OBM Neurobiology is an international peer-reviewed Open Access journal published quarterly online by LIDSEN Publishing Inc. By design, the scope of OBM Neurobiology is broad, so as to reflect the multidisciplinary nature of the field of Neurobiology that interfaces biology with the fundamental and clinical neurosciences. As such, OBM Neurobiology embraces rigorous multidisciplinary investigations into the form and function of neurons and glia that make up the nervous system, either individually or in ensemble, in health or disease. OBM Neurobiology welcomes original contributions that employ a combination of molecular, cellular, systems and behavioral approaches to report novel neuroanatomical, neuropharmacological, neurophysiological and neurobehavioral findings related to the following aspects of the nervous system: Signal Transduction and Neurotransmission; Neural Circuits and Systems Neurobiology; Nervous System Development and Aging; Neurobiology of Nervous System Diseases (e.g., Developmental Brain Disorders; Neurodegenerative Disorders).

OBM Neurobiology publishes research articles, technical reports and invited topical reviews. Although the OBM Neurobiology Editorial Board encourages authors to be succinct, there is no restriction on the length of the papers. Authors should present their results in as much detail as possible, as reviewers are encouraged to emphasize scientific rigor and reproducibility.

Archiving: full-text archived in CLOCKSS.

Rapid publication: manuscripts are undertaken in 7 days from acceptance to publication (average values for papers published in this journal in the first half of 2019, 1-2 days of FREE language polishing time is also included in this period).

Free Publication in 2019
Current Issue: 2019  Archive: 2018 2017
Open Access Review
Connections between Early-Life Neuroinflammation, Neural Stem Cells and Progenitors and Origins of Neuropsychiatric Disorders

Ekta Kumari , Fernando J. Velloso , Steven W. Levison *

Department of Pharmacology, Physiology and Neuroscience, New Jersey Medical School, Newark, NJ 07103, United States

Correspondence: Steven W. Levison

Academic Editors: Jenny Berrío and Bart Ellenbroek

Special Issue: On the Role of Early-life Neuroinflammation in Neuropsychiatric Disorders

Received: February 13, 2019 | Accepted: May 08, 2019 | Published: May 13, 2019

OBM Neurobiology 2019, Volume 3, Issue 2, doi:10.21926/obm.neurobiol.1902027

Recommended citation: Kumari E, Velloso FJ, Levison SW. Connections between Early-life Neuroinflammation, Neural Stem Cells and Progenitors and Origins of Neuropsychiatric Disorders. OBM Neurobiology 2019;3(2):22; doi:10.21926/obm.neurobiol.1902027.

© 2019 by the authors. This is an open access article distributed under the conditions of the Creative Commons by Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is correctly cited.

Abstract

A number of studies have highlighted the connection between infections during pregnancy in mothers and increased risk for neuropsychiatric disorders later in life leading to the view that maternal immune activation is a significant contributor to psychiatric illnesses. Meta-analyses have revealed associations between the incidence of premature birth and perinatal inflammation with smaller total brain volumes, cognitive, motor and behavioral deficits in childhood and adolescents. In animal studies where inflammation has been induced during the perinatal period, parallel changes in cognition and behavior have been seen reminiscent of those observed in human clinical studies. Several cytokines and in particular IL-1ß and IL-6 that are produced maternally can cross the placenta as well as the blood-brain-barrier to affect the developing brain, and they may positively or negatively regulate the stem cells and progenitors that reside in the brain’s germinal matrices. Therefore, here we will review the literature towards the goal of highlighting how IL-1 and IL-6 affect the proliferation and differentiation of the stem cells and progenitors of the major germinal zones of the developing brain, and discuss how changes in the progenitor cell population can contribute to psychiatric disorders such as autism and schizophrenia.

Graphical abstract

Keywords

Subventricular zone; subgranular zone; neurogenesis; gliogenesis; maternal infection

1. Maternal Immune Activation is a Risk Factor for Psychiatric Disorders

Studies over the past two decades have established that abnormal fetal brain development puts children at risk for neuropsychiatric disorders later in life [1,2]. These studies also indicate that there is an interplay between genetic variations and environmental factors that contribute to the etiology of these complex disorders [3]. Maternal infections comprise the most widely implicated environmental factors for abnormal fetal brain development. Epidemiological studies suggest an association between maternal viral infections and psychiatric disorders such as attention deficit and hyperactivity disorder, autism and schizophrenia [4,5]. Over time, other infectious agents have been added to the list suggesting that a diverse group of pathogens that infect mothers can produce similar neurodevelopmental problems. Furthermore, clinical studies have concluded that the maternal immune response to viral and bacterial infections, and not direct fetal infections, are responsible for the higher incidence of psychiatric disorders in their infants [6]. Experimental studies in rodents have validated the consequences of maternal influenza infections which produce behavioral deficits reminiscent of autism where no virus can be detected in the fetus [7]. Although the underlying mechanisms of this epidemiological association remain unclear, maternal cytokine production in response to infection remains a crucial link [8,9,10,11].

2. Animal Models of Maternal Infection

Polyinosinic-polycytidylic acid (Poly(I:C)), is a double stranded RNA molecule that mimics a viral infection and stimulates an immune response by activating toll-like receptor-3 [12]. In the past decade, many laboratories have injected Poly(I:C) into pregnant rodents as means of activating an maternal immune response (MIA) in a controlled and temporally restricted manner [13]. Poly(I:C) induced MIA models vary in dose, route of administration, number of injections and gestational timing, that produce dramatically different maternal cytokine profiles [14] and subsequently different brain abnormalities and behavioral outcomes in the offspring [7,15,16]. For example, when poly(I:C) was injected into gestational day (GD)-9 pregnant mice their offspring exhibited a fear of being in open spaces, whereas this behavioral phenotype was not observed when poly(I:C) was injected into the dams at GD-17. By contrast, GD-17 immune activation produced perseverative behaviors in the offspring supporting the above conclusion that the gestational age at the time of infection will produce different consequences [14,17]. This makes sense when one considers the theorem that elevated levels of cytokines might affect the output of the neural stem cells and progenitors (NSPs). These NSPs produce a variety of cell types in the brain, and it has been well established that each cell type is born during specific epochs over the course of neural development [18]. For example, during the first trimester in primates there are waves of neurogenesis and cell migration during which the brain’s long projection neurons are produced. During the second trimester, the stem cells and progenitors in the brain are producing local circuit interneurons and both the projection neurons and the local circuit neurons are making synaptic connections with each other. Then during the third trimester, the non-neuronal cells and especially the myelinating oligodendrocytes are being produced. Accordingly, establishing which neurodevelopmental processes are affected by MIA and how these affect the trajectory of neurogenesis, neural circuit formation, myelination and ultimately behaviors are key areas of investigation concerning the fetal origins of adult neurological and psychiatric diseases.

An alternative MIA animal model is the maternal administration of the bacterial endotoxin lipopolysaccharide (LPS) which mimics the innate acute phase response to bacterial infections and does so in the absence of live bacteria. LPS, which is a cell wall component of gram-negative bacteria, is recognized by the pathogen recognition receptor toll-like receptor 4 [19]. Upon binding to this receptor, LPS stimulates the production of a wide array of innate immune response proteins that include the synthesis and release of proinflammatory cytokines. There are some notable similarities between the cytokine-associated inflammatory responses triggered by LPS and poly(I:C) [19,20]. Therefore, it should not be surprising that prenatal LPS treatment, similarly to poly(I:C), precipitates a number of behavioral and neurochemical changes relevant to psychiatric illnesses. Despite the apparent similarities between the LPS- and poly (I:C)-induced effects, there also are some noticeable differences between the two models with respect to the nature of brain and behavioral changes. For example, early prenatal poly(I:C) treatment in mice has been shown to increase the number of midbrain dopamine neurons produced [21], whereas prenatal LPS exposure decreases the numbers of midbrain dopamine neurons produced [22]. Prenatal LPS exposure in rhesus monkey also causes a significant increase in global white matter volume [23], whereas an opposite pattern (i.e., decreased white matter volume) has been noted in rhesus monkeys born to influenza-infected mothers [24]. Such differences in the long-term outcomes between prenatal exposures to bacterial-like and viral/viral-like immunogens support the thesis that different pathogens can induce distinct sets of neuroimmune abnormalities across brain development. Accordingly, many questions remain regarding the timing and the type of inflammatory stimuli associated with disease-specific outcomes such as ASD, Schizophrenia and other CNS disorders [25].

3. Roles of Cytokines in Normal Brain Development

Cytokines, which may be defined as small intercellular signaling proteins, shape brain development beginning very early in fetal life. Several families of these signals, such as the TGFb family (which includes the Bone Morphogenic Proteins) and the IL-6 family (which includes IL-6, Leukemia inhibitory factor (LIF), ciliary neurotrophic factor (CNTF) and others) play important roles throughout brain development. These cytokines can be detected in the human fetus as early as 5 weeks of gestation [26], which is when early patterning events are occurring during human brain development. Other studies have detected their presence in the fetal brains of non-human species beginning in early gestation [14,27]. Cytokines can modulate stem cell self-renewal, progenitor cell proliferation, cell specification, differentiation, cell migration [28,29], as well as dendrite growth, dendritic complexity [8] synaptogenesis and neuronal survival [30], thereby affecting multiple aspects of CNS development. As they play important roles during normal development, it follows that an imbalance in the levels of cytokines in the fetal circulation or in the developing brain could adversely affect neurodevelopmental processes resulting in disorders as disparate as attention deficit and hyperactivity disorder, Schizophrenia, Autism and intellectual disability. Factors that will contribute to the ultimate outcome of a maternal infection include whether the cytokines are derived from the maternal or the fetal system, whether there is a change in the balance of neuroprotective vs. cytotoxic cytokines, and the stage of fetal brain development and/or immune system development.

