OBM Transplantation

(ISSN 2577-5820)

OBM Transplantation is an international peer-reviewed Open Access journal, which covers all evidence-based scientific studies related to transplantation, including: transplantation procedures and the maintenance of transplanted tissues or organs; assimilation of grafted tissue and the reconstitution of removed organs or parts of organs; transplantation of heart, lung, kidney, liver, pancreatic islets and bone marrow, etc. Areas related to clinical and experimental transplantation are also of interest.

OBM Transplantation is committed to rapid review and publication, and we aim at serving the international transplant community with high accessibility as well as relevant and high quality content.

We welcome original clinical studies as well as basic science, reviews, short reports/rapid communications, case reports, opinions, technical notes, book reviews as well as letters to the editor. 

Indexing: DOAJ-Directory of Open Access Journals.

Archiving: full-text archived in CLOCKSS.

Rapid publication: manuscripts are undertaken in 6 days from acceptance to publication (median values for papers published in this journal in the first half of 2020, 1-2 days of FREE language polishing time is also included in this period). A first decision provided to authors of manuscripts submitted to this journal are approximately 3.7 weeks (median values) after submission.

Current Issue: 2020  Archive: 2019 2018 2017
Open Access Review
Malignancy in the Lung Transplant Population

Sheri Tran, MD 1 , Mark M. Fuster, MD 1,2,*

  1. Department of Medicine, Division of Pulmonary, Critical Care, and Sleep, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, CA, USA;
  2. Pulmonary Section/ Medical Service, VA San Diego Healthcare System, San Diego, CA, USA;

*   Correspondence: Mark M. Fuster, MD .

Received: July 16, 2017 | Accepted: August 28, 2017 | Published: September 13,2017

OBM Transplantation 2017, Volume 1, Issue 3, doi:10.21926/obm.transplant.1703004

Academic Editor: Kamyar Afshar

Recommended citation:  Tran S, Fuster MM. OBM Transplantation—Malignancy in the Lung Transplant Population . OBM Transplantation 2017;1(3):004; doi:10.21926/obm.transplant.1703004.

© 2017 by the authors. This is an open access article distributed under the conditions of the Creative Commons by Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is correctly cited.

Abstract:

The risk for developing a variety of malignancies is significantly elevated in the setting of lung transplantation. Malignancy remains among the three major causes of death in post-transplant recipients, and the relatively high risk of cancer development as well as metastatic aggression pose special threats to this population due to the need for continued immunosuppression. A variety of risks such as tobacco use and inflammatory lung diseases that led to the lung pathology prompting lung transplantation, in addition to immunosuppression and unique post-transplantat viral infections, introduce particularly high risks for carcinomas of the lung and head-and-neck, skin, endothelium (Kaposi sarcoma), colon and anogenital tracts, liver and kidneys. A uniquely high risk of developing non-hodgkins lymphoma or post-transplant lymphoproliferative disorder remains particularly challenging in this population. In this review, we discuss mechanisms leading to risk, details on malignancy presentation and characteristics, and special points on management and prevention in respective sections. In addition to highlighting key features, a major goal is to stimulate future advancements in the prevention and management of malignancy in this unique clinical setting.

Keywords

malignancy; lung; transplantation; immunosuppression; risks; lymphoma; carcinoma

Introduction

The development of malignancy in the setting of transplantation is a major contributor to morbidity and mortality in the transplant population. It is characterized by a variety of contributory risks that range from pre-transplant organ pathology that contributes to neoplastic transformation (e.g., in chronic liver, lung, or kidney disease) often associated with chronic inflammation [1] to post-transplant risks such as immunosuppression, infections/inflammatory conditions, and other conditions [2]. A particularly challenging combination is the patient previously treated curatively for malignancy pre-transplant, and the risk of post-transplant immunosuppression induction in the growth/recurrence of occult metastases. This can impose “minimum time intervals” as guidelines for the required gap between treatment of a cancer and transplantation [2,3,4]. Finally, there is also the risk of transmission of occult cancer from the donor, wherein selective risk-taking is balanced with risk avoidance in donors with a history of remotely treated cancer, and depending on the nature and risk of occult metastasis to the donor organ [5]. In this review, we specifically focus on the spectrum, contributory factors, and approach to malignancy that develops in the post-transplant period in lung transplant recipients. We will begin with risk data as well as mechanisms, expand with a focus on post-transplant lymphoproliferative disorder, and discuss a variety of other malignancies along with management, survival/outcomes issues.

Cancer risk in the post- lung transplant recipient: Epidemiology

Cancer risk in general is significantly elevated in the setting of solid organ transplants. Moreover, malignancy remains among the three major causes of death in the post-transplant population [2]. In a large registry analysis using cohort data from the U.S. Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients linking data on >175,000 solid organ transplants, the overall standardized incidence ratio (SIR) was 2.1 (95% CI 2.06 – 2.14) and the excess absolute risk of 719 per 100,000 person-years in the setting of an overall incidence of 1375 per 100,000 person-years [6]. Non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL), lung cancer, and liver malignancy remain among the solid tumors of highest incidence in this population; and both NHL and lung cancer have a particularly high incidence and risk (SIR 18.7 and 6.1, respectively) among lung transplant recipients [6].

Registry analyses also demonstrated high incidence rates for both infection-related malignancies (dominated by NHL and liver cancer) and non-infection related malignancies (dominated by lung and prostate cancers). In particular, diffuse large B-cell lymphoma remains the highest sub-type of NHL, with detectable EBV in tumor cells in most cases [6,7]. With regard to the relatively high risk of lung cancer development among lung transplant recipients, while most are single lung transplants (SLT), smoking and COPD likely exert most significant contribution to the risk of transformation, with the majority of lung cancers arising in the remaining native lung [8,9]. Overall, for patients >10 years post- lung transplantation, neoplastic disease accounts for about 17% of deaths [10]. Beyond NHL and lung cancer, liver and kidney malignancies remained the highest-incident solid tumors in the post lung transplant population.

General considerations on risk and mechanisms

In the post lung transplant setting, the most important general reasons for increased cancer risk include the presence of an immunosuppressive regimen (load and duration), the presence of oncogenic viral infections, the organ transplanted, and the summation of accumulated risks in the recipient. The variation in risk according to organ transplanted exists essentially in a pattern dominated by the organ transplanted: Thus, post-transplant kidney cancer has the highest risk in kidney recipients (i.e., ~ 8-fold risk relative to population background), and the analogous applies to lung or liver recipients. While for NHL or post-transplant lymphoproliferative disorder (PTLD; discussed further below), a many-fold risk over the background population applies to all solid organ recipients, greatest risks appear to be among heart and lung recipients [2].

In terms of immunosuppression, there are impairments in cellular immunity as well as an altered balance of humoral factors that may impair effector anti-tumor mechanisms. Impairment in T-cell surveillance and T effector mechanisms may be particularly important, whether in the presence or absence of contributions by oncogenic viruses (that may further promote tumor initiation and progression). Certain regimen-specific effects may also be unique, such as specific inhibition in DNA repair combined with increased TGFβ as well as endothelial growth stimulation in classical calcineurin inhibitors such as cyclosporine [11,12,13]. Anti-proliferative agents such as those inhibiting mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR), including sirolimus or everolimus, might also have inhibitory growth effects on tumors once neoplastic transformation has taken place, and there is evidence of lower malignancy risk with such regimens [14,15,16]. Tacrolimus, on the other hand, is a more potent calcineurin inhibitor that inhibits cytokines such as IL-2 as well as T cell proliferation; and this common effect on cellular immunity imparts a tumor-suppressive milieu by all such agents.

Viral transformation is an important mechanism of malignancy induction during lung transplant immunosuppression. Unchecked viral replication may be linked to the initiation of immunosuppression as well, and evident in the rapidity with which certain viral-oncogenesis associated malignancies develop after transplantation [2,17]. Those viruses include Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) involved in the pathogenesis of PTLD, Human Herpesvirus 8 (HHV-8), associated with Kaposi’s sarcoma, Human Papillomavirus (HPV), associated with anogenital cancers as well as squamous skin cancers. In addition, hepatitis B and C pose additional risks for hepatocellular carcinoma in the post-transplant period.

