OBM Geriatrics is an Open Access journal published quarterly online by LIDSEN Publishing Inc. The journal takes the premise that innovative approaches – including gene therapy, cell therapy, and epigenetic modulation – will result in clinical interventions that alter the fundamental pathology and the clinical course of age-related human diseases. We will give strong preference to papers that emphasize an alteration (or a potential alteration) in the fundamental disease course of Alzheimer’s disease, vascular aging diseases, osteoarthritis, osteoporosis, skin aging, immune senescence, and other age-related diseases.
Geriatric medicine is now entering a unique point in history, where the focus will no longer be on palliative, ameliorative, or social aspects of care for age-related disease, but will be capable of stopping, preventing, and reversing major disease constellations that have heretofore been entirely resistant to interventions based on “small molecular” pharmacological approaches. With the changing emphasis from genetic to epigenetic understandings of pathology (including telomere biology), with the use of gene delivery systems (including viral delivery systems), and with the use of cell-based therapies (including stem cell therapies), a fatalistic view of age-related disease is no longer a reasonable clinical default nor an appropriate clinical research paradigm.
Precedence will be given to papers describing fundamental interventions, including interventions that affect cell senescence, patterns of gene expression, telomere biology, stem cell biology, and other innovative, 21st century interventions, especially if the focus is on clinical applications, ongoing clinical trials, or animal trials preparatory to phase 1 human clinical trials.
Papers must be clear and concise, but detailed data is strongly encouraged. The journal publishes research articles, reviews, communications and technical notes. There is no restriction on the length of the papers and we encourage scientists to publish their results in as much detail as possible.
Indexing: DOAJ-Directory of Open Access Journals.
Archiving: full-text archived in CLOCKSS.
Rapid publication: manuscripts are undertaken in 6 days from acceptance to publication (median values for papers published in this journal in the first half of 2019, 1-2 days of FREE language polishing time is also included in this period).
Models of Caregiver Support
Submission Deadline: February 25, 2019 (Open)
James S. Powers, MD
Professor of Medicine, Department of Medicine, Vanderbilt University School of Medicine, USA
Clinical Associate Director, Geriatric Research, Education, and Clinical Center (GRECC), Tennessee Valley Health System
Website | E-Mail
Research Interests: Accidental Falls; Delirium; Dementia; Geriatric Consultation; Geriatric Syndromes; Hospital Care of Elderly; Interdisciplinary Patient Care Teams; Long Term Care; Patient Centered Medical Home
About This Topic
Care for aging persons involves consideration of caregiving. Aging persons experience heavy healthcare utilization and functional self-care limitations. In addition to clinical needs, some of this high-need population also have behavioral and social needs. The majority of long-term care provided to older adults and persons with disabilities is provided by unpaid family caregivers and friends. The 2015 National Caregiver Survey conducted by the National Alliance for Caregiving in partnership with the American Association of Retired Persons estimates that 43.5 million unpaid caregivers provide assistance to at least one adult and the average caregiver spends over 24 hours per week in this role. Many caregivers report their health to be worse because of caregiving strain, and most report another unpaid caregiver assists them in their tasks. Caregivers help loved ones with at least one activity of daily living and four instrumental activities of daily living in addition to arranging or supervising outside services. The National Academy of Medicine predicts that the future professional workforce will be inadequate to meet the care needs for our aging population and that we will continue to rely on informal caregiving to supply the majority of long-term care services. Caregiver resources consist of skilled and non-skilled services. The major barrier to utilization of caregiver resources continues to be lack of awareness of available services with many caregivers also facing significant challenges trying to access community services, understanding eligibility criteria, and completing applications for services.
It is my pleasure to serve as Guest Editor for this Special Issue of the journal OBM Geriatrics focused on the subject of Models of Caregiver Support. Innovative care models which demonstrate improved outcomes in health and well-being, care utilization, and cost moderation can be scaled to enhance care generally. Successful models can involve the service setting, direct care delivery, and organizational culture. It is my pleasure to invite you to submit an invited feature article on the topic of Models of Caregiver Support. The manuscript may be either a full paper or a communication based on your own research in this area, or may be a focused review article on some aspect of the subject. Please note that for your contribution, all article processing charges will be *waived*. Potential contributors to this special edition of OBM Geriatrics may include investigators and participants in innovative models of care such as interactive, self – directed virtual care management, automated decision support tools, sharing of best practices, development of care management tools and referral help lines, long-distance caregiving, and addressing the need for professional support and guidance to cope with caregiver stress. Submissions with data and analyses are particularly welcome. Additionally, thoughtful descriptive proposals to identify high-need patients and caregivers, improve the cultural environment and attitudes regarding aging and society, health policy concerns, and successful team-based and collaborative care models are welcome.
Akemi Hirano, Yusuke Suzuki, Hiroyuki Umegaki, Toshio Hayashi, Koichiro Ina, Joji Onishi, Jun Hasegawa, Masafumi Kuzuya
Received: October 13, 2019; Published: February 19, 2020; doi:10.21926/obm.geriatr.2001108
Zena Aldridge, Karen Harrison Dening
Received: September 19, 2019; Published: October 18, 2019; doi:10.21926/obm.geriatr.1904081
Hsueh-Fen S. Kao, Maria A. Amaya
Received: May 19, 2019; Published: August 07, 2019; doi:10.21926/obm.geriatr.1903065
Tracy Harwood, John Maltby, Elizabeta B. Mukaetova-Ladinska
Received: March 28, 2019; Published: July 15, 2019; doi:10.21926/obm.geriatr.1903062
Yoko Moriyama, Timothy Bolt, Marilyn Luptak, Nanako Tamiya
Received: February 19, 2019; Published: July 09, 2019; doi:10.21926/obm.geriatr.1903061
Mamta Saxena, Anne F. Farrell, Kari Adamsons
Received: February 25, 2019; Published: May 20, 2019; doi:10.21926/obm.geriatr.1902054
Karen Harrison Dening, Zena Aldridge
Received: February 26, 2019; Published: May 10, 2019; doi:10.21926/obm.geriatr.1902053
Lindy A. Kilik, Robert W. Hopkins
Received: March 01, 2019; Published: May 09, 2019; doi:10.21926/obm.geriatr.1902052
Received: October 05, 2018; Published: December 26, 2018; doi:10.21926/obm.geriatr.1804026
James S. Powers, Barbara Clinton, Kayse Martin, Margaret A. Genendlis, Grace S. Smith
Received: October 26, 2018; Published: December 13, 2018; doi:10.21926/obm.geriatr.1804024