4. Cytokine Levels Increase in Placenta and Amniotic Fluid in Prenatal Infection

Several models of MIA, including influenza infection, LPS and Poly I:C administration, increase levels of cytokines in the maternal serum, placenta and fetal brain [14,31,32,33,34,35]. In the Poly (I:C) model both maternal serum interleukin-1 (IL-1β) and interleukin-6 (IL-6) protein levels were elevated and comparable when pregnant dams were injected at early (GD-9) and late (GD-17) stages of fetal development. Notably, poly (I:C) induced a stronger IL-6 response at GD-17 than at GD-9 [14]. Moreover, studies have provided evidence that the increased levels of cytokines in the maternal circulation can cross the placenta to enter the fetal circulation. For example, high levels of cytokines, such as IL-2 and IL-6, were detected in the amniotic fluid and fetal tissues after administering cytokines into the maternal jugular vein [36,37]. Interestingly, IL-6 is transferred bi-directionally across healthy term human placentas whereas the cytokines IL-1α and TNF-α are transferred only minimally through the placenta [38].

To determine whether elevated levels of cytokines in the fetal circulation cross the blood-barrier to enter the brain, Urakubo et al., 2001 injected GD-16 pregnant rats with a low-dose (0.5 mg/kg) of LPS [33] and collected amniotic fluid, placenta and fetal brains 2 - 8 hours later. Protein levels of IL-1 β, IL-6 and TNFα were quantified by ELISA. They showed that LPS significantly increased placental levels of IL-1β, IL-6 and TNFα. Of these three cytokines, only IL-6 levels were significantly increased in the amniotic fluid. In a similar study, pregnant rats were injected systemically with 100 mg/kg of LPS at gestation day 18 [35]. Subsequently, maternal blood, amniotic fluid, placenta and fetal brains were collected. Analyses of maternal serum showed a significant increase in IL-6 and IL-1β and increased levels of these cytokines achieved a maximum in the amniotic fluid 6 hours after LPS treatment.

Key to implicating elevated levels of cytokines in altered fetal brain development is establishing whether these pro-inflammatory cytokines can pass from the maternal circulation into the fetus and from the fetal circulation into the brain. In one study, pregnant rats were infused with radioactive IL-6 at mid-pregnancy (GD 11-13) and late- pregnancy (GD 17-19) [36]. When fetal tissue was sampled, a 40-fold passage of IL-6 across the placental barrier to fetal tissue was detected at mid-pregnancy compared to late pregnancy (which showed little passage of IL-6). In another study where radioactively labeled IL-6 and IL-1β were injected into the jugular veins of adult mice, there was a linear relationship between brain/serum ratios for both IL-6 and IL-1β, suggesting that these cytokines can cross the murine blood-brain barrier. Furthermore, administering unlabeled IL-6 or IL-1β along with the radioactively labeled IL-6 or IL-1β competitively reduced the levels of radioactive cytokines into the brain suggesting the presence of saturable transporters for these cytokines [39]. Banks et al., 1994 showed that IL-6 was transported into the murine brain and could be inhibited by unlabeled IL-6 but not by unlabeled IL-1α or TNFα, providing evidence that the transporter for IL-6 is distinct from that used by IL-1α and TNFα. They also found that most of the IL-6 could be recovered from the brain parenchyma, demonstrating that blood-borne IL-6 can penetrate the blood-brain barrier. Despite intense research, the identity of the transporter has not yet been established. In addition, a recent study showed that subsequent to a systemic maternal inflammation stimulating a fetal inflammatory response, that levels of IL-6 mRNA increase within the fetal CNS indicating that local production of IL-6 within the CNS also occurs [40]. Given the importance of the cell proliferation to produce the variety of cells within the developing brain, and the evidence that IL-6 can cross the blood-brain barrier and can be produced locally, a key question is whether elevated levels of cytokines in the developing brain will alter the proliferation of the neural stem cells and/or the neural progenitors and if so, whether this disruption of normal brain histogenesis will contribute to the etiology of psychiatric disorders.

5. Adverse Effects of IL-6 on Fetal Brain Development

Studies have established that IL-6 is elevated in maternal serum, amniotic fluid and serum of children subsequently diagnosed with Autism Spectrum Disorder (ASD). Moreover, independent studies have established that children and adults with ASD have higher circulating IL-6 levels compared to controls [41,42,43]. These increases are associated with impaired communication skills, irritability, socialization and intelligence [44]. Accordingly, IL-6 is increasingly being used as a biomarker for ASD [45]. Experimental studies in mice also highlight the role of IL-6 in disrupting the brain development. Indeed, a single injection of IL-6 into a pregnant mouse at GD12.5 produced cognitive and behavioral deficits similar to those seen in neurodevelopmental disorders like ASD and Schizophrenia [46]. Moreover, administering a blocking antibody to IL-6, but not to IL-1a, TNFa or IFNg reversed all of the behavioral deficits seen in this mouse model of MIA. This study further showed that Poly I:C injections into pregnant IL-6 knockout mice didn’t produce the behavioral problems seen in wild-type mice, lending strong support to the conclusion that IL-6 is the key mediator of the effects of MIA on fetal brain development. Those data are further supported in a LPS model of MIA, where treatment with the anti-inflammatory drug Pioglitazone abolished ASD-like behaviors and reduced elevated plasma IL-6 levels [47].

Recent studies have aimed at uncovering the underlying mechanisms leading to the cognitive and behavioral deficits seen in ASD. For instance, exposure to diesel exhaust gases during intrauterine development, an environmental factor associated with ASD, leads to behavioral alterations in adult mice reminiscent of ASD [48]. These mice displayed elevated brain IL-6 at birth, as well as abnormally high levels of phosphorylated STAT3 and decreased levels of reelin. At P60, reelin co-localizes with an accumulation of calretinin+ cells in the inner layers of the cortex, suggesting that increased levels of IL-6 during development inhibits interneuron migration and consequently disrupts proper cortical lamination and, therefore, upsets the balance of inhibitory and excitatory synapses [48].

6. Adverse Effects of IL-6 on SVZ Neurogenesis

Normal brain development is highly dependent on timely, regulated proliferation and differentiation of NSPs. Hence, neurogenesis is observed at high levels throughout the brain during the early stages of development, being later restricted to a few specific niches in the adult brain. In the developing brain, neurogenesis and gliogenesis are vulnerable to changes in the fetal environment, and especially to neuroinflammation. For example, Gallagher et al., 2013 evaluated the long-lasting effects of maternal IL-6 on embryonic NSPs [49]. They administered a single pulse of IL-6 into pregnant mice at gestational day 13.5, the equivalent of the human 1st trimester [18], and evaluated the effects on NSP proliferation in adult subventricular (SVZ) of 2-month old offspring. Using the marker Sox2 along with BrdU, they found increased numbers of double labeled cells in the adults that had been exposed to IL-6 at E13.5. They concluded that IL-6 increased the proliferation of NSCs in the SVZ, as they didn’t find any differences in other NSP subpopulations when labeled using antibodies to GFAP, Olig2 and Mash1. However, as Sox-2 is expressed by both progenitors and stem cells, these data do not conclusively establish which of these populations was increased.

Gallagher et. al., 2013, also used the neurosphere assay and reported an increase in SVZ neurosphere initiating cells cultured from adults exposed to IL-6 as fetuses. In contrast, when we treated cultured SVZ cells from P5 mice for 6 days with IL-6 (5 ng/ml), it decreased both the number and sizes of the neurospheres. Typically, a decrease in neurosphere number is interpreted as a reduction in number of NSCs. However, when we differentiated the neurospheres that were treated with IL-6 there was an increase in the percentage of multipotential neurospheres compared to control. One limitation of the neurosphere assay is that it can’t distinguish between spheres formed by stem cells vs. those formed by progenitors . In order to resolve this issue, we used a multi-color flow cytometry panel to more completely establish how IL-6 affects the NSPs of the SVZ. As we will explain in more detail below, IL-6 stimulated the proliferation of a multipotential progenitor at the expense of the NSCs. This result is reminiscent of a study in adult mice, where a transient surge in IL-6 activated the putative adult NSCs in the short term but depleted the NSC pool in the long term [51]. This same study also showed that accompanying the depletion of the NSCs, there was reduced olfactory bulb neurogenesis. These results demonstrate that increasing IL-6 levels at different stages of brain development has different consequences.

6.1 Multipotential Progenitors within the Neonatal SVZ

Many studies have demonstrated that cells isolated from the SVZ are epidermal growth factor and/or fibroblast growth factor (FGF) responsive, but more recent studies have determined that another subset of cells in the SVZ express receptors that respond to platelet–derived growth factor (PDGF) . PDGF stimulates the growth of PDGFRα and PDGFRβ positive cells from both the embryonic and the adult mouse SVZ While PDGF responsive radial glia are rare in the mouse brain, they are important for human neocortical development Five of the 8 subpopulations are multipotential progenitors when differentiated in vitro, yielding neurons, oligodendrocytes and astrocytes. These were the CD133+LeX+NG2–CD140a– (NSC), CD133–LeX+NG2–CD140a– (MP1), CD133+LeX+NG2+ CD140a– (MP2), CD133+LeX+NG2+CD140a+ (MP4) and CD133–LeX+NG2+CD140a+ (referred to as PDGFRa -FGF2-responsive MPs: PFMP). This PFMP is likely the NG2+ multipotential progenitor that has been isolated from the embryonic forebrain [54] and is similar to the PDGF responsive progenitors present in the neonatal rat SVZ as described by Moore et al., 2014 [57].