Various humoral factors play roles in modulating cancer initiation and progression. Those involved in innate anti-tumor responses may include interleukins and interferons as well as complement; while important humoral factors in acquired anti-tumor immunity include antibodies against specific tumor antigens. The latter may kill tumor cells via complement activation or through antibody-dependent cell-mediated cytotoxicity (ADCC), whereby the antibody’s Fc portion bridges with receptors on NK cells or macrophages that effect tumor-cell killing [18]. Often, tumor complex carbohydrate antigens may be the targets of such processes [19]. Cellular T-cell immunity probably plays a more robust role than that of humoral immunity in anti-tumor responses by the immune system: As such, inhibition in cellular immunity by immunosuppressive regimens may account for the development of malignancies (including viral-driven neoplasia) following lung transplantation, while the role of transplant immunosuppression in limiting anti-tumor humoral immunity in this setting is less well understood. Nevertheless, it is important to consider the possibility that novel efforts to limit antibody-mediated rejection (AMR) and donor-specific antibody (DSA) responses in the post-transplant period [20] stand the possibility of interfering with acquired humoral responses against carcinomas in post-transplant recipients.

The spectrum of PTLD post lung transplant

The majority (>80%) of PTLD is comprised of a group of B cell lymphoproliferative disorders with variable clonal involvement and lymph node preservation versus destruction, while a much lesser incidence of the disease originates from T cells (~15%) or NK cells (~1%) [21]. Most adults have been EBV exposed, and thus most donor organs are EBV positive [22,23]. In the setting of a relatively aggressive immunosuppressive regimen required post- lung transplantation, the development of EBV mediated transformation of B cells with progression to PTLD is particularly significant, especially in the relatively uncommon EBV-naïve host [24]. The major immunologic arm of protection from PTLD development in the immunocompetent EBV-infected host results from EBV-specific cytotoxic T cells; and the setting of altered T cell immunity following lung transplantation is thus a fertile microenvironment for the uncontrolled growth of EBV-infected B cells. Overall rates of PTLD following lung transplantation have improved to ~5% in more recent years [25,26,27]; however, this depends on factors such as improved prolonged anti-viral prophylaxis and viremia DNA detection assays, and immunomodulatory regimens [23]. Nevertheless, overall mortality from PTLD may still approach 50%, especially in the setting of late-presenting PTLD.

PTLD spectrum of presentation and prognosis

Four histologic variants of PTLD may be distinguished in the most recent (2008 WHO) classification [21]: In one variant, early plasmacytic hyperplasia, lymph node architecture remains preserved; while destruction of architecture is noted with polymorphic PTLD, characterized by a polyclonal infiltrate with cellular atypia. Monomorphic PTLD resembles NHL, with clonal B cells, T cells, and NK cells. On the other hand, classical Hodgkin’s lymphoma has been described.

Early-onset PTLD (within first year post-transplant) typically occurs in the allograft; and pulmonary nodules, masses, or infiltrates may occur in the presence or absence of abdominal, CNS, or even cutaneous involvement. Early presentation is associated with primary EBV infection, CMV infection, increased rejection frequency, and induction agents at time of transplant [23,28,29]. Late onset PTLD (>1 year post-transplant) is more likely to present as extrathoracic disease, especially in the gastrointestinal tract. Diagnosis of PTLD requires sufficient tissue in a biopsy or surgical sample to evaluate histologic architecture, which is often sufficient in transbronchial or needle-core biopsies. Analyses of clonality and lineage tracing may be carried out with flow cytometry, while levels of plasma EBV assayed from whole blood appear to correlate with risk of disease and treatment response in established disease [21,30].

Evolution in the management of PTLD

Immunosuppression adjustments and standard cytotoxic/ablative treatment: The first modality in the treatment of PTLD is reduced immunosuppression (RI), whereby calcineurin inhibitors may be reduced from 25-50% while low-dose prednisone is maintained in the absence of mycophenolate and azathioprine [21,23]. While the majority of cases without multiorgan disease or allograft dysfunction will remit within weeks, the risk of acute and chronic rejection is significant and requires tight monitoring [21,31]. Occasionally, chemotherapy (typically CHOP regimen) +/- radiation (especially in CNS disease) may be required, and surgical tumor de-bulking may be required for obstruction (e.g., bulky chest- or colonic-obstructive disease) or bleeding. In CD20+ PTLD, rituximab is an effective option in those unresponsive to RI or showing progression; and thus CHOP or multi-agent therapy is often reserved for CD20- or EBV- disease or for aggressive PTLD sub-types [32,33]. While the Ann Arbor system for lymphoma staging as well as the International Prognostic Index may be applied to PTLD to assist in prognosis, disseminated disease and presentation >6 months after transplant are predictors of mortality [34]. Nevertheless, for rituximab treated patients, remissions have been generally >50 - 60%, with median survivals of around 3 years [35,36].

Therapies more recently under development include viral gene induction or infusion of cytotoxic T lymphocytes (CTLs). With particular regard to EBV-specific cytotoxic T cell approaches, targeting EBV-positive tumor cells may be achieved through infusion of CTLs from EBV-experienced donors, thus transferred adoptively. Potential off-target effects of the adoptive response, however, may impose challenges [23,37]. Treatment with a proteosome inhibitor such as bortezomib, which also targets B cell lymphoma cells, is another strategy where pairing with rituximab has been considered [23]: More work is needed to assess the full efficacy of this combination over the individual drugs. Finally, it is also important to consider technology for early detection of PTLD, and possibly for recurrence of disease, wherein CD30 antibodies may be used as a monitoring tool; while measuring light chains to detect early B cell dysfunction/progression may be quantified in the circulation [38,39].

Special considerations on the diagnosis of lung cancer following lung transplantation

As introduced, the risk of lung cancer remains significantly elevated in lung transplant recipients (with an incidence range of ~ 0.25% to as high as 4%). Smoking, older age, and underlying diagnoses of COPD or IPF are known to increase risk, with the vast majority of bronchogenic carcinomas (>90% non-small cell lung cancer) in single-lung transplant series developing in the native lung [21]. Bronchogenic carcinoma has been described in the explanted lung (incidence as high as 1.4% in one series [40]). Given the incidence, and since prognosis is especially poor (especially at clinical stage II or greater), it is important to screen at regular intervals in high-risk transplant candidates. Several forms of infection in post- lung transplant patients may commonly present with heralding symptoms, nodules, infiltrates, and other manifestations that can mask a primary lung malignancy (or metastatic disease) during workup. Given the elevated risk, it is thus especially important to consider malignancy with a high index of suspicion upon encountering such lesions in this population. Often, such lesions may be missed due to other radiographic factors such as postoperative changes or existing disease in the native lung [21].

Treatment for lung cancer in the post- lung transplant patient follows the state-of-the-art approach according to stage under the most current IASLC/AJCC recommendations [41]. A reduction in immunosuppression, however, is commonly applied; although this is without data to guide specific adjustment(s) and timing. Lesions are occasionally discovered at the time of transplant, with surgical margin decisions and appropriate surgical correction with adjuvant adjustments made in the peri-transplant period.

Skin malignancies in the post lung transplant recipient

Cutaneous carcinomas develop with increased incidence in post-transplant population, with risk-ratios for squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) and basal cell carcinoma (BCC) many-fold above that of immunocompetent hosts. In one study, malignant melanoma rates were 2.6 fold higher than the expected rate in the reference population [42]. Beyond sunlight exposure, cumulative voriconazole exposure, and previous cutaneous malignancy, risks factors include the nature and level of immunosuppression as well as some viral infections (including human papillomavirus (SCC), human herpesvirus 8 (Kaposi’s sarcoma), and Merckel cell polyomavirus (Merckel cell carcinoma) (reviewed in [21]). It should be highlighted that a personal history of melanoma may be a strong relative contraindication to transplantation; with approximately 1/3 of post-transplant melanomas developing at the site of pre-existing nevi [43]. Beyond prevention with appropriate sun and UVA/B exposure reduction measures, the discovery of even early-appearing SCC-type (e.g., actinic keratosis) lesions in this population may require a biopsy to ensure invasive SCC is ruled out.

For SCC or BCC, treatment recommendations follow guidelines for the immunocompetent population, with excision +/- Mohs approaches, depending on risk, margins, and recurrence history; along with lymph node biopsy/staging and metastasis workup as appropriate examination reveals. While radiation may be used for invasive lesions and/or nerve involvement, chemotherapy is considered sparingly given risk/benefit concerns for adverse effects in the setting of post-transplant immunosuppression. Pre-cancerous lesions in single organ transplant patients in general may be approached with cryotherapy or electrocautery, or with topical (e.g. 5-FU, imiquimod) or photodynamic strategies [44,45,46,47].

