-up. Community Ment Health J. 2004; 40: 249-263. [CrossRef]
  17. Department of Health and Ageing, Government of Australia. Research and evidence in suicide prevention. 2008. Available from: https://apo.org.au/sites/default/files/resource-files/2008/07/apo-nid2610-1216311.pdf.
  18. Hawton K, Zahl D, Weatherall R. Suicide following deliberate self-harm: Long-term follow-up of patients who presented to a general hospital. Br J Psychiatry Suppl. 2003; 182: 537-542. [CrossRef]
  19. Silverman MM, Berman AL, Sanddal ND, O'Carroll PW, Joiner TE. Rebuilding the tower of babel: A revised nomenclature for the study of suicide and suicidal behaviors. Part 2: Suicide-related ideations, communications, and behaviors. Suicide Life Threat Behav. 2007; 37: 264-277. [CrossRef]
  20. Garand L, Mitchell A, Dietrick A, Hijjawi S, Pan D. Suicide in older adults: Nursing assessment of suicide risk. Issues Ment Health Nurs. 2006; 27: 355-370. [CrossRef]
  21. Mitty E, Flores S. Suicide in late life. Geriatr Nurs. 2008; 29: 160-165. [CrossRef]
  22. Tang NKY, Crane C. Suicidality in chronic pain: A review of the prevalence, risk factors and psychological links. Psychol Med. 2006; 36: 575-586. [CrossRef]
  23. Turvey CL, Conwell Y, Jones MP, Phillips C, Simonsick E, Pearson JL, et al. Risk factors for late-life suicide: A prospective, community-based study. Am J Geriatr Psychiatry. 2002; 10: 398-406. [CrossRef]
  24. Waern M, Rubenowitz E, Runeson B, Skoog I. Burden of illness and suicide in elderly people: Case-control study. Br Med J. 2002; 324: 1355. [CrossRef]
  25. Demirçin S, Akkoyun M, Yilmaz R, Gökdoğan MR. Suicide of elderly persons: Towards a framework for prevention. Geriatr Gerontol Int. 2011; 11: 107-113. [CrossRef]
  26. Fung Y-L, Chan ZCY. A systematic review of suicidal behaviour in old age: A gender perspective. J Clin Nurs. 2011; 20: 2109-2124. [CrossRef]
  27. Waern M. Alcohol dependence and misuse in elderly suicides. Alcohol Alcohol. 2003; 38: 249-254. [CrossRef]
  28. Bhar SS, Brown GK. Treatment of depression and suicide in older adults. Cogn Behav Pract. 2012; 19: 116-125. [CrossRef]
  29. Fiske A, Wetherell JL, Gatz M. Depression in older adults. Annu Rev Clin Psychol. 2009; 5: 363-389. [CrossRef]
  30. Lapierre S, Erlangsen A, Waern M, De Leo D, Oyama H, Scocco P, et al. A systematic review of elderly suicide prevention programs. Crisis. 2011; 32: 88-98. [CrossRef]
  31. Taylor R, Page A, Morrell S, Harrison J, Carter G. Mental health and socio-economic variations in Australian suicide. Soc Sci Med. 2005; 61: 1551-1559. [CrossRef]
  32. Fraser CE, Smith KB, Judd F, Humphreys JS, Fragar LJ, Henderson A. Farming and mental health problems and mental illness. Int J Soc Psychiatry. 2005; 51: 340-349. [CrossRef]
  33. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, National Center for Injury Prevention and Control Atlanta. Strategic direction for the prevention of suicidal behavior: Promoting individual, family, and community connectedness to prevent suicidal behavior. 2010. Available from: http://www.cdc.gov/ViolencePrevention/pdf/Suicide_Strategic_Direction_Full_Version-a.pdf.
  34. Van Orden KA, Stone DM, Rowe JL, McIntosh WL, Podgorski C, Conwell Y. The senior connection: Design and rationale of a randomized trial of peer companionship to reduce suicide risk in later life. Contemp Clin Trials. 2013; 35: 117-126. [CrossRef]
  35. Aiba M, Matsui Y, Kikkawa T, Matsumoto T, Tachimori H. Factors influencing suicidal ideation among Japanese adults: From the national survey by the Cabinet Office. Psychiat Clin Neuros. 2011; 65: 468-475. [CrossRef]
  36. Caceda R, Strassnig MT, Nemeroff CB. Advances in the neuropsychobiology of suicide. Minerva Psichiatr. 2012; 53: 61-78.