6.2 Modeling Maternal Infections by Systemically Injecting IL-6

Mice are born precociously, thus the brain of a newborn mouse is equivalent to that of an early 3rd trimester human infant [17]. Previous studies have measured 2-3 fold increases in the blood plasma IL-6 levels in children with ASD [41,43]. Therefore, to determine the dose of IL-6 provided to mice needed to mimic the elevated levels of IL-6 seen in children who will develop ASD, we injected neonatal mice with increasing doses of IL-6 vs PBS twice on postnatal day 4 (P4) and once on P5 and then measured plasma levels of IL-6 two hours after the 3rd injection. We used this paradigm to produce prolonged and elevated levels of IL-6 for at least 36 hours. Administering 75 ng of IL-6 increased blood plasma levels by 2- fold; therefore, decided to administer 75 ng of IL-6 to mimic the 2-fold increase in circulating IL-6 level observed in ASD patients.

6.3 Elevated Levels of Il-6 Increase the Proliferation of Pdgf-Responsive Multipotential Progenitors

Administering 75 ng of IL-6 twice on P4 and once on P5 altered the neonatal SVZ NSP cell pool by specifically increasing the proportion of PFMPs 2-fold while reducing the proportions of NSCs, MP1s, BNAP/GRP1s and GRP2s, as determined using flow cytometry . This result begins to explain how IL-6 treatment can reduce neurosphere number and size, while increasing multipotentiality. We also found that IL-6 increased the percentage of EdU+ PFMPs by 2-fold compared to a decrease in EdU+ NSCs in vitro and confirmed our in vitro results in vivo using intraperitoneal injections of 75 ng of IL-6, which increased the percentage of EdU+ PFMPs . We did not see any significant differences in NSC proliferation in situ, but that can be attributed to the long cell cycle length of the NSCs, which was not captured, as we evaluated a single time point. Altogether, these data lead to the conclusion that IL-6 expands the PFMPs at the expense of the NSCs.

As discussed above, different progenitor cell types are differentially responsive to IL-6 and that IL-6 can either promote or suppress cell proliferation. For example, studies have analyzed the expression of the IL-6 receptor and gp130 on hematopoietic progenitorsdemonstrated that most CD34+ progenitors are IL6Rα negative and are unresponsive to IL-6 alone . By contrast, Monje et al., 2003 showed that the hippocampal NSPs express IL-6 receptors and IL-6 inhibited hippocampal neurogenesis . Gallagher et. al., 2013 also showed that fetal Sox2+ VZ/SVZ progenitors express the IL-6R. To determine whether IL-6 acts directly on the PFMPs we used flow cytometry to show that the PFMPs as well as another multipotential and one bipotential NSP in neonatal SVZ express IL-6Rα, whereas the IL-6Rα was not expressed by the NSCs or several other SVZ NSPs. Therefore, the cell types that express membrane-bound receptor can be stimulated directly in the presence of increased level of IL-6, whereas the rest can be stimulated by IL-6, but only through trans-signaling which will require the presence of sIL-6Rα.

6.4 Signaling Pathways Activated by IL-6 Family Cytokines

A number of signaling pathways have been shown to be activated by IL-6 in different CNS cell types such as the Janus kinases (JAK) and, to a lesser extent, TYK, which, in turn, activate a number of proteins including STATs. IL-6 can also activate the RAS-RAF-MAPK, the phosphatidyl inositol-3 kinase pathway and the NFkB pathway [61]. Studies have investigated the activation of pSTAT1 vs. pSTAT3 by IL-6 in highly enriched astrocyte compared to microglial cultures [62]. The astrocytes responded with significant increases in both pSTAT1 and pSTAT3, in contrast IL-6 treated microglia activated pSTAT1 significantly, but not pSTAT3. Therefore, we evaluated signal transduction pathways activated in SVZ NSPs in response to IL-6 and LIF, a related cytokine that shares GP130R with IL-6 and has been shown to affect SVZ NPs [56]. We found that IL-6 significantly increased pSTAT3 signal, with no effect on pSTAT1 and no effect on either pAKT or p44/p42 MAPK. In contrast, LIF significantly increased both pSTAT1 and pSTAT3 in these SVZ NSPs and it increased phosphorylation of both P42 and P44 MAPK [58].

STAT3 has been shown to be present and active in the developing mouse CNS as early as GD-7.5 [63]. The loss of STAT3 resulted in fewer NSPs suggesting that the STAT3 functions first to promote NSP proliferation. STAT3 activity increases again later in development during cell fate commitment, showing its dual role during CNS development. Interestingly, Jak/Stat3 activation by IL-6 has been shown to promote the proliferation of mesenchymal stem cells in bone cancer and inhibiting STAT3 decreased cell proliferation, migration and invasion with down-regulation of mRNA expression of CyclinD, Bcl-xL and Survivin, which enhanced apoptosis [64]. Also, treatment with a STAT3 inhibitor decreased tumor growth with reduced protein levels of IL-6, pSTAT3 and PCNA indicating a role for IL-6 in mesenchymal stem cell proliferation, supporting our data that IL-6 mediated activation of pSTAT3 in SVZ NSPs increases PFMP cell proliferation. However, this hypothesis needs to be further tested.

6.5 Transcription Factors Induced in SVZ Neural Progenitors by IL-6

We postulated that the IL-6 mediated increase in PFMP proliferation could be due to increased expression of transcription factors involved in self-renewal of the NSPs. Therefore, we analyzed the self-renewal genes Ascl1, Dlx2, Klf4, Id2, Olig2, Fbx15, Gsx1, Gsx2 and Bmi-1, which have been shown to be important for neural progenitor proliferation. Neurospheres maintained in medium supplemented with IL-6 had 2.5 fold higher levels of Ascl1 than controls [58]. Using chromatin immunoprecipitation, it has been shown that Ascl1 induces E2f1 (a transcriptional activator of genes promoting G1/S transition) and its co-activators Ep400, Cdca7, Tead1, Tead2, and FoxM1, to promote G2/M transition [65]. Additionally, acute loss of Ascl1 impairs progenitor cell divisions in the SVZ. These data support the conclusion that Ascl1 directly regulates the genes involved in cell-cycle progression.

Gsx1 and Gsx2 represent a family of homeobox genes that are expressed in discrete progenitors of the embryonic brain, including the ventral telencephalon where they have been shown to govern the early specification of lateral ganglionic eminence progenitors [66,67,68,69]. Gsx genes are not only required for the patterning, but also for the control of cell proliferation. Gain-of-function studies suggest that Gsx1 promotes progenitor maturation and acquisition of neuronal phenotypes [70]. We found that IL-6 significantly increased Gsx1 in SVZ NSPs consistent with the view that the Gsx1 transcription factor is involved in the proliferative response of the PFMPs to IL-6 [58].

7. Elevated Perinatal Systemic IL-6 Increases Anxiety

Perinatal inflammatory challenges with LPS have been shown to promote behavioral alterations in adolescent (P35) and adult (P70) male mice, reminiscent of human psychiatric disorders such as ASD. One the hallmarks of these behavioral alterations is an increase in anxiety [71]. The elevated plus maze is a well characterized behavioral paradigm and is one of the most widely used tests for anxiety research. This test relies upon the animal’s natural tendency to stay in enclosed spaces and their unconditioned fear for open spaces and heights. In our own experiments, mice injected with IL-6 from P3-P5 were then analyzed as adolescents (P32). They spent significantly more time in the closed arm compared to the PBS group, suggesting that elevating IL-6 perinatally increases anxiety [72]. Furthermore, LPS-induces anxiety-like behaviors in several animal models that are associated with hippocampal neuroinflammation and increased production of inflammatory mediators such as IL-6 and IL-1β [73]. Earlier studies in our lab have shown that increased levels of IL-1β affect hippocampal based functions and that mice treated with IL-1β between P1-P5 postnatally displayed anxiety-like behavior both in the open-field test and elevated plus maze when tested as adults [74].

8. Role of Ventral Hippocampus and Basolateral Amygdala in Anxiety Behavior

The amygdala is the brain structure that is typically associated with anxiety and social behaviors [75,76] and it has robust and reciprocal connections to the ventral hippocampus (vHPC)[77,78]. Human and rodent studies have demonstrated that the vHPC is important for the expression of fear- and anxiety-related behaviors as well as for social interactions [79,80,81]. In non-human primates, vHPC lesions lead to abnormal responses to social signals and to degradation of social bonds [82]. Experiments using social interaction paradigms in rodents have also provided evidence that the vHPC is involved in social behaviors [83,84,85]. In a recent study, investigators showed that newly added adult dentate granule neurons decrease the excitability of pre-existing vHPC granule neurons. When they experimentally inhibited adult neurogenesis the animals were more anxiogenic when placed into a stressful situation [86].