Kaposi’s sarcoma in the setting of lung transplantation

Kaposi’s Sarcoma (KS) is a mesenchymal tumor originating from the cells of blood and lymphatic vessels that has been associated with Human herpesvirus 8, which likely contributes to the mechanism of KS in the transplant recipient. The virus can be reactivated from a latent persistent infection during immunosuppression (especially with use of calcineurin inhibitors), or may be transmitted to the recipient via the donor organ itself. KS primarily affects the skin but can cause disease in other parts, including the lung allograft without other systemic involvement. Case reports of KS include presentations with allograft nodules and hemorrhagic pleural effusion, with or without cutaneous involvement [48].

A multicenter, longitudinal study of over 4,700 solid organ transplant recipients in Italy showed that the overall KS risk was 125.3-fold higher than the general Italian population [49]. Indeed, origin from a high HHV8 sero-prevalence area appears to confer the greatest risk for the development of KS in the post-transplant patient [2]. The risk of KS also significantly increased with age (greater than 60 years compared to younger than 40 years), male sex, and lung transplant recipients (2.6-fold increase in incidence compared to kidney recipients). Over time, the incidence of KS decreased with a reduction of 80% after 18 months from transplantation.

Treatment of KS is dependent on the location of the lesions as well as the extent of involvement. Some patients show remission with reduction of immunosuppression alone, which is typically the first therapeutic step [2]. Local treatments include surgery (ie. local excision), radiation therapy, cryotherapy, laser therapy, topical therapy, and intralesional injection of chemotherapy agents. Systemic treatments include chemotherapy, such as doxorubicin, vinblastine, and bleomycin, which are usually used for widespread and rapidly progressive KS.

Other malignancies and screening

In general, cancers with a particularly high risk in the post- lung transplant population include non-melanoma skin- and lip cancer, KS, NHL, lung, colorectal, and anogenital tract cancers [2,6]. An Australian study also found a 9.3-fold increase in head and neck cancer incidence in heart and/or lung transplant recipients. A variety of “field-effects” by carcinogens or lung inflammatory conditions may markedly increase the risk for cancers of the lung as well as the head/neck prior to transplantation: This is in the setting of smoking (resulting in COPD) or chronic inflammatory lung disease (e.g., IPF) that result in the host’s need for a lung transplant.

In addition to strict adherence to tobacco cessation, measures to screen for a variety of cancers in the post-transplant period are important to adopt during follow-up. One must be cautious in solid-organ transplant recipients, given the greater development of common solid-organ malignancies (including breast, prostate, lung, and colon cancers) in that population [50]. For example, post-transplant cancer screening guidelines (published most recently from the renal transplant literature) [51] include cervical cancer screening on an annual basis, with standard breast cancer screening (annual or biannual for women over 50 yr), and colorectal screening with yearly fecal occult blood testing and endoscopic examinations every 5 years. Skin screening should include monthly self-examination with total body reviews by a dermatologist every 6 to 12 months. Finally, prostate cancer screening with annual PSA and digital rectal examination for male recipients over 50 yr and hepatocellular cancer screening with 6-monthly -fetoprotein and ultrasound examinations in high-risk individuals should also be included. While there are no formal guidelines for lung cancer screening in lung transplant recipients per se, Grewal and others [52] cite the relatively high risk of lung cancer in the lung transplant recipient and the importance of developing improved guidelines for screening in this area. For now, it is at the very least prudent to follow standard USPHTF recommendations regarding low-dose CT scanning for at-risk individuals based on pre-transplant tobacco exposure [53]. However, post lung transplant imaging schemes should take into account specialized surveillance for this high-risk/high-mortality malignancy. Finally, and more generally, it would be advantageous to have a program of immune-monitoring built into any screening program to facilitate the enrichment of sub-populations with especially high risk (and thus with improved probability of cancer detection).

Funding

This study was supported by an American Lung Association Lung Cancer Discovery Award (to MMF).

Competing Interests

None to declare.