  37. Goss CW, Harrod CS, Gliner JA, Stallones L, Di Guiseppi C. Social connectedness interventions for preventing suicide in young and middle-aged adults. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012; 1: 1-11. [CrossRef]
  38. Raue PJ, Meyers BS, Rowe JL, Heo M, Bruce ML. Suicidal ideation among elderly homecare patients. Int J Geriatr Psychiatry. 2007; 22: 32-37. [CrossRef]
  39. Bailey M, McLaren S. Physical activity alone and with others as predictors of sense of belonging and mental health in retirees. Aging Ment Health. 2005; 9: 82-90. [CrossRef]
  40. Oyama H, Watanabe N, Ono Y, Sakashita T, Takenoshita Y, Taguchi M, et al. Community-based suicide prevention through group activity for the elderly successfully reduced the high suicide rate for females. Psychiatry Clin Neurosci. 2005; 59: 337-344. [CrossRef]
  41. Vanderhorst RK, McLaren S. Social relationships as predictors of depression and suicidal ideation in older adults. Aging Ment Health. 2005; 9: 517-525. [CrossRef]
  42. Kolves K, Värnik A, Schneider B, Fritze J, Allik J. Recent life events and suicide: A case-control study in Tallinn and Frankfurt. Soc Sci Med. 2006; 62: 2887-2896. [CrossRef]
  43. Bearman PS, Moody J. Suicide and friendships among American adolescents. Am J Public Health. 2004; 94: 89-95. [CrossRef]
  44. Rubenowitz E, Waern M, Wilhelmson K, Allebeck P. Life events and psychosocial factors in elderly suicides--a case-control study. Psychol Med. 2001; 31: 1193-1202. [CrossRef]
  45. Donald M, Dower J, Correa-Velez I, Jones M. Risk and protective factors for medically serious suicide attempts: A comparison of hospital-based with population-based samples of young adults. Aust N Z J Psychiatry. 2006; 40: 87-96. [CrossRef]
  46. Martina CMS, Stevens NL. Breaking the cycle of loneliness? Psychological effects of a friendship enrichment program for older women. Aging Ment Health. 2006; 10: 467-475. [CrossRef]
  47. Yip PSF, Chi I, Chiu H, Chi Wai K, Conwell Y, Caine E. A prevalence study of suicide ideation among older adults in Hong Kong SAR. Int J Geriatr Psychiatry. 2003; 18: 1056-1062. [CrossRef]
  48. Duberstein PR, Conwell Y, Conner KR, Eberly S, Caine ED. Suicide at 50 years of age and older: Perceived physical illness, family discord and financial strain. Psychol Med. 2004; 34: 137-146. [CrossRef]
  49. Oyama H, Fujita M, Goto M, Shibuya H, Sakashita T. Outcomes of community-based screening for depression and suicide prevention among Japanese elders. Gerontologist. 2006; 46: 821-826. [CrossRef]
  50. Oyama H, Sakashita T, Hojo K, Ono Y, Watanabe N, Takizawa T, et al. A community-based survey and screening for depression in the elderly: The short-term effect on suicide risk in Japan. Crisis. 2010; 31: 100-108. [CrossRef]
  51. Beautrais AL. Case control study of suicide and attempted suicide in older adults. Suicide Life Threat Behav. 2002; 32: 1-9. [CrossRef]
  52. Rushing NC, Corsentino E, Hames JL, Sachs-Ericsson N, Steffens DC. The relationship of religious involvement indicators and social support to current and past suicidality among depressed older adults. Aging Ment Health. 2013; 17: 366-374. [CrossRef]
  53. Uchino BN, Cacioppo JT, Kiecolt-Glaser JK. The relationship between social support and physiological processes: A review with emphasis on underlying mechanisms and implications for health. Psychol Bull. 1996; 119: 488-531. [CrossRef]
  54. Hawkley LC, Thisted RA, Masi CM, Cacioppo JT. Loneliness predicts increased blood pressure: 5-year cross-lagged analyses in middle-aged and older adults. Psychol Aging. 2010; 25: 132-141. [CrossRef]
  55. Ong AD, Rothstein JD, Uchino BN. Loneliness accentuates age differences in cardiovascular responses to social evaluative threat. Psychol Aging. 2012; 27: 190-198. [CrossRef]
  56. Perissinotto CM, Stijacic Cenzer I, Covinsky KE. Loneliness in older persons: A predictor of functional decline and death. Arch Intern Med. 2012; 172: 1078-1084. [CrossRef]
  57. Wilson RS, Krueger KR, Arnold SE, Schneider JA, Kelly JF, Barnes LL, et al. Loneliness and risk of Alzheimer disease. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 2007; 64: 234-240. [CrossRef]
Announcement
Newsletter
Download PDF Download Citation
0 0
Newsletter  

TOP