As anxiety is correlated with deficits in social interaction, and both the amygdala and vHPC are involved in both anxiety and social behaviors, investigators have studied the role the basolateral amygdala-vHPC circuit in social behavior. Using an optogenetic approach to target basolateral amygdala terminals in the vHPC, it has been found that inhibiting basolateral amygdala-vHPC projections increased sociability in both the juvenile-intruder test and the three-chamber sociability test, while exciting this pathway decreased sociability [87]. As these brain structures play important roles in these behaviors, it will be important in future studies to determine whether elevated levels of IL-6 affect neurogenesis and the function of this circuit.

9. Effects of Inflammation on the Stem Cells and Progenitors of the Developing Hippocampus

It has long been reported that preterm births are usually a consequence of MIA . Neuroimaging and cognitive studies have suggested that abnormal hippocampal development and function in premature infants may be a result of MIA . Similarly, decreased neurogenesis in the hippocampus has been reported in murine models of gestational inflammation using LPS and poly (I:C) . However, the long-term effects of maternal infections on hippocampal development are still poorly understood. In a rat model for prenatal systemic inflammation, consecutive LPS administrations during late gestation resulted in a decrease in DCX labeled cells at adolescence, suggesting a persisting effect on the NSPs of the SGZ. These deficits were rescued with postnatal administration of IL-1ra . Another study administered LPS for two days at mid- and late-gestation and showed a reduction in the number of immature neurons produced in the dentate gyrus that persisted into adulthood . Additional reports using other inflammation inducers showed similar results. For instance, exposure of mice from P1 to P17 to silica nanoparticles inhibited progenitor cell proliferation in the SGZ in a dose-dependent manner, associated with social interaction deficits and increased anxiety. Importantly, perinatal silica exposure did not produce deficits in locomotion, short-term memory or depression-like behavior. Similarly, injecting Poly(I:C) into late-gestation mice leads to a strong inflammatory response in the hippocampus of the offspring, associated with impaired hippocampal neurogenesis in prepubertal males, cognitive deficits and anxiety-like behavior. These animals displayed high microglial activation, which was rescued by treatment with a peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor gamma agonist .

The observed cellular and behavioral neurodevelopmental outcomes of prenatal exposure to LPS and poly I:C are correlated with an elevation of proinflammatory cytokines in maternal and fetal systems . Additionally, systemic inflammation decreases hippocampal neurogenesis in the adult brain , suggesting that proinflammatory cytokines can negatively regulate both the proliferation and differentiation of NSPs. In fact, treatment with IL-6 neutralizing antibodies can restore the negative effects of inflammation on adult hippocampal neurogenesis .

Other studies have more dramatically manipulated the levels of IL-6 and reported that the hippocampal NSP pool is altered, but with mixed results. In a study of IL-6 germ-line null mice, where IL-6 is deficient, Bowen et al., 2011 showed compromised neurogenesis with reduced NSP cell proliferation, survival and maturation in the subgranular zone (SGZ) and SVZ [101]. By contrast, Vallieres et al., (2002) used transgenic mice to constitutively over-express IL-6 in astrocytes and reported that the proliferation, survival, and differentiation of NSPs were all reduced in the hippocampal SGZ [102]. Also, the injection of IL-6 into late pregnant Wistar rats, leads to structural hippocampal abnormalities and neuronal loss and decreased spatial learning in adulthood [103].

Thus, hippocampal NSPs appear to be sensitive to both excessively high and excessively low levels of IL-6 in vivo. In vitro, the soluble factors released by human olfactory epithelial neural stem/progenitor cells, of which IL-6 is an important component, reduced neurogenesis of murine hippocampal NSPs, promoting astrocytic differentiation . However, in another in vitro model in which hippocampal neurogenesis was reduced by treatment with either interferon-α or its downstream effectors interferon-stimulated gene 15 and ubiquitin-specific peptidase 18, IL-6 had no direct impact on neurogenesis. Despite the high levels of IL-6 elicited by interferon-α, treatment with IL-6 alone was not sufficient to recapitulate the neurogenic effect, although, it reproduced the interferon-α-induced increase in apoptosis .

10. Interleukin-1 and Hippocampal Neurogenesis

The regulated expression of both IL-1R1 and IL-1β during early postnatal development of the hippocampus suggests that this cytokine may have an important role during hippocampal development. IL-1β belongs to the IL-1 family of cytokines, which includes IL-1α, IL-1ra, and IL-18, which play important roles in both innate and adaptive immunity. IL-1α and IL-1β bind respectively to two receptors, Il-1R1 and Il-1R2. However, only IL-1R1 binding results in proinflammatory cell signaling, as Il-1R2 lacks the intracellular domain necessary for signal transmission. Both receptors can be alternatively spliced and secreted, acting as soluble decoys that sequester IL-1 without activating inflammatory signaling .

IL-1β is considered a prototypical proinflammatory cytokine, as it is released by activated macrophages along with other major proinflammatory molecules, such as IL-6, IL-12, TNFα, and the chemokine CXCL8. IL-1β contributes to a host of local and systemic activities. Local effects include vascular endothelium activation, lymphocyte activation, local tissue destruction, and enhancing effector immune cell infiltration. Systemic effects include inducing a fever, lymphocyte activation, and increasing IL-6 production through MAPK signaling cascades .

IL-1β is quickly upregulated in the brain following different forms of experimental brain injury . In these experimental models, blocking either IL-1β or its receptor reduces the neuroinflammation seen after the brain injury. . IL-1R1 is widely expressed by resident brain cells, and signaling through this receptor in neurons, astrocytes, microglia, and endothelial cells results in a range of both toxic and protective effects in the brain . In neurons, IL-1β appears to exert a dose-dependent effect that results in depolarization at lower concentrations and hyperpolarization and synaptic transmission inhibition at higher concentrations . Additionally, IL-1β has been shown to mediate excitotoxicity, regulate NMDA receptor phosphorylation and induce the expression of neuronal chemokines that act on local microglia to influence acute neuroinflammation . In astrocytes, IL-1β signaling via IL-1R1 induce astrogliosis and the production of neurotoxic, neuroprotective and inflammatory mediators via activation of the MAPK and NFκB signaling pathways . The brain endothelium is also activated by IL-β via the MAPK and NFκB signaling pathways, resulting in the expression of cell adhesion molecules and various chemokines that aid in leukocyte infiltration . Therefore, the widespread expression and/or responsiveness to IL-1β in the brain infiltrating immune cells indicate that signaling through this pathway is a major regulator of neurodevelopment throughout the brain. However, the hippocampus appears to be particularly sensitive to IL-1, since the IL-1R1 is expressed at extraordinarily high levels within the dentate gyrus .

In vitro studies have shown that IL-1β signaling negatively affects rat embryonic hippocampal neurogenesis by decreasing the proliferation of NSPs [122] and suppressing neuronal differentiation [123], via activation of NF-κB signaling [122,124]. Interestingly, IL-1β-induced activation of NF-κB also suppresses the expression of TLX (the orphan nuclear receptor tailless homolog), that promotes NSP proliferation and inhibits neuronal differentiation. Lentiviral overexpression of TLX was shown to counteract the negative effects of IL-1β on the proliferation of embryonic rat NSPs in vitro [122].

Studies on adult hippocampal neurogenesis can shed light on the effects of IL-1β on fetal neurogenesis. For example, Koo and Duman performed in vitro studies of adult rat hippocampal NSPs and showed that NSPs express IL-1R1 and that activation of IL-1R1 by IL-1β decreased NP proliferation via NF-κB signaling [124]. Similarly, in vitro studies on embryonic rat hippocampal NPs by Green and colleagues revealed decreased NSP proliferation and decreased neuronal differentiation as a result of IL-1β signaling through IL-1R1 [123], supporting the conclusion that IL-1R1 signaling negatively affects hippocampal NPs. A recent study showed that the cannabinoid system can modulate NSP proliferation and have a neuroprotective role, rescuing hippocampal neurogenesis during HIV-1 neurotoxic insults [125,126]. Activating a candidate cannabinoid receptor, GPR55, suppressed the pro-inflammatory responses of IL-1β treatment on adult rat hippocampal NSCs in vitro, rescuing the negative effects of IL-1β on neurogenesis [127].

By contrast, a separate study showed that treating hippocampal NSPs in vitro with IL-1α increased proliferation of adolescent (P21) hippocampal NSPs, while treatment with IL-6 produced an inverse effect. In an animal model of chemically induced hippocampal injury using trimethyltin (TMT) IL-1R1 signaling was shown to activate IκB/NFκB in the SGZ of adolescent (P21) mice, whereas in adults, the same injury activated IL-6/gp130 signaling via Ras/MAPK more prominently [128]. These data suggest that IL-1 can affect hippocampal neurogenesis both directly and indirectly by inducing IL-6.

In our studies to elucidate the effects of increased levels of IL-1 on hippocampal neurogenesis we have established that inducing systemic inflammation by daily administration of IL-1β during the first 5 days of life increased hippocampal levels of IL-1α and acutely reduced the proliferation of Tbr2+ progenitors in the dentate gyrus of mice. In vitro, both IL-1α and IL-1β produced G1/S cell cycle arrest that resulted in reduced progenitor cell proliferation within the transient amplifying progenitor cell cohort. By contrast, IL-1β treatment did not reduce neural stem cell self-renewal. By contrast treating hippocampal NSPs with IL-1 increased neural stem cell frequency[74].