References

  1. Modell B, Darlison M. Global epidemiology of haemoglobin disorders and derived service indicators. Bulletin of the World Health Organization. 2008;86(6):480-7. [CrossRef]
  2. Finn OJ. Cancer immunology. N Engl J Med. 2008;358:2704-2715. [CrossRef]
  3. Giardine B, Borg J, Viennas E, Pavlidis C, Moradkhani K, Joly P, et al. Updates of the HbVar database of human hemoglobin variants and thalassemia mutations. Nucleic acids research. 2014;42(Database issue):D1063-9. [CrossRef]
  4. Chapman JR, Webster AC, Wong G. Cancer in the transplant recipient. Cold Spring Harb Perspect Med. 2013;3:a015677. [CrossRef]
  5. Weatherall DJ, Clegg JB. The thalassaemia syndromes: John Wiley & Sons; 2008.
  6. Knoll G, Cockfield S, Blydt-Hansen T, Baran D, Kiberd B, Landsberg D, et al. Canadian Society of Transplantation consensus guidelines on eligibility for kidney transplantation. CMAJ. 2005;173:1181-1184. [CrossRef]
  7. Weatherall DJ. The inherited diseases of hemoglobin are an emerging global health burden. Blood. 2010;115(22):4331-6. [CrossRef]
  8. Batabyal P, Chapman JR, Wong G, Craig JC, Tong A. Clinical practice guidelines on wait-listing for kidney transplantation: consistent and equitable? Transplantation. 2012;94:703-713. [CrossRef]
  9. Cao A, Kan YW. The prevention of thalassemia. Cold Spring Harbor perspectives in medicine. 2013;3(2):a011775. [CrossRef]
  10. Nalesnik MA, Woodle ES, Dimaio JM, Vasudev B, Teperman LW, Covington S, et al. Donor-transmitted malignancies in organ transplantation: assessment of clinical risk. Am J Transplant. 2011;11:1140-1147. [CrossRef]
  11. Traeger-Synodinos J, Harteveld CL, Old JM, Petrou M, Galanello R, Giordano P, et al. EMQN Best Practice Guidelines for molecular and haematology methods for carrier identification and prenatal diagnosis of the haemoglobinopathies. European journal of human genetics : EJHG. 2015;23(4):560. [CrossRef]
  12. Engels EA, Pfeiffer RM, Fraumeni JF, Jr., Kasiske BL, Israni AK, Snyder JJ, et al. Spectrum of cancer risk among US solid organ transplant recipients. JAMA. 2011;306:1891-1901. [CrossRef]
  13. Angastiniotis M, Kyriakidou S, Hadjiminas M. How thalassaemia was controlled in Cyprus. World Health Forum. 1986;7(3):291-7.
  14. van Leeuwen MT, Grulich AE, Webster AC, McCredie MR, Stewart JH, McDonald SP, et al. Immunosuppression and other risk factors for early and late non-Hodgkin lymphoma after kidney transplantation. Blood. 2009;114:630-637. [CrossRef]
  15. Cao A, Rosatelli MC, Leoni GB, Tuveri T, Scalas MT, Monni G, et al. Antenatal diagnosis of beta-thalassemia in Sardinia. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences. 1990;612:215-25. [CrossRef]
  16. Minai OA, Shah S, Mazzone P, Budev MM, Sahoo D, Murthy S, et al. Bronchogenic carcinoma after lung transplantation: characteristics and outcomes. J Thorac Oncol. 2008;3:1404-1409. [CrossRef]
  17. Loukopoulos D. Haemoglobinopathies in Greece: prevention programme over the past 35 years. The Indian journal of medical research. 2011;134:572-6.
  18. Dickson RP, Davis RD, Rea JB, Palmer SM. High frequency of bronchogenic carcinoma after single-lung transplantation. J Heart Lung Transplant. 2006;25:1297-1301. [CrossRef]
  19. Old JM. Screening and genetic diagnosis of haemoglobinopathies. Scandinavian journal of clinical and laboratory investigation. 2007;67(1):71-86. [CrossRef]
  20. Yusen RD, Edwards LB, Dipchand AI, Goldfarb SB, Kucheryavaya AY, Levvey BJ, et al. The Registry of the International Society for Heart and Lung Transplantation: Thirty-third Adult Lung and Heart-Lung Transplant Report-2016; Focus Theme: Primary Diagnostic Indications for Transplant. J Heart Lung Transplant. 2016;35:1170-1184. [CrossRef]
  21. Community control of hereditary anaemias: memorandum from a WHO meeting. Bulletin of the World Health Organization. 1983;61(1):63-80.
  22. Herman M, Weinstein T, Korzets A, Chagnac A, Ori Y, Zevin D, et al. Effect of cyclosporin A on DNA repair and cancer incidence in kidney transplant recipients. J Lab Clin Med. 2001;137:14-20. [CrossRef]
  23. Modell B, Organization WH. Guidelines for the control of haemoglobin disorders. 1994.
  24. Hojo M, Morimoto T, Maluccio M, Asano T, Morimoto K, Lagman M, et al. Cyclosporine induces cancer progression by a cell-autonomous mechanism. Nature. 1999;397:530-534. [CrossRef]
  25. Giordano PC, Harteveld CL, Bakker E. Genetic epidemiology and preventive healthcare in multiethnic societies: the hemoglobinopathies. International journal of environmental research and public health. 2014;11(6):6136-46. [CrossRef]
  26. Guba M, von Breitenbuch P, Steinbauer M, Koehl G, Flegel S, Hornung M, et al. Rapamycin inhibits primary and metastatic tumor growth by antiangiogenesis: involvement of vascular endothelial growth factor. Nat Med. 2002;8:128-135. [CrossRef]
  27. Cousens NE, Gaff CL, Metcalfe SA, Delatycki MB. Carrier screening for beta-thalassaemia: a review of international practice. European journal of human genetics : EJHG. 2010;18(10):1077-83. [CrossRef]
  28. Kauffman HM, Cherikh WS, Cheng Y, Hanto DW, Kahan BD. Maintenance immunosuppression with target-of-rapamycin inhibitors is associated with a reduced incidence of de novo malignancies. Transplantation. 2005;80:883-889. [CrossRef]
  29. Daniel D, Henthorn J. Sickle Cell and Thalassaemia Handbook for Laboratories. NHS Sickle Cell and Thalassaemia Screening Programme. 2012.
  30. Campistol JM, Eris J, Oberbauer R, Friend P, Hutchison B, Morales JM, et al. Sirolimus therapy after early cyclosporine withdrawal reduces the risk for cancer in adult renal transplantation. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2006;17:581-589. [CrossRef]
  31. Therrell BL, Jr., Lloyd-Puryear MA, Eckman JR, Mann MY. Newborn screening for sickle cell diseases in the United States: A review of data spanning 2 decades. Seminars in perinatology. 2015;39(3):238-51. [CrossRef]
  32. Kirk AD, Cherikh WS, Ring M, Burke G, Kaufman D, Knechtle SJ, et al. Dissociation of depletional induction and posttransplant lymphoproliferative disease in kidney recipients treated with alemtuzumab. Am J Transplant. 2007;7:2619-2625. [CrossRef]
  33. King L, Knight-Madden J, Reid M. Newborn screening for sickle cell disease in Jamaica: a review - past, present and future. The West Indian medical journal. 2014;63(2):147-50. [CrossRef]
  34. van Leeuwen MT, Webster AC, McCredie MR, Stewart JH, McDonald SP, Amin J, et al. Effect of reduced immunosuppression after kidney transplant failure on risk of cancer: population based retrospective cohort study. BMJ. 2010;340:c570. [CrossRef]
  35. Wagner SC, de Castro SM, Gonzalez TP, Santin AP, Zaleski CF, Azevedo LA, et al. Neonatal screening for hemoglobinopathies: results of a public health system in South Brazil. Genetic testing and molecular biomarkers. 2010;14(4):565-9. [CrossRef]
  36. Hogarth PM, Pietersz GA. Fc receptor-targeted therapies for the treatment of inflammation, cancer and beyond. Nat Rev Drug Discov. 2012;11:311-331. [CrossRef]
  37. Upadhye DS, Jain DL, Trivedi YL, Nadkarni AH, Ghosh K, Colah RB. Neonatal Screening and the Clinical Outcome in Children with Sickle Cell Disease in Central India. PLoS One. 2016;11(1):e0147081. [CrossRef]
  38. Fuster MM, Esko JD. The sweet and sour of cancer: glycans as novel therapeutic targets. Nat Rev Cancer. 2014;5:526-542. [CrossRef]
  39. Bain BJ. Neonatal/newborn haemoglobinopathy screening in Europe and Africa. Journal of clinical pathology. 2009;62(1):53-6. [CrossRef]
  40. Montgomery RA, Cozzi E, West LJ, Warren DS. Humoral immunity and antibody-mediated rejection in solid organ transplantation. Semin Immunol. 2011;23:224-234. [CrossRef]
  41. Old J, Harteveld CL, Traeger-Synodinos J, Petrou M, Angastiniotis M, Galanello R. Prevention of Thalassaemias and Other Haemoglobin Disorders: Volume 2: Laboratory Protocols. Synodinos. 2012.
  42. Robbins HY, Arcasoy SM. Malignancies following lung transplantation. Clin Chest Med. 2011;32:343-355. [CrossRef]
  43. Bain BJ, Amos RJ, Bareford D, Chapman C, Davies SC, Old JM, et al. THE LABORATORY DIAGNOSIS OF HAEMOGLOBINOPATHIES. British journal of haematology. 1998;101(4):783-92. [CrossRef]
  44. Lazda VA. Evaluation of Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) antibody screening of organ donors for allocation of organs to EBV serostatus matched recipients. Transplant Proc. 2006;38:3404-3405. [CrossRef]