An earlier study that used this same model of in vivo perinatal inflammation showed that mice that received IL-1β as neonates displayed memory deficits which suggested abnormal hippocampal function [129]. To evaluate whether other cognitive and behavioral traits associated with hippocampal function would also be altered in these mice, we administered tasks designed to assess exploratory and anxiety behavior and working and spatial memory. Interestingly, mice that received IL-1β as neonates showed signs of anxiety in both the open field test and the elevated plus maze during adolescence that were also evident in adulthood. These mice did not display working memory deficits in adulthood, but they did display deficits in long-term spatial memory [74]. Altogether, these da support the view that perinatal inflammation negatively affects the developing hippocampus and results in behavioral problems that persist into adulthood. Future studies will contribute new insights into the origins of the cognitive and behavioral impairments seen in prematurely born sick infants.

11. Modulating Neuroinflammation as a Therapeutic Strategy

Given the potent effects that elevated levels of IL-1 and IL-6 can exert on the developing brain, a natural conclusion is that reducing the levels of these cytokines to baseline levels or decreasing their ability to activate their cognate receptors will be beneficial. While we are not aware of any clinical trials to date that have attempted to manipulate these specific cytokines to prevent psychiatric disorders, the data reviewed above from pre-clinical studies show that there are existing approaches that are technically feasible. For example, as shown by Wang et al., 2017, administering the immunopotentiator thymosin alpha-1 (Ta1), decreased IL-6 levels and negated the LPS-induced impairment of hippocampal neurogenesis [100]. An alternative approach would be to administer a neutralizing antibody to IL-6 maternally to antagonize circulating levels of IL-6 [130] or to administer polyethylene glycol linked IL-6 binding peptides that have been generated and which antagonize IL-6 with sub-nanomolar potency and persists in circulation for several days. Neutralizing antibodies to IL-6 have been shown as a feasible approach for reducing IL-6 efficacy in a model of gestational inflammation induced by LPS [131]. Girard et al., 2012, showed that administering the IL-1 receptor antagonist postnatally after prenatal LPS administration restored neurogenesis in the hippocampus demonstrating that treatments directed to the fetus and neonate may well restore brain development [92]. Accordingly, it is certainly feasible to administer reagents to modify the actions of these cytokines; however, systematic studies will be necessary to determine the timing and doses of these modulators to obtain optimal therapeutic benefits.

12. Summary

Increased levels of maternal cytokines, especially IL-1β and IL-6, which are positively associated with an increased risk of psychiatric disease in the offspring as discussed in two excellent reviews [132,133] can cross the fetal placenta and cross the BBB through saturable transporters, where they can affect the developing brain. While many studies have evaluated their effects on neuronal survival, astrogliosis and microgliosis and failure of oligodendrocyte maturation. However, it is clear that they can produce other effects. In particular, as we’ve reviewed here, they can influence (either negatively or positively) the proliferation of the neural progenitors that reside with within the subventricular and subgranular zones, which in turn may affect the final cellular composition of the brain, deviating the potentially the balance of excitatory and inhibitory neurons as well as the neuroglial composition (summarized in Figure 1). Collectively, the studies reviewed here warrant further investigations into the role of these two cytokines on neurogenesis and how they may contribute to cognitive, motor and behavioral problems seen in childhood and adolescents born prematurely [134,135,136].

Figure 1 Model for effects of perinatal inflammation on neural development. Infection induced inflammation during pregnancy increases the levels of circulating cytokines, reaching the uterine membranes and the placenta. Cytokines that cross the placental barrier will trigger fetal systemic inflammation, with production of interleukins such as IL-6 and IL-1. These in turn can affect the endothelium resulting on local cytokine production or they can be transported across the endothelium to directly affect intermediate progenitor cells (IPC) in the subventricular zone and the hippocampal subgranular zone, to increase or decrease the proliferation of specific subsets of neurons and glial cells. The alterations in the types of cells produced will, in turn, affect the formation of neural circuits which in turn will lead to abnormal cognition and behavior.

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by grants from the National Institutes of Health # NS107772, the Leducq Foundation and the New Jersey Governor’s Council on Autism, #CAUT17BSP010.

Author Contributions

EK, FV and SWL performed literature reviews and contributed to writing the manuscript. EK produced Figure 1. All authors discussed the contents of the article, provided comments on drafts and approved the final manuscript.

Competing Interests

The authors confirm that they have no conflicts of interest to declare for this publication.

References

  1. Ploeger A, Raijmakers ME, van der Maas HL, Galis F. The association between autism and errors in early embryogenesis: What is the causal mechanism? Biol Psychiatry. 2010; 67: 602-607. [CrossRef]
  2. Schmidt-Kastner R, van Os J, Esquivel G, Steinbusch HW, Rutten BP. An environmental analysis of genes associated with schizophrenia: Hypoxia and vascular factors as interacting elements in the neurodevelopmental model. Mol Psychiatry. 2012; 17: 1194-1205. [CrossRef]
  3. Stiles J, Jernigan TL. The basics of brain development. Neuropsychol Rev. 2010; 20: 327-348. [CrossRef]
  4. Mednick SA, Machon RA, Huttunen MO, Bonett D. Adult schizophrenia following prenatal exposure to an influenza epidemic. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 1988; 45: 189-192. [CrossRef]
  5. Miller MT, Stromland K, Ventura L, Johansson M, Bandim JM, Gillberg C. Autism associated with conditions characterized by developmental errors in early embryogenesis: A mini review. Int J Dev Neurosci. 2005; 23: 201-219. [CrossRef]
  6. Shi L, Tu N, Patterson PH. Maternal influenza infection is likely to alter fetal brain development indirectly: The virus is not detected in the fetus. Int J Dev Neurosci. 2005; 23: 299-305. [CrossRef]
  7. Shi L, Fatemi SH, Sidwell RW, Patterson PH. Maternal influenza infection causes marked behavioral and pharmacological changes in the offspring. J Neurosci. 2003; 23: 297-302. [CrossRef]
  8. Gilmore JH, Jarskog LF. Exposure to infection and brain development: Cytokines in the pathogenesis of schizophrenia. Schizophr Res. 1997; 24: 365-367. [CrossRef]
  9. Buka SL, Tsuang MT, Torrey EF, Klebanoff MA, Wagner RL, Yolken RH. Maternal cytokine levels during pregnancy and adult psychosis. Brain Behav Immun. 2001; 15: 411-420. [CrossRef]
  10. Pearce BD. Schizophrenia and viral infection during neurodevelopment: A focus on mechanisms. Mol Psychiatry. 2001; 6: 634-646. [CrossRef]
  11. Brown AS, Hooton J, Schaefer CA, Zhang H, Petkova E, Babulas V, et al. Elevated maternal interleukin-8 levels and risk of schizophrenia in adult offspring. Am J Psychiatry. 2004; 161: 889-895. [CrossRef]
  12. Medzhitov R. Toll-like receptors and innate immunity. Nat Rev Immunol. 2001; 1: 135-145. [CrossRef]
  13. Meyer U, Feldon J. To poly(i:C) or not to poly(i:C): Advancing preclinical schizophrenia research through the use of prenatal immune activation models. Neuropharmacology. 2012; 62: 1308-1321. [CrossRef]
  14. Meyer U, Nyffeler M, Engler A, Urwyler A, Schedlowski M, Knuesel I, et al. The time of prenatal immune challenge determines the specificity of inflammation-mediated brain and behavioral pathology. J Neurosci. 2006; 26: 4752-4762. [CrossRef]
  15. Meyer U, Feldon J, Schedlowski M, Yee BK. Towards an immuno-precipitated neurodevelopmental animal model of schizophrenia. Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2005; 29: 913-947. [CrossRef]
  16. Missault S, Van den Eynde K, Vanden Berghe W, Fransen E, Weeren A, Timmermans JP, et al. The risk for behavioural deficits is determined by the maternal immune response to prenatal immune challenge in a neurodevelopmental model. Brain Behav Immun. 2014; 42: 138-146. [CrossRef]
  17. Salmaso N, Jablonska B, Scafidi J, Vaccarino FM, Gallo V. Neurobiology of premature brain injury. Nat Neurosci. 2014; 17: 341-346. [CrossRef]
  18. Bayer SA, Altman J. Neocortical development. New York: Raven Press; 1991.
  19. Akira S, Takeda K. Toll-like receptor signalling. Nat Rev Immunol. 2004; 4: 499-511. [CrossRef]
  20. Kimura M, Toth LA, Agostini H, Cady AB, Majde JA, Krueger JM. Comparison of acute phase responses induced in rabbits by lipopolysaccharide and double-stranded rna. Am J Physiol. 1994; 267: R1596-1605. [CrossRef]
  21. Vuillermot S, Weber L, Feldon J, Meyer U. A longitudinal examination of the neurodevelopmental impact of prenatal immune activation in mice reveals primary defects in dopaminergic development relevant to schizophrenia. J Neurosci. 2010; 30: 1270-1287. [CrossRef]
  22. Carvey PM, Chang Q, Lipton JW, Ling Z. Prenatal exposure to the bacteriotoxin lipopolysaccharide leads to long-term losses of dopamine neurons in offspring: A potential, new model of parkinson's disease. Front Biosci. 2003; 8: s826-837. [CrossRef]
  23. Willette AA, Lubach GR, Knickmeyer RC, Short SJ, Styner M, Gilmore JH, et al. Brain enlargement and increased behavioral and cytokine reactivity in infant monkeys following acute prenatal endotoxemia. Behav Brain Res. 2011; 219: 108-115. [CrossRef]
  24. Short SJ, Lubach GR, Karasin AI, Olsen CW, Styner M, Knickmeyer RC, et al. Maternal influenza infection during pregnancy impacts postnatal brain development in the rhesus monkey. Biol Psychiatry. 2010; 67: 965-973. [CrossRef]
  25. Patterson PH. Immune involvement in schizophrenia and autism: Etiology, pathology and animal models. Behav Brain Res. 2009; 204: 313-321. [CrossRef]
  26. Mousa A, SeigerA, Kjaeldgaard A, Bakhiet M. Human first trimester forebrain cells express genes for inflammatory and anti-inflammatory cytokines. Cytokine. 1999; 11: 55-60. [CrossRef]
  27. Meyer U, Feldon J, Yee BK. A review of the fetal brain cytokine imbalance hypothesis of schizophrenia. Schizophrenia Bull. 2009; 35: 959-972. [CrossRef]
  28. Ling ZD, Potter ED, Lipton JW, Carvey PM. Differentiation of mesencephalic progenitor cells into dopaminergic neurons by cytokines. Exp Neurol. 1998; 149: 411-423. [CrossRef]
  29. Potter ED, Ling ZD, Carvey PM. Cytokine-induced conversion of mesencephalic-derived progenitor cells into dopamine neurons. Cell Tissue Res. 1999; 296: 235-246. [CrossRef]
  30. Marx CE, Jarskog LF, Lauder JM, Lieberman JA, Gilmore JH. Cytokine effects on cortical neuron map-2 immunoreactivity: Implications for schizophrenia. Biol Psychiatry. 2001; 50: 743-749. [CrossRef]
  31. Fidel PL, Jr., Romero R, Wolf N, Cutright J, Ramirez M, Araneda H, et al. Systemic and local cytokine profiles in endotoxin-induced preterm parturition in mice. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1994; 170: 1467-1475. [CrossRef]
  32. Cai Z, Pan ZL, Pang Y, Evans OB, Rhodes PG. Cytokine induction in fetal rat brains and brain injury in neonatal rats after maternal lipopolysaccharide administration. Pediatr Res. 2000; 47: 64-72. [CrossRef]
  33. Urakubo A, Jarskog LF, Lieberman JA, Gilmore JH. Prenatal exposure to maternal infection alters cytokine expression in the placenta, amniotic fluid, and fetal brain. Schizophr Res. 2001; 47: 27-36. [CrossRef]
  34. Paintlia MK, Paintlia AS, Barbosa E, Singh I, Singh AK. N-acetylcysteine prevents endotoxin-induced degeneration of oligodendrocyte progenitors and hypomyelination in developing rat brain. J Neurosci Res. 2004; 78: 347-361. [CrossRef]
  35. Gayle DA, Beloosesky R, Desai M, Amidi F, Nunez SE, Ross MG. Maternal lps induces cytokines in the amniotic fluid and corticotropin releasing hormone in the fetal rat brain. Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol. 2004; 286: R1024-1029. [CrossRef]
  36. Dahlgren J, Samuelsson AM, Jansson T, Holmang A. Interleukin-6 in the maternal circulation reaches the rat fetus in mid-gestation. Pediatr Res. 2006; 60: 147-151. [CrossRef]
  37. Ponzio NM, Servatius R, Beck K, Marzouk A, Kreider T. Cytokine levels during pregnancy influence immunological profiles and neurobehavioral patterns of the offspring. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2007; 1107: 118-128. [CrossRef]
  38. Zaretsky MV, Alexander JM, Byrd W, Bawdon RE. Transfer of inflammatory cytokines across the placenta. Obstet Gynecol. 2004; 103: 546-550. [CrossRef]
  39. Threlkeld SW, Lynch JL, Lynch KM, Sadowska GB, Banks WA, Stonestreet BS. Ovine proinflammatory cytokines cross the murine blood-brain barrier by a common saturable transport mechanism. Neuroimmunomodulat. 2010; 17: 405-410. [CrossRef]
  40. Wu WL, Hsiao EY, Yan Z, Mazmanian SK, Patterson PH. The placental interleukin-6 signaling controls fetal brain development and behavior. Brain Behav Immun. 2017; 62: 11-23. [CrossRef]
  41. Ashwood P, Krakowiak P, Hertz-Picciotto I, Hansen R, Pessah IN, Van de Water J. Associations of impaired behaviors with elevated plasma chemokines in autism spectrum disorders. J Neuroimmunol. 2011; 232: 196-199. [CrossRef]
  42. Emanuele E, Orsi P, Boso M, Broglia D, Brondino N, Barale F, et al. Low-grade endotoxemia in patients with severe autism. Neurosci Lett. 2010; 471: 162-165. [CrossRef]
  43. Ashwood P, Krakowiak P, Hertz-Picciotto I, Hansen R, Pessah I, Van de Water J. Elevated plasma cytokines in autism spectrum disorders provide evidence of immune dysfunction and are associated with impaired behavioral outcome. Brain Behav Immun. 2011; 25: 40-45. [CrossRef]
  44. Ferguson BJ, Marler S, Altstein LL, Lee EB, Mazurek MO, McLaughlin A, et al. Associations between cytokines, endocrine stress response, and gastrointestinal symptoms in autism spectrum disorder. Brain Behav Immun. 2016; 58: 57-62. [CrossRef]
  45. Yang CJ, Liu CL, Sang B, Zhu XM, Du YJ. The combined role of serotonin and interleukin-6 as biomarker for autism. Neuroscience. 2015; 284: 290-296. [CrossRef]
  46. Smith SE, Li J, Garbett K, Mirnics K, Patterson PH. Maternal immune activation alters fetal brain development through interleukin-6. J Neurosci. 2007; 27: 10695-10702. [CrossRef]
  47. Kirsten TB, Casarin RC, Bernardi MM, Felicio LF. Pioglitazone abolishes autistic-like behaviors via the il-6 pathway. PLoS One. 2018; 13: e0197060. [CrossRef]