  45. The British Society for Haematology General Haematology Task Force. Guidelines for haemoglobinopathy screening. Clinical and laboratory haematology. 1988;10(1):87–94. [CrossRef]
  46. Neuringer IP. Posttransplant lymphoproliferative disease after lung transplantation. Clin Dev Immunol. 2013;2013:430209-430219. [CrossRef]
  47. Guidelines for investigation of the alpha and beta thalassaemia traits. The Thalassaemia Working Party of the BCSH General Haematology Task Force. Journal of clinical pathology. 1994;47(4):289-95. [CrossRef]
  48. Savoie A, Perpete C, Carpentier L, Joncas J, Alfieri C. Direct correlation between the load of Epstein-Barr virus-infected lymphocytes in the peripheral blood of pediatric transplant patients and risk of lymphoproliferative disease. Blood. 1994;83:2715-2722.
  49. Guidelines for the fetal diagnosis of globin gene disorders. Globin Gene Disorder Working Party of the BCSH General Haematology Task Force. Journal of clinical pathology. 1994;47(3):199-204. [CrossRef]
  50. Wudhikarn K, Holman CJ, Linan M, Blaes AH, Dunitz JM, Hertz ME, et al. Post-transplant lymphoproliferative disorders in lung transplant recipients: 20-yr experience at the University of Minnesota. Clin Transplant. 2011;25:705-713. [CrossRef]
  51. Ryan K, Bain BJ, Worthington D, James J, Plews D, Mason A, et al. Significant haemoglobinopathies: guidelines for screening and diagnosis. British journal of haematology. 2010;149(1):35-49. [CrossRef]
  52. Baldanti F, Rognoni V, Cascina A, Oggionni T, Tinelli C, Meloni F. Post-transplant lymphoproliferative disorders and Epstein-Barr virus DNAemia in a cohort of lung transplant recipients. Virol J. 2011;8:421. [CrossRef]
  53. Angastiniotis M, Eleftheriou, A., Galanello, R., Harteveld, C. L., Petrou, M., Traeger-Synodinos, J., Giordano, P., Jauniaux, E., Modell, B., Serour, G. In: Old J, editor. Prevention of Thalassaemias and Other Haemoglobin Disorders: Volume 1: Principles. Nicosia, Cyprus: Thalassaemia International Federation; 2013.
  54. Kremer BE, Reshef R, Misleh JG, Christie JD, Ahya VN, Blumenthal NP, et al. Post-transplant lymphoproliferative disorder after lung transplantation: a review of 35 cases. J Heart Lung Transplant. 2012;31:296-304. [CrossRef]
  55. J O. Prevention and diagnosis of haemoglobinopathies. A short guide for health professionals and laboratory scientists. Nicosia, Cyprus: Thalassaemia International Federation. 2017.
  56. Gao SZ, Chaparro SV, Perlroth M, Montoya JG, Miller JL, DiMiceli S, et al. Post-transplantation lymphoproliferative disease in heart and heart-lung transplant recipients: 30-year experience at Stanford University. J Heart Lung Transplant. 2003;22:505-514. [CrossRef]
  57. Piplani S, Manan R, Lalit M, Manjari M, Bhasin T, Bawa J. NESTROFT - A Valuable, Cost Effective Screening Test for Beta Thalassemia Trait in North Indian Punjabi Population. Journal of clinical and diagnostic research : JCDR. 2013;7(12):2784-687. [CrossRef]
  58. Knight JS, Tsodikov A, Cibrik DM, Ross CW, Kaminski MS, Blayney DW. Lymphoma after solid organ transplantation: risk, response to therapy, and survival at a transplantation center. J Clin Oncol. 2009;27:3354-3362. [CrossRef]
  59. Bain BJ, Wild BJ, Stephens AD, Phelan LA. Variant Haemoglobins: A Guide to Identification2010.
  60. Tsai DE, Douglas L, Andreadis C, Vogl DT, Arnoldi S, Kotloff R, et al. EBV PCR in the diagnosis and monitoring of posttransplant lymphoproliferative disorder: results of a two-arm prospective trial. Am J Transplant. 2008;8:1016-1024. [CrossRef]
  61. Keren DF, Hedstrom D, Gulbranson R, Ou CN, Bak R. Comparison of Sebia Capillarys capillary electrophoresis with the Primus high-pressure liquid chromatography in the evaluation of hemoglobinopathies. American journal of clinical pathology. 2008;130(5):824-31. [CrossRef]
  62. Tsai DE, Hardy CL, Tomaszewski JE, Kotloff RM, Oltoff KM, Somer BG, et al. Reduction in immunosuppression as initial therapy for posttransplant lymphoproliferative disorder: analysis of prognostic variables and long-term follow-up of 42 adult patients. Transplantation. 2001;71:1076-1088. [CrossRef]
  63. Srivorakun H, Fucharoen G, Sanchaisuriya K, Fucharoen S. Diagnosis of common hemoglobinopathies among South East Asian population using capillary isoelectric focusing system. International journal of laboratory hematology. 2017;39(1):101-11. [CrossRef]
  64. Parker A, Bowles K, Bradley JA, Emery V, Featherstone C, Gupte G, et al. Management of post-transplant lymphoproliferative disorder in adult solid organ transplant recipients - BCSH and BTS Guidelines. Br J Haematol. 2010;149:693-705. [CrossRef]
  65. Wilkie A. Jones EM and Tansey EM (eds): Clinical molecular genetics in the UK c.1975–c.2000. Wellcome witnesses to contemporary medicine, vol 48. Human Genetics. 2016;135(2):257.
  66. Frey NV, Tsai DE. The management of posttransplant lymphoproliferative disorder. Med Oncol. 2007;24:125-136. [CrossRef]
  67. Old J, Henderson S. Molecular diagnostics for haemoglobinopathies. Expert opinion on medical diagnostics. 2010;4(3):225-40. [CrossRef]
  68. Raj R, Frost AE. Lung retransplantation after posttransplantation lymphoproliferative disorder (PTLD): a single-center experience and review of literature of PTLD in lung transplant recipients. J Heart Lung Transplant. 2005;24:671-679. [CrossRef]
  69. Harteveld CL, Kleanthous M, Traeger-Synodinos J. Prenatal diagnosis of hemoglobin disorders: present and future strategies. Clinical biochemistry. 2009;42(18):1767-79. [CrossRef]
  70. Knoop C, Kentos A, Remmelink M, Garbar C, Goldman S, Feremans W, et al. Post-transplant lymphoproliferative disorders after lung transplantation: first-line treatment with rituximab may induce complete remission. Clin Transplant. 2006;20:179-187. [CrossRef]
  71. Kan YW, Golbus MS, Dozy AM. Prenatal diagnosis of alpha-thalassemia. Clinical application of molecular hybridization. The New England journal of medicine. 1976;295(21):1165-7. [CrossRef]
  72. Oertel SH, Verschuuren E, Reinke P, Zeidler K, Papp-Vary M, Babel N, et al. Effect of anti-CD 20 antibody rituximab in patients with post-transplant lymphoproliferative disorder (PTLD). Am J Transplant. 2005;5:2901-2906. [CrossRef]
  73. Karnpean R, Fucharoen G, Fucharoen S, Sae-ung N, Sanchaisuriya K, Ratanasiri T. Accurate prenatal diagnosis of Hb Bart's hydrops fetalis in daily practice with a double-check PCR system. Acta haematologica. 2009;121(4):227-33. [CrossRef]
  74. Gandhi MK, Wilkie GM, Dua U, Mollee PN, Grimmett K, Williams T, et al. Immunity, homing and efficacy of allogeneic adoptive immunotherapy for posttransplant lymphoproliferative disorders. Am J Transplant. 2007;7:1293-1299. [CrossRef]
  75. Dode C, Krishnamoorthy R, Lamb J, Rochette J. Rapid analysis of -alpha 3.7 thalassaemia and alpha alpha alpha anti 3.7 triplication by enzymatic amplification analysis. British journal of haematology. 1993;83(1):105-11. [CrossRef]
  76. Haque T, Chaggar T, Schafers J, Atkinson C, McAulay KA, Crawford DH. Soluble CD30: a serum marker for Epstein-Barr virus-associated lymphoproliferative diseases. J Med Virol. 2011;83:311-316. [CrossRef]
  77. Bowden DK, Vickers MA, Higgs DR. A PCR-based strategy to detect the common severe determinants of alpha thalassaemia. British journal of haematology. 1992;81(1):104-8. [CrossRef]
  78. Engels EA, Preiksaitis J, Zingone A, Landgren O. Circulating antibody free light chains and risk of posttransplant lymphoproliferative disorder. Am J Transplant. 2012;12:1268-1274. [CrossRef]
  79. Baysal E, Huisman TH. Detection of common deletional alpha-thalassemia-2 determinants by PCR. American journal of hematology. 1994;46(3):208-13. [CrossRef]
  80. Abrahams NA, Meziane M, Ramalingam P, Mehta A, DeCamp M, Farver CF. Incidence of primary neoplasms in explanted lungs: long-term follow-up from 214 lung transplant patients. Transplant Proc. 2004;36:2808-2811. [CrossRef]
  81. Liu YT, Old JM, Miles K, Fisher CA, Weatherall DJ, Clegg JB. Rapid detection of alpha-thalassaemia deletions and alpha-globin gene triplication by multiplex polymerase chain reactions. British journal of haematology. 2000;108(2):295-9. [CrossRef]