  48. Chang YC, Daza R, Hevner R, Costa LG, Cole TB. Prenatal and early life diesel exhaust exposure disrupts cortical lamina organization: Evidence for a reelin-related pathogenic pathway induced by interleukin-6. Brain Behav Immun. 2019. [CrossRef]
  49. Gallagher D, Norman AA, Woodard CL, Yang G, Gauthier-Fisher A, Fujitani M, et al. Transient maternal il-6 mediates long-lasting changes in neural stem cell pools by deregulating an endogenous self-renewal pathway. Cell Stem Cell. 2013; 13: 564-576. [CrossRef]
  50. Reynolds BA, Rietze RL. Neural stem cells and neurospheres--re-evaluating the relationship. Nat Methods. 2005; 2: 333-336. [CrossRef]
  51. Storer MA, Gallagher D, Fatt MP, Simonetta JV, Kaplan DR, Miller FD. Interleukin-6 regulates adult neural stem cell numbers during normal and abnormal post-natal development. Stem Cell Rep. 2018; 10: 1464-1480. [CrossRef]
  52. Assanah MC, Bruce JN, Suzuki SO, Chen A, Goldman JE, Canoll P. Pdgf stimulates the massive expansion of glial progenitors in the neonatal forebrain. Glia. 2009; 57: 1835-1847. [CrossRef]
  53. Jackson EL, Garcia-Verdugo JM, Gil-Perotin S, Roy M, Quinones-Hinojosa A, VandenBerg S, et al. Pdgfr alpha-positive b cells are neural stem cells in the adult svz that form glioma-like growths in response to increased pdgf signaling. Neuron. 2006; 51: 187-199. [CrossRef]
  54. Chojnacki A, Weiss S. Isolation of a novel platelet-derived growth factor-responsive precursor from the embryonic ventral forebrain. J Neurosci. 2004; 24: 10888-10899. [CrossRef]
  55. Lui JH, Nowakowski TJ, Pollen AA, Javaherian A, Kriegstein AR, Oldham MC. Radial glia require pdgfd-pdgfrbeta signalling in human but not mouse neocortex. Nature. 2014; 515: 264. [CrossRef]
  56. Buono KD, Vadlamuri D, Gan Q, Levison SW. Leukemia inhibitory factor is essential for subventricular zone neural stem cell and progenitor homeostasis as revealed by a novel flow cytometric analysis. Dev Neurosci. 2012; 34: 449-462. [CrossRef]
  57. Moore L, Bain JM, Loh JM, Levison SW. Pdgf-responsive progenitors persist in the subventricular zone across the lifespan. ASN Neuro. 2014; 6. [CrossRef]
  58. Kumari E, Nasuhidehnavi A, Somasundaram A, Buono KD, Savanur VH, Levison SW. Interleukin-6 enhances the production of multipotential progenitors at the expense of neural stem cells. Stem Cell Rep. 2019.
  59. Tajima S, Tsuji K, Ebihara Y, Sui X, Tanaka R, Muraoka K, et al. Analysis of interleukin 6 receptor and gp130 expressions and proliferative capability of human cd34+ cells. J Exp Med. 1996; 184: 1357-1364. [CrossRef]
  60. Monje ML, Toda H, Palmer TD. Inflammatory blockade restores adult hippocampal neurogenesis. Science. 2003; 302: 1760-1765. [CrossRef]
  61. Boulanger MJ, Bankovich AJ, Kortemme T, Baker D, Garcia KC. Convergent mechanisms for recognition of divergent cytokines by the shared signaling receptor gp130. Mol Cell. 2003; 12: 577-589. [CrossRef]
  62. Hsu M-P, Frausto R, Rose-John S, Campbell IL. Analysis of il-6/gp130 family receptor expression reveals that in contrast to astroglia, microglia lack the oncostatin m receptor and functional responses to oncostatin m. Glia. 2015; 63: 132-141. [CrossRef]
  63. Foshay KM, Gallicano GI. Regulation of sox2 by stat3 initiates commitment to the neural precursor cell fate. Stem Cells Dev. 2008; 17: 269-278. [CrossRef]
  64. Tu B, Du L, Fan QM, Tang Z, Tang TT. Stat3 activation by il-6 from mesenchymal stem cells promotes the proliferation and metastasis of osteosarcoma. Cancer Lett. 2012; 325: 80-88. [CrossRef]
  65. Castro DS, Martynoga B, Parras C, Ramesh V, Pacary E, Johnston C, et al. A novel function of the proneural factor ascl1 in progenitor proliferation identified by genome-wide characterization of its targets. Genes Dev. 2011; 25: 930-945. [CrossRef]
  66. Toresson H, Potter SS, Campbell K. Genetic control of dorsal-ventral identity in the telencephalon: Opposing roles for pax6 and gsh2. Development. 2000; 127: 4361-4371.
  67. Yun K, Potter S, Rubenstein JL. Gsh2 and pax6 play complementary roles in dorsoventral patterning of the mammalian telencephalon. Development. 2001; 128: 193-205.
  68. Hsieh-Li HM, Witte DP, Szucsik JC, Weinstein M, Li H, Potter SS. Gsh-2, a murine homeobox gene expressed in the developing brain. Mech Dev. 1995; 50: 177-186. [CrossRef]
  69. Carney RS, Cocas LA, Hirata T, Mansfield K, Corbin JG. Differential regulation of telencephalic pallial-subpallial boundary patterning by pax6 and gsh2. Cereb Cortex. 2009; 19: 745-759. [CrossRef]
  70. Pei Z, Wang B, Chen G, Nagao M, Nakafuku M, Campbell K. Homeobox genes gsx1 and gsx2 differentially regulate telencephalic progenitor maturation. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2011; 108: 1675-1680. [CrossRef]
  71. Custodio CS, Mello BSF, Filho A, de Carvalho Lima CN, Cordeiro RC, Miyajima F, et al. Neonatal immune challenge with lipopolysaccharide triggers long-lasting sex- and age-related behavioral and immune/neurotrophic alterations in mice: Relevance to autism spectrum disorders. Mol Neurobiol. 2018; 55: 3775-3788. [CrossRef]
  72. Kumari E. Il-6 enhances the production of pdgf responsive multipotential progenitors at the expense of neural stem cells - implications for neuropsychiatric disorders. RBHS-New Jersey Medical School: Rutgers University; 2019.
  73. Lee B, Shim I, Lee H, Hahm DH. Gypenosides attenuate lipopolysaccharide-induced neuroinflammation and anxiety-like behaviors in rats. Anim Cells Syst. 2018; 22: 305-316. [CrossRef]
  74. Veerasammy S. Cellular, molecular and behavioral consequences of neuroinflammation on the developing mouse hippocampus. RBHS-New Jersey Medical School: Rutgers University; 2017.
  75. Davis M. The role of the amygdala in fear and anxiety. Annu Rev Neurosci. 1992; 15: 353-375. [CrossRef]
  76. Davidson RJ. Anxiety and affective style: Role of prefrontal cortex and amygdala. Biol Psychiatry. 2002; 51: 68-80. [CrossRef]
  77. O'Donnell P, Grace AA. Synaptic interactions among excitatory afferents to nucleus accumbens neurons: Hippocampal gating of prefrontal cortical input. J Neurosci. 1995; 15: 3622-3639. [CrossRef]
  78. Pikkarainen M, Ronkko S, Savander V, Insausti R, Pitkanen A. Projections from the lateral, basal, and accessory basal nuclei of the amygdala to the hippocampal formation in rat. J Comp Neurol. 1999; 403: 229-260. [CrossRef]
  79. Kjelstrup KG, Tuvnes FA, Steffenach HA, Murison R, Moser EI, Moser MB. Reduced fear expression after lesions of the ventral hippocampus. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2002; 99: 10825-10830. [CrossRef]
  80. Bannerman DM, Rawlins JN, McHugh SB, Deacon RM, Yee BK, Bast T, et al. Regional dissociations within the hippocampus--memory and anxiety. Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2004; 28: 273-283. [CrossRef]
  81. Kheirbek MA, Drew LJ, Burghardt NS, Costantini DO, Tannenholz L, Ahmari SE, et al. Differential control of learning and anxiety along the dorsoventral axis of the dentate gyrus. Neuron. 2013; 77: 955-968. [CrossRef]
  82. Machado CJ, Bachevalier J. The impact of selective amygdala, orbital frontal cortex, or hippocampal formation lesions on established social relationships in rhesus monkeys (macaca mulatta). Behav Neurosci. 2006; 120: 761-786. [CrossRef]
  83. Cadogan AK, Kendall DA, Fink H, Marsden CA. Social interaction increases 5-ht release and camp efflux in the rat ventral hippocampus in vivo. Behav Pharmacol. 1994; 5: 299-305. [CrossRef]
  84. Deacon RM, Bannerman DM, Rawlins JN. Anxiolytic effects of cytotoxic hippocampal lesions in rats. Behav Neurosci. 2002; 116: 494-497. [CrossRef]
  85. McHugh SB, Deacon RM, Rawlins JN, Bannerman DM. Amygdala and ventral hippocampus contribute differentially to mechanisms of fear and anxiety. Behav Neurosci. 2004; 118: 63-78. [CrossRef]
  86. Anacker C, Luna VM, Stevens GS, Millette A, Shores R, Jimenez JC, et al. Hippocampal neurogenesis confers stress resilience by inhibiting the ventral dentate gyrus. Nature. 2018; 559: 98-102. [CrossRef]
  87. Felix-Ortiz AC, Tye KM. Amygdala inputs to the ventral hippocampus bidirectionally modulate social behavior. J Neurosci. 2014; 34: 586-595. [CrossRef]
  88. Fuksman RB, Mazzitelli NG. Second-trimester histopathological placental findings in maternal-fetal inflammatory response syndrome. Pediatr Dev Pathol. 2009; 12: 42-46. [CrossRef]
  89. Richetto J, Riva MA. Prenatal maternal factors in the development of cognitive impairments in the offspring. J Reprod Immunol. 2014; 104-105: 20-25. [CrossRef]
  90. Ma Y, Matsuwaki T, Yamanouchi K, Nishihara M. Progranulin protects hippocampal neurogenesis via suppression of neuroinflammatory responses under acute immune stress. Mol Neurobiol. 2017; 54: 3717-3728. [CrossRef]
  91. Zhao Q, Wang Q, Wang J, Tang M, Huang S, Peng K, et al. Maternal immune activation-induced ppargamma-dependent dysfunction of microglia associated with neurogenic impairment and aberrant postnatal behaviors in offspring. Neurobiol Dis. 2019; 125: 1-13. [CrossRef]
  92. Girard S, Sebire H, Brochu ME, Briota S, Sarret P, Sebire G. Postnatal administration of il-1ra exerts neuroprotective effects following perinatal inflammation and/or hypoxic-ischemic injuries. Brain Behav Immun. 2012; 26: 1331-1339. [CrossRef]
  93. Cui K, Ashdown H, Luheshi GN, Boksa P. Effects of prenatal immune activation on hippocampal neurogenesis in the rat. Schizophr Res. 2009; 113: 288-297. [CrossRef]
  94. Allred EN, Dammann O, Kuban KK, Leviton A, Pagano M, Stewart JE, et al. Prenatal magnesium sulfate exposure and risk of cerebral palsy. Jama. 1997; 277: 1033-1034. [CrossRef]
  95. Malaeb S, Dammann O. Fetal inflammatory response and brain injury in the preterm newborn. J Child Neurol. 2009; 24: 1119-1126. [CrossRef]
  96. Arrode-Bruses G, Bruses JL. Maternal immune activation by poly(i:C) induces expression of cytokines il-1beta and il-13, chemokine mcp-1 and colony stimulating factor vegf in fetal mouse brain. J Neuroinflammation. 2012; 9: 83. [CrossRef]
  97. Ekdahl CT, Kokaia Z, Lindvall O. Brain inflammation and adult neurogenesis: The dual role of microglia. Neuroscience. 2009; 158: 1021-1029. [CrossRef]
  98. Liu Z, Fan Y, Won SJ, Neumann M, Hu D, Zhou L, et al. Chronic treatment with minocycline preserves adult new neurons and reduces functional impairment after focal cerebral ischemia. Stroke. 2007; 38: 146-152. [CrossRef]
  99. Perez-Dominguez M, Avila-Munoz E, Dominguez-Rivas E, Zepeda A. The detrimental effects of lipopolysaccharide-induced neuroinflammation on adult hippocampal neurogenesis depend on the duration of the pro-inflammatory response. NRR. 2019; 14: 817-825. [CrossRef]
  100. Wang G, He F, Xu Y, Zhang Y, Wang X, Zhou C, et al. Immunopotentiator thymosin alpha-1 promotes neurogenesis and cognition in the developing mouse via a systemic th1 bias. Neurosci Bull. 2017; 33: 675-684. [CrossRef]
  101. Bowen KK, Dempsey RJ, Vemuganti R. Adult interleukin-6 knockout mice show compromised neurogenesis. Neuroreport. 2011; 22: 126-130. [CrossRef]
  102. Vallieres L, Campbell IL, Gage FH, Sawchenko PE. Reduced hippocampal neurogenesis in adult transgenic mice with chronic astrocytic production of interleukin-6. J Neurosci. 2002; 22: 486-492. [CrossRef]
  103. Samuelsson AM, Jennische E, Hansson HA, Holmang A. Prenatal exposure to interleukin-6 results in inflammatory neurodegeneration in hippocampus with nmda/gaba(a) dysregulation and impaired spatial learning. Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol. 2006; 290: R1345-1356. [CrossRef]
  104. Gomez-Virgilio L, Ramirez-Rodriguez GB, Sanchez-Torres C, Ortiz-Lopez L, Meraz-Rios MA. Soluble factors from human olfactory neural stem/progenitor cells influence the fate decisions of hippocampal neural precursor cells. Mol Neurobiol. 2018; 55: 8014-8037. [CrossRef]
  105. Borsini A, Cattaneo A, Malpighi C, Thuret S, Harrison NA, Consortium MRCI, et al. Interferon-alpha reduces human hippocampal neurogenesis and increases apoptosis via activation of distinct stat1-dependent mechanisms. Int J Neuropsychopharmacol. 2018; 21: 187-200. [CrossRef]
  106. Simao F, Habekost Oliveira V, Lahourgue Nunes M. Enhanced susceptibility to seizures modulated by high interleukin-1beta levels during early life malnutrition. Dev Neurobiol. 2016; 76: 1150-1159. [CrossRef]
  107. Garay PA, Hsiao EY, Patterson PH, McAllister AK. Maternal immune activation causes age- and region-specific changes in brain cytokines in offspring throughout development. Brain Behav Immun. 2013; 31: 54-68. [CrossRef]
  108. Denes A, Pinteaux E, Rothwell NJ, Allan SM. Interleukin-1 and stroke: Biomarker, harbinger of damage, and therapeutic target. Cerebrovasc Dis. 2011; 32: 517-527. [CrossRef]
  109. Murphy K, Travers P, Walport M, Janeway C. Janeway's immunobiology. 7th ed. New York: Garland Science; 2008. xxi, 887 p. p. [CrossRef]
  110. Giulian D, Lachman LB. Interleukin-1 stimulation of astroglial proliferation after brain injury. Science. 1985; 228: 497-499. [CrossRef]
  111. Woodroofe MN, Sarna GS, Wadhwa M, Hayes GM, Loughlin AJ, Tinker A, et al. Detection of interleukin-1 and interleukin-6 in adult rat brain, following mechanical injury, by in vivo microdialysis: Evidence of a role for microglia in cytokine production. J Neuroimmunol. 1991; 33: 227-236. [CrossRef]
  112. Relton JK, Rothwell NJ. Interleukin-1 receptor antagonist inhibits ischaemic and excitotoxic neuronal damage in the rat. Brain Res Bull. 1992; 29: 243-246. [CrossRef]
  113. Basu A, Krady JK, Levison SW. Interleukin-1: A master regulator of neuroinflammation. J Neurosci Res. 2004; 78: 151-156. [CrossRef]
  114. Bolton SJ, Anthony DC, Perry VH. Loss of the tight junction proteins occludin and zonula occludens-1 from cerebral vascular endothelium during neutrophil-induced blood-brain barrier breakdown in vivo. Neuroscience. 1998; 86: 1245-1257. [CrossRef]
  115. Desson SE, Ferguson AV. Interleukin 1beta modulates rat subfornical organ neurons as a result of activation of a non-selective cationic conductance. J Physiol. 2003; 550: 113-122. [CrossRef]
  116. Fogal B, Hewett SJ. Interleukin-1beta: A bridge between inflammation and excitotoxicity? J Neurochem. 2008; 106: 1-23. [CrossRef]
  117. Parker LC, Luheshi GN, Rothwell NJ, Pinteaux E. Il-1 beta signalling in glial cells in wildtype and il-1ri deficient mice. Br J Pharmacol. 2002; 136: 312-320. [CrossRef]
  118. Sama MA, Mathis DM, Furman JL, Abdul HM, Artiushin IA, Kraner SD, et al. Interleukin-1beta-dependent signaling between astrocytes and neurons depends critically on astrocytic calcineurin/nfat activity. J Biol Chem. 2008; 283: 21953-21964. [CrossRef]
  119. Thornton P, McColl BW, Cooper L, Rothwell NJ, Allan SM. Interleukin-1 drives cerebrovascular inflammation via map kinase-independent pathways. Curr Neurovasc Res. 2010; 7: 330-340. [CrossRef]
  120. Tsakiri N, Kimber I, Rothwell NJ, Pinteaux E. Differential effects of interleukin-1 alpha and beta on interleukin-6 and chemokine synthesis in neurones. Mol Cell Neurosci. 2008; 38: 259-265. [CrossRef]
  121. Cunningham ET, Jr., Wada E, Carter DB, Tracey DE, Battey JF, De Souza EB. In situ histochemical licalization of type i interleukin-1 receptro messenger rna in the central nervous system, pituitary, and adrenal gland of the mouse. J Neurosci. 1992; 12: 1101-1114. [CrossRef]
  122. O'Leime CS, Kozareva DA, Hoban AE, Long-Smith CM, Cryan JF, Nolan YM. Tlx is an intrinsic regulator of the negative effects of il-1beta on proliferating hippocampal neural progenitor cells. FASEB J. 2018; 32: 613-624. [CrossRef]
  123. Green HF, Treacy E, Keohane AK, Sullivan AM, O'Keeffe GW, Nolan YM. A role for interleukin-1beta in determining the lineage fate of embryonic rat hippocampal neural precursor cells. Mol Cell Neurosci. 2012; 49: 311-321. [CrossRef]
  124. Koo JW, Duman RS. Il-1beta is an essential mediator of the antineurogenic and anhedonic effects of stress. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2008; 105: 751-756. [CrossRef]
  125. Rodrigues RS, Ribeiro FF, Ferreira F, Vaz SH, Sebastiao AM, Xapelli S. Interaction between cannabinoid type 1 and type 2 receptors in the modulation of subventricular zone and dentate gyrus neurogenesis. Front Pharmacol. 2017; 8: 516. [CrossRef]
  126. Avraham HK, Jiang S, Fu Y, Rockenstein E, Makriyannis A, Zvonok A, et al. The cannabinoid cb(2) receptor agonist am1241 enhances neurogenesis in gfap/gp120 transgenic mice displaying deficits in neurogenesis. Br J Pharmacol. 2014; 171: 468-479. [CrossRef]
  127. Hill JD, Zuluaga-Ramirez V, Gajghate S, Winfield M, Sriram U, Rom S, et al. Activation of gpr55 induces neuroprotection of hippocampal neurogenesis and immune responses of neural stem cells following chronic, systemic inflammation. Brain Behav Immun. 2019; 76: 165-181. [CrossRef]
  128. McPherson CA, Aoyama M, Harry GJ. Interleukin (il)-1 and il-6 regulation of neural progenitor cell proliferation with hippocampal injury: Differential regulatory pathways in the subgranular zone (sgz) of the adolescent and mature mouse brain. Brain Behav Immun. 2011; 25: 850-862. [CrossRef]
  129. Favrais G, van de Looij Y, Fleiss B, Ramanantsoa N, Bonnin P, Stoltenburg-Didinger G, et al. Systemic inflammation disrupts the developmental program of white matter. Ann Neurol. 2011; 70: 550-565. [CrossRef]
  130. Mouihate A, Mehdawi H. Toll-like receptor 4-mediated immune stress in pregnant rats activates stat3 in the fetal brain: Role of interleukin-6. Pediatr Res. 2016; 79: 781-787. [CrossRef]
  131. Ranganath S, Bhandari A, Avitahl-Curtis N, McMahon J, Wachtel D, Zhang J, et al. Discovery and characterization of a potent interleukin-6 binding peptide with neutralizing activity in vivo. PloS one. 2015; 10: e0141330. [CrossRef]
  132. Masi A, Glozier N, Dale R, Guastella AJ. The immune system, cytokines, and biomarkers in autism spectrum disorder. Neurosci Bull. 2017; 33: 194-204. [CrossRef]
  133. Miller BJ, Buckley P, Seabolt W, Mellor A, Kirkpatrick B. Meta-analysis of cytokine alterations in schizophrenia: Clinical status and antipsychotic effects. Biol Psychiatry. 2011; 70: 663-671. [CrossRef]
  134. de Kieviet JF, Zoetebier L, van Elburg RM, Vermeulen RJ, Oosterlaan J. Brain development of very preterm and very low-birthweight children in childhood and adolescence: A meta-analysis. Dev Med Child Neurol. 2012; 54: 313-323. [CrossRef]
  135. Bhutta AT, Cleves MA, Casey PH, Cradock MM, Anand KJ. Cognitive and behavioral outcomes of school-aged children who were born preterm: A meta-analysis. JAMA. 2002; 288: 728-737. [CrossRef]
  136. Aarnoudse-Moens CS, Weisglas-Kuperus N, van Goudoever JB, Oosterlaan J. Meta-analysis of neurobehavioral outcomes in very preterm and/or very low birth weight children. Pediatrics. 2009; 124: 717-728. [CrossRef]
Newsletter
Download PDF
0 0

TOP