  82. Rami-Porta R, Asamura H, Travis WD, Rusch VW. Lung cancer - major changes in the American Joint Committee on Cancer eighth edition cancer staging manual. CA Cancer J Clin. 2017;67:138-155. [CrossRef]
  83. Chong SS, Boehm CD, Higgs DR, Cutting GR. Single-tube multiplex-PCR screen for common deletional determinants of alpha-thalassemia. Blood. 2000;95(1):360-2.
  84. Jensen AO, Svaerke C, Farkas D, Pedersen L, Kragballe K, Sorensen HT. Skin cancer risk among solid organ recipients: a nationwide cohort study in Denmark. Acta Derm Venereol. 2010;90:474-479. [CrossRef]
  85. Wang XY, Lin MX, Lin M. A novel 6.3 kb deletion and the Rare 27.6 kb Deletion Causing alpha+-Thalassemia in two Chinese Patients. Hemoglobin. 2016;40(5):365-8. [CrossRef]
  86. Matin RN, Mesher D, Proby CM, McGregor JM, Bouwes Bavinck JN, del Marmol V, et al. Melanoma in organ transplant recipients: clinicopathological features and outcome in 100 cases. Am J Transplant. 2008;8:1891-1900. [CrossRef]
  87. Harteveld CL, Voskamp A, Phylipsen M, Akkermans N, den Dunnen JT, White SJ, et al. Nine unknown rearrangements in 16p13.3 and 11p15.4 causing alpha- and beta-thalassaemia characterised by high resolution multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification. Journal of medical genetics. 2005;42(12):922-31. [CrossRef]
  88. Ulrich C, Bichel J, Euvrard S, Guidi B, Proby CM, van de Kerkhof PC, et al. Topical immunomodulation under systemic immunosuppression: results of a multicentre, randomized, placebo-controlled safety and efficacy study of imiquimod 5% cream for the treatment of actinic keratoses in kidney, heart, and liver transplant patients. Br J Dermatol. 2007;157 Suppl 2:25-31. [CrossRef]
  89. Liu JZ, Han H, Schouten JP, Wang LR, Fan XP, Duarte HB, et al. Detection of alpha-thalassemia in China by using multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification. Hemoglobin. 2008;32(6):561-71. [CrossRef]
  90. Ulrich C, Johannsen A, Rowert-Huber J, Ulrich M, Sterry W, Stockfleth E. Results of a randomized, placebo-controlled safety and efficacy study of topical diclofenac 3% gel in organ transplant patients with multiple actinic keratoses. Eur J Dermatol. 2010;20:482-488.
  91. Harteveld CL, Refaldi C, Cassinerio E, Cappellini MD, Giordano PC. Segmental duplications involving the alpha-globin gene cluster are causing beta-thalassemia intermedia phenotypes in beta-thalassemia heterozygous patients. Blood cells, molecules & diseases. 2008;40(3):312-6. [CrossRef]
  92. Perrett CM, McGregor JM, Warwick J, Karran P, Leigh IM, Proby CM, et al. Treatment of post-transplant premalignant skin disease: a randomized intrapatient comparative study of 5-fluorouracil cream and topical photodynamic therapy. Br J Dermatol. 2007;156:320-328. [CrossRef]
  93. Sun CF, Lee CH, Cheng SW, Lin MH, Wu TL, Tsao KC, et al. Real-time quantitative PCR analysis for alpha-thalassemia-1 of Southeast Asian type deletion in Taiwan. Clinical genetics. 2001;60(4):305-9. [CrossRef]
  94. Wennberg AM, Stenquist B, Stockfleth E, Keohane S, Lear JT, Jemec G, et al. Photodynamic therapy with methyl aminolevulinate for prevention of new skin lesions in transplant recipients: a randomized study. Transplantation. 2008;86:423-429. [CrossRef]
  95. Pornprasert S, Phusua A, Suanta S, Saetung R, Sanguansermsri T. Detection of alpha-thalassemia-1 Southeast Asian type using real-time gap-PCR with SYBR Green1 and high resolution melting analysis. European journal of haematology. 2008;80(6):510-4. [CrossRef]
  96. Sathy SJ, Martinu T, Youens K, Lawrence CM, Howell DN, Palmer SM, et al. Symptomatic pulmonary allograft Kaposi's sarcoma in two lung transplant recipients. Am J Transplant. 2008;8:1951-1956. [CrossRef]
  97. Ou-Yang H, Hua L, Mo QH, Xu XM. Rapid, accurate genotyping of the common -alpha(4.2) thalassaemia deletion based on the use of denaturing HPLC. Journal of clinical pathology. 2004;57(2):159-63. [CrossRef]
  98. Piselli P, Busnach G, Citterio F, Frigerio M, Arbustini E, Burra P, et al. Risk of Kaposi sarcoma after solid-organ transplantation: multicenter study in 4,767 recipients in Italy, 1970-2006. Transplant Proc. 2009;41:1227-1230. [CrossRef]
  99. Zesong L, Ruijun G, Wen Z. Rapid detection of deletional alpha-thalassemia by an oligonucleotide microarray. American journal of hematology. 2005;80(4):306-8. [CrossRef]
  100. Kasiske BL, Snyder JJ, Gilbertson DT, Wang C. Cancer after kidney transplantation in the United States. Am J Transplant. 2004;4:905-913. [CrossRef]
  101. Bang-Ce Y, Hongqiong L, Zhuanfong Z, Zhengsong L, Jianling G. Simultaneous detection of alpha-thalassemia and beta-thalassemia by oligonucleotide microarray. Haematologica. 2004;89(8):1010-2.
  102. Wong G, Chapman JR, Craig JC. Cancer screening in renal transplant recipients: what is the evidence? Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. 2008;3 Suppl 2:S87-S100. [CrossRef]
  103. Molchanova TP, Pobedimskaya DD, Postnikov Yu V. A simplified procedure for sequencing amplified DNA containing the alpha 2- or alpha 1-globin gene. Hemoglobin. 1994;18(3):251-5. [CrossRef]
  104. Grewal AS, Padera RF, Boukedes S, Divo M, Rosas IO, Camp PC, et al. Prevalence and outcome of lung cancer in lung transplant recipients. Respir Med. 2015;109:427-433. [CrossRef]
  105. Ko TM, Tseng LH, Hsieh FJ, Lee TY. Prenatal diagnosis of Hb H disease due to compound heterozygosity for South-east Asian deletion and Hb constant spring by polymerase chain reaction. Prenatal diagnosis. 1993;13(2):143-6. [CrossRef]
  106. Sateia HF, Choi Y, Stewart RW, Peairs KS. Screening for lung cancer. Semin Oncol. 2017;44:74-82. [CrossRef]
  107. Foglietta E, Bianco I, Maggio A, Giambona A. Rapid detection of six common Mediterranean and three non-Mediterranean alpha-thalassemia point mutations by reverse dot blot analysis. American journal of hematology. 2003;74(3):191-5. [CrossRef]
  108. Eng B, Patterson M, Walker L, Chui DH, Waye JS. Detection of severe nondeletional alpha-thalassemia mutations using a single-tube multiplex ARMS assay. Genetic testing. 2001;5(4):327-9. [CrossRef]
  109. Puehringer H, Najmabadi H, Law HY, Krugluger W, Viprakasit V, Pissard S, et al. Validation of a reverse-hybridization StripAssay for the simultaneous analysis of common alpha-thalassemia point mutations and deletions. Clinical chemistry and laboratory medicine. 2007;45(5):605-10. [CrossRef]
  110. Gilad O, Shemer OS, Dgany O, Krasnov T, Nevo M, Noy-Lotan S, et al. Molecular diagnosis of alpha-thalassemia in a multiethnic population. European journal of haematology. 2017;98(6):553-62. [CrossRef]
  111. Staaf J, Torngren T, Rambech E, Johansson U, Persson C, Sellberg G, et al. Detection and precise mapping of germline rearrangements in BRCA1, BRCA2, MSH2, and MLH1 using zoom-in array comparative genomic hybridization (aCGH). Human mutation. 2008;29(4):555-64. [CrossRef]
  112. Saillour Y, Cossee M, Leturcq F, Vasson A, Beugnet C, Poirier K, et al. Detection of exonic copy-number changes using a highly efficient oligonucleotide-based comparative genomic hybridization-array method. Human mutation. 2008;29(9):1083-90. [CrossRef]
  113. Phylipsen M, Chaibunruang A, Vogelaar IP, Balak JR, Schaap RA, Ariyurek Y, et al. Fine-tiling array CGH to improve diagnostics for alpha- and beta-thalassemia rearrangements. Human mutation. 2012;33(1):272-80. [CrossRef]
  114. Blattner A, Brunner-Agten S, Ludin K, Hergersberg M, Herklotz R, Huber AR, et al. Detection of germline rearrangements in patients with alpha- and beta-thalassemia using high resolution array CGH. Blood cells, molecules & diseases. 2013;51(1):39-47. [CrossRef]
  115. Gilad O, Dgany O, Noy-Lotan S, Krasnov T, Elitzur S, Pissard S, et al. Characterization of two unique alpha-globin gene cluster deletions causing alpha-thalassemia in Israeli Arabs. Hemoglobin. 2014;38(5):319-24. [CrossRef]
  116. Jiang H, Liu S, Zhang YL, Wan JH, Li R, Li DZ. Association of an alpha-globin gene cluster duplication and heterozygous beta-thalassemia in a patient with a severe thalassemia syndrome. Hemoglobin. 2015;39(2):102-6. [CrossRef]
  117. Liu S, Jiang H, Wu MY, Zhang YL, Li DZ. Thalassemia Intermedia Caused by 16p13.3 Sectional Duplication in a beta-Thalassemia Heterozygous Child. Pediatric hematology and oncology. 2015;32(5):349-53. [CrossRef]
  118. Goodwin S, McPherson JD, McCombie WR. Coming of age: ten years of next-generation sequencing technologies. Nature reviews Genetics. 2016;17(6):333-51. [CrossRef]
  119. Clark BE, Shooter C, Smith F, Brawand D, Thein SL. Next-generation sequencing as a tool for breakpoint analysis in rearrangements of the globin gene clusters. International journal of laboratory hematology. 2017;39 Suppl 1:111-20. [CrossRef]
  120. Shooter C, Rooks H, Thein SL, Clark B. Next generation sequencing identifies a novel rearrangement in the HBB cluster permitting to-the-base characterization. Human mutation. 2015;36(1):142-50. [CrossRef]
  121. Clark B, Shooter C, Smith F, Brawand D, Steedman L, Oakley M, et al. Beta thalassaemia intermedia due to co-inheritance of three unique alpha globin cluster duplications characterised by next generation sequencing analysis. British journal of haematology. 2016.
  122. Henderson S, Timbs A, McCarthy J, Gallienne A, Van Mourik M, Masters G, et al. Incidence of haemoglobinopathies in various populations - the impact of immigration. Clinical biochemistry. 2009;42(18):1745-56. [CrossRef]
  123. Old JM. Screening and genetic diagnosis of haemoglobin disorders. Blood reviews. 2003;17(1):43-53. [CrossRef]
  124. Henderson SJ, Timbs AT, McCarthy J, Gallienne AE, Proven M, Rugless MJ, et al. Ten Years of Routine alpha- and beta-Globin Gene Sequencing in UK Hemoglobinopathy Referrals Reveals 60 Novel Mutations. Hemoglobin. 2016;40(2):75-84. [CrossRef]
  125. Kan YW, Lee KY, Furbetta M, Angius A, Cao A. Polymorphism of DNA sequence in the beta-globin gene region. Application to prenatal diagnosis of beta 0 thalassemia in Sardinia. The New England journal of medicine. 1980;302(4):185-8. [CrossRef]
  126. Orkin SH, Kazazian HH, Jr., Antonarakis SE, Goff SC, Boehm CD, Sexton JP, et al. Linkage of beta-thalassaemia mutations and beta-globin gene polymorphisms with DNA polymorphisms in human beta-globin gene cluster. Nature. 1982;296(5858):627-31. [CrossRef]
  127. Old JM, Fitches A, Heath C, Thein SL, Weatherall DJ, Warren R, et al. First-trimester fetal diagnosis for haemoglobinopathies: report on 200 cases. Lancet (London, England). 1986;2(8510):763-7. [CrossRef]
  128. Rosatelli C, Falchi AM, Tuveri T, Scalas MT, Di Tucci A, Monni G, et al. Prenatal diagnosis of beta-thalassaemia with the synthetic-oligomer technique. Lancet (London, England). 1985;1(8423):241-3. [CrossRef]
  129. Ristaldi MS, Pirastu M, Rosatelli C, Monni G, Erlich H, Saiki R, et al. Prenatal diagnosis of beta-thalassaemia in Mediterranean populations by dot blot analysis with DNA amplification and allele specific oligonucleotide probes. Prenatal diagnosis. 1989;9(9):629-38. [CrossRef]
  130. Saiki RK, Walsh PS, Levenson CH, Erlich HA. Genetic analysis of amplified DNA with immobilized sequence-specific oligonucleotide probes. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1989;86(16):6230-4. [CrossRef]
  131. Maggio A, Giambona A, Cai SP, Wall J, Kan YW, Chehab FF. Rapid and simultaneous typing of hemoglobin S, hemoglobin C, and seven Mediterranean beta-thalassemia mutations by covalent reverse dot-blot analysis: application to prenatal diagnosis in Sicily. Blood. 1993;81(1):239-42.
  132. Sutcharitchan P, Saiki R, Huisman TH, Kutlar A, McKie V, Erlich H, et al. Reverse dot-blot detection of the African-American beta-thalassemia mutations. Blood. 1995;86(4):1580-5.
  133. Sutcharitchan P, Saiki R, Fucharoen S, Winichagoon P, Erlich H, Embury SH. Reverse dot-blot detection of Thai beta-thalassaemia mutations. British journal of haematology. 1995;90(4):809-16. [CrossRef]
  134. Cremonesi L, Ferrari M, Giordano PC, Harteveld CL, Kleanthous M, Papasavva T, et al. An overview of current microarray-based human globin gene mutation detection methods. Hemoglobin. 2007;31(3):289-311. [CrossRef]
  135. Gemignani F, Perra C, Landi S, Canzian F, Kurg A, Tonisson N, et al. Reliable detection of beta-thalassemia and G6PD mutations by a DNA microarray. Clinical chemistry. 2002;48(11):2051-4.
  136. van Moorsel CH, van Wijngaarden EE, Fokkema IF, den Dunnen JT, Roos D, van Zwieten R, et al. beta-Globin mutation detection by tagged single-base extension and hybridization to universal glass and flow-through microarrays. European journal of human genetics : EJHG. 2004;12(7):567-73. [CrossRef]
  137. Lu Y, Kham SK, Tan PL, Quah TC, Heng CK, Yeoh AE. Arrayed primer extension: a robust and reliable genotyping platform for the diagnosis of single gene disorders: beta-thalassemia and thiopurine methyltransferase deficiency. Genetic testing. 2005;9(3):212-9. [CrossRef]
  138. Yin A, Zhang L, Luo M, He T, Zhang Y, Liu C, et al. Development of bead-based suspension array technology for the diagnosis of thalassemia. American journal of hematology. 2014;89(12):1158-9. [CrossRef]
  139. Old JM, Varawalla NY, Weatherall DJ. Rapid detection and prenatal diagnosis of beta-thalassaemia: studies in Indian and Cypriot populations in the UK. Lancet (London, England). 1990;336(8719):834-7. [CrossRef]
  140. Old JM, Khan SN, Verma I, Fucharoen S, Kleanthous M, Ioannou P, et al. A multi-center study in order to further define the molecular basis of beta-thalassemia in Thailand, Pakistan, Sri Lanka, Mauritius, Syria, and India, and to develop a simple molecular diagnostic strategy by amplification refractory mutation system-polymer. Hemoglobin. 2001;25(4):397. [CrossRef]
  141. Baig SM. Molecular diagnosis of beta-thalassemia by multiplex ARMS-PCR: a cost effective method for developing countries like Pakistan. Prenatal diagnosis. 2007;27(6):580-1. [CrossRef]
  142. Miri-Moghaddam E, Bahrami S, Naderi M, Bazi A, Karimipoor M. Molecular Characterization of beta-Thalassemia Intermedia in Southeast Iran. Hemoglobin. 2016;40(3):173-8. [CrossRef]
  143. Losekoot M, Fodde R, Harteveld CL, van Heeren H, Giordano PC, Bernini LF. Denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis and direct sequencing of PCR amplified genomic DNA: a rapid and reliable diagnostic approach to beta thalassaemia. British journal of haematology. 1990;76(2):269-74. [CrossRef]
  144. Gorakshakar AC, Lulla CP, Nadkarni AH, Pawar AR, Desai SN, Colah RB, et al. Prenatal diagnosis of beta-thalassemia among Indians using denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis. Hemoglobin. 1997;21(5):421-35. [CrossRef]
  145. Kanavakis E, Traeger-Synodinos J, Vrettou C, Maragoudaki E, Tzetis M, Kattamis C. Prenatal diagnosis of the thalassaemia syndromes by rapid DNA analytical methods. Molecular human reproduction. 1997;3(6):523-8. [CrossRef]
  146. Akhavan-Niaki H, Banihashemi A, Azizi M. Beta globin frameworks in thalassemia major patients from north iran. Iranian journal of pediatrics. 2012;22(3):297-302.
  147. Lindeman R, Hu SP, Volpato F, Trent RJ. Polymerase chain reaction (PCR) mutagenesis enabling rapid non-radioactive detection of common beta-thalassaemia mutations in Mediterraneans. British journal of haematology. 1991;78(1):100-4. [CrossRef]
  148. Varawalla NY, Fitches AC, Old JM. Analysis of beta-globin gene haplotypes in Asian Indians: origin and spread of beta-thalassaemia on the Indian subcontinent. Hum Genet. 1992;90(4):443-9. [CrossRef]
  149. Webster MT, Wells RS, Clegg JB. Analysis of variation in the human beta-globin gene cluster using a novel DHPLC technique. Mutation research. 2002;501(1-2):99-103. [CrossRef]
  150. Yip SP, Pun SF, Leung KH, Lee SY. Rapid, simultaneous genotyping of five common Southeast Asian beta-thalassemia mutations by multiplex minisequencing and denaturing HPLC. Clinical chemistry. 2003;49(10):1656-9. [CrossRef]
  151. Su YN, Lee CN, Hung CC, Chen CA, Cheng WF, Tsao PN, et al. Rapid detection of beta-globin gene (HBB) mutations coupling heteroduplex and primer-extension analysis by DHPLC. Human mutation. 2003;22(4):326-36. [CrossRef]
  152. Wu G, Hua L, Zhu J, Mo QH, Xu XM. Rapid, accurate genotyping of beta-thalassaemia mutations using a novel multiplex primer extension/denaturing high-performance liquid chromatography assay. British journal of haematology. 2003;122(2):311-6. [CrossRef]
  153. Bournazos SN, Tserga A, Patrinos GP, Papadakis MN. A versatile denaturing HPLC approach for human beta-globin gene mutation screening. American journal of hematology. 2007;82(2):168-70. [CrossRef]
  154. Vrettou C, Traeger-Synodinos J, Tzetis M, Palmer G, Sofocleous C, Kanavakis E. Real-time PCR for single-cell genotyping in sickle cell and thalassemia syndromes as a rapid, accurate, reliable, and widely applicable protocol for preimplantation genetic diagnosis. Human mutation. 2004;23(5):513-21. [CrossRef]
  155. Naja RP, Kaspar H, Shbaklo H, Chakar N, Makhoul NJ, Zalloua PA. Accurate and rapid prenatal diagnosis of the most frequent East Mediterranean beta-thalassemia mutations. American journal of hematology. 2004;75(4):220-4. [CrossRef]
  156. Camps C, Petousi N, Bento C, Cario H, Copley RR, McMullin MF, et al. Gene panel sequencing improves the diagnostic work-up of patients with idiopathic erythrocytosis and identifies new mutations. Haematologica. 2016;101(11):1306-18. [CrossRef]
  157. Del Orbe Barreto R, Arrizabalaga B, De la Hoz AB, Garcia-Orad A, Tejada MI, Garcia-Ruiz JC, et al. Detection of new pathogenic mutations in patients with congenital haemolytic anaemia using next-generation sequencing. International journal of laboratory hematology. 2016;38(6):629-38. [CrossRef]
  158. Hassan SM, Vossen RH, Chessa R, den Dunnen JT, Bakker E, Giordano PC, et al. Molecular diagnostics of the HBB gene in an Omani cohort using bench-top DNA Ion Torrent PGM technology. Blood cells, molecules & diseases. 2014;53(3):133-7. [CrossRef]
  159. Reading NS, Shooter C, Song J, Miller R, Agarwal A, Lanikova L, et al. Loss of Major DNase I Hypersensitive Sites in Duplicated beta-globin Gene Cluster Incompletely Silences HBB Gene Expression. Human mutation. 2016;37(11):1153-6. [CrossRef]
  160. Cardiero G, Prezioso R, Dembech S, Del Vecchio Blanco F, Scarano C, Lacerra G. Identification and molecular characterization of a novel 163 kb deletion: The Italian (gammadeltabeta)(0)-thalassemia. Hematology (Amsterdam, Netherlands). 2016;21(5):317-24. [CrossRef]
  161. Craig JE, Barnetson RA, Prior J, Raven JL, Thein SL. Rapid detection of deletions causing delta beta thalassemia and hereditary persistence of fetal hemoglobin by enzymatic amplification. Blood. 1994;83(6):1673-82.
  162. Gallienne AE, Dreau HM, McCarthy J, Timbs AT, Hampson JM, Schuh A, et al. Multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification identification of 17 different beta-globin gene deletions (including four novel mutations) in the UK population. Hemoglobin. 2009;33(6):406-16. [CrossRef]
  163. Lee ST, Yoo EH, Kim JY, Kim JW, Ki CS. Multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification screening of isolated increased HbF levels revealed three cases of novel rearrangements/deletions in the beta-globin gene cluster. British journal of haematology. 2010;148(1):154-60. [CrossRef]
  164. Kan YW, Dozy AM. Antenatal diagnosis of sickle-cell anaemia by D.N.A. analysis of amniotic-fluid cells. Lancet (London, England). 1978;2(8096):910-2.
  165. Kan YW, Dozy AM. Polymorphism of DNA sequence adjacent to human beta-globin structural gene: relationship to sickle mutation. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1978;75(11):5631-5. [CrossRef]
  166. Chang JC, Kan YW. Antenatal diagnosis of sickle cell anaemia by direct analysis of the sickle mutation. Lancet (London, England). 1981;2(8256):1127-9. [CrossRef]
  167. Daniel YA, Henthorn J. Newborn screening for sickling and other haemoglobin disorders using tandem mass spectrometry: A pilot study of methodology in laboratories in England. Journal of medical screening. 2016;23(4):175-8. [CrossRef]
  168. Edwards RL, Griffiths P, Bunch J, Cooper HJ. Top-down proteomics and direct surface sampling of neonatal dried blood spots: diagnosis of unknown hemoglobin variants. Journal of the American Society for Mass Spectrometry. 2012;23(11):1921-30. [CrossRef]
  169. Alter BP. Antenatal diagnosis. Summary of results. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences. 1990;612:237-50. [CrossRef]
  170. Old JM, Ward RH, Petrou M, Karagozlu F, Modell B, Weatherall DJ. First-trimester fetal diagnosis for haemoglobinopathies: three cases. Lancet (London, England). 1982;2(8313):1413-6. [CrossRef]
  171. Lo YM, Corbetta N, Chamberlain PF, Rai V, Sargent IL, Redman CW, et al. Presence of fetal DNA in maternal plasma and serum. Lancet (London, England). 1997;350(9076):485-7. [CrossRef]
  172. Hudecova I, Chiu RW. Non-invasive prenatal diagnosis of thalassemias using maternal plasma cell free DNA. Best practice & research Clinical obstetrics & gynaecology. 2017;39:63-73. [CrossRef]
  173. Ferrari M, Carrera P, Lampasona V, Galbiati S. New trend in non-invasive prenatal diagnosis. Clinica chimica acta; international journal of clinical chemistry. 2015;451(Pt A):9-13.
  174. Lam KW, Jiang P, Liao GJ, Chan KC, Leung TY, Chiu RW, et al. Noninvasive prenatal diagnosis of monogenic diseases by targeted massively parallel sequencing of maternal plasma: application to beta-thalassemia. Clinical chemistry. 2012;58(10):1467-75. [CrossRef]
  175. Galbiati S, Foglieni B, Travi M, Curcio C, Restagno G, Sbaiz L, et al. Peptide-nucleic acid-mediated enriched polymerase chain reaction as a key point for non-invasive prenatal diagnosis of beta-thalassemia. Haematologica. 2008;93(4):610. [CrossRef]
  176. Galbiati S, Monguzzi A, Damin F, Soriani N, Passiu M, Castellani C, et al. COLD-PCR and microarray: two independent highly sensitive approaches allowing the identification of fetal paternally inherited mutations in maternal plasma. Journal of medical genetics. 2016;53(7):481-7. [CrossRef]
  177. Papasavva T, Kalakoutis G, Kalikas I, Neokli E, Papacharalambous S, Kyrri A, et al. Noninvasive prenatal diagnostic assay for the detection of beta-thalassemia. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences. 2006;1075:148-53. [CrossRef]
  178. Papasavva T, Kalikas I, Kyrri A, Kleanthous M. Arrayed primer extension for the noninvasive prenatal diagnosis of beta-thalassemia based on detection of single nucleotide polymorphisms. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences. 2008;1137:302-8. [CrossRef]
  179. Papasavva T, van Ijcken WF, Kockx CE, van den Hout MC, Kountouris P, Kythreotis L, et al. Next generation sequencing of SNPs for non-invasive prenatal diagnosis: challenges and feasibility as illustrated by an application to beta-thalassaemia. European journal of human genetics : EJHG. 2013;21(12):1403-10. [CrossRef]
  180. Li Y, Di Naro E, Vitucci A, Grill S, Zhong XY, Holzgreve W, et al. Size fractionation of cell-free DNA in maternal plasma improves the detection of a paternally inherited beta-thalassemia point mutation by MALDI-TOF mass spectrometry. Fetal diagnosis and therapy. 2009;25(2):246-9. [CrossRef]
  181. Lun FM, Tsui NB, Chan KC, Leung TY, Lau TK, Charoenkwan P, et al. Noninvasive prenatal diagnosis of monogenic diseases by digital size selection and relative mutation dosage on DNA in maternal plasma. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2008;105(50):19920-5. [CrossRef]
  182. Barrett AN, McDonnell TC, Chan KC, Chitty LS. Digital PCR analysis of maternal plasma for noninvasive detection of sickle cell anemia. Clinical chemistry. 2012;58(6):1026-32. [CrossRef]
  183. Snyder MW, Adey A, Kitzman JO, Shendure J. Haplotype-resolved genome sequencing: experimental methods and applications. Nature reviews Genetics. 2015;16(6):344-58. [CrossRef]
  184. de Vree PJ, de Wit E, Yilmaz M, van de Heijning M, Klous P, Verstegen MJ, et al. Targeted sequencing by proximity ligation for comprehensive variant detection and local haplotyping. Nature biotechnology. 2014;32(10):1019-25. [CrossRef]
  185. Giambona A, Damiani G, Leto F, Jakil C, Renda D, Cigna V, et al. Embryo-fetal erythroid cell selection from celomic fluid allows earlier prenatal diagnosis of hemoglobinopathies. Prenatal diagnosis. 2016;36(4):375-81. [CrossRef]
  186. Giambona A, Leto F, Damiani G, Jakil C, Cigna V, Schillaci G, et al. Identification of embryo-fetal cells in celomic fluid using morphological and short-tandem repeats analysis. Prenatal diagnosis. 2016;36(10):973-8. [CrossRef]
  187. He J, Song W, Yang J, Lu S, Yuan Y, Guo J, et al. Next-generation sequencing improves thalassemia carrier screening among premarital adults in a high prevalence population: the Dai nationality, China. Genetics in medicine : official journal of the American College of Medical Genetics. 2017.
Newsletter
Download PDF
0 0

TOP